• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 12:28
CET 18:28
KST 02:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA14
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Data analysis on 70 million replays soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2073 users

A Puzzling Fortnight - Day 9

Blogs > JeeJee
Post a Reply
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
March 17 2010 14:26 GMT
#1
Catching a pirate

You're Blizzard, and you've finally become tired of pirates. Tired enough that you are actually going to devote some serious firepower to the task. You're going to find them. And you're going to lock them away.

Here's the situation.

You're aboard a sea-faring vessel, looking for that pirate ship . You're quite familiar enough with the pirates' methods -- you know exactly how fast their ship is and its main limitation: it can only travel in one direction. Further in your favor is the fact that your own ship travels twice as fast as theirs. Unfortunately for you, it's dark outside. So dark that you cannot see a thing.

But then.. a flash of lightning from flamewheel91! You see the pirate ship for a split second. You know exactly where it was although you do not know which way it was headed. From now on you'll be forever in the dark. How can you navigate your ship to catch the pirates?

+ Show Spoiler [hint] +

This is similar to shooting the frog puzzle although worded differently. If you're having trouble, try your hand at this one; maybe the different wording will help you:
Let's take a number line (abstracted to the integers), and a frog that you want to kill. Frog starts at number A and each turn always jumps X units to the right (if X is negative, that would be to the left). You don't know A nor X, but you have a gun. At each turn, you can shoot a random number and if the frog is there, you kill it. Devise a way to always kill the frog. Another version of this problem has A=0.


GL!

(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
Aim Here
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Scotland672 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 15:13:01
March 17 2010 14:39 GMT
#2
+ Show Spoiler +
You know that at time t after the lightning, the ship has to be on a circle radius v*t, where v is the ship's speed.

So you go in a spiral path with distance from the ship exactly equal to vt, expressed in polar co-ordinates (r,theta)=(v*t, cos Mt+alpha) where M and alpha are arbitrarily chosen so that your ship can actually be on such a curve at some t, and M low enough that your ship is fast enough to traverse the curve in one 360-degree rotation. (I'm too lazy/busy to do the calculus right now)
qrs
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States3637 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 08:30:06
March 17 2010 14:55 GMT
#3
+ Show Spoiler +

OK, my first thought is at any given moment you can identify a circle on whose circumference the pirates are (center = the point where you glimpsed them; radius = time elapsed * rate of pirates movement). The radius of the circle expands with time. So all you have to do is go around that "expanding circle" until you catch the pirates; since it's expanding, your path will be a spiral. Now I have to prove that you have enough time to catch them even though their path is straight and yours is a spiral.

I don't like calculus so I'm going to try and just prove it intuitively:

Just to make the proof a little bit simpler, park your ship for exactly long enough that if the pirates were going towards you they would have hit you by now. OK, from then on:

At any given moment, you are on some point of the circle where the pirates are, at that moment. One component of your motion (one vector, if you like) has to be outward (i.e. perpendicular to the circle's tangent at the point you are on), in order to stay on the circle as it expands. This component has to match the pirates' speed. The second component of your motion is devoted to going around the circle (i.e. this vector is parallel to the tangent line at the point you are on; clockwise or counterclockwise doesn't matter as long as you are consistent). The magnitude of this vector = whatever speed you have left over--i.e. your-speed - pirates'-speed. As long as this is more than 0, you are steadily covering the circle and will eventually go all the way around its circumference, at which point you must have found the pirates.

So in short, as long as your speed is even a tiny bit greater than the pirates', you will catch them eventually.
edit: On second thought, realized that this is not quite true: if the rate at which you traverse the circumference decreases rapidly enough (as a result of the circle's rate of increase), you will never traverse it entirely, despite being constantly in motion along it. So we have to compare the rate of increase of the circle's circumference with the rate of your travel along it (ugh, this is edging closer to calculus):

At any given moment, the "momentary" difference in radius is the limit of t*v where v is your "outward" speed, or the length of the vector corresponding to your outward motion. "t" is time traveled, and t approaches 0. The momentary increase in circumference is 2*pi*t*v (the distance to the pirates is fractionally less, since you only have to cover some fraction of the circumference). Therefore, the "momentary distance" traveled along the circumference must be at least 2*pi*t*v. for you to make headway.

The momentary difference you travel along the circumference is determined by the other vector of your motion: the vector parallel to the tangent. Call its length xv. Your total speed is not the sum of the lengths of these vectors, as I hastily said before, but the length of the vector that corresponds to the distance between your origin and the diagonal of the parallelogram formed by these two vectors (i.e. the vector that corresponds to your actual direction of travel).

So, basically, we want to make sure that x>=2*pi, so that 2*pi*t*x*v >= 2*pi*t*v, so that you are constantly making headway along the circumference as it expands.

Now, the "outward" and "sidelong" vectors are perpendicular by definition, so that makes finding their diagonal easier. Making "v" (the pirates' speed) our unit, for convenience, we have a right triangle here: one side has length 1, one side has length x; hypotenuse (corresponding to our speed, in terms of the pirates' speed) has length sqrt(x^2 + 1). Given that x must be at least 2*pi, the hypotenuse must be at least sqrt(4*pi^2 +1) According to Google, this is upwards of 6.36, so unless I am making some new mistake (which I very possibly am), this method of catching them would not work unless you went over 6.36 times the pirates' speed.

edit1: wrote original post as Aim Here was writing his.
edit 2: realized that my (informal) proof erred in some important details; fixed it. Hopefully it's correct now (but my numbers no longer match JeeJee's, so I'm probably making some new mistake).

edit 3: I realize that my explanation of my reasoning is not that easy to follow, so here's a diagram to hopefully make it a bit clearer what I'm talking about. Also, every time I said something about "momentary distance" traveled, it might have made more sense had I talked about "momentary speed" (it amounts to the same idea).
+ Show Spoiler [diagram] +
[image loading]
'As per the American Heart Association, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR. One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust".' —Wikipedia
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
March 17 2010 17:38 GMT
#4
Yup gj, not too much to it.
However, I was just reading over my hint (which is just another puzzle with conceptually the same solution as this pirate one), and realized that while the A=0 case is trivial/easy to explain, I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around an arbitrary A. Anyone have any ideas?
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
incnone
Profile Joined July 2009
17 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 18:03:07
March 17 2010 18:00 GMT
#5
+ Show Spoiler [puzzle in hint, arbitrary (A, X)] +

One way you could think about this is as follows. Put the possible pairs for (A, X) in some order, such as:

(0, 0),
(1, -1), (1, 0), (1, 1),
(-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1),
(2, -2), (2, -1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2),
(-2, -2), (-2, -1), (-2, 0), (-2, 1), (-2, 2),
(3, -3), ... etc.

The actual ordering doesn't matter. I just want a way to refer to the "first pair", "second pair", and so on, in such a way that every pairing gets a number, starting at 1.

Then, at my first shot, I look at the first pair -- (0,0) in my list -- and pretend those were the starting (A, X) values, and shoot wherever the frog would be -- in this case, (0,0). For my second shot, I look at the second pair -- in this case (1, -1) -- and pretend those were the starting values. Since the frog started at 1 and has moved once to the left, I ought to shoot at zero again. For the third shot, I have the pair (1, 0), so I'd assume the frog has moved twice (0 spaces) starting at 1, and I'd shoot 1. For the fourth shot (starting at (1,1)), you can see I'd want to shoot at 4.

Since the frog's initial (A,X) started in the list, I'll eventually hit it (on the turn corresponding to where its initial (A,X) was in the list, if not before).
qrs
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States3637 Posts
March 17 2010 18:27 GMT
#6
Re the original puzzle: I realized on rereading my solution that I had made a couple of mistakes. When I corrected for them, I came to the conclusion that you would need to travel at over 6 times the speed of the pirates for that solution to work (updated my previous post with those calculations). Am I making a mistake?
'As per the American Heart Association, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR. One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust".' —Wikipedia
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 18:44:05
March 17 2010 18:43 GMT
#7
On March 18 2010 03:00 incnone wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [puzzle in hint, arbitrary (A, X)] +

One way you could think about this is as follows. Put the possible pairs for (A, X) in some order, such as:

(0, 0),
(1, -1), (1, 0), (1, 1),
(-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1),
(2, -2), (2, -1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2),
(-2, -2), (-2, -1), (-2, 0), (-2, 1), (-2, 2),
(3, -3), ... etc.

The actual ordering doesn't matter. I just want a way to refer to the "first pair", "second pair", and so on, in such a way that every pairing gets a number, starting at 1.

Then, at my first shot, I look at the first pair -- (0,0) in my list -- and pretend those were the starting (A, X) values, and shoot wherever the frog would be -- in this case, (0,0). For my second shot, I look at the second pair -- in this case (1, -1) -- and pretend those were the starting values. Since the frog started at 1 and has moved once to the left, I ought to shoot at zero again. For the third shot, I have the pair (1, 0), so I'd assume the frog has moved twice (0 spaces) starting at 1, and I'd shoot 1. For the fourth shot (starting at (1,1)), you can see I'd want to shoot at 4.

Since the frog's initial (A,X) started in the list, I'll eventually hit it (on the turn corresponding to where its initial (A,X) was in the list, if not before).


+ Show Spoiler +

that's the thing, there's nowhere in the problem that states X<=A or anything along those lines
so the pairs would really be
(0,0) (0,1) (0,2) (0,3) ... (0,-1) (0,-2) (0,-3)...
(1,0) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) ... (1,-1) (1,-2) (1,-3)...
(-1,0) (-1,1) (-1,2) (-1,3) ... (-1,-1) (-1,-2) (-1,-3)...

the original problem fixes A=0 (and this has been posted on TL before), and i had no problem with that one, if it's 0,0 shoot at 0, then assume 0,1, shoot at 1, then 0,-1 so shoot at -2, etc.
but with multiple starting locations arbitrary but fixed starting location i don't see how this works
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
qrs
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States3637 Posts
March 17 2010 19:11 GMT
#8
On March 18 2010 03:43 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2010 03:00 incnone wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [puzzle in hint, arbitrary (A, X)] +

One way you could think about this is as follows. Put the possible pairs for (A, X) in some order, such as:

(0, 0),
(1, -1), (1, 0), (1, 1),
(-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1),
(2, -2), (2, -1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2),
(-2, -2), (-2, -1), (-2, 0), (-2, 1), (-2, 2),
(3, -3), ... etc.

The actual ordering doesn't matter. I just want a way to refer to the "first pair", "second pair", and so on, in such a way that every pairing gets a number, starting at 1.

Then, at my first shot, I look at the first pair -- (0,0) in my list -- and pretend those were the starting (A, X) values, and shoot wherever the frog would be -- in this case, (0,0). For my second shot, I look at the second pair -- in this case (1, -1) -- and pretend those were the starting values. Since the frog started at 1 and has moved once to the left, I ought to shoot at zero again. For the third shot, I have the pair (1, 0), so I'd assume the frog has moved twice (0 spaces) starting at 1, and I'd shoot 1. For the fourth shot (starting at (1,1)), you can see I'd want to shoot at 4.

Since the frog's initial (A,X) started in the list, I'll eventually hit it (on the turn corresponding to where its initial (A,X) was in the list, if not before).


+ Show Spoiler +

that's the thing, there's nowhere in the problem that states X<=A or anything along those lines
so the pairs would really be
(0,0) (0,1) (0,2) (0,3) ... (0,-1) (0,-2) (0,-3)...
(1,0) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) ... (1,-1) (1,-2) (1,-3)...
(-1,0) (-1,1) (-1,2) (-1,3) ... (-1,-1) (-1,-2) (-1,-3)...

the original problem fixes A=0 (and this has been posted on TL before), and i had no problem with that one, if it's 0,0 shoot at 0, then assume 0,1, shoot at 1, then 0,-1 so shoot at -2, etc.
but with multiple starting locations arbitrary but fixed starting location i don't see how this works

There's a very useful concept called "diagonalization" that shows how you can arrange 2(or more)-dimensional matrixes like that one in countable order:

First, on each row, intersperse the +s and -s of the second digits of the pairs: (0,0), (0,1),(0,-1),(0,2),(0,-2), etc. Do the same for the first digits of the columns (as you started to).

Then, go through the pairs by successively bigger diagonals: e.g. (0,0), (0,1),(1,0),(0,-1),(1,1),(-1,0), etc. This way, you will list every pair in a predictable order.
'As per the American Heart Association, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR. One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust".' —Wikipedia
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 03:39:59
March 18 2010 03:39 GMT
#9
On March 18 2010 04:11 qrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2010 03:43 JeeJee wrote:
On March 18 2010 03:00 incnone wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [puzzle in hint, arbitrary (A, X)] +

One way you could think about this is as follows. Put the possible pairs for (A, X) in some order, such as:

(0, 0),
(1, -1), (1, 0), (1, 1),
(-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1),
(2, -2), (2, -1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2),
(-2, -2), (-2, -1), (-2, 0), (-2, 1), (-2, 2),
(3, -3), ... etc.

The actual ordering doesn't matter. I just want a way to refer to the "first pair", "second pair", and so on, in such a way that every pairing gets a number, starting at 1.

Then, at my first shot, I look at the first pair -- (0,0) in my list -- and pretend those were the starting (A, X) values, and shoot wherever the frog would be -- in this case, (0,0). For my second shot, I look at the second pair -- in this case (1, -1) -- and pretend those were the starting values. Since the frog started at 1 and has moved once to the left, I ought to shoot at zero again. For the third shot, I have the pair (1, 0), so I'd assume the frog has moved twice (0 spaces) starting at 1, and I'd shoot 1. For the fourth shot (starting at (1,1)), you can see I'd want to shoot at 4.

Since the frog's initial (A,X) started in the list, I'll eventually hit it (on the turn corresponding to where its initial (A,X) was in the list, if not before).


+ Show Spoiler +

that's the thing, there's nowhere in the problem that states X<=A or anything along those lines
so the pairs would really be
(0,0) (0,1) (0,2) (0,3) ... (0,-1) (0,-2) (0,-3)...
(1,0) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) ... (1,-1) (1,-2) (1,-3)...
(-1,0) (-1,1) (-1,2) (-1,3) ... (-1,-1) (-1,-2) (-1,-3)...

the original problem fixes A=0 (and this has been posted on TL before), and i had no problem with that one, if it's 0,0 shoot at 0, then assume 0,1, shoot at 1, then 0,-1 so shoot at -2, etc.
but with multiple starting locations arbitrary but fixed starting location i don't see how this works

There's a very useful concept called "diagonalization" that shows how you can arrange 2(or more)-dimensional matrixes like that one in countable order:

First, on each row, intersperse the +s and -s of the second digits of the pairs: (0,0), (0,1),(0,-1),(0,2),(0,-2), etc. Do the same for the first digits of the columns (as you started to).

Then, go through the pairs by successively bigger diagonals: e.g. (0,0), (0,1),(1,0),(0,-1),(1,1),(-1,0), etc. This way, you will list every pair in a predictable order.


oh
that's pretty clever; i see it now
thanks^^
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
March 18 2010 03:44 GMT
#10
wait a minute.. i just saw your edit
i've only skimmed it quite briefly but let me think about it. i'm actually going to sleep so i'll just sleep on it i guess and get back to you sometime tomorrow
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
incnone
Profile Joined July 2009
17 Posts
March 24 2010 07:10 GMT
#11
Not much discussion on this in a while. I wanted to disagree with some of qrs's claims.
+ Show Spoiler +

I want to claim that as long as you have the ability to travel faster than the pirate ship, that you can always catch them (using the method proposed by qrs), and that there is in fact no worry about the circle "expanding faster than you can keep up with" (though I don't think this should be a priori obvious).

My argument is as follows. I'm going to let a be the speed of the pirate ship, and v be our speed; I am assuming v > a. The pirate ship travels radially outward from its starting position (which is in the center of our polar coordinate system, coordinates r and T -- here I'll use T to stand for theta). For simplicity, I'll wait until the pirate ship reaches my current radius, and then begin traveling outwards with a radial velocity a (so that I am always on the same "expanding circle" as the pirate ship) and around with an angular velocity W. (Here W is literally dT/dt, where t is time.) I will travel so as to make W as large as possible given my maximum speed of v. Evidently, as r increases, W must decrease. We have the fundamental relationship that if our ship is at a distance r from center, then, given that our total speed is v and our radial speed is a,

v^2 = a^2 + r^2 W^2,

from decomposing my velocity into its "radial" and "angular" components (as shown in qrs's picture). In addition, we may solve for r in terms of a; at a given time t, since I am always traveling radially outward with speed a, we must have

r = at + R,

where R is my initial distance from the pirate ship (I'm choosing time so that I start moving at time t=0. Thus, for instance, the flash of lightning occurs at time t = -R/a).

Now, the total angle through which I travel is the integral from time t=0 to time t=(infinity) of W (with respect to time). I would like this to be at least 2pi. The above two equations let me solve for W in terms of t. I find

W = (v^2 - a^2)^(1/2) * (integral from t = 0 to t = infinity) 1/(at+R) dt.

This integral diverges (an antiderivative of the integrand for t > 0 is (1/a)log(at + R)). It follows that I can go as far as I want around the "expanding circle", while still keeping on this circle (so I am at the same r-coordinate as the pirates), and will therefore catch them.

You could even use the above integral to compute, for given v, a, how long it will take at most to catch the pirates. In JeeJee's case of v = 2a, I am finding that it ought take no more than (R/a)*e^(2pi) from the flash of light.
qrs
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States3637 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 13:24:51
March 24 2010 13:23 GMT
#12
On March 24 2010 16:10 incnone wrote:
Not much discussion on this in a while. I wanted to disagree with some of qrs's claims.
Prompted by your post, I looked at my reasoning again and I realized that you're right: I did make another mistake.

I tried to avoid calculus and simplify matters by assuming that the distance along the circumference to the pirates changed at a constant rate that was dependent only on the (constant) speeds of the two ships, and not their (changing) relative positions on the circle. I was wrong, though. It's true that the distance along the entire circumference increases at a constant rate proportional to the rate of increase of the radius, but the distance along the circumference to the pirates changes at a rate that is affected by the relative positions of the ships, since the smaller the angle between them, the smaller the proportion of the circumference that must be covered. That's the point that I missed.
'As per the American Heart Association, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR. One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust".' —Wikipedia
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 668
IndyStarCraft 137
BRAT_OK 54
MindelVK 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29531
Calm 2780
Rain 2660
GuemChi 559
firebathero 242
BeSt 150
Backho 60
Oya187 54
zelot 28
ToSsGirL 22
[ Show more ]
Shine 21
scan(afreeca) 17
SilentControl 15
Sacsri 11
JulyZerg 10
Bale 8
HiyA 7
Dota 2
Gorgc8638
qojqva2810
singsing2144
League of Legends
rGuardiaN45
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1780
pashabiceps1430
byalli504
allub301
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor681
Other Games
FrodaN2247
Fuzer 293
mouzStarbuck236
KnowMe128
ArmadaUGS93
XaKoH 83
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream30063
Other Games
EGCTV1719
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH184
• poizon28 30
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1824
• WagamamaTV430
League of Legends
• Nemesis3083
Other Games
• tFFMrPink 21
Upcoming Events
IPSL
2h 33m
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
2h 33m
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
OSC
5h 33m
OSC
15h 33m
Wardi Open
18h 33m
Monday Night Weeklies
23h 33m
OSC
1d 5h
Wardi Open
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
LAN Event
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.