|
On July 10 2012 03:55 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2012 03:38 The_Zen_Man wrote: JieXian, if i was lying, you could just lynch me d3 if mafia didnt kill me. That way, if i survive n2, you would know i am lying. Or mafia can kill someone else and get the free lynch >_>
Im guessing they would go for the other known blue roles (except me), but then they would have the risk of me treating one of them, right?
|
So you played incredibly bad because the only way we could lose was by playing incredibly bad. Ok, gotcha.
|
On July 10 2012 04:01 Evulrabbitz wrote: So you played incredibly bad because the only way we could lose was by playing incredibly bad. Ok, gotcha.
No, i havent played at all, because there was no reason, and i thougt that mafia would concede. As you dont seem to be understanding this, i will not continue this anymore.
|
No, i havent played at all, because there was no reason, and i thougt that mafia would concede. As you dont seem to be understanding this, i will not continue this anymore.
*sigh*
Read what you are writing and you will understand my aspect.
Anyway. This isn't leading anywhere so I'm gonna wait and see if someone counterclaims. If no one does I guess I'll change my vote.
|
ZEN ROLECLAIMED MEDIC
Switch your votes NOW
|
|
|
|
|
I have so much to say about your play, Zen_Man. But it's post game material.
##unvote ##Vote Release
|
If ZenMan is lying, the medic should COUNTER CLAIM TODAY
And medic will not be targeted to be NK'ed tonight. It would be a mistake for scum to do so. So you should expect to live. Anyway, medic claiming doesn't matter. Just protect tracker or detective.
|
|
probably should put this in: ** Change the above to:
##unvote Vote Release
|
On July 10 2012 06:36 Mackin wrote: probably should put this in: ** Change the above to:
##unvote Vote Release
I think you technically unvoted there.
|
Lol Harry. I just noticed that I haven't got the ## where I tried to vote the second time - so yes technically unvoted... see I had forgot to unvote before and meant to just append to add unvote... so I'll fix it just to make sure -.-
##unvote ##Vote Release
|
'cause I'm bored and there's nothing to talk about until the lynch, here are my thoughts on a Blue Action Plan for the night:
Le Plan [List][*]Medic (Zen) randomly selects DT or Tracker to protect (flip a coin or something). [*]DT and Tracker agree on two different people to get information on.
Mafia has a kill and a Roleblock tonight. If Mafia wants to prevent our information roles from clearing a townie, Mafia has to Roleblock and Kill the DT and Tracker. By randomizing Medic's protection, Mafia has a 50% chance of losing the game instantly if he/she guesses wrong, as we'll get information on two players.
Mafia can opt to roleblock medic and kill one of our information roles, but we'll be guaranteed information on one target.
Thirdly, Mafia can opt to not roleblock (to render tracker useless) and try to kill tracker or DT. In this case, we have a 50/50 shot of a free lynch (and a large advantage) or one blue dies.
|
EBWOP: Formatting fail.
Le Plan
- Medic (Zen) randomly selects DT or Tracker to protect (flip a coin or something).
- DT and Tracker agree on two different people to get information on.
|
Of course, all of this assumes that we don't win the game tonight with Release getting lynched.
|
I'd say Tracker and DT should NOT claim. The only advantage we would get by saying who to investigate is to avoid checking the same person. But I fail to see a scenario where both of them will get info anyways(at least one of them should get RBed/killed).
|
So can we collectively agree then on two people they should investigate?
|
|
|
|