• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:54
CEST 16:54
KST 23:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202538RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 849 users

Do you believe in Karma? - Page 2

Blogs > Deleted User 3420
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 27 2008 23:57 GMT
#21
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-07-28 00:01:03
July 28 2008 00:00 GMT
#22
I believe in karma.

It's probably already been said, but in a purely logical sense, if you do something 'bad' people will feel animosity toward you, which makes it more likely for bad things to happen to you (people won't be as conscious of your welfare as normal), and someone might even go out of their way to hurt you. That's just common sense, and it goes the same way if you do good things.

If you want to talk about karma in games and sports... if you're disrespectful of your opponents, you only fuel their desire to hurt you. You'll be the target of body checks in Hockey, you'll be the target of everyone in Gin Rummy for bad cards.

There's a hidden logic to karma, qi and feng shui that goes beyond foolish oogy boogiery. I don't think any Buddhists are trying to convince people the world is magical; they're just trying to share a wisdom that will help you best live your life, with or without calling yourself Buddhist. Even reincarnation has a logic to it... When you die, your body decomposes and helps fertilize soil for new plants to grow, which new animals can feed on, and be fed on... I admit I don't know an entirely large amount about Buddhism, but I've never seen them as the crazy mystical types, or illogical leapers of faith with abandonment of reality (such as certain popular Western religions are).
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:00 GMT
#23
On July 28 2008 08:56 CommanderFluffy wrote:
My understanding of karma is that every action/deed has a consequence. Whether the consequence is good or bad depends on the nature of the original action. I dont think karma really exists, people just use it on the basis of confirmation bias.


Yes, that is what the purely logical calculating part of me says.

But then the subjective part steps in and says "but remember when this happened and then that happened??

Life is very strange if you take enough time to examine it. I have trouble believing some of the situations I get into are not part of a greater scheme.
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
July 28 2008 00:00 GMT
#24
There's no reason to believe in karma.

It might be tempting to look for explanations when things happen that are out of your control, like your favourite starcraft player lose, your car crashes or someone you love dies in an accident.

But these are natural things that can happen to anyone, they don't happen because you are being a good or bad person.
Enter a Uh
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:08 GMT
#25
On July 28 2008 09:00 jtan wrote:
There's no reason to believe in karma.


what is that supposed to mean? either it is real or it isn't. that's like saying there is no reason to believe the earth is round(or flat ). Either it is or it isn't, the point is in knowing the truth so that you can use it.


It might be tempting to look for explanations when things happen that are out of your control, like your favourite starcraft player lose, your car crashes or someone you love dies in an accident.

But these are natural things that can happen to anyone, they don't happen because you are being a good or bad person.


the sun is made out of water and im right because I say so
Doctorasul
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Romania1145 Posts
July 28 2008 00:09 GMT
#26
There are forms of Buddhism that are completely stripped of any irrational beliefs such as reincarnation or karma, making them effectively a spiritual practice or merely a philosophy with an emphasis on experiencing the world within us. I guess there's little reason to call it Buddhism by those practicing it, yet one must recognize the merit of the originators of these practices.

I think meditation is a worthwhile discipline. Ekhart Tolle describes in "The Power of Now" how meditation can bring a state of supreme bliss and peace, free of the constraints of the past, the future, free of what we commonly associate with our identity, bathed in our true identity, that consists simply of our consciousness, our being.

Sam Harris sees meditation as an instrument into one's spiritual world (if the word "spiritual" is too much for you, I guess ""inner" or "subjective" are equally good). Just like one must first build a telescope to study the stars in detail, so must one first invest a considerable amount of time and effort in building an "inner telescope" through mastering the practice of meditation. After reaching a high enough level of control of the surprisingly difficult task of observing and guiding your thoughts, one can start to explore and experience the world in a different way. One of his realizations is that there is no "I", that what we usually associate with our identity is merely an illusion, the boundaries we impose between us and the landscape in which we find ourselves are an illusion.

As I sat and gazed upon the surrounding hills gently sloping to an inland sea, a feeling of peace came over me. It soon grew to a blissful stillness that silenced my thoughts. In an instant, the sense of being a separate self—an “I” or a “me”—vanished. Everything was as it had been—the cloudless sky, the pilgrims clutching their bottles of water—but I no longer felt like I was separate from the scene, peering out at the world from behind my eyes. Only the world remained.

(full article here)

I have tried meditation by the simple to state but difficult to follow exercise of observing my thoughts as they appear and simply stopping them as I observe them, returning to the initial state of waiting for a thought to occur spontaneously. I have reached the sought-after "thoughtless" state, although only for a few fleeting moments. I haven't even glimpsed the state of blissful peace and acceptance of the world, or the feeling of losing one's self that other have, although I am a beginner.

I prefer to use meditation devoid of any metaphysical context, simply because my mind cannot accept assertions on any other grounds than evidence. Since subjective experience, like qualia, is hard to put under a microscope, I take everything I read on meditation with a grain of salt. It is however encouraging when people of completely different backgrounds describe their experience in such a similar fashion (please watch the 3 videos at the end of the post). Also, as long as they don't make truth claims about the world, but simply describe as best they can their experience, I find it worthwhile to take their advice and explore and see first-hand what works and what doesn't.

Sorry for sort of going off-topic. As far as Buddhism goes, I understand the Dalai Lama has repeatedly said that "if science contradicts Buddhist beliefs, science wins!". How many other religious leaders have said anything remotely close to that?





"I believe in Spinoza's god who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but not in a god who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings." - Albert Einstein
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
July 28 2008 00:10 GMT
#27
There's plenty of evidence the earth is round.

There's no evidence for karma.

And do you even think it makes sense?
Enter a Uh
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:14 GMT
#28
On July 28 2008 09:10 jtan wrote:
There's plenty of evidence the earth is round.

There's no evidence for karma.

And do you even think it makes sense?



did people have evidence the earth was round 300 years ago?

how do you not get my point
BottleAbuser
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Korea (South)1888 Posts
July 28 2008 00:15 GMT
#29
There's like 10 different posters so far on this thread, and about that many unique interpretations of the theory of Karma. Of course it makes sense to some and is absolute batshit crazy to others - you aren't talking about the same thing.

My interpretation is that the Buddhist doctrine asserts that eventually, everything normalizes. Good shit is good because it helps everyone. Bad shit is bad because it is hurtful. Consistently do good stuff, and the benefits will eventually reach you - verify with statistics and probability theory. Consistently do bad stuff, and the results will eventually bite your ass - also verify with statistics and probability theory.

Now, the part about reincarnation and what you did in your previous life affecting you today -- surely the lives and decisions of previous persons affect today's lives and decisions, but whether or not there is some sort of "spirit" or "me-ness" that survives death and goes on in another life is moot for me -- I can't remember, and I don't care if I can't remember and there are no other implications. Yay for longest sentence in the thread.
Compilers are like boyfriends, you miss a period and they go crazy on you.
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-07-28 00:16:27
July 28 2008 00:15 GMT
#30
There's plenty of evidence the earth is round.

There's no evidence for karma.

And do you even think it makes sense?

What evidence have you personally witnessed though? Maybe you've seen the Earth's curve over the Ocean, which only suggests the Earth could be round, but that's not much more than anyone saying "this guys an asshole, and because of that people weren't worried about his safety when they saw him in potential danger."

Like... I don't know what you think karma is... It's not some hokey pokey witchcraft, it's just common sense. "What goes around, comes around." You can't argue that you don't increase the chances of people feeling animosity toward you if you're an asshole and never generous.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-07-28 00:20:41
July 28 2008 00:19 GMT
#31
On July 28 2008 09:09 Doctorasul wrote:
There are forms of Buddhism that are completely stripped of any irrational beliefs such as reincarnation or karma, making them effectively a spiritual practice or merely a philosophy with an emphasis on experiencing the world within us. I guess there's little reason to call it Buddhism by those practicing it, yet one must recognize the merit of the originators of these practices.


I think it is unfair to call them irrational. Buddhism says that Buddhas are enlightened. And so if Buddha says he can remember past lives, and he can interpret karma, then there should be no reason to call him irrational. Though there would certainly be reason to doubt him.

Anyways, thank you for good the post. watching some videos .
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
July 28 2008 00:24 GMT
#32
Oh come on

To believe in karma, you'd have to assume there's some sort of supernatural scheme going on. Why would you make that assumption when you don't have to?
Enter a Uh
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-07-28 00:30:57
July 28 2008 00:29 GMT
#33
On July 28 2008 09:24 jtan wrote:
Oh come on

To believe in karma, you'd have to assume there's some sort of supernatural scheme going on.


no you don't. you're being closeminded. what kind of world do you think we live in? how much do you really know?

we don't even know what causes consciousness. how can you say that.
Ryot
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada316 Posts
July 28 2008 00:31 GMT
#34
On July 28 2008 08:57 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.


Hypothesize all you want, but if there's no scientific data to back it (like some sort of controlled experiment for example) then I can't blindly believe in it.

Obviously saving someone's life will lead to positive benefits (or a reward) from that someone, a logical series of events. But helping an old woman cross the street isn't gonna randomly lead to a promotion at work. Probably not great examples, but you get the point. There's logical responses based off of actions, then there's coincidence.
Elric
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom1327 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-07-28 00:52:52
July 28 2008 00:33 GMT
#35
On July 28 2008 09:31 Ryot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 08:57 travis wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.


Hypothesize all you want, but if there's no scientific data to back it (like some sort of controlled experiment for example) then I can't blindly believe in it.

Obviously saving someone's life will lead to positive benefits (or a reward) from that someone, a logical series of events. But helping an old woman cross the street isn't gonna randomly lead to a promotion at work. Probably not great examples, but you get the point. There's logical responses based off of actions, then there's coincidence.


QFE.

For added emphasis, I think some of you guys should look up the Invisible Pink Unicorn and the Flying Spaghetti monster.

Edit: :/ Doesn't seem like you guys did. Here's a less belittling version:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot
Shauni
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
4077 Posts
July 28 2008 00:34 GMT
#36
On July 28 2008 08:30 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 08:19 Shauni wrote:
buddhism is pretty gay. I've read alot about it in religion class and I have a couple of relatives who are buddhists.


ok

Show nested quote +

It's way too mild to compete with the 'real' religions, it doesn't have any harsh rules at all, the main branch that is.


since when is the worth of a religion determined by it's popularity?

Show nested quote +

All those things you wrote about it fits better in on hinduism since the reincarnation and karma is even more in focus in that religion.


I don't know what you are trying to mean by this.



I mean literally gay. It's too soft. Real religions should have a holy book where you interpret and declare war over the different views on the books.
Buddhism doesn't have anything like that, and a lot of people in my country is like 'yeah, I'm an atheist but if I wanted to belong to a religion it'd be buddhism cause it's so peaceful and kind etc etc'. You get the point. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, because obviously the buddhism way of living makes a lot more sense than most religions in the present. But it's very meek and a lot more of philosophy than actual religion (no god or scribings, no real requirements to join, enlightenment and the meditation to gain enlightenment). I didn't intend that the 'worth' of buddhism is lesser than with any other religion. I guess phrased that bad.

What I meant in that last paragraph was that I was slightly confused as to why you started talking about buddhism then proceeded to write down general stuff which a lot of asian religions follow. I'm not questioning your knowledge of buddhism, I'm just saying that if there are any fellow teamliquidans who doesn't know anything about buddhism, they won't understand the religion very well from reading your opening post.
I'm taking whatever coverage I can get, because frankly, I'm busy working on this million dollar deal at my job. Early retirement is a good thing brotha man. - MessengerASL
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:36 GMT
#37
On July 28 2008 09:31 Ryot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 08:57 travis wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.


Hypothesize all you want, but if there's no scientific data to back it (like some sort of controlled experiment for example) then I can't blindly believe in it.


science is not the only method to find truth. but I agree with your point.
Ryot
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada316 Posts
July 28 2008 00:38 GMT
#38
On July 28 2008 09:36 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 09:31 Ryot wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:57 travis wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.


Hypothesize all you want, but if there's no scientific data to back it (like some sort of controlled experiment for example) then I can't blindly believe in it.


science is not the only method to find truth. but I agree with your point.


Just out of curiosity, what are the other methods? Empirical evidence falls under science doesn't it?
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:38 GMT
#39
On July 28 2008 09:34 Shauni wrote:
What I meant in that last paragraph was that I was slightly confused as to why you started talking about buddhism then proceeded to write down general stuff which a lot of asian religions follow. I'm not questioning your knowledge of buddhism, I'm just saying that if there are any fellow teamliquidans who doesn't know anything about buddhism, they won't understand the religion very well from reading your opening post.


Karma and reincarnation are part of buddhism. I don't understand you.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 28 2008 00:39 GMT
#40
On July 28 2008 09:38 Ryot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2008 09:36 travis wrote:
On July 28 2008 09:31 Ryot wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:57 travis wrote:
On July 28 2008 08:52 Ryot wrote:
As far as I know Karma has no scientific backing, seems like nothing more than superstition.


How can something be validated scientifically without first being hypothesized?

Science still has alot to learn. It is very very silly to think we have a great understanding of our existence.


Hypothesize all you want, but if there's no scientific data to back it (like some sort of controlled experiment for example) then I can't blindly believe in it.


science is not the only method to find truth. but I agree with your point.


Just out of curiosity, what are the other methods? Empirical evidence falls under science doesn't it?


Introspection. Figuring out what makes sense with your own mind. Philosophy, meditation, whatever you want to call it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11753
ComeBackTV 2726
TaKeTV 665
Hui .617
3DClanTV 419
Rex266
EnkiAlexander 255
mcanning197
CranKy Ducklings176
Reynor168
UpATreeSC128
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11753
Hui .617
Rex 266
mcanning 197
Reynor 168
UpATreeSC 128
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4265
Barracks 1899
Flash 1805
Jaedong 1514
BeSt 1435
EffOrt 1100
Mini 568
Stork 505
ggaemo 358
Snow 356
[ Show more ]
Soma 274
Soulkey 265
GuemChi 247
ZerO 247
ToSsGirL 187
Rush 123
Hyun 107
TY 52
soO 46
Sacsri 40
Sea.KH 39
Dewaltoss 23
scan(afreeca) 23
Terrorterran 15
ivOry 11
Movie 10
Bale 7
sas.Sziky 6
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN519
420jenkins354
XcaliburYe319
Counter-Strike
sgares754
flusha182
edward44
Super Smash Bros
Westballz32
Other Games
singsing2089
hiko1322
crisheroes440
Fuzer 160
ArmadaUGS94
KnowMe63
QueenE48
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH287
• Adnapsc2 1
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1996
• WagamamaTV595
League of Legends
• Nemesis3644
• TFBlade757
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 6m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.