It could be 2 - 5 but i mean ~~setup speculation~~
Autumn Leaves Mafia - Page 11
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
It could be 2 - 5 but i mean ~~setup speculation~~ | ||
Conversion
United States3308 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia8976 Posts
On September 28 2018 08:25 Conversion wrote: 6/3 is way too unforgiving as town imo, and I don’t know anything about balance in mafia. I’d buy a 6/2/1 maybe i already considered if chez could be 3rd party, but OP only lists town and mafia. | ||
Mocsta
Australia8976 Posts
On September 28 2018 07:51 Mocsta wrote: btw, thank you to prplhz for seeking clarification from koshi.I dunno how we would ever tell because Koshi goes from this and then literally to this (bear in mind, no one else posted in between this).... This post is false. Koshi confirms later that the first post is about HF being town. Koshi never actually comments on vivax until this list post. so i can totally see a world where scum!koshi/vivax are bantering with each other, and keeping options open to then jump across.. but that never happens. this is more relevant given that grack voted me BEFORE prplhz went onto vivax, so vivax lynch was certainly not set in stone. Grack vote on me looks pretty honest and left-field, so I dont see it as an attempt by scum to take pressure off vivax. I just think this conspiracy stuff is over the top. It comes back down to HF / Chezinu for me. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Chezinu
United States7409 Posts
On September 26 2018 09:48 Chezinu wrote: Player List 1) Holyflare 2) Vivax 3) prplhz 4) Grackaroni - What kind of Grackaroni should I be this game? 5) Chezinu - undefined 6) OriginalName 7) Mocsta - refusing to claim town 8. Koshi - claims "I am town" 9. Conversion - claims "I'm town" First 3 signups still need to report OriginalName joins Post Chez and no post Vivax has reported. So.. Mocsta did not claim town. ON was suspect. Chez joins Mocsta and scares everybody OFF ON including Mocsta. Being undefined in a game with no 3rd party. Plurality for vote, yet so few votes. Vivax afk, so mafia could not save. Until the end, when Vivac was there, but by then Mafia afk or bus or lacked a possible hop. With Vivax and a fellow Mafia, if the mafia was on Vivax and active. Once Vivax appeared, could have hopped together joining a town against another town, which there was plenty. Making a 3 v 2. However, if mafia not on Vivax.. what hope? Vivax voted solo with no forced wagon hope. So fellow afk mafia, committed busser mafia, or hopeless/hopless option. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 28 2018 10:15 Chezinu wrote: Vivax has reported. So.. Mocsta did not claim town. ON was suspect. Chez joins Mocsta and scares everybody OFF ON including Mocsta. Being undefined in a game with no 3rd party. Plurality for vote, yet so few votes. Vivax afk, so mafia could not save. Until the end, when Vivac was there, but by then Mafia afk or bus or lacked a possible hop. With Vivax and a fellow Mafia, if the mafia was on Vivax and active. Once Vivax appeared, could have hopped together joining a town against another town, which there was plenty. Making a 3 v 2. However, if mafia not on Vivax.. what hope? Vivax voted solo with no forced wagon hope. So fellow afk mafia, committed busser mafia, or hopeless/hopless option. Except by the time the lynch on vivax had more or less solidified moving the lynch last second wouldve been by far the most suspicious possible play. At least that's kind of what I'm parsing from this. | ||
Conversion
United States3308 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia8976 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 28 2018 10:15 Chezinu wrote: Vivax has reported. So.. Mocsta did not claim town. ON was suspect. Chez joins Mocsta and scares everybody OFF ON including Mocsta. Being undefined in a game with no 3rd party. Plurality for vote, yet so few votes. Vivax afk, so mafia could not save. Until the end, when Vivac was there, but by then Mafia afk or bus or lacked a possible hop. With Vivax and a fellow Mafia, if the mafia was on Vivax and active. Once Vivax appeared, could have hopped together joining a town against another town, which there was plenty. Making a 3 v 2. However, if mafia not on Vivax.. what hope? Vivax voted solo with no forced wagon hope. So fellow afk mafia, committed busser mafia, or hopeless/hopless option. Good recap. People should tinfoil around this. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 28 2018 05:30 KelsierSC wrote: Vote Count - Day 1 OriginalName (1): Holyflare (0): Mocsta (1): Koshi (1): Holyflare Vivax (3): OriginalName, Koshi, prplhz Chezinu (1): Mocsta, prplhz (1): Conversion Not voted (1): Vivax It's looking like a tree is going to fall on Vivax tonight. Day 1 ends in at 22:00 GMT (+00:00). The voting thread is here. After this there was 1 vote. Which was Vivax on me. Which means if ON or prplhz are mafia they could save Vivax but show face. prplhz is not mafia ofc. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 28 2018 10:52 Conversion wrote: IMO day 2 lynch should be into non-Vivax votes and into me/holyflare/grackaroni/chezchez/mocsta? or am I seeing this game wrong ON is most likely mafia. But you could do what you suggest. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
I quote some but cba to put too much work in it. Some might sound like reaching a bit but that is because you people are not on the same level as I am. That is ok. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 27 2018 02:31 OriginalName wrote: I'm down to at the very least pressure some afkers no point to committing to lynching them this early tbh got a whole day to kick around still. Contradictive sentence but also with his next move in the game. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 27 2018 06:49 OriginalName wrote: I might've phrased that kinda mediocrely, I also didn't vote for an afker, lemme fix that rq ##Vote Vivax i mean it's definitely not a terrible option with the amount of information we have, I'd rather argue over policy lynching in the first place and have people actually talking than actually going through with the policy lynch but eh its not even getting into least bad option territory - although the faster it becomes the least bad option the better as usually we actually have other options at that point. I pressure him a bit on that post and he votes Vivax. So basically doing what he didnt want to do because pressure. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 27 2018 07:24 OriginalName wrote: oh ya btw can totally confirmed i pick Vivax cause he hasn't posted even once. Very nonchalant post style. One may say too nonchalant and oit of character. MAXIMUM TINFOIL | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 27 2018 22:13 OriginalName wrote: I don't think I'm pushing that hard into afk lynching at all considering I stated multiple times that if a better option presented itself I'd prefer that. I also don't think Mocsta is scum just for voting me over a difference of opinion and I'm honestly confused why he went all "IF ITS BETWEEN ME AND ON IM GOING TO VOTE ON!!!!" when honestly I think both of us are pretty piss poor options since at least we were trying have some posts with actual substance. Holyflare and Conversion both arguing over minor semantics like 'how green should your reads start' literally just reads like posting for the sake of posting to me. Which I mean is better than just lurking but considering that honestly it shouldn't matter how people read as long as you're willing to be objective and actually be willing to change your reads. and like cool now everyones posted, tbh i think its weird that chezinu just quickly hops on the first wagon presented and I'd like to know why he did that. I haven't exactly been around for more than a few years and I'm not trawling 5-6 games to metagame you guys so I'm just saying how it looks to me without past context. His best post and I repeat myself | ||
Koshi
Belgium38410 Posts
On September 28 2018 01:14 Koshi wrote: Good defense. But that is what it is. A defense. Would be better if the good observation made here was on the attack. Why are you smart while defending and mediocre on the attack? bad on. | ||
| ||