News media: discerning bias, propaganda, and lies - Page 5
Forum Index > General Forum |
MoonfireSpam
United Kingdom1153 Posts
| ||
Sermokala
United States13608 Posts
On May 30 2017 02:07 MoonfireSpam wrote: Now this isn't to say that fake news should be allowed, but isn't more of the problem that "people" can't critically think or appraise what they are reading? Its pointless to complain about things you can't control or change. | ||
Dapper_Cad
United Kingdom964 Posts
On May 30 2017 02:14 Sermokala wrote: Its pointless to complain about things you can't control or change. Generally it's pointless to complain. However we can recognize that education in the U.S. and the U.K. is woeful and that we can do something about that. We can vote for parties that will tax the rich and invest in good public schooling. As a follow up for the poles who were discussing facebook moderation above: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/may/21/revealed-facebook-internal-rulebook-sex-terrorism-violence | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
We are all susceptible to manipulation by media. It is the root of advertising and the why we build casinos. The general public has a limited ability to deal with mass propaganda and attempts as manipulation on a large scale. There is only so much critical thinking can accomplish. It is easy to view Facebook and Google as systems we control and what we find there to be our own choice. But that isn't reality. We don't control what appears on the news sections of google and facebook. The disturbing part of these site isn't the 1984 total control of media we feared post WW2. It is that they could become the opposite through a lack of control, allowing unlimited disinformation at all times and no ability to fact check. | ||
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
Not to mention that these same media conglomerates have played their part in the scaremongering with regards to terrorism (and thus essentially working side-by-side with the terrorists, and instilling fear of immigrants in the population). But, you know, Hitler, so we better keep it the way it is now. Close the thread people, we're done. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 30 2017 18:51 a_flayer wrote: And yet, the current system is working hard at whitewashing the war crimes caused by weapons sold by the United States. I'd say that mass propaganda seems to be happening right now due to the fact that there's just a few media conglomerates that exert at least some level of top-down control over their messaging. Messaging that largely forgoes criticism towards the state foreign policy and large corporations due to the few wealthy people with that top-down control that are profiting from it all in various ways (ad-money, stock options, etc). You can argue that there are a few outlets that do speak honestly about these things, but the simple fact is that many people do not get exposed to this kind of thing because of the masses of mainstream media that leave out details such as the war crimes in Yemen, which perpetuates the murders & rampant inequality due to lack of outrage. Not to mention that these same media conglomerates have played their part in the scaremongering with regards to terrorism (and thus essentially working side-by-side with the terrorists, and instilling fear of immigrants in the population). But, you know, Hitler, so we better keep it the way it is now. Close the thread people, we're done. Godwin’s law really shouldn’t apply in a thread about propaganda, since Nazi Germany is a case study in the power of state media propaganda. But you are 100% correct that the fear mongering about terrorism has only fed the flames of violence. | ||
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On May 30 2017 18:51 a_flayer wrote: And yet, the current system is working hard at whitewashing the war crimes caused by weapons sold by the United States. I'd say that mass propaganda seems to be happening right now due to the fact that there's just a few media conglomerates that exert at least some level of top-down control over their messaging. Messaging that largely forgoes criticism towards the state foreign policy and large corporations due to the few wealthy people with that top-down control that are profiting from it all in various ways (ad-money, stock options, etc). You can argue that there are a few outlets that do speak honestly about these things, but the simple fact is that many people do not get exposed to this kind of thing because of the masses of mainstream media that leave out details such as the war crimes in Yemen, which perpetuates the murders & rampant inequality due to lack of outrage. Not to mention that these same media conglomerates have played their part in the scaremongering with regards to terrorism (and thus essentially working side-by-side with the terrorists, and instilling fear of immigrants in the population). But, you know, Hitler, so we better keep it the way it is now. Close the thread people, we're done. Because it's the Corporate world that sells the Weapons. That is Plutocracy 101. | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8801 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43257 Posts
| ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On May 30 2017 22:38 Plansix wrote: Godwin’s law really shouldn’t apply in a thread about propaganda, since Nazi Germany is a case study in the power of state media propaganda. But you are 100% correct that the fear mongering about terrorism has only fed the flames of violence. The problem here, is that it was the US and Woodrow Wilson (re: Bernays and Lippman) that created the modern idea of propaganda (an idea which was borrowed by Hitler and Nazi Germany), not Nazi Germany. If you have any finger to point you need to point it at progressive icon Woodrow Wilson and the US. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-woodrow-wilsons-propaganda-machine-changed-american-journalism-180963082/ | ||
Wulfey_LA
932 Posts
EDIT: to be explicit: What is fake news to Libs / Evidence based reality community: Hannity, FOX commentators, Breitbart, Trump, Sinclair Broadcasting Network, literally everything Pence says about reality (check it out, he is opposite man). What is fake news to Cons / Cultists: everything that isn't wholly devoted to Trump and within the Conservative Entertainment industry. Literally all of it. And any evidence that might go against Dear Leader. | ||
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
On July 16 2017 12:42 Wulfey_LA wrote: The President says that the CBO produces Fake News and his cultists and a huge Conservatainment propaganda industry repeat it. The CBO isn't some New Organization with an axe to grind. They are the last vestige of professional economics analysis in government. They still get called Fake News and a huge amount of people believe it. We can yammer about media bias all we want but we need to acknowledge the yawning asymmetry as to what people of different political persuasions consider to be Fake News. EDIT: to be explicit: What is fake news to Libs / Evidence based reality community: Hannity, FOX commentators, Breitbart, Trump, Sinclair Broadcasting Network, literally everything Pence says about reality (check it out, he is opposite man). What is fake news to Cons / Cultists: everything that isn't wholly devoted to Trump and within the Conservative Entertainment industry. Literally all of it. And any evidence that might go against Dear Leader. Yeah... the whole Trump thing really undermines any legitimate criticism that may be leveled against mainstream news sources other than Fox & co. It's problematic. | ||
ninazerg
United States7290 Posts
On July 16 2017 12:42 Wulfey_LA wrote: What is fake news to Libs / Evidence based reality community: Hannity, FOX commentators, Breitbart, Trump, Sinclair Broadcasting Network, literally everything Pence says about reality (check it out, he is opposite man). What is fake news to Cons / Cultists: everything that isn't wholly devoted to Trump and within the Conservative Entertainment industry. Literally all of it. And any evidence that might go against Dear Leader. Liberals do not have a monopoly on "evidence-based reality". | ||
farvacola
United States18805 Posts
On July 16 2017 12:42 Wulfey_LA wrote: The President says that the CBO produces Fake News and his cultists and a huge Conservatainment propaganda industry repeat it. The CBO isn't some New Organization with an axe to grind. They are the last vestige of professional economics analysis in government. They still get called Fake News and a huge amount of people believe it. We can yammer about media bias all we want but we need to acknowledge the yawning asymmetry as to what people of different political persuasions consider to be Fake News. EDIT: to be explicit: What is fake news to Libs / Evidence based reality community: Hannity, FOX commentators, Breitbart, Trump, Sinclair Broadcasting Network, literally everything Pence says about reality (check it out, he is opposite man). What is fake news to Cons / Cultists: everything that isn't wholly devoted to Trump and within the Conservative Entertainment industry. Literally all of it. And any evidence that might go against Dear Leader. To be fair, even a number of Fox News commentators have stopped straddling the Trump train in recent days. Shepard Smith in particular has really changed his tune as of late. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43257 Posts
On July 16 2017 15:46 ninazerg wrote: Liberals do not have a monopoly on "evidence-based reality". I don't think most liberals are happy that most conservatives don't give a shit about evidence or reality, but in terms of which group is known for lying and fearmongering and hatemongering a hundred times to one, the conservatives pretty much have no dog in the fight for truth and facts. Currently. It'd be great if they could be intellectually honest someday. | ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On April 07 2017 23:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: All news in the US, particularly, is biased and pretty much 60% propaganda. Hell look at the morning shows on basic cable half of it is literally infomercials and them talking about where they shopped and ate last then having a "interview" with said employees/managers to advertise for the next ten minutes. That's not even taking account the war drums the media is ready to beat for anyone or anything. It's all consumer bullshit. From the same networks that own pretty much every other thing in the country. It's disheartening to find such an irresponsible statement by a moderator. It's both false and feeds people's perception that their biased media is acceptable because all media is biased. | ||
CUTtheCBC
Canada91 Posts
i was thinking like, scrape their results and do sentiment analysis? check out the images they use via google image?? any suggestions? | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43257 Posts
On July 16 2017 23:03 CUTtheCBC wrote: what's a good way to objectively analyze a news site for bias ? i was thinking like, scrape their results and do sentiment analysis? check out the images they use via google image?? any suggestions? I think fact-checking major claims against other/ original sources and being able to analyze the way certain things are worded are useful tools to address bias. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43257 Posts
Or you could have sources like Fox News or InfoWars, who are both biased and generally incorrect. I'm sure we're all aware by now the multiple studies that have shown that Fox News viewers are, on average, less informed about the news than not just other news viewers, but people who don't watch any news at all! And nobody would say that Fox News doesn't have a biased, conservative, anti-progressive agenda. | ||
| ||