• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:02
CEST 12:02
KST 19:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists13[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy21
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers11Maestros of the Game 2 announced32026 GSL Tour plans announced10Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid20
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail MaNa leaves Team Liquid Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued 2026 GSL Tour plans announced
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power
Brood War
General
Pros React To: Tulbo in Ro.16 Group A BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion BW General Discussion [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group B Small VOD Thread 2.0 Korean KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2 [BSL22] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Reappraising The Situation T…
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1815 users

mp3 vs flac

Blogs > PH
Post a Reply
Normal
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 03:20 GMT
#1
Is the whole flac thing overrated in anyone else's opinion? I was struggling to get some music I DL'd in flac working...I couldn't get any of the fucking quicktime plugins to work (I have an ipod and so use itunes to organize my music...it would've been convenient). I gave up and tried using other programs to at least give it a listen for a noticeable difference.

I have a Creative X-fi sound card and an old but decent 4.1 Altec Lansing speaker system...and I noticed virtually NO difference between mp3 and flac versions of the same song.

There is a SLIGHT difference...the sound does seem a bit more full and rich at times, but it's not worth the gi-fucking-normous file sizes.

Does anyone else share this feeling, or was it possibly my software (I was using VLC of all things...-___- )?

Hello
FirstProbe
Profile Joined June 2004
1206 Posts
April 18 2009 03:26 GMT
#2
I think the high bitrate mp3's are probably similar enough that you won't be able to discern the difference with your current system.
IMO flac is something pushed around by audiophiles for their more specialised systems.
crabsman
Profile Joined April 2009
United States13 Posts
April 18 2009 03:26 GMT
#3
What rate were you using for the mp3s?
Archaic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States4024 Posts
April 18 2009 03:29 GMT
#4
Normally, I would say that high rate mp3 is good enough. If you have an amazing sound system though, then you will definitely notice a difference. But for casual, and not obsessive music listening (i.e. listening to flac just because the number is so much higher!), then I'd say that it isn't worth it. Then again, it usually depends on the song or genre.
zgl
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1055 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 03:33:28
April 18 2009 03:29 GMT
#5
To really notice advantage of FLAC:
1. Use properly configured foobar or winamp
2. Use a real source. There are some good USB DACs. For example: Stello DA100 or Benchmark DAC1 USB.
3a. Use a nice set of speakers + amplifier (either integrated or pre+power combo), i.e., not something designed for computers.
3b. Alternatively, use good headphones + amplifier.

In a typical computer setup such as yours, FLAC won't make much difference since the music file won't be the bottleneck.
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
April 18 2009 03:30 GMT
#6
I think mp3 encoded at 192kbps with the newest Lame encoder sounds very close to loseless. Even audiophiles might not be able to tell it apart. aac sounds better than mp3 at the same bitrate though.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
Guilford
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Australia290 Posts
April 18 2009 03:46 GMT
#7
you can use flac to create identical copy of the original cd
Being forgotten is worse than death.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 03:48 GMT
#8
Hmm...yeah, most of the mp3s I tried comparing were 192kbps.

I have a decent set of headphones...nothing pro, so I'll try comparing them through there as well.

zgl, can you explain what you mean by real source? What is a USB DAC?
Hello
sexsexpussyhair
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada133 Posts
April 18 2009 03:54 GMT
#9
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.
GTR
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
51582 Posts
April 18 2009 04:02 GMT
#10
V0 MP3's are best IMO.
Commentator
crabsman
Profile Joined April 2009
United States13 Posts
April 18 2009 04:04 GMT
#11
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.


You are very misinformed the human eye can sense the difference between 60 fps and 100 fps. Please stop spreading this rumor.

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:12:38
April 18 2009 04:04 GMT
#12
mp3 is loosy it throws away a ton of info that is given that most people and sets up wont be able to hear or produce
FLAC is a lossless it keeps all quality thus size at similar bitrates size is quite different

i just use AAC myself encoding though a cmd line death weeks with neroAAC great size and a ton better quality then mp3 although i can't really tell unless im using my higher quality headphones
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 04:05 GMT
#13
On April 18 2009 13:04 crabsman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:
i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.


You are very misinformed the human eye can sense the difference between 60 fps and 100 fps. Please stop spreading this rumor.

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm

=p but most monitors can't display over 60.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
Chromyne
Profile Joined January 2008
Canada561 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:13:35
April 18 2009 04:11 GMT
#14
I agree with zgl. FLAC won't make a difference unless the rest of your gear can convey the differences. Of course, a good/musical ear will help differentiate between lossless and lossy formats, so you may not hear the different regardless of your rig.
Soli Deo gloria.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-18 04:16:35
April 18 2009 04:13 GMT
#15
mp3 is one of the worst lossly formats
AAC is much better in keeping quality
When i rip music i do full lossless .wav and then transcode into AAC making a mp3 ish sized file but smaller with much high quality i don't have a rig to make use of a lossless files so i just do the best loosy fomart there is

although you can do aac in lossless (it's file size is just a wedge smaller then flac) but i dont
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
April 18 2009 04:19 GMT
#16
lossless formats are useless unless your some weird audiophile who has super high end hardware and insists they can tell the difference. other wise 320kbps mp3 or VBR mp3s are fine.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 04:27 GMT
#17
I don't have many 320kbps mp3s...most are around 192-256...or VBR.

btw guys...it's lossy vs lossless. Not loosy or lossly or whatever else...
Hello
Shivaz
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada1783 Posts
April 18 2009 04:29 GMT
#18
Yup, most people even with high end hardware cannot tell the difference between 256-320kbps and flac/lossless, 192 though is easier to tell. However I find when possible people rather listen to lossless just knowing they will not be missing out on anything. After all why listen to lower quality if storage space is not an issue, $80-$100 for 1 terabyte.
benjammin
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States2728 Posts
April 18 2009 04:37 GMT
#19
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way
wash uffitizi, drive me to firenze
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11562 Posts
April 18 2009 05:04 GMT
#20
v0 and v2 all the way. I don't have room for those FLACs
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
DatTheMighty
Profile Joined March 2009
Vietnam122 Posts
April 18 2009 05:08 GMT
#21
Also, i went nuts installing over 5 plugins trying to play flac. Almost gave up until i found out vlc can play it inherently.
omninmo
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
2349 Posts
April 18 2009 05:12 GMT
#22
FLAC is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better quality. anyone who says otherwise doesnt have the ear to appreciate it. test for yourself. flacs are much larger files however.. but the difference is noticeable to anyone with a good ear.
rwong48
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States105 Posts
April 18 2009 05:18 GMT
#23
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).
FirstProbe
Profile Joined June 2004
1206 Posts
April 18 2009 05:22 GMT
#24
On April 18 2009 14:18 rwong48 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).


I think the reason why you won't be able to is because of your setup.
Knickknack
Profile Joined February 2004
United States1187 Posts
April 18 2009 05:32 GMT
#25
use something like vlc, foobar, beatport sync for flac.
lke others said it comes down to your hardware and what your listening abilities are, as to whether the quality of encoding will matter.
foobar supports abx testing so you can see what what your limit is.
I keep stuff mostly V0 (~256kpbs variable) and i can only very rarely hear a difference between that and lossless with my equation rp21s.
The real reason to keep in lossless is so you can rerip into whatever you want at any time.
| www.ArtofProtoss.vze.com |
hideo
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada1641 Posts
April 18 2009 05:49 GMT
#26
ogg is definitely better than mp3 right now in terms of space efficiency...

My cowon d2 supports both flac and ogg, but in a portable setup flac isn't really worth it: hp out is not that great, noisy listening environment, etc. etc.

What flac is useful for is archival purposes. You rip a cd to flac you don't have to worry about reencoding issues in the future, when you upgrade your system. It's gonna be identical quality to the original cd.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 06:25 GMT
#27
On April 18 2009 14:12 omninmo wrote:
FLAC is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better quality. anyone who says otherwise doesnt have the ear to appreciate it. test for yourself. flacs are much larger files however.. but the difference is noticeable to anyone with a good ear.

I'm sure it is...but like everyone else has said...without the hardware to make use of that, you won't be able to tell the difference.

My hardware is bottlenecking it, and I don't have the money, nor a good reason to go out and purchase a sound system that can make use of flac.

So...
Hello
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 06:27 GMT
#28
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 06:28 GMT
#29
On April 18 2009 14:22 FirstProbe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 14:18 rwong48 wrote:
On April 18 2009 12:54 sexsexpussyhair wrote:i doubt there is noticeable difference, its like playing at 60fps and 100fps, can't be detected by human.

it so can. have you ever used a CRT with 60/75/85/100/120 Hz refresh rates? I can tell the difference between ALL of them.

100/120 Hz counterstrike FTW

(which leads to 120 Hz starcraft, which might be what they use in PL/MSL/OSL?)

as for mp3 vs flac, I'm an audiophile (not necessarily with all the gear though), and i tweak my sound heavily to have it sound exactly the way I want it.. and I still cannot tell the difference between a well-encoded 192+ kbps VBR/CBR MP3 and FLAC. i have various sets of Sennheiser headphones and earbuds.

I use Winamp with DFX on an integrated sound card (lol) and Rockbox on my Sansa with bass/treble way high (+12-16 dB each).


I think the reason why you won't be able to is because of your setup.

Lol 120hz sc you do know sc doesn't acutlly display any frames over 23.793? or something like that.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
benjammin
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States2728 Posts
April 18 2009 06:47 GMT
#30
On April 18 2009 15:27 IzzyCraft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.


uh, what?
wash uffitizi, drive me to firenze
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
April 18 2009 06:52 GMT
#31
If you can't hear the difference, use AAC. Some people can, some people can't. There isn't a clear-cut answer.

But seriously, for lossy codecs, AAC or even Vorbis is better than MP3.

It's kind of like comparing jpg to png. Both viewed at resolution, you probably won't notice the difference, but if you magnify them, the differences can be rather striking.
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
SonuvBob
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Aiur21550 Posts
April 18 2009 07:12 GMT
#32
On April 18 2009 15:27 IzzyCraft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2009 13:37 benjammin wrote:
lossless is great for certain applications, just make sure you have one of those applications (also FLAC is the best lossless format out there, despite some having fractionally better compression ratios)

if not, v0 all the way

Lol its lossless as long as it plays in terms of quality it's all the same.

I guess he means FLAC is widely supported and requires minimal CPU usage for playback.
Administrator
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 07:14 GMT
#33
jpg would be loosy and png would be lossless in that.
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
April 18 2009 07:48 GMT
#34
On April 18 2009 16:14 IzzyCraft wrote:
jpg would be loosy and png would be lossless in that.


Yeah, like MP3 is lossy and FLAC is lossless.
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
IzzyCraft
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4487 Posts
April 18 2009 07:50 GMT
#35
jpg is great as long as you don't have to zoom in to the image lol
I have ass for brains so,
even when I shit I'm droping knowledge.
kartoffel
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany38 Posts
April 18 2009 07:54 GMT
#36
i don't know if it's worth to encode random pop music with flac.
i suggest encoding at least classical music with flac or if you want to build a digital archiv of all your music cd's flac would be better.
i encode all cd's in flac btw.
Iss immer deine Kartoffeln.
PriitM
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Algeria181 Posts
April 18 2009 08:13 GMT
#37
--- Nuked ---
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
April 18 2009 08:31 GMT
#38
One question though...how do you split songs in flac or whatever?

I've DL'd many (more than a couple dozen) albums in flac format, and they come all in one big .flac file and some kind of .cue file. I can play the flac file just fine in VLC and whatnot, but it's all the tracks of the album packed together.

What am I supposed to do with that?
Hello
xxsaznpride
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States506 Posts
April 18 2009 08:50 GMT
#39
Split it? Or idk maybe the cue file can be read in Foobar as separate songs.

128 v 256/320k mp3 = obvious difference
320k v Lossless = not so much.

The only difference I can think of is in the upper spectrum of sound. If you're older, there's a chance you won't be able to hear it in the first place. Even if you CAN hear, you're going to need balls-to-the-walls expensive sound devices (nice sound card, dedicated amp, ~$200+ headphones, etc) to appreciate it.

I'm going to a headphone store tomorrow to buy my first nice headphones, hopefully =D
“Life is too short to embrace a woman I don’t love. I also think a woman’s life is too short to be embraced by a man she doesn’t love.” | CSGO: Cure Moonlight
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
April 18 2009 09:02 GMT
#40
Way overrated imo

320kbps or v0 for me please
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
xmShake
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1100 Posts
April 18 2009 09:13 GMT
#41
On April 18 2009 17:31 PH wrote:
One question though...how do you split songs in flac or whatever?

I've DL'd many (more than a couple dozen) albums in flac format, and they come all in one big .flac file and some kind of .cue file. I can play the flac file just fine in VLC and whatnot, but it's all the tracks of the album packed together.

What am I supposed to do with that?

You need a cue splitter
(I use medieval)
http://www.medieval.it/content/view/28/70/
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
April 18 2009 22:34 GMT
#42
99% of everyone should just use mp3.
You either
don't have the proper hardware/software to tell the difference
can't even tell anyways
don't listen to the kinds of music where it will even matter
don't have the drive space to store the x3 size files
don't have the software to convert/rip/burn/play/trade these files types

..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Escore
10:00
Week 3
escodisco0
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 393
Stork 290
BeSt 230
Mini 180
Soma 180
Leta 157
actioN 152
Shuttle 98
Pusan 69
EffOrt 68
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 63
Hyuk 59
ggaemo 45
Rush 44
Snow 42
ZerO 41
Backho 38
Hm[arnc] 38
Free 32
910 24
soO 24
Shinee 22
Soulkey 21
Movie 19
Bale 16
JulyZerg 15
hero 13
yabsab 13
Hyun 13
Sacsri 12
Barracks 12
zelot 11
Sexy 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Dota 2
XaKoH 632
BananaSlamJamma213
NeuroSwarm75
League of Legends
JimRising 421
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1057
allub194
edward27
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King65
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr24
Other Games
gofns14550
singsing2051
Happy256
crisheroes231
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL152
Other Games
BasetradeTV115
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH383
• LUISG 36
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1135
• TFBlade1083
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
58m
OSC
4h 58m
Big Brain Bouts
5h 58m
MaNa vs goblin
Scarlett vs Spirit
Serral vs herO
Korean StarCraft League
16h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
23h 58m
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d
IPSL
1d 5h
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
BSL
1d 8h
UltrA vs KwarK
Gosudark vs cavapoo
dxtr13 vs HBO
Doodle vs Razz
Patches Events
1d 11h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 23h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
Ladder Legends
2 days
BSL
2 days
StRyKeR vs rasowy
Artosis vs Aether
JDConan vs OyAji
Hawk vs izu
IPSL
2 days
JDConan vs TBD
Aegong vs rasowy
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Bisu vs Ample
Jaedong vs Flash
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Barracks vs Leta
Royal vs Light
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-15
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Escore Tournament S2: W3
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W4
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.