| Blogs > blagoonga123 |
|
blagoonga123
United States2068 Posts
Well now, no. because instead of 6-8 seconds of wasted time watching chains per game, i spend 30 seconds watching the stupid ass timer click down. Why would blizzard think a 30 second timer is necessary? I just don't understand. The more I watch what's happening to b.net 2.0, the less i understand what is happening.  | ||
|
aike
United States1629 Posts
| ||
|
blagoonga123
United States2068 Posts
all this time my hate has been misplaced!? I feel so foolish | ||
|
aike
United States1629 Posts
| ||
|
seRapH
United States9830 Posts
On September 06 2010 10:12 blagoonga123 wrote: oh really? all this time my hate has been misplaced!? I feel so foolish you can keep blaming blizzard for making it so its on by default. | ||
|
prototype.
Canada4215 Posts
| ||
|
AlienAlias
United States324 Posts
On September 06 2010 11:36 prototype. wrote: Some people need time to decide whether they want to bail the game or not you know? What I don't understand is why the only reason to leave once the 30 second countdown has started is to log off :[ | ||
|
Bob300
United States505 Posts
On September 06 2010 11:25 seRapH wrote: you can keep blaming blizzard for making it so its on by default. Lol great logic!! But Bnet 2.0 is getting better for me I just want chat channels then i will be fine... | ||
|
SilentCrono
United States1420 Posts
i don't even care about LAN anymore. i had a LAN party today it was super awesome we just all connected to bnet. zero lag. | ||
|
Dromar
United States2145 Posts
On September 06 2010 11:53 Bob300 wrote: Lol great logic!! But Bnet 2.0 is getting better for me I just want chat channels then i will be fine... That, and they need to fix the custom game list. You can't play anything but the most popular ~5 games because that's all anybody ever joins. It's not that nobody wants to try something new, the problem is that if you join something different, you're probably joining and empty room, and you gotta wait until other people join too. But no one ever does, because they expect the room to be empty. See, Bnet (1.0) was good. You made a game, people saw the game and joined, knowing there were people in there, waiting for it to fill up to play. Instead, we have this huge list of EMPTY LOBBIES, and there's no way to tell if there's anybody in any of the rooms. Try playing a 3v3 BGH on Bnet 2.0. Can't happen. It's like 50 pages down the list in popularity. It's not that nobody wants to play the game, it's that they don't ever see it, even when there's someone in the lobby waiting. Can't even get a 1v1 on the less popular ladder maps. Custom maps, like the beautiful Devotion by prodiG? In your dreams, bro. To give a poker analogy, imagine an online poker client where you couldn't see how many people were at a table. And you could only be at one table at a time. You join a game, empty table. You can sit there and wait an eternity hoping for someone else to come (or for SEVEN more people to come, lol), or you can go to the next table. Eventually, you'll give up and just play one of the few most popular variants (.05/.10 NLHE) because that's the only place you actually know you'll be able to play, rather than wait until you die. It's so unbelievably stupid. /rant. | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On September 06 2010 14:17 SuperJongMan wrote: Online multi-viewer replays! this MIGHT make me buy the game | ||
|
Loanshark
China3094 Posts
| ||
|
Mortician
Bulgaria2332 Posts
That WILL make me buy the game! | ||
| ||
|
|
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
OSC
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
