• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:45
CEST 16:45
KST 23:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview5[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris38Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195
StarCraft 2
General
#2: Serral - Greatest Players of All Time 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Kirktown Chat Brawl #8 - 4.6K max Tonight LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below
Brood War
General
Post ASL20 Ro24 discussion. BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Easiest luckies way to get out of Asl groups BW General Discussion No Rain in ASL20?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group F [IPSL] CSLAN Review and CSLPRO Reimagined! Small VOD Thread 2.0 Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Path of Exile Mechabellum Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
How Culture and Conflict Imp…
TrAiDoS
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 690 users

Fixing PvP in hots (Shield Batteries)

Blogs > vOdToasT
Post a Reply
Normal
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
September 08 2011 13:27 GMT
#1
We all know how shit PvP is compared to every other matchup, especially on maps without ramps. Because of the warp in mechanic and the lack of a defenders' advantage, PvP on tal darim altar is always 4 gate vs 4 gate. If you try to expand or tech, you will die. On other maps with ramps, you can tech, but you still can't expand until very late, since without the ramp you don't have a substantial defenders' advantage.

The shield battery could solve this if it was strong enough. If it was cheap (75-200 minerals) and built fast, it could create a defenders' advantage in PvP that would let players fast expand. Offensive shield batteries wouldn't be nearly as effective as defensive ones for obvious reasons.

What do you think?

***
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
Kassploj
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden67 Posts
September 08 2011 13:32 GMT
#2
I think they shouldn't have removed it to begin with. Made me angry a year after release when I realized it was gone.
Ghin
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States2391 Posts
September 08 2011 13:36 GMT
#3
What are the obvious reasons an offensive shield battery would be less effective?
Legalize drugs and murder.
Salivanth
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Australia1071 Posts
September 08 2011 13:37 GMT
#4
I don't see it either. When 4-gating, just retreat every time you warp in a new wave of units, use your battery, and re-engage. Shield battery would be cool, but I don't see it fixing PvP.
<@Wikt> so you are one of those nega-fans <@Wikt> that hates the company that makes a game and everything they stand for <@Wikt> but still plays the game <@Wikt> (like roughly 30% of blizzard's player base, maybe much more...)
ranjutan
Profile Joined November 2010
United States636 Posts
September 08 2011 13:38 GMT
#5
On September 08 2011 22:32 Kassploj wrote:
Made me angry a year after release when I realized it was gone.


Maybe that's why they removed it

On topic, yeah I think that could work. It would definitely be very cool, but to be honest I don't really mind PvP anymore, even though expansions still have to be very delayed, I think (especially with 1.4) it's getting increasingly easier to hold off warpgate or blink rushes and I think that eventually the game might evolve naturally to the point where expanding before 10:00 is standard.
http://i53.tinypic.com/1r3j0p.gif
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-08 13:48:13
September 08 2011 13:45 GMT
#6
On September 08 2011 22:36 Ghin wrote:
What are the obvious reasons an offensive shield battery would be less effective?


1. Building a shield battery right next to the enemy natural isn't easy. His units will be there to stop it.
2. Even if you manage to do that, the defending player's battery will have more energy since he built it earlier.
3. If you build it farther away, you have to keep going back and forth, while the defender can heal his units during the battle itself without them having to leave.

Imagine if a shield battery started with 100 energy, and that energy grew very quickly so that every second mattered. You could have two batteries with 800 energy total by the time the enemy attacks you. And so what if he puts up shield batteries outside your natural? You'll still have an advantage over him. As the number of units continues to grow, eventually stalkers would be able to one shot each other. This means that the attacking player can not pull back stalkers to heal, but the defending player CAN heal his stalkers, even vs a volley that would "one shot" since not all attacks will land at exactly the same time. Because of this, eventually the defending player would be able to push out and take out the enemy pylon.
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
DroneAllDay
Profile Joined April 2011
United States140 Posts
September 08 2011 13:50 GMT
#7
Huge problem that broke PvP? Who knee that it was fixed ten years ago in Brood War and Blizz just removed it? Well I'll be damned that just might work...
Don't pressure me please, I like my drones too much
Ghin
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States2391 Posts
September 08 2011 13:51 GMT
#8
On September 08 2011 22:45 vOdToasT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2011 22:36 Ghin wrote:
What are the obvious reasons an offensive shield battery would be less effective?


1. Building a shield battery right next to the enemy natural isn't easy. His units will be there to stop it.
2. Even if you manage to do that, the defending player's battery will have more energy since he built it earlier.
3. If you build it farther away, you have to keep going back and forth, while the defender can heal his units during the battle itself without them having to leave.

1. It would be just as hard to build a shield battery in the natural as it is to build a pylon there (not very hard). There is a very common build PvP called the "Korean 4 Gate" that makes multiple pylons in the opponent's main.

2. This is probably true

3. See #1. You can build a shield battery in or near his base just as easily as he can during a 4gate.

Legalize drugs and murder.
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-08 14:02:22
September 08 2011 13:52 GMT
#9
On September 08 2011 22:51 Ghin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2011 22:45 vOdToasT wrote:
On September 08 2011 22:36 Ghin wrote:
What are the obvious reasons an offensive shield battery would be less effective?


1. Building a shield battery right next to the enemy natural isn't easy. His units will be there to stop it.
2. Even if you manage to do that, the defending player's battery will have more energy since he built it earlier.
3. If you build it farther away, you have to keep going back and forth, while the defender can heal his units during the battle itself without them having to leave.

1. It would be just as hard to build a shield battery in the natural as it is to build a pylon there (not very hard). There is a very common build PvP called the "Korean 4 Gate" that makes multiple pylons in the opponent's main.

2. This is probably true

3. See #1. You can build a shield battery in or near his base just as easily as he can during a 4gate.



If I build a shield battery right after I make my gateways, my battery will have way more energy than yours. Especially if Blizzard makes it grow fast. I'll have a shield battery there before you even start building your own. And while your battery is building, I'm healing my units there and killing your battery. There's no way you could possibly do it.

Also, before your battery is done, I can send my units back to heal while you are still waiting for your battery to complete, if you choose to build it far away and not in my face.

As for the korean 4 gate, what if I open 3 stalker rush? that would kill your probe and the pylons it is warping in, right?

Gateway core gateway gateway shield battery shield battery, with chrono'd stalkers.

Remember that you can start building batteries before warp gate tech is done. Before warp gate tech, there is a defenders' advantage, meaning that I can get shield batteries up to defend much earlier than you can get them up to attack. By the time you CAN build shield batteries at my front, I already have the advantage of a shield battery, which makes it hard for you to put up your own.
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
CreationSoul
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Romania231 Posts
September 08 2011 13:56 GMT
#10
they removed it because the shield mechanic was changed as well. In BW shield could also regenerate in battle also, but very slowly. now shields don't regenerate at all in battle, but they do very quickly after a few seconds away from the battle.

i have to agree that it might actually help PvP.
Quitting is the easy way out...
WightyCity
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada887 Posts
September 08 2011 14:08 GMT
#11
would be a great idea. i was saying this since the beginning
90% watching it 8% talking about it and 2% playing it - sc2
Mobius_1
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United Kingdom2763 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-08 14:21:30
September 08 2011 14:20 GMT
#12
OK, theory crafting time then. Let's say Tal'Darim PvP (since that epitomises the 4 gate), opponent 4 gates you, you 3 gate and get a Battery instead of a 4th gate, possibly later than his 4th gate and therefore allow you to build a couple more Probes, but still fast enough to have it done in time for the attack. Well, having an undying Zealot (or very very slowly dying Zealot) or Stalker can truly turn the difference in such a case.

And it'd make defending easier, too, but there is the possibility of it being abused somehow by really clever people. But this is one of the better ideas on the internet.

EDIT:
On September 08 2011 23:08 WightyCity wrote:
would be a great idea. i was saying this since the beginning


Hipster
Starleague Forever. RIP KT Violet~
Kassploj
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden67 Posts
September 08 2011 14:54 GMT
#13
On September 08 2011 22:38 ranjutan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2011 22:32 Kassploj wrote:
Made me angry a year after release when I realized it was gone.


Maybe that's why they removed it

On topic, yeah I think that could work. It would definitely be very cool, but to be honest I don't really mind PvP anymore, even though expansions still have to be very delayed, I think (especially with 1.4) it's getting increasingly easier to hold off warpgate or blink rushes and I think that eventually the game might evolve naturally to the point where expanding before 10:00 is standard.


The reason I didn't notice until a short while back was that I don't play SC2.

But yeah, not like I use it alot in BW either, happens like once every fifty games if even that. I have won a few matches solely because of the shield battery though, and I love them to death.
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
September 08 2011 15:00 GMT
#14
On September 08 2011 23:54 Kassploj wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2011 22:38 ranjutan wrote:
On September 08 2011 22:32 Kassploj wrote:
Made me angry a year after release when I realized it was gone.


Maybe that's why they removed it

On topic, yeah I think that could work. It would definitely be very cool, but to be honest I don't really mind PvP anymore, even though expansions still have to be very delayed, I think (especially with 1.4) it's getting increasingly easier to hold off warpgate or blink rushes and I think that eventually the game might evolve naturally to the point where expanding before 10:00 is standard.


The reason I didn't notice until a short while back was that I don't play SC2.

But yeah, not like I use it alot in BW either, happens like once every fifty games if even that. I have won a few matches solely because of the shield battery though, and I love them to death.


Shield batteries are great for expanding in PvP! :D

When you're going 1 gate expand then robo, if the enemy goes 2 gate robo, he will have reavers and a shuttle. You won't have the shuttle since you expanded, so to compensate for the lack of a shuttle you have a shield battery to heal the reaver instead of picking it up and dodging enemy scarabs.

Stork won a game vs Bisu on Tau Cross exactly that way in IEF. It was 1 gate expand vs 2 gate robo.
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
September 08 2011 15:17 GMT
#15
Sounds great. Would you take a shield nerf on all units in trade?

All of these fix Protoss suggestions always sound terrific. The problem I find is they fuck up PvZ and PvT while fixing PvP. Or any other order. Balance is pretty tough

Good luck though if this is something you want to put more detail into. It would be very nice to find PvP entertaining.
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
September 08 2011 15:29 GMT
#16
On September 09 2011 00:17 Probe1 wrote:
Sounds great. Would you take a shield nerf on all units in trade?

All of these fix Protoss suggestions always sound terrific. The problem I find is they fuck up PvZ and PvT while fixing PvP. Or any other order. Balance is pretty tough

Good luck though if this is something you want to put more detail into. It would be very nice to find PvP entertaining.


If shield batteries would be too good in PvZ or PvT, there is one way to fix that.

Make it so that when you use a battery on a unit, it increases the shield regeneration by a LOT. But it doesn't instantly heal shields. So large numbers of units will still one shot them, but smaller numbers of units will be repelled.

This will make it so that it's really only useful for PvP.
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
TiTanIum_
Profile Joined August 2011
Brazil1335 Posts
September 08 2011 16:49 GMT
#17
Make a custom map where SBs are available and test it in different MUs. Probably the best way to figure out the balance issues with it, instead of the whole theorycrafting.
arsenic
Profile Joined January 2009
United States163 Posts
September 08 2011 16:55 GMT
#18
If you are for adding in the Shield Battery, I don't think you've considered its implications in ZvP... You'd need to nerf some things about Protoss if you were to do this. =/
PassiveAce
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States18076 Posts
September 08 2011 17:11 GMT
#19
I would love to see a modified version of the shield battery, but I don't think that the BW Shield battery is appropriate in this game. I do want them to play with the shield mechanics more.
Call me Marge Simpson cuz I love you homie
Lomak
Profile Joined June 2010
United States311 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-08 17:22:20
September 08 2011 17:21 GMT
#20
I don't understand how people think PvP is so wrong when ZvZ barely ever gets past baneling / speedling tech. Not complaining , but I see a lot more variance in PvP beyond 4 gate than I do in ZvZ past hatch tech, from a spectator standpoint.
Some see the glass half full, others half empty. I think the glass is just too big.
zeru
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
8156 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-08 17:34:26
September 08 2011 17:33 GMT
#21
--- Nuked ---
yoshi_yoshi
Profile Joined January 2010
United States440 Posts
September 08 2011 17:34 GMT
#22
How about putting the shield battery mechanic on Nexus energy? That would make it purely defensive, as well as making the Nexus more useful.
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
September 08 2011 20:07 GMT
#23
shield batteries aren't nearly as good in sc2 (still good though) because of how shields work now. This is debatable probably.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
September 08 2011 21:04 GMT
#24
On September 09 2011 02:33 zeru wrote:
My idea on a "fix" for PVP is to make build time of gateway units shorter than the cooldown of warp in is when warp gates are upgraded (maybe like 3/4th of warp CD). That way there's a defenders advantage and an actual use for being able to switch back and forth between warp gates.

Maybe its completely dumb though havent thought that much about it :p

IIRC, before Gateway/Warpgate cooldowns weren't paused when you switched between Warpgate/Gateways, allowing Protoss to get units out faster. Then Blizzard decided to patch it out -_-
Writerptrk
Eishi_Ki
Profile Joined April 2009
Korea (South)1667 Posts
September 09 2011 21:33 GMT
#25
On September 09 2011 02:34 yoshi_yoshi wrote:
How about putting the shield battery mechanic on Nexus energy? That would make it purely defensive, as well as making the Nexus more useful.


I feel like this didn't get enough attention. P's have always said there's a lack of choice in what you use Nexus energy for where OC's have three options and Queens have three options. A Shield Battery mechanic attached to the Nexus would provide a massive defenders advantage at very minimal risk of having it used offensively (unless you're a complete moron).
MCDayC
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom14464 Posts
September 09 2011 21:55 GMT
#26
I actually like the nexus idea. Give it a specific range, and then defensive play becomes very possible. Forge Fast Expand would become viable if you could just keep charging the photon cannons, or some variant of 1gate expand. Quick Nexus would have the same benefit as Hatch first for Zerg. It would significantly help early game.
VERY FRAGILE, LIKE A BABY PANDA EGG
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
September 09 2011 22:00 GMT
#27
Bear in mind that a unit being recharged by a shield battery in BW is stunned and cannot move or attack. Would you retain this?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Eishi_Ki
Profile Joined April 2009
Korea (South)1667 Posts
September 10 2011 00:10 GMT
#28
I wouldn't retain that aspect because of the dual nature of the energy, say you click a unit and then tell it to move to the nexus, it takes one 'charge' (example 10 energy) from the nexus and converts it to a hypothetical 30 shields. Click the nexus as many times as wanted or required.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-10 00:13:40
September 10 2011 00:13 GMT
#29
There were 2 additional ways to use the shield battery besides that, btw-- you could select the shield battery and cast its heal on a unit, or on an AREA and it would heal the units in that area. I wonder if something similar to the way a medivac works would be ideal, or something different?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Xyik
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Canada728 Posts
September 10 2011 00:14 GMT
#30
It's about as hard to build a shield battery close to someones base as it is to build pylons for a 4gate.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
September 10 2011 00:15 GMT
#31
Technically it's not, because you have to wait for the pylons to warp in. Also there's the whole stunning-the-unit-thats-being-healed thing.

I could see this interacting poorly with hardened shield though.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Count9
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China10928 Posts
September 10 2011 00:28 GMT
#32
Give pylons some sort of shield charge ability, theoretically there should always be more pylons in the defenders base/natural or ramp/natural than an enemy protoss could build. I wouldn't want this actually implemented in the real game, but in a UMS I'd like to play it =)
Geovu
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Estonia1344 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-10 00:30:29
September 10 2011 00:29 GMT
#33
I would love it to be like essentially a healer unit, like a combination of a Priest and a Moonwell in Warcraft III :D
(Would also love the Inner Fire spell and Mana Regeneration (!!! High Templar amulet replacement !!!!), but I doubt that would happen even if Blizzard was super awesome)

Would be totally sick, and make many Terran 1 base attacks (And Zerg ofc) much much more reasonable to hold with any build. Though EMP would rape it I'm afraid :S


On September 09 2011 02:21 Lomak wrote:
I don't understand how people think PvP is so wrong when ZvZ barely ever gets past baneling / speedling tech. Not complaining , but I see a lot more variance in PvP beyond 4 gate than I do in ZvZ past hatch tech, from a spectator standpoint.

Most ZvZs I watch get well past the 15 minute mark, and they very frequently reach hive tech, broodlords and ultras. I saw a 50 minute ZvZ on Destiny's stream a few days ago that looked more like a TvT with mass spine crawlers, infestor drops and roach drops everywhere, and I can say with relative confidence that over 100 infestors and 50 broodlords were made in that one game.

You're opinion is simply wrong, I'm sorry. If you decide to all in on hatch tech every game, that is your choice.
Aelonius
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Netherlands432 Posts
September 10 2011 02:39 GMT
#34
I don't get it why the whole metagame must change for one matchup, when other matchups will also suffer from it eventually. Right now the changes for PvP are getting better and better across the board. Lets play this patch out before we come running with extra things. I disagree with some changes, but untill we try them we have to wait.
''The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.''—Ronald Reagan
RoboBob
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States798 Posts
September 10 2011 03:31 GMT
#35
I dunno. I think you'd be just exchanging 4 gate for 3 gate blink stalker. I don't understand why you think the defender would get their shield battery up first. Fast proxy pylons means it could be warped in at the same time as the defender. It would have huge ramifications for other matchups as well, because unlike BW shields, SC2 shields don't take extra damage from everything.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
S2 Championship: Playoffs D2
SteadfastSC380
IndyStarCraft 213
BRAT_OK 97
EnkiAlexander 60
3DClanTV 49
IntoTheiNu 18
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 380
Clem_sc2 367
IndyStarCraft 213
BRAT_OK 97
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 47970
Bisu 1433
Jaedong 1126
firebathero 907
Mini 766
BeSt 651
Hyuk 454
ggaemo 222
Barracks 171
Hyun 135
[ Show more ]
Last 128
Pusan 113
hero 98
Mind 94
Mong 86
Movie 79
Leta 74
Free 70
PianO 64
sSak 63
Yoon 57
Sea.KH 44
ToSsGirL 39
soO 33
sas.Sziky 31
Backho 25
zelot 17
yabsab 12
SilentControl 11
Noble 7
NaDa 5
Beast 1
Shinee 0
Dota 2
Gorgc6093
qojqva2774
Dendi1128
XcaliburYe283
syndereN226
Fuzer 179
Counter-Strike
fl0m2833
ScreaM1612
zeus793
edward48
oskar1
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu420
Other Games
B2W.Neo4217
singsing2036
Hui .308
KnowMe159
SortOf144
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick789
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hinosc 28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota277
Other Games
• WagamamaTV238
Upcoming Events
Maestros of the Game
1h 15m
SHIN vs Creator
Astrea vs Lambo
Bunny vs SKillous
HeRoMaRinE vs TriGGeR
BSL Team Wars
4h 15m
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
BSL Team Wars
4h 15m
Team Dewalt vs Team Sziky
Afreeca Starleague
19h 15m
Soulkey vs BeSt
Snow vs Light
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs SHIN
MaNa vs MaxPax
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Astrea
Classic vs sOs
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
GuMiho vs Cham
ByuN vs TriGGeR
Cosmonarchy
5 days
TriGGeR vs YoungYakov
YoungYakov vs HonMonO
HonMonO vs TriGGeR
[BSL 2025] Weekly
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS1
WardiTV Summer 2025
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
Sisters' Call Cup
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
Skyesports Masters 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.