|
I hope Stats wins this. He has been arround forever, just like TY and has never won anything Btw, Zest simply cant win vs any KT player lol. This is hilarious. Everyone has beaten Zest in various tournaments the last 2-3 years and yet he is the most succesful of them all. They really must hate him deep inside Ok with the expection of the GSL finals. I had forgotten about that
|
Mute City2363 Posts
On May 22 2016 22:37 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2016 22:36 Ej_ wrote:On May 22 2016 22:35 [PkF] Wire wrote: ling bling into blords such an entertaining razor edge style yeah this feels like a proper macro style for ZvP, even if you're getting counter-played you can still win. This is going to be the meta. there should be a slight chance lurker style (at least lurker hydra ling timings) make a resurgence to test the immortal shield nerf then again I'm really happy if ling bling becomes the meta, that's indeed a great style.
ling bling >>>>> roach ravager to watch.
Infestor ravager makes me want to gouge my eyes out
|
Canada8157 Posts
|
On May 22 2016 22:43 lastride wrote:I hope Stats wins this. He has been arround forever, just like TY and has never won anything Btw, Zest simply cant win vs any KT player lol. This is hilarious. Everyone has beaten Zest in various tournaments the last 2-3 years and yet he is the most succesful of them all. They really must hate him deep inside Well, he beat TY in the GSL finals where it mattered the most
|
On May 22 2016 22:43 Durnuu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2016 22:43 lastride wrote:I hope Stats wins this. He has been arround forever, just like TY and has never won anything Btw, Zest simply cant win vs any KT player lol. This is hilarious. Everyone has beaten Zest in various tournaments the last 2-3 years and yet he is the most succesful of them all. They really must hate him deep inside Well, he beat TY in the GSL finals where it mattered the most TY would lose even against me if it was for a title for his career
|
|
How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon?
|
On May 22 2016 22:48 HolydaKing wrote: How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon? too many
|
On May 22 2016 22:48 HolydaKing wrote: How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon? 18 I think (without upgrades)
|
|
Is that the counter to this play? Just attack with archons and wait with your zealots in the background?
|
On May 22 2016 22:49 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2016 22:48 HolydaKing wrote: How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon? too many Idk, I remember a game where mass Thors got destroyed by Banelings. Then again those don't have splash.
|
On May 22 2016 22:48 HolydaKing wrote: How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon? With no upgrades on anything just a casual 18 (maybe 19 if shields regen in time)
|
did Dark just take too much damage early on ? Or was he a bit wasteful with the blings (using them on stalkers + sentries then on stalkers + archons during the fight) ?
|
United States97273 Posts
Dark please don't lose to Stats!
|
On May 22 2016 22:50 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2016 22:48 HolydaKing wrote: How many banelings are needed to kill an Archon? With no upgrades on anything just a casual 18. 18*25 = 450 gas, if you take out some zealots while killing the archon I think that's still manageable
|
I thought it was gonna be vertical again. Ruins of Seras? It's usually always vertical.
|
these are the queen/ravager all-in spawns
|
On May 22 2016 22:52 Ej_ wrote: these are the queen/ravager all-in spawns Aren't those all spawns on all maps except 4-p maps cross?
|
On May 22 2016 22:52 Ej_ wrote: these are the queen/ravager all-in spawns I see you're a connoisseur
|
|
|
|