NASA and the Private Sector - Page 92
Forum Index > General Forum |
Keep debates civil. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
iHirO
United Kingdom1381 Posts
| ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8801 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Yrr
Germany796 Posts
On May 28 2016 14:05 iHirO wrote: This is pretty cool! + Show Spoiler + https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4jEz03Z8azc Pretty amazing but I wonder how long or rather short it would take in normal speed. | ||
iHirO
United Kingdom1381 Posts
On May 28 2016 18:33 Yrr wrote: Pretty amazing but I wonder how long or rather short it would take in normal speed. Its about 6x speed. If you check out the webcast, you can see the first stage reenter at normal speed until it hits the upper atmosphere. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
EDIT-1: EDIT-2: EDIT-3: | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
EDIT-1: Once BEAM expands over 40 inches in length it can withstand higher pressures, which should speed up the process. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
EDIT-1: | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
30 second burst now. + Show Spoiler + EDIT-1: EDIT-2: + Show Spoiler + EDIT-3: EDIT-4: | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Possible temp and pressure checks. Now breaking down control panel. EDIT-1: Relieving pressure for 10 seconds to bring down pressure slightly. | ||
arbiter_md
Moldova1219 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
During the next week, leak checks will be performed on BEAM to ensure its structural integrity. Hatch opening and NASA astronaut Jeff Williams’ first entrance into BEAM will take place about a week after leak checks are complete. BEAM is an example of NASA’s increased commitment to partnering with industry to enable the growth of the commercial use of space. The project is co-sponsored by NASA’s Advanced Exploration Systems Division and Bigelow Aerospace. Expandable habitats are designed to take up less room on a spacecraft but provide greater volume for living and working in space once expanded. This first test of an expandable module will allow investigators to gauge how well the habitat performs and specifically, how well it protects against solar radiation, space debris and the temperature extremes of space. Source | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + The launch vehicle Orbital ATK wants to face off against SpaceX and United Launch Alliance for lucrative U.S. military contracts would be made of two internally-built solid rocket motors and an upper stage engine supplied by Blue Origin, the entrepreneurial space firm led by Jeff Bezos, an Orbital ATK official said this week. The new rocket, dubbed the Next-Generation Launcher for now, would offer the U.S. Air Force a third option to launch the military’s communications, navigation, early warning and intelligence-gathering satellites. “The intention is that this will be a new family of launchers developed and qualified as a public-private partnership with joint Air Force and industry investment, and available for satellite launches as early as 2020,” said John Steinmeyer, director of strategy and business development for Orbital ATK’s launch vehicle division. Only SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and ULA’s Atlas 5 and Delta 4 launchers are currently certified to fly the Defense Department’s most sensitive and costly payloads. But ULA is retiring the base, medium-lift version of the Delta 4 around 2018, and a new Vulcan rocket with U.S.-built main engines is scheduled to debut in 2019, eventually replacing the Atlas 5 in the early 2020s. At that time, ULA’s Vulcan rocket and SpaceX’s Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy vehicles will likely share the military’s space launch load. The Pentagon requires two independent rocket families to ensure its satellites have a ride to space if one booster is unavailable. Steinmeyer said Orbital ATK will only go forward with its new rocket development if assured of Air Force funding support, but he said the company’s launcher design has “moderate” development costs. Source | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
| ||