i know some of my friends and, other people general get bored with music, but no one really has any ideas, so i was hoping tl may have some brilliant suggestions. anybody have any good, time-filling pieces/studies?
piano piece suggestions?
Blogs > bluemanrocks |
bluemanrocks
United States304 Posts
i know some of my friends and, other people general get bored with music, but no one really has any ideas, so i was hoping tl may have some brilliant suggestions. anybody have any good, time-filling pieces/studies? | ||
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6755 Posts
If you can please record it or something I love that piece | ||
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6755 Posts
and I guess if you really want something to work on there's rachmaninoff if you havent already | ||
zgl
United States1055 Posts
Beethoven's Hammerklavier Sonata (no. 29) Beethoven's Waldstein Sonata (no. 21) Bach's Goldberg Variations You can get some nice free insight from http://music.guardian.co.uk/classical/page/0,,1943867,00.html | ||
Slithe
United States985 Posts
If you wanna try playing something hellish, you could try Ravel's Scarbo, from Gaspard de la Nuit. | ||
bluemanrocks
United States304 Posts
i have the music for goldberg variations and i have a photocopy hammerklavier somewhere, i actually was thinking of digging up the goldberg variations but id actually have to find them =\ edit: also have chopin ballades, learned the first, but thats another good idea thanks so far for your guys' suggestions | ||
Xenocide_Knight
Korea (South)2625 Posts
and beethoven pathetique | ||
Titusmaster6
United States5933 Posts
Chopin "Raindrop" Tchaikovsky "Juin" | ||
Empyrean
16937 Posts
On November 16 2008 12:25 Slithe wrote: As a Chopin fan, I recommend fantasie impromptu for a shorter and relatively easier work, or one of the Ballades for something tougher. If you wanna try playing something hellish, you could try Ravel's Scarbo, from Gaspard de la Nuit. Are you honestly suggesting Scarbo? ... | ||
Epicfailguy
Norway893 Posts
Best piano song ever. | ||
imDerek
United States1944 Posts
u should play his transcendental etudes | ||
Empyrean
16937 Posts
On November 16 2008 12:29 imDerek wrote: yaya liszt is so good u should play his transcendental etudes If he can't play a simple Liszt piece like his Liebestraumes, there's no way he's going to attempt any of his etudes, not even relatively easy ones like his concert etudes, much less his transcendental etudes. | ||
bluemanrocks
United States304 Posts
also, just a little note, i kinda wanna stay away from one of chopins opus 25 etudes, winter winds is enough for now and transcendental etudes/scarbo would actaully be AMAZING but it would take forever to learn | ||
Slithe
United States985 Posts
lol not really, but it would be fun to see someone try. | ||
bluemanrocks
United States304 Posts
On November 16 2008 12:33 Empyrean wrote: If he can't play a simple Liszt piece like his Liebestraumes, there's no way he's going to attempt any of his etudes, not even relatively easy ones like his concert etudes, much less his transcendental etudes. ouch, lol. and i just picked it up and started to learn it casually and i should be done soon. anyways i was thinking of gnomenreigen since i have the sheets and have looked it over before, so if anyones played it before if you have any input as to how that learning process would go, thatd be nice EDIT: also, though follets is obviously infinitely harder, liebestraume's cadences/the end of the middle section is harder than a bunch of parts from the transcendentals. not saying the transcendentals are easier, as even the easiest is harder, but liebestraume has its moments. and also, i didnt choose liebestraume for its technical difficulty, i chose it because i loved the piece. | ||
Chromyne
Canada561 Posts
| ||
triangle
United States3803 Posts
Although it would be really hard | ||
Empyrean
16937 Posts
On November 16 2008 12:36 bluemanrocks wrote: ouch, lol. and i just picked it up and started to learn it casually and i should be done soon. anyways i was thinking of gnomenreigen since i have the sheets and have looked it over before, so if anyones played it before if you have any input as to how that learning process would go, thatd be nice EDIT: also, though follets is obviously infinitely harder, liebestraume's cadences/the end of the middle section is harder than a bunch of parts from the transcendentals. not saying the transcendentals are easier, as even the easiest is harder, but liebestraume has its moments. and also, i didnt choose liebestraume for its technical difficulty, i chose it because i loved the piece. The second cadenza in the Liebestraume you're playing is a very simple downwards chromatic progression. Not to disparage it or anything, but it's pretty much mindless in the sense that once you know the "trick", it's very, very simple. If you compare it to sections in some other pieces with more tricky fingerings, not as obvious progressions/patterns, etc., it's technically a lot easier than lots of his other stuff. (The first cadenza is more difficult, actually). Hell, even the sustained difficulty of some of his other etudes are technically harder than that cadenza (pages of the first edition to some of his paganini etudes, for example). Anyway, I'm not such a big Liszt fan...which isn't to disparage his pieces, or anything. I do enjoy them to some extent. To get some useful suggestions, what pieces have you finished? | ||
404.Nintu
Canada1723 Posts
Greatest Fugue of all time. I know you wanted Classical but I hope Baroque is alright? I don't think anything else can compare to this. Edit: Proper link. | ||
Chromyne
Canada561 Posts
| ||
| ||