|
Nice paper, could've been a little more scientific but that's probably because my psych study has put a very heavy emphasis on statistics and research so far. Still, very interesting read I liked it.
On September 16 2008 18:24 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
a psychology paper on tl.net that doesn't mention me is an incomplete paper sir.
Operant condition works on more than one kind of behavior on TL, while contributing to the SC scene is rewarded by praise and power I feel that trolling is definately encouraged as well as long it is justified and funny. Whenever I troll someone and I see people laughing at it I definately feel like trolling some more.
Great idea to research initiated behavior on forums man, would've never crossed my mind. Oh and you could've have put a little description of operant condition to make it accessible to more people who are clueless on the matter, making it an even better blog. :p
|
you should name drop and describe some people just so people know who Manlyfesto is and such.
|
Does your paper focus on anything else or is it just about TL and you being a part of it?
It would be quite interesting if you decided to analyze some of the website's notorious troll posters.
|
Don't forget, in order to maintain the standard of academic excellence and precision that is expected of you, you must update the paper with your new post count with every new post you make! And send the revised paper to your professor of course.
|
United States20661 Posts
The market value is more than 100$, sir. 
I do like your paper, though.
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
wanna do a case study on fakesteve??????
|
I love TeamLiquid too. Not only is it for Starcraft but I can interact with many other people around the world and yeah..there are many interesting people around
Thank you for everything ^^
|
that was cool, thanks! i would be interested in reading the full thing =)
|
United States7488 Posts
On September 17 2008 13:51 Last Romantic wrote:The market value is more than 100$, sir. I do like your paper, though.
very much so... someone here bought his for $700 (not me)
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
interesting that your first impression of this site is "intimidated by rules." did you not notice the cavalier behavior of mods that had created a more loose and free flowing culture. oh, i guess im talking about earlier times.
|
Eventually, I became a “veteran member” myself, and gained recognition from the staff and community for my contributions. Most recently, I was offered a free ticket to BlizzCon, an annual gaming convention in Anaheim hosted by Blizzard Entertainment. The market value of the ticket is approximately 100 dollars.
Brag
Nice paper, I hope you do good, if not, well I suppose you can call the MiR
|
Uhm... Kinda neat... But there's practically no academic value in this paper... You should at least try to prove things... While I agree with a lot of what you're saying, the arguments range from non-existent (blatant statements), to very weak, (assuming that the reader agrees with your premises)...
Maybe I hold too high a standard to what would do TeamLiquid justice.
|
CA10824 Posts
On September 20 2008 12:39 PsycHOTemplar wrote:
Uhm... Kinda neat... But there's practically no academic value in this paper... You should at least try to prove things... While I agree with a lot of what you're saying, the arguments range from non-existent (blatant statements), to very weak, (assuming that the reader agrees with your premises)...
Maybe I hold too high a standard to what would do TeamLiquid justice. the other half of the paper where the actual analysis / further explanation is done is not posted up. this is just my anecdotal story about an example of operant conditioning. it's not supposed to be an argument, but rather just an example where i analyze it later.
the other part is really dry and boring so i didn't bother posting it up. really though, it isn't worth reading lol.
On September 17 2008 00:44 fanatacist wrote:
Yea I want to see how this really ties into psychological principles n_n
EDIT: Beyond the fundamentals of operant conditioning... I think you could have (and maybe did) say a lot more on it...
i talked about positive reinforcement, punishment, passive avoidance, and extinction, as well.
|
United States5262 Posts
You didn't mention Mani in your paper. FAIL
|
the other half of the paper where the actual analysis / further explanation is done is not posted up. this is just my anecdotal story about an example of operant conditioning. it's not supposed to be an argument, but rather just an example where i analyze it later.
the other part is really dry and boring so i didn't bother posting it up. really though, it isn't worth reading lol.
Oh... Fair enough... But I think that's the only part that would actually interest me personally lol.
|
On September 20 2008 01:10 oneofthem wrote:
interesting that your first impression of this site is "intimidated by rules." did you not notice the cavalier behavior of mods that had created a more loose and free flowing culture. oh, i guess im talking about earlier times.
Meh, I've only recently registered at TL, but I've read it for a while. I've also accumulated post counts in the tens of thousands on lots of other boards. There is definitely a unique spirit of intimidation on TL. If I could describe the social style of governance here, it's essentialy quite fascist. The rules are arbitrarily enforced, often ruthlessly, with little option for the conscientious poster but to fear the worst, never knowing when the people with their finger on the button are having a pissy day. The enforcers of the rules, to confound the issue, break them routinely, which I feel lends a sense of confusion about what is appropriate and how seriously to take the rules. In terms of raw, non-forum content, the site is great. The forums, on the other hand, I would say suffer from these neurotic and unpredictable circumstances. Critical discussion, especially, seems lacking in all but the most niche areas (SC2 features, etc). In its place is a lot of ass kissing and yes-man-ship. Sort of kills intelligent, adult discussion, imo. A classic example, well described by praexeology, of rules having effects counterproductive to their intended purpose. At least for myself, I would probably post here a lot more if the forums weren't so volatile.
|
On September 20 2008 12:39 PsycHOTemplar wrote:
Uhm... Kinda neat... But there's practically no academic value in this paper... You should at least try to prove things... While I agree with a lot of what you're saying, the arguments range from non-existent (blatant statements), to very weak, (assuming that the reader agrees with your premises)...
Maybe I hold too high a standard to what would do TeamLiquid justice.
I agree. The essay is maybe at a grade-11 level in terms of its content and style. It's far too informal for a scientific paper and is completely lacking in any sort of analysis or even clear verbal logic. I assume that it must be a university paper simply by the intended content, but not one I'd give my studens high marks for. If it is for high-school, though, it's not a bad piece of work.
edit : ah, nevermind, there's more to the paper it seems. This bit is still much too informal, I would think. It reads like vernacular dialogue rather than polished scientific prose. Still, formal writing seems to be something that lots of people have a really hard time with, especially native english speakers, oddly enough. If you are at a university, then you should have access to online journals - articles from them make for excellent examples of good writing to model your work after.
|
Would you mind posting the rest of it? I'd really like to read it all.
|
CA10824 Posts
On September 24 2008 01:19 jgad wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2008 12:39 PsycHOTemplar wrote:
Uhm... Kinda neat... But there's practically no academic value in this paper... You should at least try to prove things... While I agree with a lot of what you're saying, the arguments range from non-existent (blatant statements), to very weak, (assuming that the reader agrees with your premises)...
Maybe I hold too high a standard to what would do TeamLiquid justice. I agree. The essay is maybe at a grade-11 level in terms of its content and style. It's far too informal for a scientific paper and is completely lacking in any sort of analysis or even clear verbal logic. I assume that it must be a university paper simply by the intended content, but not one I'd give my studens high marks for. If it is for high-school, though, it's not a bad piece of work. edit : ah, nevermind, there's more to the paper it seems. This bit is still much too informal, I would think. It reads like vernacular dialogue rather than polished scientific prose. Still, formal writing seems to be something that lots of people have a really hard time with, especially native english speakers, oddly enough. If you are at a university, then you should have access to online journals - articles from them make for excellent examples of good writing to model your work after.
lol do you think i'm stupid? i'm in my 3rd year at a fairly reputable university. i've written plenty of papers in "scientific prose" and have written a lot of essays requiring formal writing in both university and in high school (thanks to IB English, History, Biology, and Chemistry HL!)
here is the paper prompt. perhaps this will give you a better understanding as to why my paper was written in this style.
+ Show Spoiler +PAPER 1 CONDITIONING AS YOU’VE EXPERIENCED IT
Assigned and Discussed: Week of Sept 1 Due: Tues. Sept. 16 at lecture
The first writing assignment requires you to describe and analyze your own experiences with the process of conditioning. The basic requirement of the paper is to first present two examples of conditioning as you’ve experienced it and then analyze them in terms of the concepts presented in lectures and in Chapter 4.
Your paper should be organized as follows:
1, A brief introduction that describes the purpose and content of the paper. This section should not consist of a long list of definitions.
2. Operant conditioning experience
• A description of the experience in narrative style, using everyday terms.
• An analysis of the experiences in terms of conditioning theory must identify the central components as they apply to your examples. Diagrams can be very effective in communicating these ideas.
3. Classical conditioning experience (same sections as in 2.)
Your examples should be ones that are possible to analyze in conditioning terms, and ones that allow you to illustrate several principles of conditioning. Very simple examples (“Loud noises make me jump”; “I work for money”) won’t do.
You can use examples of appetitive or aversive conditioning, positive or negative reinforcement; extinction, punishment, etc. Note: Conditioning experience that are a mixture of classical and operant components are quite common – see the lecture notes on ‘escape’ and ‘avoidance’. Be sure to make this clear if you use such as example.
Check the sample paper at the course Website. This will also give you an example of acceptable format, length, references, etc. Also: get a draft done early have a TA or the instructor comment on it.
but thanks for saying that i write like an 11th grader.
@Frits: lol, i'm not really comfortable with my analysis portion since this was my first psych paper (i'm taking psych 100), so i'd rather not post it up. i just posted up this portion since it was a fairly easy read and i thought a lot of people could relate to it.
|
HAhHAha I bet losing has a way more cynical piece of literature but he posted this one in fear of a ban bwahah
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
