• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:16
CEST 23:16
KST 06:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic2Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Wizard Hilton Cybertech Crypto Recovery: Proven Re
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 28782 users

Gamers

Blogs > dignity
Post a Reply
Normal
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
December 14 2010 19:49 GMT
#1
I am currently in a game development program in university, and I happened to take a course appropriately named "Business of Gaming". My professor in this course owns his own gaming company so he is quite knowledgeable in this field. Last week was our last lecture with him, and since he did not have anything left to teach us, he decided to do a Q&A session with us. Some of the questions asked and answers given were irrelevant to the majority of you, but there was one question that I asked which gave me really thought provoking answer which I would like to share.

The question I asked him was "How do you think society views gamers?". This is a question that was asked many times on TL but this was the first time I got such a response. His response goes as follows (paraphrasing):

Society is much more accepting of gamers today definitely. We aren't viewed so much as just lazy dropouts that live in our mother's basements. That being said, there is a kind of backlash effect going on right now. For example, a gamer, when asked if he is a gamer, might say "Yes, I am a gamer, BUT I am not like THOSE type of gamers".

The idea that he was trying to show us was basically that gamers, although more accepted, now have this kind of double standard. People are now more willing to tell others that they play games, but they do not want to associate themselves with their hardcore counterparts, and the hardcore gamers do not want to associate themselves with the casual gamers, causing a divide in the gaming community.

The reality is that every single person today is a gamer. Whether you are playing angry birds on your iPhone, or playing Starcraft on your PC. It doesn't matter what game you play, you are still a gamer. We all play games because we love to play games.

Going a bit more in depth into the gaming industry, there are games that actually appeal to both the casual and the hardcore. The most popular games in the world, like Sonic or even Mario. These games did something right, in the sense that the hardcore gamers would want to get every single coin and be the perfectionist that they are, while the casual gamers just wanted to go through the level without losing. These type of games prove that we are all just gamers, and we shouldn't disassociate ourselves from our own community.

I think that the day of which when gamers can truly be accepted by society would come only when we accept ourselves for who we are. It does not matter what game you play, or how well you play it, as long as you share the same love for games. There will be a day when gamers can talk to one another and say "Oh yeah I am a(n) FPS/RTS/RPG gamer".

As Day[9] once said, "I play Starcraft, and I am proud that I am a Starcraft player". There will come a day when all gamers can stand together and say, We play games, and we are proud that we are gamers.

Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 14 2010 19:59 GMT
#2
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?
Moderator
PaPaLung
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada51 Posts
December 14 2010 20:01 GMT
#3
To me the self title gamer states that the person spends the majority of their free time playing video games as opposed to other things like sports.
______ is OP and you would have lost so bad if i would have ________ , _______ing noob
Comeh
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States18918 Posts
December 14 2010 20:03 GMT
#4
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".
ヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノDELETE ICEFROGヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 14 2010 20:04 GMT
#5
On December 15 2010 05:01 PaPaLung wrote:
To me the self title gamer states that the person spends the majority of their free time playing video games as opposed to other things like sports.

That's my point. Everyone does something with the majority of their free time. You don't see groups of people discussing the ins and outsof being cast by society as "readers", "sewers", "TV watchers", "shoppers", "talkers", "cooks", etc. These are just normal people. Oh and they have a hobby.
Moderator
crayhasissues
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States682 Posts
December 14 2010 20:04 GMT
#6
I agree Chill. I am a gamer, but that is not the only thing I identify myself as being. And to OP, I think that maybe we just not want to be embarrassed to claim to be gamers, and maybe not so much proud of it.
twitch.tv/crayhasissues ||| @crayhasissues on twitter ||| Dota 2 Streamer that loves to help new players!
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 14 2010 20:06 GMT
#7
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.
Moderator
emperorchampion
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada9496 Posts
December 14 2010 20:08 GMT
#8
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?


Very good point, I really don't understand it personally. I mean if someone asks if I play Starcraft, I'm not gonna deny it. But this doesn't mean my life revolves around gaming.
TRUEESPORTS || your days as a respected member of team liquid are over
Comeh
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States18918 Posts
December 14 2010 20:08 GMT
#9
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Well, I would guess that gamers value their hobby more than the normal hobby as well - playing games often bring forth very strong feelings of accomplishment, interaction, absorption, etc, and considering the amount of time gamers put into it, they want to feel as though there is something more to it then just playing a video game. This is compounded by the development of competitive gaming, though this becomes another discussion entirely.
ヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノDELETE ICEFROGヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:12:05
December 14 2010 20:09 GMT
#10
By definition, a gamer is a person who plays games. As such, I am going by that definition that anyone who plays games is a gamer.

Also, why is it embarrassing to admit you play games? Literally everyone today plays games to some extent.
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:13:39
December 14 2010 20:11 GMT
#11
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.


there are many people that call themselves a football player or whatever. "Fanatic" book readers call themselves "book worms" i guess (at least they do in germany). So yeah, everyone does that.

What i think is true on your statement however, chill, is, that the share of people giving themselves a name for what they are doing still depends on how "abnormal" their thing is. Like, reading books is considered the most normal thing in the world, thus not that many people fell the "need" to call themselves a special name for that. But gaming was just until recently still considered a very weird thing, so "gamers" still quite often call themselves just that.
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 14 2010 20:12 GMT
#12
On December 15 2010 05:09 dignity wrote:
By definition, a gamer is a person who plays games.

As such, I am going by that definition that anyone who plays games is a gamer.

I think this is a pretty vanilla response to my comments. I expected a little more. If you want to dig deep enough, your definition applies to 95% of modern people.
Moderator
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
December 14 2010 20:17 GMT
#13
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.
Scorcher2k
Profile Joined November 2009
United States802 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:20:26
December 14 2010 20:19 GMT
#14
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:23:34
December 14 2010 20:22 GMT
#15
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?


I think a big part of it is because for someone identifying themselves as a gamer it is cultural just as much as it is a hobby.

To make an example look at Punk rock (more so back when it was new and not now). Listening to music is just a hobby/past time/entertainment, but people who were punk would identify themselves as such because it was also a cultural experience to them. You can easily say the same about skaters, potheads, and a bunch of other 'groups'. Sometimes a hobby is used as the central identifier for a type of culture. I don't see a gamer as an identifier for anyone who plays games, I see it as an identifier for someone who is involved with a particular culture that has a common ground of video games.
Logo
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
December 14 2010 20:23 GMT
#16
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

Good examples.
Moderator
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
December 14 2010 20:25 GMT
#17
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:29:04
December 14 2010 20:28 GMT
#18
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


I don't really follow your logic or thought process through all of that. I probably don't agree with your conclusions, but I have noticed that some of the most... um imposing I guess is the right word... people who identify themselves as gamers seem to have very little gaming skills and/or play very little video games and instead tend to just enjoy more of the humor, stories, and culture of the games they do play. I noticed this a ton when I was at Pax East.
Logo
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32046 Posts
December 14 2010 20:29 GMT
#19
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?


I agree. I have never understood the fascination with forging an identity around a hobby.

PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
-Frog-
Profile Joined February 2009
United States514 Posts
December 14 2010 20:31 GMT
#20
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


You are far too wrapped up in what it means to be a "real gamer." Who cares if someone says they are a gamer and only plays farmville for an hour a day? Is that really a huge problem that we need to address? Do hardcore gamers really get furious when they hear a casual gamer talk about playing games?
powered by coffee, driven by hate.
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
December 14 2010 20:36 GMT
#21
On December 15 2010 05:31 -Frog- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


You are far too wrapped up in what it means to be a "real gamer." Who cares if someone says they are a gamer and only plays farmville for an hour a day? Is that really a huge problem that we need to address? Do hardcore gamers really get furious when they hear a casual gamer talk about playing games?


It's not a problem at all. It just denies the existence of the gamer subculture. In order to have a subculture, there must be minimum standards. That is why people can call themselves musicians or dancer, solely because there is a requirement. Being a gamer does not carry any standards, so, the subculture does not exist. The OP was talking about gamers being more accepted in society. That cannot be possible if there wasn't the gamer subculture in the first place.
Scorcher2k
Profile Joined November 2009
United States802 Posts
December 14 2010 20:38 GMT
#22
On December 15 2010 05:31 -Frog- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


You are far too wrapped up in what it means to be a "real gamer." Who cares if someone says they are a gamer and only plays farmville for an hour a day? Is that really a huge problem that we need to address? Do hardcore gamers really get furious when they hear a casual gamer talk about playing games?

Some definitely do. Then again, this happens with really anything...
LittLeD
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden7973 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:39:31
December 14 2010 20:38 GMT
#23
http://www.cracked.com/article_18571_5-reasons-its-still-not-cool-to-admit-youre-gamer.html

Related article
I consider myself a gamer though. And im not ashamed of myself for doing so.
Its just an easier way to describe what im passionate about.
☆Grubby ☆| Tod|DeMusliM|ThorZaiN|SaSe|Moon|Mana| ☆HerO ☆
-Frog-
Profile Joined February 2009
United States514 Posts
December 14 2010 20:40 GMT
#24
On December 15 2010 05:36 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:31 -Frog- wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


You are far too wrapped up in what it means to be a "real gamer." Who cares if someone says they are a gamer and only plays farmville for an hour a day? Is that really a huge problem that we need to address? Do hardcore gamers really get furious when they hear a casual gamer talk about playing games?


It's not a problem at all. It just denies the existence of the gamer subculture. In order to have a subculture, there must be minimum standards. That is why people can call themselves musicians or dancer, solely because there is a requirement. Being a gamer does not carry any standards, so, the subculture does not exist. The OP was talking about gamers being more accepted in society. That cannot be possible if there wasn't the gamer subculture in the first place.


I don't think that you can deny the existence of a subculture just because some people who don't belong to said subculture claim that they do. We could be talking about any subculture you want and you would find people who aren't actually a part of it that claim they are - that doesn't mean the subculture doesn't exist.
powered by coffee, driven by hate.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
December 14 2010 20:44 GMT
#25
On December 15 2010 05:40 -Frog- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:36 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:31 -Frog- wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:25 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...


Sorry, my paragraph was a bit confusing. I'll try to summarize it.

Basically, people who call themselves gamers don't play a lot of video games, which discourages the very small population of real gamers from calling themselves gamers. Therefore the subculture of being a gamer does not exist.


You are far too wrapped up in what it means to be a "real gamer." Who cares if someone says they are a gamer and only plays farmville for an hour a day? Is that really a huge problem that we need to address? Do hardcore gamers really get furious when they hear a casual gamer talk about playing games?


It's not a problem at all. It just denies the existence of the gamer subculture. In order to have a subculture, there must be minimum standards. That is why people can call themselves musicians or dancer, solely because there is a requirement. Being a gamer does not carry any standards, so, the subculture does not exist. The OP was talking about gamers being more accepted in society. That cannot be possible if there wasn't the gamer subculture in the first place.


I don't think that you can deny the existence of a subculture just because some people who don't belong to said subculture claim that they do. We could be talking about any subculture you want and you would find people who aren't actually a part of it that claim they are - that doesn't mean the subculture doesn't exist.


Considering things like PAX, Teamliquid, and community driven gaming sites exist, denying that there is a gaming related culture is like denying evolution.
Logo
evanthebouncy!
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United States12796 Posts
December 14 2010 20:55 GMT
#26
So if anyone ask me, I'd say:
I play starcraft 1 hour a day to keep myself fresh.

I hope that's okay
Life is run, it is dance, it is fast, passionate and BAM!, you dance and sing and booze while you can for now is the time and time is mine. Smile and laugh when still can for now is the time and soon you die!
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
December 14 2010 20:55 GMT
#27
Frog pretty much summed up my whole point in one paragraph. It doesn't matter if you just play farmville for an hour a week, that does not mean you are not a gamer. Casual gamers are still gamers, as much as the hardcore are.

Just because you play hockey at the most amateur of levels does not mean you are not a hockey player.
Scarecrow
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Korea (South)9172 Posts
December 14 2010 20:57 GMT
#28
To me a gamer is someone who prioritizes gaming over all else. Some might classify themselves as a student, or a musician as that is their main occupation in life at the time. I've considered myself a gamer for years now. Pure Pwnage and Jeremy also had alot to do with it.
Yhamm is the god of predictions
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
December 14 2010 21:05 GMT
#29
On December 15 2010 05:57 Scarecrow wrote:
To me a gamer is someone who prioritizes gaming over all else. Some might classify themselves as a student, or a musician as that is their main occupation in life at the time. I've considered myself a gamer for years now. Pure Pwnage and Jeremy also had alot to do with it.


I would have to disagree with this view.

I do not prioritize playing games as the highest priority, but I would still be considered a gamer by friends and family. The reason being is because I play games. Even if someone just plays iPhone games, they are still gamers, even if they might not classify themselves as such. The creators of iPhone games are still game developers.
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
December 14 2010 21:05 GMT
#30
Though gaming is becoming more and more "accepted", I think there is still some stigma behind it for the population. If anything, casual gaming is becoming more accepted while the sub-culture of competitive gaming is still something that's odd to people. As long as their's some separation from social norm, I think the term "gamer" will still be around no matter who agrees with it or not.

It's also a great term for people trying to market stuff. "Gamer" drink, "gamer" food, "gamer" clothing, etc.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 21:15:42
December 14 2010 21:14 GMT
#31
On December 15 2010 05:55 dignity wrote:
Frog pretty much summed up my whole point in one paragraph. It doesn't matter if you just play farmville for an hour a week, that does not mean you are not a gamer. Casual gamers are still gamers, as much as the hardcore are.

Just because you play hockey at the most amateur of levels does not mean you are not a hockey player.


Well the word gamer is a bit different because it's something that carries a bit of a double meaning. The term "Hockey Player" is really only ever used as "one who plays Hockey Games". Words like Gamer or Skater have more contexts. I could use the term skater to describe a 12 year old kid riding around on his first ever skateboard as he is "a person who skateboards", but the word is often used more to describe someone who skates AND is part of a certain culture. When you call someone a skater out of context people are generally going to assume they are part of the 'skateboarding culture'. When you call someone a gamer people are likewise going to generally assume you are referring to someone who is a part of the 'gaming culture' (or in this case just someone who plays a TON of video games as that's as far as some people seem to take the word).

As for you being considered a gamer even though it's not your priority, is it because you exhibit or are associated with several characteristics thought to be common among gaming culture/stereotypes? Chances are if you're posting on TL the answer is yes.
Logo
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 22:29:40
December 14 2010 22:28 GMT
#32
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...

did you really just compare dancers and musicians to "gamers"?
merriam-webster defines a gamer as : a person who plays games; especially : a person who regularly plays computer or video games

the average people who call themselves "gamers" play easy video games to pass time. Games these days are designed so that virtually anyone can pickup the game and play..usually to its full extent. There is no hours of practice daily to become a gamer, there arent public classes and private lessons to become a gamer, and nobody goes to watch "gamers" perform in front of an audience. There are these things for progamers, but that's a different word.
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
VonLego
Profile Joined June 2010
United States519 Posts
December 14 2010 22:57 GMT
#33
On December 15 2010 05:01 PaPaLung wrote:
To me the self title gamer states that the person spends the majority of their free time playing video games as opposed to other things like sports.


Yes but how often does an adult actually play sports? Whenever an adult mentions that they love sports, 9/10 times it is watching sports. Hell I actually play at least a league or two a year (usually softball) which is much more than most "sport fans."

Do folks who follow sports, or even play sports for recreation identify themselves on a personal level with said activities? Likely not, but it happens. Do I play video games? Of course, but video games aren't me in any more of a way that the dude sitting in front of the TV on game night is a part of him. Sure there are folks who have their identity firmly rooted as a "gamer," but most of the time that is an unhealthy level of personal identification. The 15 year old who played CoD for 9 hours a day on his xbox during the summer, the full time WoW raider/pvper, and the occasional mass gamer of SC2 probably fall into said category. "Professional" gamers obviously fall into a special category in that they are able to produce entertainment for the masses and "sell" that product.

Unfortunately that is one of the things that makes being a professional gamer so hard (or so I would assume, I obviously haven't done it). Making the jump from having fun to being top 100 in the world is ridiculous and requires a huge commitment and risks "wasting" valuable time you could have spent in a "productive" way-- thus the stigma of professional gaming. It's almost like being a poker pro in that if you make it everyone cheers for you, but if you fail society thinks you're scum.
kainzero
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States5211 Posts
December 14 2010 23:27 GMT
#34
On December 15 2010 04:49 dignity wrote:
Going a bit more in depth into the gaming industry, there are games that actually appeal to both the casual and the hardcore. The most popular games in the world, like Sonic or even Mario. These games did something right, in the sense that the hardcore gamers would want to get every single coin and be the perfectionist that they are, while the casual gamers just wanted to go through the level without losing. These type of games prove that we are all just gamers, and we shouldn't disassociate ourselves from our own community.

I think that the day of which when gamers can truly be accepted by society would come only when we accept ourselves for who we are. It does not matter what game you play, or how well you play it, as long as you share the same love for games. There will be a day when gamers can talk to one another and say "Oh yeah I am a(n) FPS/RTS/RPG gamer".

I think the word "gamer" is too general.

For example, let's say someone says "I like to watch TV." Okay, cool.
Now then, someone else says "I like to watch Star Trek." or "I like to watch reality shows." or "I like to watch sports." They're all different people but there's probably some sort of backlash within each group towards another group.

Should they all drop it just to say that "We're all avid TV watchers."?

As for society's concern, I can freely state that I play games with no fear. But that's as interesting as saying I watch movies, collect things, play sports. It's not specific enough to be interesting at all. Generally if someone asks, I'll tell them specifically which games I play. It's a bit weird for them to be all lumped in into one genre of "gamer."

Even within a game, there's different kinds of players. If I told you I was a Starcraft player... "So... you play BGH? UMS? Fastest? Or are you like one of those Korean players?" And each group will have a different outlook on the other groups, whether it's positive or negative. Does that mean other gamers will look down on Starcraft gamers, because they aren't unified?


LittLeD
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden7973 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 01:02:27
December 15 2010 00:01 GMT
#35
On December 15 2010 07:28 Zelniq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:19 Scorcher2k wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:06 Chill wrote:
On December 15 2010 05:03 Comeh wrote:
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?

Well, I think its sort of the same reason that someone that is a really big football player might consider himself a football player. The same can be said of many hobbies - people often define themselves on said hobbies. Because gaming is a hobby that usually takes up a lot of peoples' free time that they enjoy, it seems natural to describe themselves as "one who games", or easier "a gamer".

I think being an athlete goes above and beyond a hobby. But you still see gamers define themselves by their hobby. I can't think of anyone else who does this besides gamers. It's a little strange.

Dancers, musicians, and many other people definitely do define themselves as such. I think people want to define themselves as what they are passionate about. So what if you work whatever job, collect baseball cards, etc... You consider yourself a gamer because it is your passion just as the dancer, musician, etc would.

On December 15 2010 05:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
I have a high disrespect for gamers, not because they spend most their time playing video games, but because they don't. Most self-proclaimed gamers aren't actual gamers. They are a regular person who happens to play COD for a few hours a week and believes that it's a real skill set. Playing video games isn't an occupation to them, it isn't even a hobby most of the time. It's just something they do to pass the time, and then they get back to their normal lives. 'Gamers' are an insult to real gamers. There are people who dedicate their existence to playing video games even non-professionally. These people do not usually call themselves gamers and I can see why. Personally, I am not a real gamer, and I am not a 'gamer' either. I am someone who plays video games for 8+ hours a day, and I will try to be a 'gamer' until the standard for being a gamer requires you to actually play video games.

I have no idea wtf you just said...

did you really just compare dancers and musicians to "gamers"?
merriam-webster defines a gamer as : a person who plays games; especially : a person who regularly plays computer or video games

the average people who call themselves "gamers" play easy video games to pass time. Games these days are designed so that virtually anyone can pickup the game and play..usually to its full extent. There is no hours of practice daily to become a gamer, there arent public classes and private lessons to become a gamer, and nobody goes to watch "gamers" perform in front of an audience. There are these things for progamers, but that's a different word.

Dancing and composing music can be done on an amateur level as well, without much practise and just as a time-passer (A hobby).
I really dont see the problem here. You're passionate about gaming -> Gamer.
You're passionate about dancing - > Dancer (Lets call professional dancers PROdancers)
You're passionate about collecting stuff -> collecter? Sure this isnt really used regulary, but I find it convenient that I can sum up my passion in a simple word, that still has a lot of weight to it when you explain it for someone.
☆Grubby ☆| Tod|DeMusliM|ThorZaiN|SaSe|Moon|Mana| ☆HerO ☆
PaPaLung
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada51 Posts
December 15 2010 00:35 GMT
#36
I think its more of a word thing, I mean if you asked some pro football player if he was a gamer, and he did play his xbox 360 once in a while he might say yes. Does this make him not a "real gamer" because he spends more time playing football. NO.
______ is OP and you would have lost so bad if i would have ________ , _______ing noob
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19027 Posts
December 15 2010 00:41 GMT
#37
I'm a gamer.
And a musician.
And a programmer.
And an editor.
And a reader.
And a writer.
And a cook.
And a scientist.

Why do I have to pick just one? There's negative stigmas attached to everything. Don't let it get to you. There's also different levels to everything. Why do we even need to argue about these this? Let's face it, if we're serious enough to be TL regulars, we're gamers, whether we use the term or not. This does not me we are only gamers.
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 00:53:28
December 15 2010 00:50 GMT
#38
On December 15 2010 05:04 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 05:01 PaPaLung wrote:
To me the self title gamer states that the person spends the majority of their free time playing video games as opposed to other things like sports.

That's my point. Everyone does something with the majority of their free time. You don't see groups of people discussing the ins and outsof being cast by society as "readers", "sewers", "TV watchers", "shoppers", "talkers", "cooks", etc. These are just normal people. Oh and they have a hobby.


That's because those things aren't ostracized in 'normal' society /culture.
A better example would be the homosexual community, or racial minorities. They are always running events and parades to show their self pride etc.

That being said, I still agree with your opinion on it. It's stupid for people to go around claiming things and making a fuss about what a label means, who's actually X label or not etc.
We even see these kind of disparages in the gamer community itself. There are casuals, girls, etc.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
Kwidowmaker
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Canada978 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-15 04:36:01
December 15 2010 04:33 GMT
#39
On December 15 2010 04:59 Chill wrote:
Regarding your final paragraph: I find it strange that so many game-players define themselves personally as "gamers". I don't see triple-A hockey players going around calling themselves "hockey players" and defining their self-worth as it relates to being a hockey player.

Why can't you just be a guy? Oh and you also like games. But you like other stuff too. What's with this "gamer" box I see a lot of people trying to fit themselves into?


"I'm a homosexual" "I'm a Muslim" "I'm a mathematician" "I'm a guy" "I'm a Brazilian" "I'm a Red Wings fan" "I'm a gamer" I tried to get a wide range in there to make the point that even if someone says "I'm an X" they aren't just X, they could conceivably be everything I listed. I'm sure AAA hockey players go around calling themselves "hockey players" at clubs (and likely with emphasis on their high ability). I know scientists go around calling themselves scientists in contexts like "It is our job as scientists to educate the public about evolution", even if they are more things than scientists. It's no feasible to define new words to totally describe each individual, and it helps to be able to discriminate in the information you reveal when you say "I'm an X".

-e- Actually I've held your view in the past, but I've changed my mind while writing this response
Kk.
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
December 15 2010 08:14 GMT
#40
I think this thread's responses actually prove my point. Most of us here would consider ourselves hardcore gamers I assume and so we say that the people that play games occasionally as not being gamers. On the flip side, the casual gamers say that they are gamers but they are not like those hardcore gamers that spend most of their time playing games.

This point has been the whole basis of what I have been trying to say. I am not here to argue about labels and their stigmas, but rather how gamers view gamers and why it is bad to our growth in society.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub192
UpATreeSC 138
ForJumy 81
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 4837
Calm 2425
Rain 1262
Mini 392
Dewaltoss 117
Soulkey 64
Aegong 39
TY 23
NaDa 10
Dota 2
capcasts110
NeuroSwarm57
Counter-Strike
Dendi1514
flusha534
Foxcn298
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu640
Khaldor175
Other Games
tarik_tv54002
gofns41479
summit1g5736
Grubby3899
FrodaN1031
shahzam521
mouzStarbuck301
ViBE24
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream4869
Other Games
BasetradeTV190
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 47
• davetesta27
• Reevou 3
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 44
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22120
League of Legends
• Doublelift3244
• Jankos2213
• TFBlade1487
Other Games
• imaqtpie1426
• Shiphtur395
Upcoming Events
Online Event
2h 44m
Replay Cast
4h 44m
GSL Code S
12h 14m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
12h 44m
Replay Cast
1d 2h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 13h
OSC
1d 15h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.