• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:37
CEST 16:37
KST 23:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy0[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon100Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Yamato Cup Series StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy BW General Discussion an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot Working 1v1, 2v2, 3v3 Ladder
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr -> DragOn vs StRyKeR [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8159 users

mp3 vs flac

Blogs > PH
Post a Reply
Normal
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 03:20 GMT
#1
Is the whole flac thing overrated in anyone else's opinion? I was struggling to get some music I DL'd in flac working...I couldn't get any of the fucking quicktime plugins to work (I have an ipod and so use itunes to organize my music...it would've been convenient). I gave up and tried using other programs to at least give it a listen for a noticeable difference.

I have a Creative X-fi sound card and an old but decent 4.1 Altec Lansing speaker system...and I noticed virtually NO difference between mp3 and flac versions of the same song.

There is a SLIGHT difference...the sound does seem a bit more full and rich at times, but it's not worth the gi-fucking-normous file sizes.

Does anyone else share this feeling, or was it possibly my software (I was using VLC of all things...-___- )?

Hello
FirstProbe
Profile Joined June 2004
1206 Posts
April 18 2009 03:26 GMT
#2
I think the high bitrate mp3's are probably similar enough that you won't be able to discern the difference with your current system.
IMO flac is something pushed around by audiophiles for their more specialised systems.
crabsman
Profile Joined April 2009
United States13 Posts
April 18 2009 03:26 GMT
#3
What rate were you using for the mp3s?
Archaic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States4024 Posts
April 18 2009 03:29 GMT
#4
Normally, I would say that high rate mp3 is good enough. If you have an amazing sound system though, then you will definitely notice a difference. But for casual, and not obsessive music listening (i.e. listening to flac just because the number is so much higher!), then I'd say that it isn't worth it. Then again, it usually depends on the song or genre.
zgl
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1055 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 03:33:28
April 18 2009 03:29 GMT
#5
To really notice advantage of FLAC:
1. Use properly configured foobar or winamp
2. Use a real source. There are some good USB DACs. For example: Stello DA100 or Benchmark DAC1 USB.
3a. Use a nice set of speakers + amplifier (either integrated or pre+power combo), i.e., not something designed for computers.
3b. Alternatively, use good headphones + amplifier.

In a typical computer setup such as yours, FLAC won't make much difference since the music file won't be the bottleneck.
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
April 18 2009 03:30 GMT
#6
I think mp3 encoded at 192kbps with the newest Lame encoder sounds very close to loseless. Even audiophiles might not be able to tell it apart. aac sounds better than mp3 at the same bitrate though.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
Guilford
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Australia290 Posts
April 18 2009 03:46 GMT
#7
you can use flac to create identical copy of the original cd
Being forgotten is worse than death.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 03:48 GMT
#8
Hmm...yeah, most of the mp3s I tried comparing were 192kbps.

I have a decent set of headphones...nothing pro, so I'll try comparing them through there as well.

zgl, can you explain what you mean by real source? What is a USB DAC?
Hello
sexsexpussyhair
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada133 Posts
April 18 2009 03:54 GMT
#9
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.
GTR
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
51693 Posts
April 18 2009 04:02 GMT
#10
V0 MP3's are best IMO.
Commentator
crabsman
Profile Joined April 2009
United States13 Posts
April 18 2009 04:04 GMT
#11
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.


You are very misinformed the human eye can sense the difference between 60 fps and 100 fps. Please stop spreading this rumor.

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:12:38
April 18 2009 04:04 GMT
#12
mp3 is loosy it throws away a ton of info that is given that most people and sets up wont be able to hear or produce
FLAC is a lossless it keeps all quality thus size at similar bitrates size is quite different

i just use AAC myself encoding though a cmd line death weeks with neroAAC great size and a ton better quality then mp3 although i can't really tell unless im using my higher quality headphones
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 04:05 GMT
#13
On April 18 2009 13:04 crabsman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.


You are very misinformed the human eye can sense the difference between 60 fps and 100 fps. Please stop spreading this rumor.

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm

=p but most monitors can't display over 60.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
Chromyne
Profile Joined January 2008
Canada561 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:13:35
April 18 2009 04:11 GMT
#14
I agree with zgl. FLAC won't make a difference unless the rest of your gear can convey the differences. Of course, a good/musical ear will help differentiate between lossless and lossy formats, so you may not hear the different regardless of your rig.
Soli Deo gloria.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:16:35
April 18 2009 04:13 GMT
#15
mp3 is one of the worst lossly formats
AAC is much better in keeping quality
When i rip music i do full lossless .wav and then transcode into AAC making a mp3 ish sized file but smaller with much high quality i don't have a rig to make use of a lossless files so i just do the best loosy fomart there is

although you can do aac in lossless (it's file size is just a wedge smaller then flac) but i dont
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
April 18 2009 04:19 GMT
#16
lossless formats are useless unless your some weird audiophile who has super high end hardware and insists they can tell the difference. other wise 320kbps mp3 or VBR mp3s are fine.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 04:27 GMT
#17
I don't have many 320kbps mp3s...most are around 192-256...or VBR.

btw guys...it's lossy vs lossless. Not loosy or lossly or whatever else...
Hello
Shivaz
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada1783 Posts
April 18 2009 04:29 GMT
#18
Yup, most people even with high end hardware cannot tell the difference between 256-320kbps and flac/lossless, 192 though is easier to tell. However I find when possible people rather listen to lossless just knowing they will not be missing out on anything. After all why listen to lower quality if storage space is not an issue, $80-$100 for 1 terabyte.
benjammin
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States2728 Posts
April 18 2009 04:37 GMT
#19
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way
wash uffitizi, drive me to firenze
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11567 Posts
April 18 2009 05:04 GMT
#20
v0 and v2 all the way. I don't have room for those FLACs
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
DatTheMighty
Profile Joined March 2009
Vietnam122 Posts
April 18 2009 05:08 GMT
#21
Also, i went nuts installing over 5 plugins trying to play flac. Almost gave up until i found out vlc can play it inherently.
omninmo
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
2349 Posts
April 18 2009 05:12 GMT
#22
FLAC is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better quality. anyone who says otherwise doesnt have the ear to appreciate it. test for yourself. flacs are much larger files however.. but the difference is noticeable to anyone with a good ear.
rwong48
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States105 Posts
April 18 2009 05:18 GMT
#23
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).
FirstProbe
Profile Joined June 2004
1206 Posts
April 18 2009 05:22 GMT
#24
On April 18 2009 14:18 rwong48 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).


I think the reason why you won't be able to is because of your setup.
Knickknack
Profile Joined February 2004
United States1187 Posts
April 18 2009 05:32 GMT
#25
use something like vlc, foobar, beatport sync for flac.
lke others said it comes down to your hardware and what your listening abilities are, as to whether the quality of encoding will matter.
foobar supports abx testing so you can see what what your limit is.
I keep stuff mostly V0 (~256kpbs variable) and i can only very rarely hear a difference between that and lossless with my equation rp21s.
The real reason to keep in lossless is so you can rerip into whatever you want at any time.
| www.ArtofProtoss.vze.com |
hideo
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada1641 Posts
April 18 2009 05:49 GMT
#26
ogg is definitely better than mp3 right now in terms of space efficiency...

My cowon d2 supports both flac and ogg, but in a portable setup flac isn't really worth it: hp out is not that great, noisy listening environment, etc. etc.

What flac is useful for is archival purposes. You rip a cd to flac you don't have to worry about reencoding issues in the future, when you upgrade your system. It's gonna be identical quality to the original cd.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 06:25 GMT
#27
On April 18 2009 14:12 omninmo wrote:
FLAC is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better quality. anyone who says otherwise doesnt have the ear to appreciate it. test for yourself. flacs are much larger files however.. but the difference is noticeable to anyone with a good ear.

I'm sure it is...but like everyone else has said...without the hardware to make use of that, you won't be able to tell the difference.

My hardware is bottlenecking it, and I don't have the money, nor a good reason to go out and purchase a sound system that can make use of flac.

So...
Hello
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 06:27 GMT
#28
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 06:28 GMT
#29
On April 18 2009 14:22 FirstProbe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 14:18 rwong48 wrote:
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).


I think the reason why you won't be able to is because of your setup.

Lol 120hz sc you do know sc doesn't acutlly display any frames over 23.793? or something like that.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
benjammin
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States2728 Posts
April 18 2009 06:47 GMT
#30
On April 18 2009 15:27 IzzyCraft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.


uh, what?
wash uffitizi, drive me to firenze
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
April 18 2009 06:52 GMT
#31
If you can't hear the difference, use AAC. Some people can, some people can't. There isn't a clear-cut answer.

But seriously, for lossy codecs, AAC or even Vorbis is better than MP3.

It's kind of like comparing jpg to png. Both viewed at resolution, you probably won't notice the difference, but if you magnify them, the differences can be rather striking.
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
SonuvBob
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Aiur21552 Posts
April 18 2009 07:12 GMT
#32
On April 18 2009 15:27 IzzyCraft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.

I guess he means FLAC is widely supported and requires minimal CPU usage for playback.
Administrator
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 07:14 GMT
#33
jpg would be loosy and png would be lossless in that.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
April 18 2009 07:48 GMT
#34
On April 18 2009 16:14 IzzyCraft wrote:
jpg would be loosy and png would be lossless in that.


Yeah, like MP3 is lossy and FLAC is lossless.
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 07:50 GMT
#35
jpg is great as long as you don't have to zoom in to the image lol
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
kartoffel
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany38 Posts
April 18 2009 07:54 GMT
#36
i don't know if it's worth to encode random pop music with flac.
i suggest encoding at least classical music with flac or if you want to build a digital archiv of all your music cd's flac would be better.
i encode all cd's in flac btw.
Iss immer deine Kartoffeln.
PriitM
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Algeria181 Posts
April 18 2009 08:13 GMT
#37
--- Nuked ---
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 08:31 GMT
#38
One question though...how do you split songs in flac or whatever?

I've DL'd many (more than a couple dozen) albums in flac format, and they come all in one big .flac file and some kind of .cue file. I can play the flac file just fine in VLC and whatnot, but it's all the tracks of the album packed together.

What am I supposed to do with that?
Hello
xxsaznpride
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States506 Posts
April 18 2009 08:50 GMT
#39
Split it? Or idk maybe the cue file can be read in Foobar as separate songs.

128 v 256/320k mp3 = obvious difference
320k v Lossless = not so much.

The only difference I can think of is in the upper spectrum of sound. If you're older, there's a chance you won't be able to hear it in the first place. Even if you CAN hear, you're going to need balls-to-the-walls expensive sound devices (nice sound card, dedicated amp, ~$200+ headphones, etc) to appreciate it.

I'm going to a headphone store tomorrow to buy my first nice headphones, hopefully =D
“Life is too short to embrace a woman I don’t love. I also think a woman’s life is too short to be embraced by a man she doesn’t love.” | CSGO: Cure Moonlight
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
April 18 2009 09:02 GMT
#40
Way overrated imo

320kbps or v0 for me please
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
xmShake
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1100 Posts
April 18 2009 09:13 GMT
#41
On April 18 2009 17:31 PH wrote:
One question though...how do you split songs in flac or whatever?

I've DL'd many (more than a couple dozen) albums in flac format, and they come all in one big .flac file and some kind of .cue file. I can play the flac file just fine in VLC and whatnot, but it's all the tracks of the album packed together.

What am I supposed to do with that?

You need a cue splitter
(I use medieval)
http://www.medieval.it/content/view/28/70/
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
April 18 2009 22:34 GMT
#42
99% of everyone should just use mp3.
You either
don't have the proper hardware/software to tell the difference
can't even tell anyways
don't listen to the kinds of music where it will even matter
don't have the drive space to store the x3 size files
don't have the software to convert/rip/burn/play/trade these files types

..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SHIN 523
ProTech143
MindelVK 42
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1040
Soulkey 378
Snow 357
actioN 229
Last 118
Mong 81
Hyun 71
Sexy 55
PianO 52
910 41
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 40
Hm[arnc] 37
Aegong 34
NaDa 30
Sharp 25
soO 21
scan(afreeca) 13
HiyA 12
JulyZerg 11
yabsab 10
zelot 9
Noble 7
Dota 2
Gorgc6947
qojqva1639
Dendi1023
febbydoto20
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes395
Trikslyr65
Khaldor34
Other Games
singsing1776
B2W.Neo829
Liquid`RaSZi397
Beastyqt322
Hui .252
KnowMe225
XaKoH 197
DeMusliM174
FrodaN93
ArmadaUGS45
Railgan26
Chillindude23
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12250
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4384
Other Games
gamesdonequick820
EGCTV787
StarCraft 2
WardiTV688
TaKeTV 215
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 40
• mYiSmile116
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• FirePhoenix0
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1925
League of Legends
• Jankos1263
Other Games
• WagamamaTV248
Upcoming Events
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
23m
Spirit vs Mixu
BSL
4h 23m
Ret vs TerrOr
DragOn vs StRyKeR
Replay Cast
9h 23m
Afreeca Starleague
19h 23m
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
20h 23m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 19h
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
1d 21h
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

K-JUNGMAN
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.