• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:33
CET 11:33
KST 19:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros9[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win52025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION1Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams10Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest4
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four DreamHack Open 2013 revealed
Tourneys
Kirktown Chat Brawl #9 $50 8:30PM EST 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment
Brood War
General
Map pack for 3v3/4v4/FFA games BW General Discussion Ladder Map Matchup Stats SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Dawn of War IV Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
KPDH "Golden" as Squid Game…
Peanutsc
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1165 users

Left vs Right Political Philosophy

Blogs > Biochemist
Post a Reply
Normal
Biochemist
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1008 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-11 19:23:00
January 11 2010 19:22 GMT
#1
So I just finished reading/skimming the following two books, and I'm left very frustrated:

[image loading]

[image loading]


Both of them promise to deliver the real truth of american history that you didn't learn in school, but both of them are just extremely biased and very subjective rants from opposite ends of the political spectrum. Where do I have to go to get the truth? I would like to take an active interest in politics, but I'm tired of people trying to jerk me around with their irrational and COMPLETELY biased arguments.

Look up the reviews for either of these books. Almost every single one is either 5 stars or 1 star, with the reviewers claiming it's either an absolute must read or a useless pile of horseshit. Also, most people I try to have political discussions with seem to be completely on one bandwagon or the other. Shouldn't there be enough historical data on major sociological issues to come up with answers that don't need to rely on half-truths to be convincing?

As something of a scientist myself, I demand rational answers!

WheelOfTime
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Canada331 Posts
January 11 2010 19:25 GMT
#2
All history books, including these, are mostly secondary sources. So...

Truth > First-hand experience > Primary source > secondary source

Since you can at best obtain first-hand experience, and in this case (American History) primary source information, you'll never know the "truth".
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32083 Posts
January 11 2010 19:36 GMT
#3
Lies My Teacher Told Me is pretty solid, if you take it with a grain of salt. I didn't read the whole thing, but got through a chunk. I'm pretty sure the author says right up front that it's meant to be taken a supplementary work and not the one and only source you should use. He's more asking the reader to open their eyes than to fully accept his statements without thought. Something along hte lines of the winners always write the history books.
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
Mortality
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States4790 Posts
January 11 2010 19:37 GMT
#4
In politics, "truth" is written by those in power. If you want to understand politics, you need to understand that there is no good, only evil, and it's name is politics.
Even though this Proleague bullshit has been completely bogus, I really, really, really do not see how Khan can lose this. I swear I will kill myself if they do. - nesix before KHAN lost to eNature
Aesop
Profile Joined October 2007
Hungary11304 Posts
January 11 2010 20:29 GMT
#5
What's your rationale for thinking that the middle between the extremes is not biased while the extremes are?
ModeratorNon veritas sed auctoritas facit legem. | Liquipedia: Don't ask me, I'm retired.
Acies
Profile Joined September 2009
Australia196 Posts
January 11 2010 20:34 GMT
#6
Aren't conservatives and revolutionaries literaly opposites by thier very definitions?
AvalancheGaming.org - SC2 Tournament and LAN in Bunbury, Western Australia
Zurles
Profile Joined February 2009
United Kingdom1659 Posts
January 11 2010 20:46 GMT
#7
bottom one has a better cover, go for that imo.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
January 11 2010 21:06 GMT
#8
I'd suggest using sources that most likely don't have much of a relation with the US (probably the Northern American country that people have the most extreme opinions about). Like some European historian that at least doesn't seem to be very biased (however you are going to verify that). I don't know any such historians at all, but that would be the kind of sources I were looking for.

On January 12 2010 05:29 Aesop wrote:
What's your rationale for thinking that the middle between the extremes is not biased while the extremes are?

I don't think he is stating anything like that. But if it is obvious that the information is provided by biased sources you cannot trust it very much.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Biochemist
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1008 Posts
January 11 2010 21:10 GMT
#9
On January 12 2010 05:29 Aesop wrote:
What's your rationale for thinking that the middle between the extremes is not biased while the extremes are?


Did I imply that the middle ground was not biased? For many of these issues, there IS no middle ground. Take programs like welfare, for instance. Most democratically oriented individuals claim that the gap between rich and poor is growing wider and we can only fix that by taxing the rich and big business and using it to provide more opportunities for the less priviledged. The opposing argument is something like welfare programs enable people to live off the system, minimum wage only causes inflation which hurts everyone, and giving tax breaks to the big guys allows them to provide employment and cheap products for everyone. There is no middle ground here.
DeathSpank
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1029 Posts
January 11 2010 21:44 GMT
#10
truth is different from facts
yes.
rushz0rz
Profile Blog Joined February 2006
Canada5300 Posts
January 11 2010 21:46 GMT
#11
On January 12 2010 06:10 Biochemist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 12 2010 05:29 Aesop wrote:
What's your rationale for thinking that the middle between the extremes is not biased while the extremes are?


Did I imply that the middle ground was not biased? For many of these issues, there IS no middle ground. Take programs like welfare, for instance. Most democratically oriented individuals claim that the gap between rich and poor is growing wider and we can only fix that by taxing the rich and big business and using it to provide more opportunities for the less priviledged. The opposing argument is something like welfare programs enable people to live off the system, minimum wage only causes inflation which hurts everyone, and giving tax breaks to the big guys allows them to provide employment and cheap products for everyone. There is no middle ground here.


Actually,

we can only fix that by taxing the rich and big business and using it to provide more opportunities for the less priviledged


is the middle ground. Extreme would be giving everyone the same salary.
IntoTheRainBOw fan~
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
January 11 2010 21:51 GMT
#12
OP: there is no absolute truth of history. Take the physics theory of relativity as a metaphor, ppl see different things depend on different reference points. The best thing for someone who seeks the truth can do, is to look at all the different points of views and make his own judgment, and form his own opinion base on whatever evidences ( facts that are constant on all the different point of views) are available.

I know there is a book out there talk about history of America from all reference points of views. The author interviewed and gather information from every major immigrant in the united states, and tell their stories of what happened to each one of them.

The Author is name Ronald Takaki, and the book i am talking about is "1993 -- A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America. Boston: Little, Brown and Company"

You should treat this as just another approach, at the end of the day you have to form your own opinion base on facts and logic.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-11 21:56:20
January 11 2010 21:55 GMT
#13
There's a few interesting tidbits in Lies, but you're right about the bias. You shouldn't expect to find good historical material off the NY Times best seller list, especially when they have bright and flashy covers, and there's no way a single book can convey all the nuances or context of that span of history.

Even in more specific cases, you need to realize that the author can frame subject matter however they'd like, or more likely they're innately biased because of their upbringing/social background/etc. This is why historiography exists.

As an example, there's American history from the perspectives of white males, women, black people, immigrants, etc. and none of them are necessarily wrong - they just influence different aspects and see different causes/effects because of this. Furthermore, within each group, historians may influence aspects like politics/economics/culture. Sorry, but looking for an absolute truth is fruitless.

What are you specifically looking for? Here's the syllabus from one of David Blight's American History classes at Yale. His research focus is the Civil War, but he's one of the top American History professors in the country.

+ Show Spoiler +
Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1992).
* Bellion, Wendy. “‘Extend the Sphere’: Charles Willson Peale’s Panorama of Annapolis.” Art Bulletin (September 2004):
529-549.
Cott, Nancy. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman’s Sphere” in New England, 1780-1835 (1977).
*Fliegelman, Jay. Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance (1993).
Breen, T.H. The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence (2004).
Ferguson, Robert. The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820 (1997).
Freeman, Joanne. Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic (2001).
*Looby, Christopher, “The Constitution of Nature: Taxonomy as Politics in Jefferson, Peale, and Bartram,” Early American
Literature 22 (December 1987), 252-273.
Nash, Gary. The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America
(2005).
Kerber, Linda. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (1997).
Maier, Pauline. American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (1997).
*Rigal, Laura. “Peale’s Mammoth,” in. American Iconology, David Miller, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.
Taylor, Alan. William Cooper's Town: Power and Persuasion on the Frontier of the Early American Republic (1996).
Wood, Gordon. The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1993).
REFORM, DEMOCRACY, AND THE MARKETPLACE IN JACKSONIAN AMERICA
Abzug, Robert H. Cosmos Crumbling: American Reform and the Religious Imagination (1994).
*Casper, Scott, “Politics, Art and the Contradictions of a Market Culture: George Caleb Bingham’s Stump Speaking,”
American Art 5 (Summer 1991): 27-47.
Clark, Christopher. The Roots of Rural Capitalism: Western Massachusetts, 1789-1890 (1990).
Feller, Daniel. The Jacksonian Promise: America, 1815-1840 (1995).
James and Lois Horton. In Hope of Liberty: Culture, Community, and Protest among Northern Free Blacks, 1700-1860
(1997).
Howe, Daniel Walker The Political Culture of the American Whigs (1979).
Prophets of Protest: Reconsidering the History of American Abolitionism, Timothy McCarthy and John Stauffer, eds.
(2006).
*Miller, Angela. The Empire of the Eye: Landscape Representation and American Cultural Politics, 1825-1875. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press (1993).
Sellers, Charles G. The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1848 (1991).
Watson, Harry L. Liberty and Power: The Politics of Jacksonian America (1990).
Wilentz, Sean R. Chants Democratic: NYC and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788-1850 (1984).
________. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (2005).
THE OLD SOUTH, SLAVERY, AND THE RISE OF SECTIONALISM
Berlin, Ira. Generations of Captivity: a History of African-American Slaves (2003).
Blassingame, John. The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South (1979).
Clarke, Erskine. Dwelling Place: A Plantation Epic. (2005).
avis, John. “Eastman Johnson’s Negro Life at the South,” Art Bulletin (March 1998): 67-92.
Johnson, Walter. Soul by Soul: Life inside the Antebellum Slave Market (2001).
Fehrenbacher, Don. The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States Government's Relations to Slavery (2001).
Foner, Eric. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War (1970).
Genovese, Eugene. Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made (1976).
Kolchin, Peter. American Slavery 1619-1877 (1993)
McCurry, Stephanie. Masters of Small Worlds: Yeoman Households, Gender Relations, and the Political Culture of the
Antebellum South Carolina Low Country (1995).
Potter, David M.. The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861 (1977).
Sewell, Richard. Ballots for Freedom: Antislavery Politics in the United States (1976).
* Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America, 1780-1865 (2000).
CIVIL WAR, MEMORY, AND RECONSTRUCTION
Ayers, Edward. “Worrying about the Civil War” and “What Caused the Civil War?” in What Caused the Civil War?
Reflections on the South and Southern History, Edward Ayers, ed. (2005).
___________. In the Presence of Mine Enemies: War in the Heart of America, 1859-1863 (2003).
Blight, David W.. Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory (2001).
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh. The Southern Past: A Clash of Race and Memory (2006).
Dew, Charles B. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War (2001).
Faust, Drew Gilpin. This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War (2008).
______________. Mothers of Invention: Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War (1996).
Foner, Eric. Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution (1988).
Frederickson, George M.. The Inner Civil War: Northern Intellectuals and the Crisis of the Union (1965).
Hahn, Steven. A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggle in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration
(2003).
McPherson, James. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (1988).
Richardson, Heather Cox. West from Appomattox: the Reconstruction of America After the Civil War (2007).
Savage, Kirk. Standing Soldiers, Kneeling Slaves: Race, War, and Monument in 19th Century America (1997).
Stampp, Kenneth. The Imperiled Union: Essays on the Background of the Civil War (1980).

This stuff is probably long, difficult and maybe uninteresting unless you have someone (professor) to guide you through it. To get a good handle on history, you need to actually study it. Don't expect that you can get a good understanding of it just by reading a few books; you wouldn't expect that with economics, chemistry or physics, and social sciences are the same.

If you want a single collection, you're only going to get the juicy, extremely biased stuff like Zinn and so on. Still a very important read, but like Hawk said, take it with a grain of salt.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
January 11 2010 22:28 GMT
#14
I go to Fox News for all my unbiased coverage.
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
Trezeguet
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States2656 Posts
January 11 2010 22:35 GMT
#15
On January 12 2010 07:28 HuskyTheHusky wrote:
I go to Fox News for all my unbiased coverage.

Wish the other networks could figure this out.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-11 22:40:42
January 11 2010 22:39 GMT
#16
first book has a conservative bias (obvious from the cover)

second book has a liberal bias (not so obvious, but look up reviews)

for history with a liberal bias i prefer howard zinn's "people's history", there's a good one with a conservative bias called "patriot's history" or whatever, but i forget the author.

basically everything is biased except primary sources, and even then you have first-hand bias (which is less bad though)

also "bias" is a noun, "biased" is an adjective, you can't say "that book is bias".
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
January 11 2010 23:59 GMT
#17
On January 12 2010 05:34 Acies wrote:
Aren't conservatives and revolutionaries literaly opposites by thier very definitions?


not necessarily, especially in counter-revolutions (which are revolutionaries in essence)

it probably meant conservative by our modern-day standards though, which they were
ghostWriter
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States3302 Posts
January 12 2010 00:05 GMT
#18
The definitions for liberal and conservative have changed dramatically since the time of the Revolutionary War. iirc, I think they meant the exact opposite of what they mean right now. I could be wrong though.
Sullifam
MountainDewJunkie
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States10344 Posts
January 12 2010 00:22 GMT
#19
Never trust a book with a bullet list on its cover.
[21:07] <Shock710> whats wrong with her face [20:50] <dAPhREAk> i beat it the day after it came out | <BLinD-RawR> esports is a giant vagina
Durak
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Canada3685 Posts
January 12 2010 01:00 GMT
#20
On January 12 2010 09:05 ghostWriter wrote:
The definitions for liberal and conservative have changed dramatically since the time of the Revolutionary War. iirc, I think they meant the exact opposite of what they mean right now. I could be wrong though.


They're extremely vague. You can basically interpret whatever you want from the words. Since you want to be clear and logical in communication, they're poor choices to use.
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32083 Posts
January 12 2010 14:39 GMT
#21
On January 12 2010 09:05 ghostWriter wrote:
The definitions for liberal and conservative have changed dramatically since the time of the Revolutionary War. iirc, I think they meant the exact opposite of what they mean right now. I could be wrong though.


They've changed, but you're probably thinking more along the lines of the values of the Democrats and the Republicans. Jibba would know more than I would, but for instance, I'm pretty sure that republicans were for abolishment and the Dems were pro-slavery in the Civil War era.
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
Biochemist
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1008 Posts
January 12 2010 15:07 GMT
#22
On January 12 2010 06:55 Jibba wrote:
There's a few interesting tidbits in Lies, but you're right about the bias. You shouldn't expect to find good historical material off the NY Times best seller list, especially when they have bright and flashy covers, and there's no way a single book can convey all the nuances or context of that span of history.

Even in more specific cases, you need to realize that the author can frame subject matter however they'd like, or more likely they're innately biased because of their upbringing/social background/etc. This is why historiography exists.

As an example, there's American history from the perspectives of white males, women, black people, immigrants, etc. and none of them are necessarily wrong - they just influence different aspects and see different causes/effects because of this. Furthermore, within each group, historians may influence aspects like politics/economics/culture. Sorry, but looking for an absolute truth is fruitless.

What are you specifically looking for? Here's the syllabus from one of David Blight's American History classes at Yale. His research focus is the Civil War, but he's one of the top American History professors in the country.

+ Show Spoiler +
Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1992).
* Bellion, Wendy. “‘Extend the Sphere’: Charles Willson Peale’s Panorama of Annapolis.” Art Bulletin (September 2004):
529-549.
Cott, Nancy. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman’s Sphere” in New England, 1780-1835 (1977).
*Fliegelman, Jay. Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance (1993).
Breen, T.H. The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence (2004).
Ferguson, Robert. The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820 (1997).
Freeman, Joanne. Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic (2001).
*Looby, Christopher, “The Constitution of Nature: Taxonomy as Politics in Jefferson, Peale, and Bartram,” Early American
Literature 22 (December 1987), 252-273.
Nash, Gary. The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America
(2005).
Kerber, Linda. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (1997).
Maier, Pauline. American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (1997).
*Rigal, Laura. “Peale’s Mammoth,” in. American Iconology, David Miller, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.
Taylor, Alan. William Cooper's Town: Power and Persuasion on the Frontier of the Early American Republic (1996).
Wood, Gordon. The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1993).
REFORM, DEMOCRACY, AND THE MARKETPLACE IN JACKSONIAN AMERICA
Abzug, Robert H. Cosmos Crumbling: American Reform and the Religious Imagination (1994).
*Casper, Scott, “Politics, Art and the Contradictions of a Market Culture: George Caleb Bingham’s Stump Speaking,”
American Art 5 (Summer 1991): 27-47.
Clark, Christopher. The Roots of Rural Capitalism: Western Massachusetts, 1789-1890 (1990).
Feller, Daniel. The Jacksonian Promise: America, 1815-1840 (1995).
James and Lois Horton. In Hope of Liberty: Culture, Community, and Protest among Northern Free Blacks, 1700-1860
(1997).
Howe, Daniel Walker The Political Culture of the American Whigs (1979).
Prophets of Protest: Reconsidering the History of American Abolitionism, Timothy McCarthy and John Stauffer, eds.
(2006).
*Miller, Angela. The Empire of the Eye: Landscape Representation and American Cultural Politics, 1825-1875. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press (1993).
Sellers, Charles G. The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1848 (1991).
Watson, Harry L. Liberty and Power: The Politics of Jacksonian America (1990).
Wilentz, Sean R. Chants Democratic: NYC and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788-1850 (1984).
________. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (2005).
THE OLD SOUTH, SLAVERY, AND THE RISE OF SECTIONALISM
Berlin, Ira. Generations of Captivity: a History of African-American Slaves (2003).
Blassingame, John. The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South (1979).
Clarke, Erskine. Dwelling Place: A Plantation Epic. (2005).
avis, John. “Eastman Johnson’s Negro Life at the South,” Art Bulletin (March 1998): 67-92.
Johnson, Walter. Soul by Soul: Life inside the Antebellum Slave Market (2001).
Fehrenbacher, Don. The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States Government's Relations to Slavery (2001).
Foner, Eric. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War (1970).
Genovese, Eugene. Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made (1976).
Kolchin, Peter. American Slavery 1619-1877 (1993)
McCurry, Stephanie. Masters of Small Worlds: Yeoman Households, Gender Relations, and the Political Culture of the
Antebellum South Carolina Low Country (1995).
Potter, David M.. The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861 (1977).
Sewell, Richard. Ballots for Freedom: Antislavery Politics in the United States (1976).
* Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America, 1780-1865 (2000).
CIVIL WAR, MEMORY, AND RECONSTRUCTION
Ayers, Edward. “Worrying about the Civil War” and “What Caused the Civil War?” in What Caused the Civil War?
Reflections on the South and Southern History, Edward Ayers, ed. (2005).
___________. In the Presence of Mine Enemies: War in the Heart of America, 1859-1863 (2003).
Blight, David W.. Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory (2001).
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh. The Southern Past: A Clash of Race and Memory (2006).
Dew, Charles B. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War (2001).
Faust, Drew Gilpin. This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War (2008).
______________. Mothers of Invention: Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War (1996).
Foner, Eric. Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution (1988).
Frederickson, George M.. The Inner Civil War: Northern Intellectuals and the Crisis of the Union (1965).
Hahn, Steven. A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggle in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration
(2003).
McPherson, James. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (1988).
Richardson, Heather Cox. West from Appomattox: the Reconstruction of America After the Civil War (2007).
Savage, Kirk. Standing Soldiers, Kneeling Slaves: Race, War, and Monument in 19th Century America (1997).
Stampp, Kenneth. The Imperiled Union: Essays on the Background of the Civil War (1980).

This stuff is probably long, difficult and maybe uninteresting unless you have someone (professor) to guide you through it. To get a good handle on history, you need to actually study it. Don't expect that you can get a good understanding of it just by reading a few books; you wouldn't expect that with economics, chemistry or physics, and social sciences are the same.

If you want a single collection, you're only going to get the juicy, extremely biased stuff like Zinn and so on. Still a very important read, but like Hawk said, take it with a grain of salt.


Unfortunately I just really don't have the time to spend that such a study would require. It's pretty rare that you find a book where you don't get the impression that the author simply ignores evidences that don't support his point, rather than trying to explain everything, not being afraid to point out and admit where things just add up. That's not the behavior that we learn in the "hard" sciences.
ShroomyD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Australia245 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-12 15:29:46
January 12 2010 15:26 GMT
#23
On January 12 2010 23:39 Hawk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 12 2010 09:05 ghostWriter wrote:
The definitions for liberal and conservative have changed dramatically since the time of the Revolutionary War. iirc, I think they meant the exact opposite of what they mean right now. I could be wrong though.


They've changed, but you're probably thinking more along the lines of the values of the Democrats and the Republicans. Jibba would know more than I would, but for instance, I'm pretty sure that republicans were for abolishment and the Dems were pro-slavery in the Civil War era.

The line was pretty skewed between parties with regards to pro-slavery stances. For instance in Lincoln's first inaugural address he praised slavery! Not to mention that Lincoln was a big supporter of this ole amendment that didn't quite get ratified (As seen in the letter from Lincoln to all state governors to support the amendment below(I think the only surviving copy of one of the letters is the letter to the governor of Florida)).

"No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State. (See U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 2nd Session, The Constitution of the United States of America: Unratified Amendments, Doc. No. 106-214)

The democrats were mostly just anti-war (and pro states rights...) during the American Civil War or as me and my peers like to call it 'The war for Southern independence' (hehe makes me look like a crank racist doesn't it?). It's all so terrible methinks. They could have freed the slaves in a much better way such as what Britain did (buying them off of slave owners). Instead 400,000 lives were lost and bitter southern sentiments were created which helped lead many peeps in the south to such a ridiculous culture of racism. I like to blame the imperfect US constitution for slavery~~ damn document~~! damn founders!!
아나코자본주의
ShroomyD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Australia245 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-12 15:36:45
January 12 2010 15:29 GMT
#24
On January 12 2010 07:39 jalstar wrote:
first book has a conservative bias (obvious from the cover)

second book has a liberal bias (not so obvious, but look up reviews)

.

Funny how you say that considering that the author is a Libertarian.
아나코자본주의
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32083 Posts
January 12 2010 15:42 GMT
#25
On January 13 2010 00:26 ShroomyD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 12 2010 23:39 Hawk wrote:
On January 12 2010 09:05 ghostWriter wrote:
The definitions for liberal and conservative have changed dramatically since the time of the Revolutionary War. iirc, I think they meant the exact opposite of what they mean right now. I could be wrong though.


They've changed, but you're probably thinking more along the lines of the values of the Democrats and the Republicans. Jibba would know more than I would, but for instance, I'm pretty sure that republicans were for abolishment and the Dems were pro-slavery in the Civil War era.

The line was pretty skewed between parties with regards to pro-slavery stances. For instance in Lincoln's first inaugural address he praised slavery! Not to mention that Lincoln was a big supporter of this ole amendment that didn't quite get ratified (As seen in the letter from Lincoln to all state governors to support the amendment below(I think the only surviving copy of one of the letters is the letter to the governor of Florida)).

"No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State. (See U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 2nd Session, The Constitution of the United States of America: Unratified Amendments, Doc. No. 106-214)

The democrats were mostly just anti-war (and pro states rights...) during the American Civil War or as me and my peers like to call it 'The war for Southern independence' (hehe makes me look like a crank racist doesn't it?). It's all so terrible methinks. They could have freed the slaves in a much better way such as what Britain did (buying them off of slave owners). Instead 400,000 lives were lost and bitter southern sentiments were created which helped lead many peeps in the south to such a ridiculous culture of racism. I like to blame the imperfect US constitution for slavery~~ damn document~~! damn founders!!


Yeah, you seem to know it better than I do, but it's just still pretty funny how much they've changed. Slavery doesn't seem to jive well with the whole ultra left thing that a lot of Dems have these days haha. Weren't the Dems the warhawks for WWII era?

It's just funny, because if a person only had knowledge of American politics from 2000-2010 and had no historical context at all, most people wouldn't guess that
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 27m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 84
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 929
Stork 500
PianO 148
Last 135
NotJumperer 26
Terrorterran 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe494
ODPixel388
canceldota105
League of Legends
JimRising 633
Counter-Strike
PGG 158
Other Games
Hui .149
hungrybox87
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL12890
Other Games
gamesdonequick729
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 49
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2479
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
1h 27m
BSL Team A[vengers]
3h 27m
Dewalt vs ZeLoT
UltrA vs ZeLoT
SC4ALL
3h 27m
SC4ALL
3h 27m
BSL 21
8h 27m
BSL Team A[vengers]
1d 3h
Cross vs Sobenz
Sziky vs IcaruS
SC4ALL
1d 4h
SC4ALL
1d 4h
BSL 21
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
BSL 21 Team A
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
SC4ALL: Brood War
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

YSL S2
BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.