2016 NFL and CFB Season Discussion - Page 224
Forum Index > Sports |
ZerOCoolSC2
8863 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18815 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On April 30 2017 23:20 JimmiC wrote: Oh bills, nothing says well run organization like fireing your gm and whole scouting staff day after draft. Yeah, WTF. Their draft didn't look that bad, and the trade back in the first round was particularly good. | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On May 01 2017 02:23 xDaunt wrote: Yeah, WTF. Their draft didn't look that bad, and the trade back in the first round was particularly good. They probably already decided to fire him before the draft but it was too late in the process to bring in a new staff. It's part of the criticism the redskins got for firing their GM so close to the draft but they apparently kept his scouts and his draft board to use for the draft | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
The beauty of the draft is in the eye of the beholder. It will take years for these players to succeed or falter and the true outcome of which teams got it right and which ones struck out is impossible to know right now. But that hasn't stopped evaluators and decision-makers around the NFL from whispering about what they liked and what they didn't like. And no team is being met with more scrutiny than the Bears. It's not a revelation that things are not great between young GM Ryan Pace and old-school head coach John Fox. I've been reporting and commenting on it since before last season. But it is reaching a nadir and the puzzling decision to give up a ransom to move up one spot and take QB Mitchell Trubisky, who would have been sitting there at pick No. 3 anyway, is just one of several decisions that has others questioning the longevity of this regime in Chicago. "We don't know what the hell they were doing," said an executive from one team that is routinely in the postseason. "It's all anyone is talking about. It's really bad between Pace and Fox. Fox is fuming about being left in the dark on the trade (for Trubisky). I don't know anyone who likes their draft. From the first pick on, we can't figure out what they were doing. Go back and look at how many small-school kids they took. People around the league are shocked. It's really bad between Pace and Fox." An executive from another team noted: "Either the Bears know something no one else in the league knows, or that draft just got a lot of people fired only they don't know it yet." Source. | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
cLutZ
United States19571 Posts
| ||
GTR
51299 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
I don't think he was able to kick touchbacks against us consistently this year either | ||
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On May 06 2017 02:59 andrewlt wrote: So the two major "off the field issues" prospects were drafted by the Raiders and the Bengals? I wasn't paying attention to the draft. Yes and the Browns took the 3rd | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
Titusmaster6
United States5935 Posts
| ||
cLutZ
United States19571 Posts
| ||
Sermokala
United States13700 Posts
| ||
cLutZ
United States19571 Posts
On May 06 2017 08:18 Sermokala wrote: I think Jay cutler got a raw deal by a lot of chicago fans. He was an thoughtfully average QB that was overpaid in a market that overpays QB's. No. He got the appropriate treatment (as did the front office), the problem is other fans and media who consistently fellate guys like Joe Flukeo by calling them "franchise QBs". | ||
GTR
51299 Posts
| ||
cLutZ
United States19571 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
| ||