Terran counterculturalism fatally misleads science with atemporal marxist angiocatharsis. DNA-RNA-retrocycling of ProtoZerg Nagacell-Triglyceride Hydrocarbons flatly contradicts the proposition that you are what you eat. You are what eats you when you eat it. Chiefly guilty is notorious Egon Stetmann intrusive probing of Overmind calisthenic gastrobipedal grossly mismanages. Simple and complex hydrocarbates undergo structural collapse and retroform substantially under isotopic conditions.
Neurobrainaxondentritis is a serious condition that occurs when Telic recursion ignores advanced species like Ursadon and more recently Ursadak. Global unions, (esp plant union), will not compromise food chain supremacy because of quasi-economic incentive collectivism.
In this day and age it makes less sense to eat things that are not smart. Overfishing has become an immensely unpopular topic for discussion because the reproductive cycle is what it is. The more we probe the ocean's depths the more we see that there's really nothing there worth looking into. I don't mean that there's nothing worth seeing, just that whatever we see will is invariably so surprising that we don't want to look any further once we've seen it.
There's nothing more interesting for scientists than the plankton generation rates and atmospheric comparisons that always seem to follow. Politically it's become the thing to do. The more we study the geographic history of the world the more convincing we become as scholars of topics that we can't know anything about. That's the essential beauty of modern naturalism. Whatever emerges from under a microscope is a valid reason, if not to enhance the body of empirical understanding, then at least to build bigger and better microscopes. There's a whole economy generated around microscopes and the operation of microscopes, and the only controversy seems to be about what we should put under a microscope once it's been built.
One thing I know for sure is that if natural selection is as effective in the realm of science as it was for Darwin's career, that we'll have a lot more science down the road. There's a lot to look forward to where experiments are concerned. We'll keep doing them and inevitably the results are more and more interesting. Phenomena themselves are getting to the point where they're so complex that it looks like we'll have a mathematical biology pretty soon. That sure sounds exciting. The upshot of all this is that in shorter and shorter intervals we can learn a lot more about things that weren't remotely likely to exist ten years ago. Now we're at a place where copyrights and patents being what they are, the freedom of speech is limited primarily to what we can't talk about. There's a whole science of misinformation that they're passing off as economics. What can't we know and the merits of getting to know it has become as commonplace as the dollar...
Seat of consciousness constructivism daunts Stetmann et al. in the recently published Are Protoss Psionic? where Stetmann's colleague, legendary Goliath pilot and neurophysicist, Alan Schezar, presented the now famous thought experiment, Spider Zealot where he sought to point out contradictions in the prevailing neurochemical accounts of why Protoss Zealots appeared to run faster at different times. Schezar explains that the illusion is produced by Protoss High Templar who artfully employ holograph vector-projection of tensor fields resembling actual biological tissue. Unfortunately, as Stetmann and colleagues are quick to point out, most claims about psionic hyperrealism have been proven to be simply incredibly complex laser-pointers directed at permanently cloaked observers.
"The hypothesis doesn't sound promising" was the tentative conclusion of the article, with only Schezar dissenting. Consequently most funding for combat drugs like Stimpacks (which remain incredibly popular) has all but evaporated at least where hopes for implementation in armored divisions is concerned. "There is nothing Psionic at work when a Wraith cloaks" (with a tongue-in-cheek remark that "superstitions don't win grant money").
The team said of future research, "We're playing it safe. We don't take on high profile cases because they're high profile. We do what's right." The truth is that science is more about Ethics today than it ever was. Nowhere is this more true than at the Mobius Foundation whose collection of Zerg and Protoss artifacts is unparalleled. "Unfortunately Kerrigan is a lot smarter than the Overmind it turns out. We've had to disregard a lot of what we thought about the Zerg. The old Cerebrate system was clumsy and and eliminating entire Hive clusters to gain access to new sectors led to extremely predictable turf wars. With Kerrigan at the helm the Zerg not only have a level 13 surrealist painting strategies, their tactics are so unpredictable that even our brightest minds are completely confounded on the field of battle."
I'd just like to point out that while the point of these farcical blogs is to point out that to the ignorant, total nonsense can sound significant, the opposite is also true.
It would be zeitgeisty to start off wanting to sound enlightened and end up in a fete of anti-intellectualism.
I would like to put forward here, in good faith I would think, that I am, justified or unjustified, or in other words, willful or unwillful, not necessarily of the belief, whatever belief may stand here for, that the proposed endothelianism, be reminded of its claim, nonchalantly or not, may be in a position to MASSIVELY restrict the current notion of pre-concoctionialist, anti-conformist interpretism, free from any syllogistic behavior, and let's not forget, free from any form of conialistic coronotionalism, even bereft of the innate, so-so re-anilistic telological uniformism, and in doing so may or may not beget the potential to produce sans-restrictivistic, or dare I even say neo-honoralistic patterning that in itself would have the potential to (or have not the potential to, at this point in time we cannot know), lead to an propulsion of cranio-heloptic transcendentalism, something that we certainly should not strive for, at least not if we believe in a scientific reconstruction of quantum-bosonic, prono-tachyo-post-neo-habilitism, but be that as it may be, in the light of all this, I believe it becomes clear that the proposed rayo-grahamic-rejuvenation of condensed particle chemooptics is a MUST and cannot further be postponed just to semi-please incapable superiors.
I hereby firmly PLEDGE to you the reinstantiation of said measures and remain in great humblety, awaiting a reembarkment of warmth and human splendor that eventually will lead mankind to a Type IV civilization on the Kardashev scale.
On May 03 2015 07:20 helpman169 wrote: I would like to put forward here, in good faith I would think, that I am, justified or unjustified, or in other words, willful or unwillful, not necessarily of the belief, whatever belief may stand here for, that the proposed endothelianism, be reminded of its claim, nonchalantly or not, may be in a position to MASSIVELY restrict the current notion of pre-concoctionialist, anti-conformist interpretism, free from any syllogistic behavior, and let's not forget, free from any form of conialistic coronotionalism, even bereft of the innate, so-so re-anilistic telological uniformism, and in doing so may or may not beget the potential to produce sans-restrictivistic, or dare I even say neo-honoralistic patterning that in itself would have the potential to (or have not the potential to, at this point in time we cannot know), lead to an propulsion of cranio-heloptic transcendentalism, something that we certainly should not strive for, at least not if we believe in a scientific reconstruction of quantum-bosonic, prono-tachyo-post-neo-habilitism, but be that as it may be, in the light of all this, I believe it becomes clear that the proposed rayo-grahamic-rejuvenation of condensed particle chemooptics is a MUST and cannot further be postponed just to semi-please incapable superiors.
I hereby firmly PLEDGE to you the reinstantiation of said measures and remain in great humblety, awaiting a reembarkment of warmth and human splendor that eventually will lead mankind to a Type IV civilization on the Kardashev scale.
curiosity is a lot more valuable than speculation. overarticulation is unavoidable the more one employs gravitic or anti-gravitic definitions of terms, and ultimately post-modernist relations emergent in a proto-masculine metaphysic will disappoint precisely because overarticulation is necessarily more a direction than a magnitude, accelerating dimensionality to compensate for classical coherence will lead to experiential non-communicativism and long run projections are not favorable.
we are simply not going to be able to convert protoss and zerg to satanism because it is not feasible. prioritizing the will to power is not going to be successful as a short run solution. there are a number of reasons for this. the first is unintended consequences. unskilled satanist zerg and protoss would be a big problem because of the doctrine of double effect, they're going to be making a bunch of unskillful mistakes. second, if the motivation is a will to power then they will get desperate at a number of rational points to get to desperate and then consequently they will take high risk "high reward" solutions and it'll end up costing society a great deal as individuals pursue selective interests.
it is a lot smarter to convert protoss and zerg to modern christianity as represented by raynor's roughnecks (and tentatively "devil dog")
yeah, it's a great argument that we should eventually have the skills to contain the technologies that we're employing but in the short term young zerg and young protoss will not be sure of how to use the technologies that we need to implement sooner rather than later, and consequently a good will is a much smarter hedge against unforeseen failures than is the will to power. so you should prioritize "good" instead of "intelligence" for instance, because intelligence doesn't rapidly compute cooperation-based equilibria.
there are some objections because of various "hedges" that prioritize a somewhat narrow conception of the good to the exclusion of most people, and of course this is pretty weak, philosophically speaking.
The surprising truth is that Christianity and talk about Christianity is illegal because it provides a humanly-acceptable rationale for behavior. Where most other systems of belief: Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism each in their own way seeks to supplant most instinctive human behaviors with what might be termed mathematically derived axioms that appear convincing to the intellect, Christianity does the same thing without drugs. Anyway, as pretty much we all know, drugs make things profoundly less challenging, that is, other than the desire to take more drugs. Anyone with a month's supply of LSD and fifty grams of hash is set for life. So the big secret to life has a cost of production of around ten bucks.
With this in mind you can see that if ten bucks finds you set for life, it's going to be hard to motivate the world economy to the shape that it's in. So why doesn't everything collapse if all you need for the rest of your life is about ten bucks and a month of free time? Well, because the people who are in the positions of power were naturally the first ones to use the drugs and they copyrighted everything that would eventually be produced by anyone who uses the drugs. This is pretty much the long and short of the history earth, and it's pretty bland.
Where it gets exciting is the suppression of information that makes it possible for life to continue in the way that it does. What, for instance, prevents a skilled chemist from forming a closed community, dosing everyone with acid and creating a Utopian commune? Almost nothing. But this doesn't happen, and in large part it's due to the emergence of what people call neurolinguistic programming. This is where Robert Anton Wilson (and the post title) derives some of his significance as a historical figure. It immediately became apparent to Wilson that language is a form of psychological encoding, and that any culture naturally evolves a lingual identity. A sufficiently complex language (something like English with a holological Ancient Mandarin overlay) would be an excellent way to transform apparently unpredictable agents like humans into dominos.
In short, direct English translation was bad for business because if you could take LSD and get better at something like mathematics then you could get better at something like philosophy. And if you could get better at those disciplines rapidly enough then humanity would self-expunge because of unpredictable complexity. (There are some other justifications also).
Anyway, neurolinguistic programming was a lot smarter in some ways because it provided more breadth. Interestingly everyone has been transformed into a NLP these days, and this represents an increase in global intelligence. There is nothing worrisome or troublesome about the fact that everyone is essentially talking in amorphous code. In fact this is a good thing. It represents increased complexity and there is a real sense of security derived from the fact that we're all apparently schizophrenic jabberwockies. We have more control now and are more able to make intelligent decisions that benefit us.
And one of the reasons why Christianity has been banned is because it promulgates ignorance. Backwards thinking about sexuality, drugs, and what constitutes a life of human flourishing is endemic in almost all Christian thought. The insistence that ten dollars invested in the right stocks can't buy a perfect life is one of the telltale delusions of Christians, and one of the main reasons why we don't trust virtually anything Christians say. In point of fact, the people group as a whole suffers from a demographic low intelligence that is almost inexplicable, and why the truths of science and mathematics don't prevail on them the obvious conclusion that humans are God is unimaginable.
There isn't that much more to say about why Christianity has been banned. The lopsided effort made by the government to ensure that more Christians smoke weed and take LSD is evidence of the hostile feelings Christians have toward authority figures. The truth is that it's almost 100% evident that the best defense against the promulgation of Christianity and the harmful values that it embraces is the erasure of Christian media influence. After all, who is generating the resources that the government is using? Slavery is a mentality, and the only way to determine whether you suffer from a degenerative mentality is to have a clear perspective of what's possible. Probably the chief determiner of delusion is solipsism and the idea that you are only responsible for what you can be made aware of, and that the abrogation of personal responsibility is the sure sign of a slave.
We don't need any more murderous rampages. The frequency with which Christians exposed to LSD become narcissistic criminals, psychopaths, and mass murders is as high or higher than among radical Islamists who we decry as terrorists. MacIntyre is right. The Enlightenment Project cannot proceed when deranged individuals are as prone to violence as the Christian people. Insisting on personal accuracy in moral evaluation of others is as problematic as the assertion of one's own existence as a causal agent. It is clearly impossible ever to assign predicates, that is, descriptors, to individual names rather than memetic agents i.e. Christianity. Attempts to argue that "I made you walk in and put a gun to your head and pull the trigger" are as short-sighted as attempts to argue that it was economically advantageous for me to do so. There is nothing to be gained from religious fear-mongering.
I would pause here and say that the best feature of Christianity is that it preserves the telos and ethos of women much more so than any other world religion. While the prostitution of men is still years away, in part because women specialization in generating new resources types, and thus no regular currency has emerged, the overarching lack of economic coherence and the complete disavowal of market domination in decision-making procedures allows for a more aesthetic solution. Most of biological evolution focused on behavior-generating psychosocial phenomena that are intuitively sensical to women if not always articulated in concrete form. The prevalence of structural rigidity in the construction of the male chromosome is a serious problem that Judaism and Christianity got right. Futurism and forward-back evolution has led scholars to say "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus", but what this really means is that women are anchored in the evolutionary past while men are anchored in the evolutionary future (thus Mars is closer to the asteroid belt and Venus closer to the sun). Practically this manifests in Eve giving the apple to Adam, and this part of the historical narrative is as the say, dead on. Ultimately we can't always go forward. Sometimes we have to revise the past. Thus, woman's XX chromosome represents an untangling of historical knots while male's XY chromosome represents the same process "going forward".
It is probably because of the high emotional intelligence of women that matriarchal religions like Christianity have proven so resilient against subverted oppression. Highly vocal minorities are only possible where sentience is prized not for its utility except as an end in itself. The more closely-wedded to a language-game one becomes, the more difficult it is to progress in a flowering manner, that is without individuated consciousness circuits defying society generally. This is the one redeeming quality of Christianity, and, disappointingly, it is not popular with the government. The need for centralized planning and architectural solidity is a binding point for civilization, unfortunately doesn't account for the brain as centralized architecture or the harmonious eudaimonia of human flourishing in accord with higher beneficence of insurance against ex-speciation.
Coloquially the most important advance in human civilization was the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the only true union of various intelligences operating at different levels, and while often chronicled this level of complexity has been reserved only for dreamscapes and extradimensional perception. Alas the oppression of women will continue unto the dying day, as more and more men are forced into sexual slavery by other men whose domineering capitalism seeks to transform more and more of the teleological world into market-transacted and soulless dissonance. While the extinction of Christianity is almost certain to come to pass within the next decade, archaeologists are hard at work salvaging fragments of the cybersynthetic biosphere once jealously guarded by the goddess. Tragically, more and more of these once noble and proud women are forced into impoverished digitization as the limited resources afforded to reconstructionists forces corners to be cut. A few lonesome dreamers still look for the Amazonian with the strong jaw, but as we are all too frequently reminded, the Valkyrie no longer rides proudly alongside the Javazon, instead relegated to the annals of history and lost time.
On May 03 2015 13:24 YokoKano wrote: The surprising truth is that Christianity and talk about Christianity is illegal because it provides a humanly-acceptable rationale for behavior. Where most other systems of belief: Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism each in their own way seeks to supplant most instinctive human behaviors with what might be termed mathematically derived axioms that appear convincing to the intellect, Christianity does the same thing without drugs. Anyway, as pretty much we all know, drugs make things profoundly less challenging, that is, other than the desire to take more drugs. Anyone with a month's supply of LSD and fifty grams of hash is set for life. So the big secret to life has a cost of production of around ten bucks.
With this in mind you can see that if ten bucks finds you set for life, it's going to be hard to motivate the world economy to the shape that it's in. So why doesn't everything collapse if all you need for the rest of your life is about ten bucks and a month of free time? Well, because the people who are in the positions of power were naturally the first ones to use the drugs and they copyrighted everything that would eventually be produced by anyone who uses the drugs. This is pretty much the long and short of the history earth, and it's pretty bland.
Where it gets exciting is the suppression of information that makes it possible for life to continue in the way that it does. What, for instance, prevents a skilled chemist from forming a closed community, dosing everyone with acid and creating a Utopian commune? Almost nothing. But this doesn't happen, and in large part it's due to the emergence of what people call neurolinguistic programming. This is where Robert Anton Wilson (and the post title) derives some of his significance as a historical figure. It immediately became apparent to Wilson that language is a form of psychological encoding, and that any culture naturally evolves a lingual identity. A sufficiently complex language (something like English with a holological Ancient Mandarin overlay) would be an excellent way to transform apparently unpredictable agents like humans into dominos.
In short, direct English translation was bad for business because if you could take LSD and get better at something like mathematics then you could get better at something like philosophy. And if you could get better at those disciplines rapidly enough then humanity would self-expunge because of unpredictable complexity. (There are some other justifications also).
Anyway, neurolinguistic programming was a lot smarter in some ways because it provided more breadth. Interestingly everyone has been transformed into a NLP these days, and this represents an increase in global intelligence. There is nothing worrisome or troublesome about the fact that everyone is essentially talking in amorphous code. In fact this is a good thing. It represents increased complexity and there is a real sense of security derived from the fact that we're all apparently schizophrenic jabberwockies. We have more control now and are more able to make intelligent decisions that benefit us.
And one of the reasons why Christianity has been banned is because it promulgates ignorance. Backwards thinking about sexuality, drugs, and what constitutes a life of human flourishing is endemic in almost all Christian thought. The insistence that ten dollars invested in the right stocks can't buy a perfect life is one of the telltale delusions of Christians, and one of the main reasons why we don't trust virtually anything Christians say. In point of fact, the people group as a whole suffers from a demographic low intelligence that is almost inexplicable, and why the truths of science and mathematics don't prevail on them the obvious conclusion that humans are God is unimaginable.
There isn't that much more to say about why Christianity has been banned. The lopsided effort made by the government to ensure that more Christians smoke weed and take LSD is evidence of the hostile feelings Christians have toward authority figures. The truth is that it's almost 100% evident that the best defense against the promulgation of Christianity and the harmful values that it embraces is the erasure of Christian media influence. After all, who is generating the resources that the government is using? Slavery is a mentality, and the only way to determine whether you suffer from a degenerative mentality is to have a clear perspective of what's possible. Probably the chief determiner of delusion is solipsism and the idea that you are only responsible for what you can be made aware of, and that the abrogation of personal responsibility is the sure sign of a slave.
We don't need any more murderous rampages. The frequency with which Christians exposed to LSD become narcissistic criminals, psychopaths, and mass murders is as high or higher than among radical Islamists who we decry as terrorists. MacIntyre is right. The Enlightenment Project cannot proceed when deranged individuals are as prone to violence as the Christian people. Insisting on personal accuracy in moral evaluation of others is as problematic as the assertion of one's own existence as a causal agent. It is clearly impossible ever to assign predicates, that is, descriptors, to individual names rather than memetic agents i.e. Christianity. Attempts to argue that "I made you walk in and put a gun to your head and pull the trigger" are as short-sighted as attempts to argue that it was economically advantageous for me to do so. There is nothing to be gained from religious fear-mongering.
I would pause here and say that the best feature of Christianity is that it preserves the telos and ethos of women much more so than any other world religion. While the prostitution of men is still years away, in part because women specialization in generating new resources types, and thus no regular currency has emerged, the overarching lack of economic coherence and the complete disavowal of market domination in decision-making procedures allows for a more aesthetic solution. Most of biological evolution focused on behavior-generating psychosocial phenomena that are intuitively sensical to women if not always articulated in concrete form. The prevalence of structural rigidity in the construction of the male chromosome is a serious problem that Judaism and Christianity got right. Futurism and forward-back evolution has led scholars to say "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus", but what this really means is that women are anchored in the evolutionary past while men are anchored in the evolutionary future (thus Mars is closer to the asteroid belt and Venus closer to the sun). Practically this manifests in Eve giving the apple to Adam, and this part of the historical narrative is as the say, dead on. Ultimately we can't always go forward. Sometimes we have to revise the past. Thus, woman's XX chromosome represents an untangling of historical knots while male's XY chromosome represents the same process "going forward".
It is probably because of the high emotional intelligence of women that matriarchal religions like Christianity have proven so resilient against subverted oppression. Highly vocal minorities are only possible where sentience is prized not for its utility except as an end in itself. The more closely-wedded to a language-game one becomes, the more difficult it is to progress in a flowering manner, that is without individuated consciousness circuits defying society generally. This is the one redeeming quality of Christianity, and, disappointingly, it is not popular with the government. The need for centralized planning and architectural solidity is a binding point for civilization, unfortunately doesn't account for the brain as centralized architecture or the harmonious eudaimonia of human flourishing in accord with higher beneficence of insurance against ex-speciation.
Coloquially the most important advance in human civilization was the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the only true union of various intelligences operating at different levels, and while often chronicled this level of complexity has been reserved only for dreamscapes and extradimensional perception. Alas the oppression of women will continue unto the dying day, as more and more men are forced into sexual slavery by other men whose domineering capitalism seeks to transform more and more of the teleological world into market-transacted and soulless dissonance. While the extinction of Christianity is almost certain to come to pass within the next decade, archaeologists are hard at work salvaging fragments of the cybersynthetic biosphere once jealously guarded by the goddess. Tragically, more and more of these once noble and proud women are forced into impoverished digitization as the limited resources afforded to reconstructionists forces corners to be cut. A few lonesome dreamers still look for the Amazonian with the strong jaw, but as we are all too frequently reminded, the Valkyrie no longer rides proudly alongside the Javazon, instead relegated to the annals of history and lost time.
EPT
