Issues with diablo 3... - Page 2
Forum Index > Diablo 3 |
OoFuzer
Chile436 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States42339 Posts
Spent thousands of Euros on a Brand New State of the Art Gaming PC, Panasonic Viera Flatscreen HD TV, Expensive Desk and Leather Directors Chair, 100 Euro Keyboard, Steel Series Diablo Mouse and Mouse Pad, Expensive Speakers, Sound and Bass unit, And a Expensive new PC Desk.. Not to Mention the game itself. All of this equipment not sits idle and does not get used. I really don't think the problem here lies with Diablo 3. The problem here lies with the fact that you got a little overexcited for a single game and shelled out your life savings for no reason. | ||
IcedBacon
Canada906 Posts
On July 11 2012 12:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I really don't think the problem here lies with Diablo 3. The problem here lies with the fact that you got a little overexcited for a single game and shelled out your life savings for no reason. Yeah pretty much, I actually laughed out loud when I kept scrolling down and saw how long the OP was. | ||
Saeglopur
Canada177 Posts
See you back on D3 when 1.04 hits. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States42339 Posts
On July 11 2012 12:42 IcedBacon wrote: Yeah pretty much, I actually laughed out loud when I kept scrolling down and saw how long the OP was. I did as well. Granted, I think Diablo 3 is far from perfect, but a lot of those things in the list are just plain silly and random nonsense, He's mad that there are cheaters? Like in every game? Item names suck? Give me a break. (Some are actually hilarious.) | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
| ||
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
On July 11 2012 13:17 fishjie wrote: ok i agree the game is not good and vastly inferior to d2, but if you played 500 hours, i think you got your moneys worth unless its 500 hours of boredom, trying to like it, waiting for it to get better, etc | ||
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On July 11 2012 12:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I really don't think the problem here lies with Diablo 3. The problem here lies with the fact that you got a little overexcited for a single game and shelled out your life savings for no reason. His point is that he was clearly ready to love this game and was incredibly hyped, yet now finds himself against it. | ||
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
Also, what else is there to do in Iceland? (OP is from iceland apparently) | ||
Samba
Germany452 Posts
D2 was not even close to it´s prime when it got released, so many patches and expansions still to come... And the level-cap will increase also. | ||
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On July 11 2012 14:58 Samba wrote: How about you give it a little bit more time?! D2 was not even close to it´s prime when it got released, so many patches and expansions still to come... And the level-cap will increase also. so they couldn't build on what they already knew from D2? i hate when people say "wow, d2 was crap until they patched it 100 times or bw wasn't as good", the point is when you do anything the second time, you don't expect it to take as long, it's called learning. also, you will have to pay for the level-cap increase through an expansion of course. nothing is for free | ||
Entertaining
Canada793 Posts
| ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On July 11 2012 13:19 Assault_1 wrote: unless its 500 hours of boredom, trying to like it, waiting for it to get better, etc insanity = doing the same thing expecting a different result every time if you hate the game you'd think you'd quit before hitting the 500 hour mark personally i'm deeply disappointed in the game, but its fun enough that i will keep trying until i beat inferno. i take long breaks and play other games in the meantime and think about it 60$ game, 500 hours, that's pretty good value. assuming the OP wasn't dumb enough to use the RMAH | ||
Samba
Germany452 Posts
On July 11 2012 15:05 Doraemon wrote: so they couldn't build on what they already knew from D2? i hate when people say "wow, d2 was crap until they patched it 100 times or bw wasn't as good", the point is when you do anything the second time, you don't expect it to take as long, it's called learning. also, you will have to pay for the level-cap increase through an expansion of course. nothing is for free Ok, i give you that point, ofc they should have learned. And ofc i expected much more from the game too but i think we all have to realise, that the targetgroup of D3 isn´t the same as it was for D2. Games in generell have to appeal to a lot bigger pool of players just because the market itself got a lot bigger. So it´s really hard to find the right balance between casual and hardcore gamer who want to spent 1000´s of hours. It´s just not the same time anymore... But i still haven´t lost all hope that it´s gonna get better for the long-time gamer as more and more casuals drop out. And didn´t the level 99 cap came with Lord of Destruction?! That wasn´t for free either. | ||
Prime`Rib
United States613 Posts
I dont see how you need more than 10 slots since the skill are interchangeable. | ||
Serpest
United States603 Posts
On July 11 2012 15:36 Samba wrote: Ok, i give you that point, ofc they should have learned. And ofc i expected much more from the game too but i think we all have to realise, that the targetgroup of D3 isn´t the same as it was for D2. Games in generell have to appeal to a lot bigger pool of players just because the market itself got a lot bigger. So it´s really hard to find the right balance between casual and hardcore gamer who want to spent 1000´s of hours. It´s just not the same time anymore... But i still haven´t lost all hope that it´s gonna get better for the long-time gamer as more and more casuals drop out. And didn´t the level 99 cap came with Lord of Destruction?! That wasn´t for free either. No, the lvl cap of 99 was in the original d2. The amount of exp gained from Hell Act 3 and 4 wasn't enough to reach those higher levels. When LoD came out, that's when the boom of 97s and 98s happened. Before that you were lucky to reach 93/94. | ||
Spray
United States402 Posts
| ||
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
I aint reading this Great Wall of Text. User was warned for this post | ||
Samba
Germany452 Posts
On July 11 2012 15:51 Serpest wrote: No, the lvl cap of 99 was in the original d2. The amount of exp gained from Hell Act 3 and 4 wasn't enough to reach those higher levels. When LoD came out, that's when the boom of 97s and 98s happened. Before that you were lucky to reach 93/94. Oh ok, already so long ago... But i think the point still stands, you have to pay to reach it. | ||
Drayne
Canada239 Posts
| ||
| ||