|
On May 04 2016 22:39 Shapelog wrote:Like this is how grammar mistake like that makes me feel The only reason i don't freak out when I do it, is because I don't see it.
It makes you feel like hitting women? That's dark bro.....
|
|
On May 04 2016 22:45 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 22:39 Shapelog wrote:Like this is how grammar mistake like that makes me feel The only reason i don't freak out when I do it, is because I don't see it. It makes you feel like hitting women? That's dark bro..... No, Incorrect Grammar is Wadsworth, and I am the women (peacock)
|
On May 04 2016 22:49 Fazers wrote: ##vote Mig
Um. I thought you said that didn't have a opinion on the afk people.
And was sus. of killing.
...
|
On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass.
|
I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
..
Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry!
|
Day 1 Votecount
Etellex (2): Alakaslam, Tubesock Palmar (1): nnn_thekushmountains Riceykins (1): Killing Tubesock (1): marvellosity Mig (1): Fazers Not Voting (7): Mig, Etellex, DrParnassus, justanothertownie, RiceyKins, Palmar, Shapelog
Day 1 ends Wednesday, May 04 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . TL countdown synchronizes with your device local time and not with the TL server time. It might be inaccurate.
|
On May 04 2016 15:37 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 15:37 justanothertownie wrote:On May 04 2016 15:35 Alakaslam wrote:On May 04 2016 15:33 justanothertownie wrote:On May 04 2016 15:16 Tubesock wrote: headed out for drinks and dinner. Will be back in a few hours. In the mean time:
Towns:
Kush Shape Slam Marvish Ricey jat
If I were to pick who to lynch of the "actives" as it were I'd take time deciding between killing and Fazer. I didnt' really like their answers but they are actually closer to null than anything. You can probably infer what I didn't like about them by some of the questions I directed at them.
for the inactives I'd lynch in this orderish
Dr Thrawn Etellex Mig (modkill though?) Palmar I don't see how ricey or shape can be in a townlist. I have no problem with Killing so far. I would not add Palmar to the inactivity policy lynches. This should tell you more. Not sure if just getting there first or not seeing it... Are you talking to me? Yes. Indirectly enough though- I apologize. Do you glean more than you are saying here or no?
@Slam were you trying to imply Tubesock is scummy based on town reads on myself and Shape based on how you and JAT were reading the game at the time? I'd like to know what else you were getting at here when you're around
|
On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
..
Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! So you think Killings posts since you made that read were also scummy? I still really do not understand this read.
|
Also please come back Dr.P
|
On May 04 2016 23:00 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
..
Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! So you think Killings posts since you made that read were also scummy? I still really do not understand this read. All I said in my previous post was that he is pointing fingers for useless reasons.
Is that so hard to understand?
|
On May 04 2016 23:02 Fazers wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 23:00 justanothertownie wrote:On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
..
Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! So you think Killings posts since you made that read were also scummy? I still really do not understand this read. All I said in my previous post was that he is pointing fingers for useless reasons. Is that so hard to understand? I disagree that it makes him mafia. And you avoided the question.
|
I never said it makes him scummy. On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
!
And to address your question I don't think his posts afterwards were scummy. At the very least the initial posts he made caught my attention.
I'm not out to get the guy, just attempted to make a read myself with what little we have! Thanks!
|
On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
..
Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! Have you read my response about your read on Killing?
Killing Mig is a total Crapshoot (A crapshoot is a risky or uncertain matter) since he has not made any posts. We could get lucky, and lynch him and he flips scum, yet it still is a crapshoot shot.
Other than Mig & Killing, is their anyone else you are sus. of?
|
On May 04 2016 23:08 Fazers wrote:I never said it makes him scummy. Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post
! And to address your question I don't think his posts afterwards were scummy. At the very least the initial posts he made caught my attention. I'm not out to get the guy, just attempted to make a read myself with what little we have! Thanks! I understand but,
To address your questions:
I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo.
Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! Idk understand this progression tbh.
|
And you want to lynch him, which means he should be scum in your eyes.
So if he is not scum, why the lynch?
Also I stop spamming.
|
I want to lynch him possibly. Why do you guys assume I want to get this man killed?
Just doing what I can to contribute lol, now I look like a fool.
|
ya leave poor fazers alone you guys.
|
On May 04 2016 23:16 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: ya leave poor fazers alone you guys. Stop it Kush. If you start defending him now he'll most likely get lynched.
|
On May 04 2016 23:13 Fazers wrote:I want to lynch him possibly. Why do you guys assume I want to get this man killed? Just doing what I can to contribute lol, now I look like a fool.
It's ok man, I think you're a little townie. But only a little. Like just the tip amount
|
|
|
|