My ex is pregnant ... - Page 2
Blogs > disciple |
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
| ||
![]()
disciple
9070 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:03 MoltkeWarding wrote: The child will probably be beaten into a regimented and unhappy childhood, and grow up with a dearth of imagination and wit. In that case I would advise the prospective mother to remain in Germany after all. hahaha I'm completely sure nothing like that will happen, at least from a financial point of view she wont have any problems taking care of 5 kids, if thats the only problem with it. Besides I have no idea how she will make it in here, taking care of new born in a foreign country. If she is in Bulgaria at least the grandmother could change the dippers while she is getting drunk in the disco | ||
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On July 18 2009 01:56 MoltkeWarding wrote: Nonsense. I'm certain that a Sino-Bulgar child has never existed in history. I would like you to provide evidence to support this certainty which you state so plainly, when it is evident that any combination of races can reproduce at any time with the advent of the internet and airfare. | ||
ForTheSwarm
United States556 Posts
On July 18 2009 01:11 nttea wrote: I think she wanted your support (: my advice to her would be to "murder" the "baby" and continue with her studies, she can get another one later. Lol. She wanted you to come over and punch her stomach as hard as you can. | ||
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:10 fanatacist wrote: I would like you to provide evidence to support this certainty which you state so plainly, when it is evident that any combination of races can reproduce at any time with the advent of the internet and airfare. My evidence is that I've never seen one or heard of one. Apart from that, logical induction tells me that no Bulgar would marry a Chinaman. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:17 For_The_Swarm wrote: Lol. She wanted you to come over and punch her stomach as hard as you can. ![]() | ||
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22250 Posts
He wants to know WHY she called him. After 14 months, why? Because she still cares about him, because they were just 'dating other people', and there was always the possibility that they could get back together, and maybe she secretly wanted that. That possibility, however small, was always there, so she never acted on it. With a baby on the way, that possibility is basically gone. Essentially, she was calling you to say the possibility of you and her being together was gone, and maybe she needed that closure to know for sure that you had moved on to. Or maybe she was hoping you'd put up your last stand and make a play for her. *shrugs* I bet she didn't know what she wanted herself, women never do. Women just hate not knowing what our feelings/thoughts are (even though we usually don't have any, they never believe us). Anyways, that's my take on it, but my fiance actually says I'm wrong too, lol. ![]() | ||
piratebay
United States399 Posts
but yeah dude, it aint your problem. just tell her good luck and send her on her merry way in ruining her future. u dodged a bullet yo | ||
Naib
Hungary4843 Posts
1, laughing at another 'logical' Moltke comment (Jesus, could you be more pretentious?) 2, teaching disciple that even though "hole" and "whole" are pronounced in a similar way, they are different words. I.e. "this whole situation" etc. This isn't flamebait, I love your banners disciple, and as a fellow Bisu zealot you have my full support in whatever you do! | ||
piratebay
United States399 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:27 EvilTeletubby wrote: Pfffffft, damn, we need more females to post on here, because so far no one has got it right... everyone is just "thank god you're not the father", etc. Which yes, that's the right reaction for a guy, but... He wants to know WHY she called him. After 14 months, why? Because she still cares about him, because they were just 'dating other people', and there was always the possibility that they could get back together, and maybe she secretly wanted that. That possibility, however small, was always there, so she never acted on it. With a baby on the way, that possibility is basically gone. Essentially, she was calling you to say the possibility of you and her being together was gone, and maybe she needed that closure to know for sure that you had moved on to. Or maybe she was hoping you'd put up your last stand and make a play for her. *shrugs* I bet she didn't know what she wanted herself, women never do. Women just hate not knowing what our feelings/thoughts are (even though we usually don't have any, they never believe us). Anyways, that's my take on it, but my fiance actually says I'm wrong too, lol. ![]() i personally think she was really nervous and wanted some reassurance she was doing the right thing. i mean the guy was with her for years right(the poster on here)? maybe she wanted to hear she was making a mistake or something, but most likely, she just needed some reassurance on a big blind leap into a different path of life. | ||
NintendoPrincess
United States50 Posts
luv ya byebye > ![]() | ||
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
| ||
Ingenol
United States1328 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:27 EvilTeletubby wrote: Pfffffft, damn, we need more females to post on here, because so far no one has got it right... everyone is just "thank god you're not the father", etc. Which yes, that's the right reaction for a guy, but... He wants to know WHY she called him. After 14 months, why? Because she still cares about him, because they were just 'dating other people', and there was always the possibility that they could get back together, and maybe she secretly wanted that. That possibility, however small, was always there, so she never acted on it. With a baby on the way, that possibility is basically gone. Essentially, she was calling you to say the possibility of you and her being together was gone, and maybe she needed that closure to know for sure that you had moved on to. Or maybe she was hoping you'd put up your last stand and make a play for her. *shrugs* I bet she didn't know what she wanted herself, women never do. Women just hate not knowing what our feelings/thoughts are (even though we usually don't have any, they never believe us). Anyways, that's my take on it, but my fiance actually says I'm wrong too, lol. ![]() This is interesting, but also interesting is that biologically men tend to respond more strongly to stress/emotional symptoms. Consequently, their stress hormones/responses become more easily agitated and they are less able to deal with emotionally intense situations, leading to a man's greater propensity to "walk away" from a situation or to take some time to cool off. There's a study where a group of 6-year-olds were presented with a two-way baby monitor on the other end of which was a crying baby. The boys were much more likely to turn the monitor off, whereas the girls would try to calm the baby down; however, rather than being disinterested or unable to sympathize with the baby, the boys had markedly higher levels of stress hormones than the girls, leading them to be unable to stand the situation and thus turn the monitor off. Sorry for the rambling, but I think OP's situation shows that women are a lot more likely to reach out for emotional support in troubling times, whereas men try to ignore it, and it's curious that there seem to be fundamental biological reasons for this. | ||
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:20 MoltkeWarding wrote: My evidence is that I've never seen one or heard of one. Apart from that, logical induction tells me that no Bulgar would marry a Chinaman. Logical induction tells me that no first-hand experience is not an appropriate candidate for classification as "evidence," and that you have a hard time accepting the fact that people of an ethnicity do not have to follow the general trends of the culture from which they originate. If there are both Western and Eastern Europeans traveling to Asian nations for both business and leisure on a daily basis, there can easily be a non-traditionalist Bulgar who finds love in China. Your sinophobia is markedly humorous but also transparently false in both its tenacity and subliminal voracity. | ||
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:29 Naib wrote: This blog serves two purposes: 1, laughing at another 'logical' Moltke comment (Jesus, could you be more pretentious?) 2, teaching disciple that even though "hole" and "whole" are pronounced in a similar way, they are different words. I.e. "this whole situation" etc. This isn't flamebait, I love your banners disciple, and as a fellow Bisu zealot you have my full support in whatever you do! I am doing a presentation on Anglo-Hungarian relations next week. Mind if I use your post to exhibit the differences between English and Hungarian humour? | ||
NintendoPrincess
United States50 Posts
| ||
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On July 18 2009 02:27 EvilTeletubby wrote: Pfffffft, damn, we need more females to post on here, because so far no one has got it right... everyone is just "thank god you're not the father", etc. Which yes, that's the right reaction for a guy, but... He wants to know WHY she called him. After 14 months, why? Because she still cares about him, because they were just 'dating other people', and there was always the possibility that they could get back together, and maybe she secretly wanted that. That possibility, however small, was always there, so she never acted on it. With a baby on the way, that possibility is basically gone. Essentially, she was calling you to say the possibility of you and her being together was gone, and maybe she needed that closure to know for sure that you had moved on to. Or maybe she was hoping you'd put up your last stand and make a play for her. *shrugs* I bet she didn't know what she wanted herself, women never do. Women just hate not knowing what our feelings/thoughts are (even though we usually don't have any, they never believe us). Anyways, that's my take on it, but my fiance actually says I'm wrong too, lol. ![]() There are lots of things motivating people to do things both consciously and unconsciously. This is easily one of the reasons, but I think like I said before, the idea that you can call a boyfriend from years ago and have them care about you is a comfort and an ego-booster. | ||
![]()
disciple
9070 Posts
and I really really want to be taken as a person and not as a banner / wallpaper guy... I'm doing gfx stuff for the community, because I'm enjoying it, I dont see it as a work or service... | ||
fanatacist
10319 Posts
No one thinks of anyone on this site as just a machine cranking out useful things (except konadora maybe). I think most people on TL are mature enough to realize there are real people with real people at the keyboard behind the alias. It's just that it's easy to associate people with what they are known for. Konadora is a forum whore/translator. I am an asshole. You do graphics. Keep on rolling. | ||
![]()
disciple
9070 Posts
| ||
| ||