




Blogs > GosI[Terran] |
GosI[Terran]1
Mexico65 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
:/ | ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
GosI[Terran]1
Mexico65 Posts
| ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
Would be helpful if you explained how it differs from CS. | ||
GosI[Terran]1
Mexico65 Posts
| ||
BaltA
Norway849 Posts
| ||
![]()
RaGe
Belgium9947 Posts
| ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
| ||
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
they even say fire in a hole in a bad korean accent :D | ||
Roffles
![]()
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
Snausages
United States529 Posts
| ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 06 2010 00:59 GosI[Terran] wrote: its faster than CS u die alot mroe easier than CS and snipe requires much more skill than in CS thats basically all diference I don't believe the part about the sniping but then again I haven't played the game... CS is definitely one of the hardest games to be a good sniper in, but the people who are good and on top of that are on fire in a match are definitely game changers. I'll have to try this before I can make any other judgements about it. | ||
Piy
Scotland3152 Posts
People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. | ||
Snausages
United States529 Posts
| ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
On January 06 2010 01:26 Piy wrote: Both games are good people. The physics are very different in each and the skill sets required are moderately different. People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. read my nickname, I know about games, my best friend is a video game designer, MW2 is the best fps of 2009. | ||
Warfie
Norway2846 Posts
On January 06 2010 01:53 ffswowsucks wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 01:26 Piy wrote: Both games are good people. The physics are very different in each and the skill sets required are moderately different. People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. read my nickname, I know about games, my best friend is a video game designer, MW2 is the best fps of 2009. Your nickname and your best friend being a game designer hardly qualifies for knowledge of games. Also, he said competetively, which means it could still very well be the best fps of 2009. | ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
| ||
Tenryu
United States565 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:06 Warfie wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 01:53 ffswowsucks wrote: On January 06 2010 01:26 Piy wrote: Both games are good people. The physics are very different in each and the skill sets required are moderately different. People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. read my nickname, I know about games, my best friend is a video game designer, MW2 is the best fps of 2009. Your nickname and your best friend being a game designer hardly qualifies for knowledge of games. Also, he said competetively, which means it could still very well be the best fps of 2009. I agree. MW2 single player was insanely sick but multiplayer is way too ez and i dont see the game going anywhere great competitively. | ||
oob
Sweden630 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:18 ffswowsucks wrote: oh ye to be able to finish a degree and work for the video game industry doesnt require knowledge of games. suuuureeee.and we play video games hardcore since we were 8 y old. This guy made me rofl for a good 20 minutes. Awesome. | ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
| ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote: this game looks crap in comparison with MW2 Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o | ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:26 Boblion wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote: this game looks crap in comparison with MW2 Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay. | ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 02:26 Boblion wrote: On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote: this game looks crap in comparison with MW2 Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay. Ok you are definitly a troll. | ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2294 Posts
ps: i m out of this topic, dont wanna start a conversation around MW2, it will ruin the thread. On a sidenote if the OP has this game for its 2nd favorite, so be it. other people have wow for their favorite game, not gonna critizise more. | ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 02:26 Boblion wrote: On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote: this game looks crap in comparison with MW2 Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay. Nobody is saying it doesn't but MW2 is one of those games that will be huge for a couple years and then nobody will play it... CS and BW on the other hand, both are ancient games and are AMAZINGLY popular and still considered huge. | ||
CoL_Drake
Germany455 Posts
| ||
9287
United States134 Posts
| ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66163 Posts
On January 06 2010 01:22 GreEny K wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 00:59 GosI[Terran] wrote: its faster than CS u die alot mroe easier than CS and snipe requires much more skill than in CS thats basically all diference I don't believe the part about the sniping but then again I haven't played the game... CS is definitely one of the hardest games to be a good sniper in, but the people who are good and on top of that are on fire in a match are definitely game changers. I'll have to try this before I can make any other judgements about it. it's kinda true, I watched a few live games of it and the difference in skill and speed displayed by the players is just incredible | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
| ||
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
Imo sa is "just another FPS". I don't find it very interesting and the gameplay doesn't run as smooth as cs. | ||
Try
United States1293 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:32 ffswowsucks wrote: First you try to make a point to something and then because I make an argument you call me a troll. anything more clever to say at least? ps: i m out of this topic, dont wanna start a conversation around MW2, it will ruin the thread. On a sidenote if the OP has this game for its 2nd favorite, so be it. other people have wow for their favorite game, not gonna critizise more. My friend is game designer i play many game so i am game expertzzzz; i can make concrete rankzz of games and people who dont agree are stoopid and wrong. btw this blog sucks. "zomg i like this game" followed by a youtube video. solid. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 02:26 Boblion wrote: On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote: this game looks crap in comparison with MW2 Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay. Lol, you think mw2 is good for competition, thats cute. Sorry, but its designed way too terrible. | ||
Re-Play-
Dominican Republic825 Posts
| ||
WeSt
Portugal918 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
This game is popular in korea and is TRASH. I know one of the coaches for the eSTRO team and HE doesn't like the game (he is former pro CS player in korea). | ||
banana
Netherlands1189 Posts
| ||
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
Has the best graphics too. | ||
Kashll
United States1117 Posts
On January 06 2010 04:02 Re-Play- wrote: my second best game is Unreal tournament 2004 ^^ True story sir. It had the best competitive 5v5 CTF of any FPS game ever made. | ||
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On January 06 2010 00:59 GosI[Terran] wrote: its faster than CS u die alot mroe easier than CS and snipe requires much more skill than in CS thats basically all diference How do you die faster in SA than in CS? You get shot in the head...you die with 1 bullet. Also explain how sniping requires MUCH more skill than in cs? Have you played CS at a high level? Using the AWP in 1.6 is extremely hard when going against top players. If you are gonna argue at least provide statements that back up the garbage you just posted. | ||
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
| ||
aeroH
United States1034 Posts
On January 06 2010 04:02 Re-Play- wrote: my second best game is Unreal tournament 2004 ^^ that's up there too | ||
Terranist
United States2496 Posts
| ||
dhe95
United States1213 Posts
| ||
Amarxist
United States371 Posts
Also, it came out same year as SC; that makes it automatically awesome. | ||
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:20 Tenryu wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 02:06 Warfie wrote: On January 06 2010 01:53 ffswowsucks wrote: On January 06 2010 01:26 Piy wrote: Both games are good people. The physics are very different in each and the skill sets required are moderately different. People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. read my nickname, I know about games, my best friend is a video game designer, MW2 is the best fps of 2009. Your nickname and your best friend being a game designer hardly qualifies for knowledge of games. Also, he said competetively, which means it could still very well be the best fps of 2009. I agree. MW2 single player was insanely sick but multiplayer is way too ez and i dont see the game going anywhere great competitively. On January 06 2010 02:06 Warfie wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 01:53 ffswowsucks wrote: On January 06 2010 01:26 Piy wrote: Both games are good people. The physics are very different in each and the skill sets required are moderately different. People saying they played SA and thought it sucked compared to 1.6 are probably just unused to the different mechanics. And the people comparing it to MW2...that game is lol bad competetively. read my nickname, I know about games, my best friend is a video game designer, MW2 is the best fps of 2009. Your nickname and your best friend being a game designer hardly qualifies for knowledge of games. Also, he said competetively, which means it could still very well be the best fps of 2009. ahahahaha | ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
CS is like auto death | ||
FlamyDeath
Netherlands146 Posts
On January 06 2010 09:41 Kenpachi wrote: rofl how the fuck do you die faster in some other game that isnt CS CS is like auto death Try OPF, ARMA(2). I've watched some SA and it just bores me to hell. I'm still sad that CS 1.6 is so much better then Source but I guess thats partialy due too nostalgia-goggles from my side. :/ | ||
Comeh
United States18918 Posts
On January 06 2010 10:24 FlamyDeath wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 09:41 Kenpachi wrote: rofl how the fuck do you die faster in some other game that isnt CS CS is like auto death I've watched some SA and it just bores me to hell. I'm still sad that CS 1.6 is so much better then Source but I guess thats partialy due too nostalgia-goggles from my side. :/ No no no. Cs 1.6 IS better than source. Just less pretty. | ||
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On January 06 2010 10:44 Comeh wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 10:24 FlamyDeath wrote: On January 06 2010 09:41 Kenpachi wrote: rofl how the fuck do you die faster in some other game that isnt CS CS is like auto death I've watched some SA and it just bores me to hell. I'm still sad that CS 1.6 is so much better then Source but I guess thats partialy due too nostalgia-goggles from my side. :/ No no no. Cs 1.6 IS better than source. Just less pretty. what? thats what he just said... | ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 06 2010 11:21 eXigent. wrote: what? thats what he just said... I think his point is that it's better, nostalgia-goggles or not. | ||
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
| ||
Mickey
United States2606 Posts
On January 06 2010 09:07 Amarxist wrote: Starsiege Tribes, hardest FPS in my opinion. Fucking miss that game so much (it pretty much defined team play that you'd see in UT later on, vehicles and all). So ahead of its time to. To much of a learning curve to get new people introduced so it was killed by its own difficulty, that and the 3rd iteration of it was poorly done slop. Also, it came out same year as SC; that makes it automatically awesome. Isn't it that game where people could practically fly and stuff? I think I saw an old youtube video about it. Seemed really interesting. edit:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8n_lrVtcj0 | ||
Tenryu
United States565 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:24 ffswowsucks wrote: guys saying that MW2 isnt competitive, did u actually set up a clanmatch 5v5 like they do in CS tourneys or u just play online TDM alone in ur room. Cause its a big difference to play on LAN 5v5 than play online alone. Any fps with auto-aim like MW2 wont go far competively, for the console atleast. However for the PC, i still dont see it becoming as popular as CS is. | ||
Tenryu
United States565 Posts
On January 06 2010 12:32 Mickey wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2010 09:07 Amarxist wrote: Starsiege Tribes, hardest FPS in my opinion. Fucking miss that game so much (it pretty much defined team play that you'd see in UT later on, vehicles and all). So ahead of its time to. To much of a learning curve to get new people introduced so it was killed by its own difficulty, that and the 3rd iteration of it was poorly done slop. Also, it came out same year as SC; that makes it automatically awesome. Isn't it that game where people could practically fly and stuff? I think I saw an old youtube video about it. Seemed really interesting. edit:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8n_lrVtcj0 Ahh i loved Tribes and it was indeed hard. Too bad it didnt pick up as much as i hoped. | ||
GosI[Terran]1
Mexico65 Posts
| ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
![]() | ||
Comeh
United States18918 Posts
Some pretty good shots, and yes it does take skill to play that game, but still. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • practicex StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Berry_CruncH48 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends Other Games |
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
RSL Revival
|
|