EPTBut I'm willing to give it a chance- a REAL chance. I'll certianly buy the game a play a lot of it before I write it off.
I am not looking forward to Starcraft 2 - Page 2
| Blogs > Resonance |
|
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
But I'm willing to give it a chance- a REAL chance. I'll certianly buy the game a play a lot of it before I write it off. | ||
|
Sprite
United States1015 Posts
2 words: Mother Ship | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
H.O.T-Forever played Brood War, and it was slow as fuck. Brood War is not slow. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
Skeptical about competitive gameplay though;o | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
On February 01 2009 13:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote: H.O.T-Forever played Brood War, and it was slow as fuck. Brood War is not slow. he wasn't implying brood war is slow, he was saying SC2 is slow "the gameplay is not slow compared to brood war" Yes [sc2] is slow compared to broodwar i've actually played [ the beta version]. | ||
|
ZerglingShepherd
Canada99 Posts
On February 01 2009 12:32 armed_ wrote: How I'm the only person who voted for the last option thus far is beyond me, it's the only sensible one. ~My overall outlook on the game at this point is pretty negative though. The only sensible thing is to wait and try the game to see how good it really is. Otherwise it's like a kid who judges food only by how it looks, instead of how it tastes. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On February 01 2009 13:39 HeavOnEarth wrote: he wasn't implying brood war is slow, he was saying SC2 is slow "the gameplay is not slow compared to brood war" Yes [sc2] is slow compared to broodwar i've actually played [ the beta version]. You completely missed the point. Saying its slow has absolutely no meaning right now. Strong players from other games played Starcraft/Brood War when it was still in its beta stages as well. Watching games from that era, the gameplay is slow. Obviously, modern Brood War is not slow. Even for players that have experience with other games, it takes time to build up the familiarity and aptitude necessary to play at a good pace. | ||
|
Skyze
Canada2324 Posts
SC2 will be a bigger pro scene than BW.. anyone who thinks SC2 sucks, is just afraid of having to relearn all their builds. The game is looking amazing so far, regardless of "lesser skill" which is a retarded argument all in itself. | ||
|
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6642 Posts
| ||
|
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
| ||
|
liger13
United States1060 Posts
 then i can decide | ||
|
AzureEye
United States1360 Posts
I hate the auto macro mining thing and secondly, I also don't appreciate what it will do to the current broodwar pro scene Just because something is newer does not always mean its better. People need to realize sometimes old games > new games. | ||
|
Folca
2235 Posts
| ||
|
Savio
United States1850 Posts
| ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
I have too, a lot (+100 games) and I think it's not very much slower, a small bit maybe, but not very much more. Just do something about automine damnit | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
In any case, I'm not very excited about it either. However, whatever game I stick with will depend on the Korean pro scene. The existence and success of that is what's keeping me playing BW. If they do a full switch, unless SC2 is horrible, I will probably play SC2 a lot more than BW. But yeah...I'm very afraid of how SC2 will end up. The only thing I hope for is that it is as mechanically oriented as BW, and that its macro/micro balance is similar to BW as well. Aside from that, as long as the game itself is balanced, I don't mind so much. | ||
|
KrAzYfoOL
Australia3037 Posts
On February 01 2009 12:33 MYM.Testie wrote: I am looking forward to Diablo 3. | ||
|
Clasic
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
| ||
|
Eternity241
Australia342 Posts
And speaking of sc2 UMS, I get the feeling that there will be a SC2 version of dota. And then people will get sc2 only to play dota, just like what happened with wc3. Man, I'd hate it if that happened. | ||
| ||
