Patch 1.3.3 on this week? - Page 5
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
| ||
nekuodah
England2409 Posts
| ||
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:28 Novalisk wrote: Looks like Thorzain gets stuck with a disadvantage yet again. Why? Not all his TvP builds are thor based. On May 09 2011 23:29 Darpa wrote: I honestly cant believe they would initiate a patch right before the finals of 2 of the biggest tournaments around. Brutal decision. This is sort of my sentiment. Seems like a very weird timing. | ||
Aristodemus
England1978 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:21 Uhh Negative wrote: Chronoboost removes 10 seconds. Either way, you can't really say something like this, if a protoss wants to get out warpgate at the same fast timing they used to do (used 2 chronos on it) now they have to use 4 chronos on it to get it out the same time. Obviously a pretty big change. 5 CB, hardcore 4gate already used 4. It just means one less CB on probes at the start and a 10second later 4gate. Wont stop its strength at all. | ||
teekesselchen
Germany886 Posts
"We got this super huge bigass LAN tournament, but gotta move it because we fear we can't play proplery because Bnet servers might be down." Yeah. Imagine it would not be GSL but something like IEM or Dreamhack, where they have a much tighter schedule and play, for example, on Cebit and thus can't move their schedule freely. | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
I'm Zerg, so going against Archons hurts, but I just love them. They're so awesome! | ||
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
5 CB, hardcore 4gate already used 4. It just means one less CB on probes at the start and a 10second later 4gate. Wont stop its strength at all. A slightly weaker 4-gate economy, and a 4-gate that hits 13 seconds later, is a pretty big deal when you're frantically trying to CB out an Immortal. But for non-Toss matchups, and if you aren't 4-gating or doing another early game all-in, I'd agree its fairly negligible | ||
Reborn8u
United States1761 Posts
| ||
ALPINA
3791 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:28 Novalisk wrote: Looks like Thorzain gets stuck with a disadvantage yet again. The purpose of patch is to balance a game, so after the patch matchups will(should) be more fair. You better say that before the patch someone is a a disadvantage. | ||
Qwix
531 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:49 Reborn8u wrote: I think this of shows how much Blizzard understands and cares about esports. Also, how seriously they take it in their decision making. Speaking about overreacting.. there are tons of Starcraft 2 tournaments nowadays launching/ending on a daily base. They really can't adapt there schedule to everyone nor make them all happy at the same time. I would argue the PTR time was rather low and expected it to be launched a bit later however. | ||
Mercury-
Great Britain804 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:51 Alpina wrote: The purpose of patch is to balance a game, so after the patch matchups will(should) be more fair. You better say that before the patch someone is a a disadvantage. It's hardly like P is at a disadvantage lategame right now, in any matchup. | ||
Sandster
United States4054 Posts
| ||
Bagonad
Denmark173 Posts
| ||
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
On May 09 2011 23:58 Sandster wrote: Did anyone get hilarious flashbacks of a certain group of ultralisks destroying a group of thors in the GSL1? A new patch which got hotfixed in about one day. Well, at least they had an entire PTR to test out the changes before applying them to the real game. Hopefully, nothing will get fucked up in the transition between PTR and the full game. | ||
Dekker
Germany169 Posts
On May 10 2011 00:02 Bagonad wrote: You can actually just emp your thors before engaging the enemy, if it's a huge problem. Its still a darn retarded design no matter what.... Actually I'd rather see the upgrae completly gone, but since Blizzard will not do that we just wont use Thors vs P again. Pretty much like it was back at the beginning. | ||
GxZ
United States375 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43256 Posts
| ||
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
On May 10 2011 00:16 Dekker wrote: Its still a darn retarded design no matter what.... Actually I'd rather see the upgrae completly gone, but since Blizzard will not do that we just wont use Thors vs P again. Pretty much like it was back at the beginning. Alot of thor based builds involve an early push, in which your gas is starved, you cant get a ghost academy and a ghost without screwing with your timing,. so it makes a big difference in build orders. | ||
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
| ||
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
On May 10 2011 00:32 Darpa wrote: Alot of thor based builds involve an early push, in which your gas is starved, you cant get a ghost academy and a ghost without screwing with your timing,. so it makes a big difference in build orders. to be fair in such a situation templars arent out and if they are out the 100 dmg from that one feedback wont break your strat. but ofcourse the thor change is bad and way too early. having to emp your own units is just plain stupid. On May 10 2011 00:33 Striding Strider wrote: Thursday for Korea, so about Friday for Europe then? no should be wednesday eu, tuesday us. | ||
| ||