• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:28
CEST 15:28
KST 22:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1
StarCraft 2
General
How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Best crypto recovery experts in the world Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32599 users

Why would people ever invest in mutual fund?

Blogs > DarkwindHK
Post a Reply
Normal
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 10:00:15
December 15 2010 09:11 GMT
#1
I really find the idea of putting your money into mutual fund very stupid.

It is a known fact that most fund managers underperform the market benchmark (~average return). It is also a mathematical truth that 50% of all investor will perform worse than average. Adding the cost of management fee, there you get a less than average expected return.

When you have so many choice of ETFs with lower cost, which do not underperform or outperform; why people still ask in newspaper, forum and during lunchtime "what fund should I buy?" (Due to my previous job in mutual fund, a lot of people ask me.)

It is really hard to understand, when you will bargain for even $1 or $2 while buying food in wet market; but you can trust all your retirement savings in mutual fund?

99% of the people do not even know who is managing their money; do you even know the name of the fund manager? Sure I enjoy my time when I was in that industry, meeting analyst, company management, having lunch at 5 star hotel...all at the expense of my fund's investor. But do you really think meeting an analyst or the companies will improve investment performance?

I think picking the right fund and right manager is at least 10 times more difficult than picking a stock. And the fact that "past performance does not indicate future return" just show the futility of this approach.

There is only one true thing I learn from that industry:
Human is simply not created to predict future.

Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
Windrose
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada64 Posts
December 15 2010 09:21 GMT
#2
I think the majority of people aren't well versed in the world of business, including me, so usually something simple such as mutual funds is the way to go.

What would you suggest for other people to do with their investment money instead of mutual funds? (preferably something simple so I can understand too!)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
December 15 2010 09:26 GMT
#3
Just buy the index (buying the ETFs of S&P500, or indexes of China, Brazil....etc), at least you will not underperform.

The cost is so much lower....
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
Windrose
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada64 Posts
December 15 2010 09:39 GMT
#4
Hmm, I think a friend of mine told me about ETF and the S&P500. Is it pretty much safe and guaranteed for a positive net gain?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
December 15 2010 09:48 GMT
#5
Because people don't have time to worry about stocks, that's why they want an "expert" managing their funds. Most people don't know what to invest in, so they ask their co-workers, their relatives on what to invest in. At least it's a much better option that investing in stocks yourself. You live in Hong Kong, so you probably seen 20-30 seniors standing outside the stock broker watching the tv in hopes that the stocks they bought would go up. That seems like legalized gambling to me lol.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
SpiritoftheTunA
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States20903 Posts
December 15 2010 09:57 GMT
#6
diversification using indexes and well-picked mutual funds is generally a good way to minimize both risk and energy spent in allocating a longer-term portfolio
posting on liquid sites in current year
CaucasianAsian
Profile Blog Joined September 2005
Korea (South)11575 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 10:03:11
December 15 2010 10:03 GMT
#7
my uncles mutual fund has profited over 1200% in the past quarter. i think it's a good investment imo
Calendar@ Fish Server: `iOps]..Stark
Windrose
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada64 Posts
December 15 2010 10:04 GMT
#8
is it possible to make a living purely off investment?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
ejac
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States1195 Posts
December 15 2010 10:06 GMT
#9
Whenever you hire someone to do something for you, you are getting ripped off, basically by definition. People use mutual funds for the exact same reason someone would hire someone to paint their house, eat out, etc,. convenience or possibly a lack of understanding in the matter.
esq>n
geno
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1404 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 10:09:07
December 15 2010 10:08 GMT
#10
On December 15 2010 19:04 Windrose wrote:
is it possible to make a living purely off investment?

It is if you're good enough at it to start doing it for other people. Ask Warren Buffet!
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
December 15 2010 10:11 GMT
#11
Retirement plans in the US typically only offer a choice between different mutual funds with no ETF options. This isn't surprising considering that the retirement plans are managed by banks and the mutual funds are managed by banks. For my own money, I'd never use a mutual fund for exactly the reasons you stated. ETFs are diversified just as much as mutual funds and have better expected value.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 10:12:05
December 15 2010 10:11 GMT
#12
On December 15 2010 19:06 ejac wrote:
Whenever you hire someone to do something for you, you are getting ripped off, basically by definition. People use mutual funds for the exact same reason someone would hire someone to paint their house, eat out, etc,. convenience or possibly a lack of understanding in the matter.


Yes, but they overcharge by A LOT and there are alternatives with cheaper cost.... that is why I find it hard to understand.
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
BrTarolg
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United Kingdom3574 Posts
December 15 2010 12:04 GMT
#13
On December 15 2010 19:03 CaucasianAsian wrote:
my uncles mutual fund has profited over 1200% in the past quarter. i think it's a good investment imo


Sounds like either
a> a huge amount of luck involved
b> insider trading (lol)
c> a horrific abuse of overleveraging (refer to a>)

An extremely well run fund with a good trading strategy would be able to consistently return 20% a year, so obviously 1200% in a quarter, rather than suggesting a well run fun, suggests something awry has happened

There are many hedge funds out there which are worth investing into, as the main source of their income comes from a fee taken from their profits.
Of course, you would need at least 1-5m to join. Also, technicalities are involved i.e when everyone wrongly pulled out their money from hedge funds (good ones who knew the 2008 collapse was going to happen and were prepared for it), of course if you pull out all investor money at such a critical time you are going to lose money

Also, if you are going to invest, at least learn something about how markets work and are driven in general, what bits of news/reports you need to look out for, the basic fundamentals behind what you invest in etc.etc.

Could be worse, you could invest in a pension fund that tells you that they "performed amazingly" by losing 18% of everything because they cant beat a crashing market that lost 20% that year
Hsanrb
Profile Joined May 2010
United States46 Posts
December 15 2010 12:22 GMT
#14
The problem with ETF's is (I heard this on a CNBC interview in 08/09, its probably lost now... maybe it was on Fast Money) is that unlike an S&P index fund that rebalances once a year (don't exactly remember, think specifically when they shuffle in and out companies. Like how Netflix is replacing Eastman Kodak in the index) the ETF has to rebalance daily. Therefore you won't see the same % return if you compare the two with the EFT being significantly lower. Kind of like those who bought into gold ETF's won't get the same increase as the commodity in which the ETF is based on.

Unless you know exactly what your doing, your better off doing your investing through mutual funds. Even then you still have homework to do such as fund manager research, fund history/performance, etc. Good funds can change from great managers to average managers hence why you can't just leave it alone outside of putting money into them. If you spend a few hours a quarter keeping up with your investments you will do well. If you don't do your homework you'll fall behind and fail to match the index.

PS: Roughly 80% of all mutual funds fail to beat the S&P 500 index.
SlayerS_BunkiE
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada1707 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 12:28:28
December 15 2010 12:25 GMT
#15
ur title should've been different since you're not actually against pooled investing, just anti active investment management

anyways, i do agree that in most cases (especially in developed markets), it is very hard to consistently outperform the index after management fees. indexed funds are usually the best way to go.

this is not always the case though. i thought it was but there really are extremely good asset managers who can consistently beat the index by A LOT.

but as you said, finding that manager is harder than just picking random stocks from the index (which would probably yield a similar result if you ended up picking an "average" asset manager)

o, before i forget, i once attended this conference where i heard something really cool. it was an asset manager that specialized in using pure mathematics. they hire really quant guys that they claim were able to use purely historical data (no regard at all to expected/future returns) to construct a portfolio that will consistently outperform the index by a small margin. they claim that they can consistently produce an information ratio of >0.5. there are constraints though like how developed the market is. they need enough liquidity since the portfolio will be trading stocks everyday, which could get expensive real fast in a developing market.
iloveby.SlayerS_BunkiE[Shield]
Ipp
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States456 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 13:04:39
December 15 2010 13:03 GMT
#16
Mutual Funds are a safe long term investment. Picking individual stocks requires research and once you own the stock, you should follow the company to know if you need to sell. All this time researching will cost you time, which costs you money. If I spent 2 hours a week figuring out investment strategies, I would be down ~$50 a week in cash I could have earned if spent doing my expertise. That will add up to ~$200 a month which is ~$1200 a year, so unless the stock will net me an extra $1200, it is not worth it.

All that being said; I do invest in stocks because unlike many people, I have too much time and not enough to do. But the age people start investing is right around the time when they start settling down and getting married so a safe investment that requires no work is very attractive. By safe I mean not only will it net them money but mutual funds generally aren't as jagged as a regular stock; meaning they can will be in the green majority of the days.

TL;DR - Time is money, Time spent researching stocks costs money -- It's not always the smartest option to go stocks.
http://youtube.com/RageQuitTV
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
December 15 2010 15:09 GMT
#17
Seems that most people dun get the point that I think you should not buy stocks, but buy ETFs in the place of actively managed fund...

Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 16:15:13
December 15 2010 15:11 GMT
#18
On December 15 2010 21:25 SlayerS_BunkiE wrote:
ur title should've been different since you're not actually against pooled investing, just anti active investment management

anyways, i do agree that in most cases (especially in developed markets), it is very hard to consistently outperform the index after management fees. indexed funds are usually the best way to go.

this is not always the case though. i thought it was but there really are extremely good asset managers who can consistently beat the index by A LOT.

but as you said, finding that manager is harder than just picking random stocks from the index (which would probably yield a similar result if you ended up picking an "average" asset manager)

o, before i forget, i once attended this conference where i heard something really cool. it was an asset manager that specialized in using pure mathematics. they hire really quant guys that they claim were able to use purely historical data (no regard at all to expected/future returns) to construct a portfolio that will consistently outperform the index by a small margin. they claim that they can consistently produce an information ratio of >0.5. there are constraints though like how developed the market is. they need enough liquidity since the portfolio will be trading stocks everyday, which could get expensive real fast in a developing market.


I can do those models, I have tried over 100 factors, so I already know which one work best in Hong Kong. Of course you need to update them regularly since one factor will not work forever.

Some of the factors that tend to work are: P/E, earning momentum and medium term share price trend. You can try it yourself with excel, its not that hard. Simple does not mean bad.
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 15 2010 15:56 GMT
#19
On December 16 2010 00:11 DarkwindHK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 21:25 SlayerS_BunkiE wrote:
ur title should've been different since you're not actually against pooled investing, just anti active investment management

anyways, i do agree that in most cases (especially in developed markets), it is very hard to consistently outperform the index after management fees. indexed funds are usually the best way to go.

this is not always the case though. i thought it was but there really are extremely good asset managers who can consistently beat the index by A LOT.

but as you said, finding that manager is harder than just picking random stocks from the index (which would probably yield a similar result if you ended up picking an "average" asset manager)

o, before i forget, i once attended this conference where i heard something really cool. it was an asset manager that specialized in using pure mathematics. they hire really quant guys that they claim were able to use purely historical data (no regard at all to expected/future returns) to construct a portfolio that will consistently outperform the index by a small margin. they claim that they can consistently produce an information ratio of >0.5. there are constraints though like how developed the market is. they need enough liquidity since the portfolio will be trading stocks everyday, which could get expensive real fast in a developing market.


I can do those models, I have information over 1... I have tried over 100 factors, so I already know which one work best in Hong Kong. Of course you need to update them regularly since one factor will not work forever.

Some of the factors that tend to work are: P/E, earning momentum and medium term share price trend. You can try it yourself with excel, its not that hard. Simple does not mean bad.

Great, I didn't understand a thing you wrote. That's why I am invested mostly in mutual funds. That's why you go to a doctor instead of self-medicating. That's why you use an auto mechanic. That's why people call appliance repair companies.

How is this difficult to get?
Moderator
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 16:22:58
December 15 2010 16:17 GMT
#20
You do not need to know quant to invest. There is also no guarantee that they work anyways.



We cannot compare going to see a doctor and buying a mutual fund. Doctor is an expert in that field, and there are empirical proofs that they can help a patient.

However, there is no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy. In fact, fund managers regularly lose to astrologist and 8 year old girls in stock picking experiments.
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
Entropic
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada2837 Posts
December 15 2010 16:20 GMT
#21
Can't go wrong with ETFs
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 15 2010 16:38 GMT
#22
On December 16 2010 01:17 DarkwindHK wrote:
You do not need to know quant to invest. There is also no guarantee that they work anyways.



We cannot compare going to see a doctor and buying a mutual fund. Doctor is an expert in that field, and there are empirical proofs that they can help a patient.

However, there is no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy. In fact, fund managers regularly lose to astrologist and 8 year old girls in stock picking experiments.

Hmm that's fair and accurate, I never thought about it like that.
Moderator
bonifaceviii
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2890 Posts
December 15 2010 16:42 GMT
#23
Mutual fund managers are experts at marketing their fund, that's about it.
Stay a while and listen || http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=354018
metaphoR
Profile Joined May 2010
United States199 Posts
December 15 2010 16:46 GMT
#24
On December 16 2010 01:17 DarkwindHK wrote:
You do not need to know quant to invest. There is also no guarantee that they work anyways.



We cannot compare going to see a doctor and buying a mutual fund. Doctor is an expert in that field, and there are empirical proofs that they can help a patient.

However, there is no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy. In fact, fund managers regularly lose to astrologist and 8 year old girls in stock picking experiments.


do you have any links for this? this is pretty interesting and it reminds me of how the gold fish or whatever it was could pick the fifa world cup winners better than "qualified" people who knew a lot about the teams and stats etc
XCLuSive
Profile Joined November 2009
Canada121 Posts
December 15 2010 17:14 GMT
#25
=( For every article/person I read and learn from saying that Mutual Funds are awesome and safe and easy, I come across another article/person that says it's bad.

I mean.. SERIOUSLY, why's it so complicated. So you're saying ETF and S&P500 Index > Mutual Funds?

Care to explain how it works, and what makes it different?
nothing less than legendary
Glacierz
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1244 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 17:33:08
December 15 2010 17:24 GMT
#26
On December 15 2010 18:11 DarkwindHK wrote:
I think picking the right fund and right manager is at least 10 times more difficult than picking a stock. And the fact that "past performance does not indicate future return" just show the futility of this approach.


Actually if you worked long enough in the investment industry you will find that the opposite is true, but both are very difficult.

Mutual fund "NET OF FEES" tend to underperform the average benchmark, but it will not be fair to average all mutual funds into a single pool. You can always find managers that outperform somewhat consistently over time. If they are truly random, then you expect 50% to outperform and 50% to under perform in year 1, and 25% would have out performed in 2 consecutive years statistically speaking. However, research shows that somewhat over 33% outperforms 2 consecutive years, which means there is value in investing in mutual fund if you are able to pick the right ones.
Glacierz
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1244 Posts
December 15 2010 17:37 GMT
#27
I have to agree that you shouldn't invest in mutual funds if you don't want to do some research. ETF is much more efficient if you are just trying to ride the beta.
bonifaceviii
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2890 Posts
December 15 2010 17:42 GMT
#28
All the talent in fund management are in hedge funds. Mutual funds are for risk-averse lay people, which means they have a place, but it's not in performance.
Stay a while and listen || http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=354018
Glacierz
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1244 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 17:53:11
December 15 2010 17:52 GMT
#29
On December 16 2010 02:42 bonifaceviii wrote:
All the talent in fund management are in hedge funds. Mutual funds are for risk-averse lay people, which means they have a place, but it's not in performance.


Not entirely true, there are mutual funds that employs significant leverage and active management, but you are right about hedge funds. 90% of people who know what they are doing are probably in Hedge Funds
azndsh
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States4447 Posts
December 15 2010 17:54 GMT
#30
because people don't know better.
sooch
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada299 Posts
December 15 2010 18:02 GMT
#31
On December 15 2010 18:11 DarkwindHK wrote:
It is also a mathematical truth that 50% of all investor will perform worse than average.

herp derp statistics...

I don't see anything wrong with people paying for a service that they don't have time to learn to do themselves...I mean sure you could paint your own garage door but you have to go out and research what paints are good for the material your garage door is made of, whether or not they're weather resistant, get all the supplies you require for painting together (remember, painting isn't a thing you do regularly), and then actually invest the time needed to do the painting. It's much easier to have someone do it for you, even if they might do a job slightly below your standards if you had done the entire thing yourself you've saved yourself a lot of time and headaches.

User was warned for this post
BrTarolg
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United Kingdom3574 Posts
December 15 2010 18:06 GMT
#32
Well, imo mutual funds and pension funds suck because they cant use complex products to hedge themselves against a falling market

If you're going to invest, learn to do it yourself or have enough money to buy into a hedge fund.

For those who are smart enough to play poker and play starcraft, really you should be smart enough to do your own research to learn how to invest - its a lot of fun, its interesting, and if you don't find it interesting then you shouldn't be investing anyway.
The fundamentals (reading the ISM when it comes out for eg) are relatively straight forward and understanding basic fundas of a stock (such as what P/E means etc.) is something you can just teach yourself and research on the internet

At the very worst, stick all your money in the hang seng and you'll be fine
Ramiel
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1220 Posts
December 15 2010 18:33 GMT
#33
Depending on the type of mutual fund you are investing in, high risk or low risk- they can both be a great way to diversify your assets, and the best part is- other people do it for you the low risk types are very popular becuase most of these types of mutual funds while having a marginal gain, are very safe and at least do increase some small percent quarter to quarter.
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
Insanious
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada1251 Posts
December 15 2010 19:09 GMT
#34
Mutual funds are there for people that want more than the interest their bank will give them... its for people that are like "I have $10,000 sitting in my chequing account wonder what I should do with it?"

In Canada, a lot of people put their money into Canada Savings Bonds... but the returns on those are so terrible it makes me sad/ So people want to put their money into something for like 30 years that makes a little more... they want to do 0 work, but want to make some interest since they have money lying around.

This is what they are for, there are few things you can throw your money into for 10,20,30 years and make safe money that you have to do 0 work on than mutual funds... most other things you jump from one thing to another when the markets start going south...
If you want to help me out... http://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4b82744b816d3
kzn
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1218 Posts
December 15 2010 23:02 GMT
#35
On December 16 2010 03:02 sooch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 18:11 DarkwindHK wrote:
It is also a mathematical truth that 50% of all investor will perform worse than average.

herp derp statistics...

I don't see anything wrong with people paying for a service that they don't have time to learn to do themselves...I mean sure you could paint your own garage door but you have to go out and research what paints are good for the material your garage door is made of, whether or not they're weather resistant, get all the supplies you require for painting together (remember, painting isn't a thing you do regularly), and then actually invest the time needed to do the painting. It's much easier to have someone do it for you, even if they might do a job slightly below your standards if you had done the entire thing yourself you've saved yourself a lot of time and headaches.


The point is not that pooled investing is a bad idea, the point is that actively managed funds consistently perform worse than market average.

There are 3 funds that have outperformed the market over the last 3 decades, and each one owes much of that to one incredibly trade they made rather than a number of good trades. The other funds that outperform are invariably private funds that you cannot get into unless you're working for the right people.

If you're just looking to invest in stocks, you would be far better in almost all cases to invest in an index fund, not a mutual fund.
Like a G6
gen.Sun
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States539 Posts
December 15 2010 23:38 GMT
#36
I'm so amused. In programmming this is called an inner platform effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner-platform_effect
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
December 16 2010 01:29 GMT
#37
On December 16 2010 02:14 XCLuSive wrote:
=( For every article/person I read and learn from saying that Mutual Funds are awesome and safe and easy, I come across another article/person that says it's bad.

I mean.. SERIOUSLY, why's it so complicated. So you're saying ETF and S&P500 Index > Mutual Funds?

Care to explain how it works, and what makes it different?


They are not better, but they are CHEAPER in cost.

Its the other way around, mutual funds does not necessarily give better return than indexes. However, you know for sure they cost more.

Essentially, you are going to pay more for sure to get a chance of getting better return, together with a chance to get disastrous return.
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
DarkwindHK
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong343 Posts
December 16 2010 01:45 GMT
#38
On December 16 2010 01:46 metaphoR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2010 01:17 DarkwindHK wrote:
You do not need to know quant to invest. There is also no guarantee that they work anyways.



We cannot compare going to see a doctor and buying a mutual fund. Doctor is an expert in that field, and there are empirical proofs that they can help a patient.

However, there is no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy. In fact, fund managers regularly lose to astrologist and 8 year old girls in stock picking experiments.


do you have any links for this? this is pretty interesting and it reminds me of how the gold fish or whatever it was could pick the fifa world cup winners better than "qualified" people who knew a lot about the teams and stats etc


No link, but you can find this in TIMES of London, March 2002. Libraries may have it.

For the "no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy"; well... I cann show the "lack of" evident, because they do not exist.

You can understand it conceptually instead:

A professional gambler (investor) going to a casino to compete with the gambler (investor) from all over the world. Other investors include old ladies, little boy, astrologer, dice thrower, starcraft players....etc

However, in this casino, the chance of winning is not known by the gamblers, in fact, the chance of winning is not a constant while the reward is also an unknown. It is in this environment the profession gambler need to compete against other professional gamblers and also...the little girl.
Too bad it is not his lucky day, and he got the wrong stock and lose in the casino.

No amount of experience in investing will get you prepared for events like 1) Apple Inc release a new product and it doesn't sell/sell very well ; 2) Korean War 2.0.

Even if you know for certain iPhone 5 or Starcraft 3 will has exactly 61.257% chance of selling like hot cake and Korean War will happen with a chance of 1.024%, how can you translate that into investment strategy? What if the other 38.743% part and the Korean war 2.0 is what actually happened? (I guess you will not be the star analyst this year!)

Addition to that, unexpected events (like earthquake, flood) has much larger effects than expected events. And unexpected events...are really unexpected. (Fund manager are also human, so they did not expect it.)
Dont be too humble, you are not that great.
decafchicken
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States20009 Posts
December 16 2010 01:58 GMT
#39
On December 16 2010 00:11 DarkwindHK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 21:25 SlayerS_BunkiE wrote:
ur title should've been different since you're not actually against pooled investing, just anti active investment management

anyways, i do agree that in most cases (especially in developed markets), it is very hard to consistently outperform the index after management fees. indexed funds are usually the best way to go.

this is not always the case though. i thought it was but there really are extremely good asset managers who can consistently beat the index by A LOT.

but as you said, finding that manager is harder than just picking random stocks from the index (which would probably yield a similar result if you ended up picking an "average" asset manager)

o, before i forget, i once attended this conference where i heard something really cool. it was an asset manager that specialized in using pure mathematics. they hire really quant guys that they claim were able to use purely historical data (no regard at all to expected/future returns) to construct a portfolio that will consistently outperform the index by a small margin. they claim that they can consistently produce an information ratio of >0.5. there are constraints though like how developed the market is. they need enough liquidity since the portfolio will be trading stocks everyday, which could get expensive real fast in a developing market.


I can do those models, I have tried over 100 factors, so I already know which one work best in Hong Kong. Of course you need to update them regularly since one factor will not work forever.

Some of the factors that tend to work are: P/E, earning momentum and medium term share price trend. You can try it yourself with excel, its not that hard. Simple does not mean bad.


You mean people actually use that shit i learned in my finance class? :D
how reasonable is it to eat off wood instead of your tummy?
Steveh
Profile Joined October 2009
United States112 Posts
December 16 2010 04:03 GMT
#40
the issues you bring up are nothing new in the financial world; its impossible to predict the future

'The Black Swan' is a great book for anyone who finds this thread's contents interesting

someone already accurately pointed out mutual vs hedge fund differences. no need to state it again.

some resolutions to the OP's problems are: diversification, money management, max sector risks, max transaction risks, unbiased to either the long or short side, simple and robust systems.

these parameters are found more with indifferent hedge fund managerial systems as opposed to buy and hold mutual fund managers.

investing means you assume the unknown risks and try your best to ameliorate their loss of equity pain when they arrive.





T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
December 16 2010 07:05 GMT
#41
On December 16 2010 01:17 DarkwindHK wrote:


However, there is no evident showing that wealth managers can do better than any average guy. In fact, fund managers regularly lose to astrologist and 8 year old girls in stock picking experiments.



Dont underestimate the power of astrology :D

I completely agree with what you are saying but unfortunately in my country we have compulsory superannuation.
rkffhk
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
474 Posts
December 16 2010 16:48 GMT
#42
On December 15 2010 19:06 ejac wrote:
Whenever you hire someone to do something for you, you are getting ripped off, basically by definition.

So THAT'S why unemployment is so high!
"Did not realize gold was such an important threshold for people, I guess I honestly take it for granted that if people practice / invest enough time into this game then they would make diamond in no time." ~Caihead
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .323
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34930
Calm 7399
Rain 4610
Horang2 1687
EffOrt 902
Nal_rA 554
Stork 443
BeSt 330
Mini 265
Last 149
[ Show more ]
ZerO 122
Pusan 120
hero 118
sas.Sziky 81
sSak 78
Sea.KH 65
Hyun 59
Shinee 48
ToSsGirL 38
Killer 37
Movie 25
Aegong 23
Icarus 20
Noble 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
SilentControl 7
Hm[arnc] 5
ivOry 4
Dota 2
qojqva2206
XcaliburYe473
Fuzer 242
Counter-Strike
allub355
edward182
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King119
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor391
Other Games
singsing2296
B2W.Neo1441
crisheroes460
C9.Mang0443
Happy321
XaKoH 119
Rex67
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream15351
Other Games
gamesdonequick759
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 103
• Adnapsc2 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2614
• WagamamaTV508
League of Legends
• Jankos3460
• Stunt484
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Qualifier
2h 32m
BSL: ProLeague
4h 32m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
10h 32m
Wardi Open
21h 32m
Replay Cast
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
SC Evo League
5 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.