On July 07 2011 08:03 JeeJee wrote:
Not for a while :<
16KST'ish?
Not for a while :<
16KST'ish?
Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 23:03 GMT
#1161
On July 07 2011 08:03 JeeJee wrote: Not for a while :< 16KST'ish? Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
July 06 2011 23:05 GMT
#1162
On July 07 2011 08:03 GMarshal wrote: Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker. Please don't Radiation levels are already too high, let them be mod killed. | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
July 06 2011 23:07 GMT
#1163
On July 07 2011 08:05 Drazerk wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:03 GMarshal wrote: On July 07 2011 08:03 JeeJee wrote: Not for a while :< 16KST'ish? Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker. Please don't Radiation levels are already too high, let them be mod killed. Shut up you. GMarshal, you should totally shoot a nuke at a lurker, that's clearly the way forward. By the way, 1 hour left, no one has actually bid on my vote yet. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
July 06 2011 23:08 GMT
#1164
On July 07 2011 08:07 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:05 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:03 GMarshal wrote: On July 07 2011 08:03 JeeJee wrote: Not for a while :< 16KST'ish? Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker. Please don't Radiation levels are already too high, let them be mod killed. Shut up you. GMarshal, you should totally shoot a nuke at a lurker, that's clearly the way forward. By the way, 1 hour left, no one has actually bid on my vote yet. $1 - yourself | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
July 06 2011 23:08 GMT
#1165
On July 07 2011 08:08 Drazerk wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:07 Palmar wrote: On July 07 2011 08:05 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:03 GMarshal wrote: On July 07 2011 08:03 JeeJee wrote: Not for a while :< 16KST'ish? Later if I decide to fire a nuke at a lurker. Please don't Radiation levels are already too high, let them be mod killed. Shut up you. GMarshal, you should totally shoot a nuke at a lurker, that's clearly the way forward. By the way, 1 hour left, no one has actually bid on my vote yet. $1 - yourself I am excluded, you bastard. | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
July 06 2011 23:10 GMT
#1166
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 23:11 GMT
#1167
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 23:12 GMT
#1168
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 23:14 GMT
#1169
This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
July 06 2011 23:15 GMT
#1170
On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
July 06 2011 23:17 GMT
#1171
On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around EBWOP also people still think im insane / scummy so it'll clear my name | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 23:17 GMT
#1172
On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around Now lets say this theoretical power had the *tiny* setback of destroying one of that person's nukes, and raising radiation levels by 1. Would you still use it that way? Lets also say you can't aim it at yourself. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
July 06 2011 23:20 GMT
#1173
On July 07 2011 08:17 GMarshal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around Now lets say this theoretical power had the *tiny* setback of destroying one of that person's nukes, and raising radiation levels by 1. Would you still use it that way? Lets also say you can't aim it at yourself. I wouldn't use it if it increased the radiation level thanks to today's nukes. The nuke issue shouldn't come up though its would be a win-win without the radiation jump | ||
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
July 06 2011 23:20 GMT
#1174
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 23:22 GMT
#1175
On July 07 2011 08:20 Eiii wrote: so what you're saying is I should get my nukes out now No. Say you have two nukes and you've been EMP'ed, that raises radiation by 3 Radiation up = bad. Sit tight and deal with it. | ||
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
July 06 2011 23:22 GMT
#1176
On July 07 2011 08:17 GMarshal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around Now lets say this theoretical power had the *tiny* setback of destroying one of that person's nukes, and raising radiation levels by 1. Would you still use it that way? Lets also say you can't aim it at yourself. I can volunteer if you want. I don't plan on using my nukes, and being confirmed would be nice. Rad levels increasing is bleh, but otherwise its good. On July 07 2011 08:20 Eiii wrote: so what you're saying is I should get my nukes out now This is why we can't have nice things | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
July 06 2011 23:23 GMT
#1177
On July 07 2011 08:20 Eiii wrote: so what you're saying is I should get my nukes out now I think that's the only way to proceed for you. | ||
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
July 06 2011 23:24 GMT
#1178
On July 07 2011 08:17 GMarshal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around Now lets say this theoretical power had the *tiny* setback of destroying one of that person's nukes, and raising radiation levels by 1. Would you still use it that way? Lets also say you can't aim it at yourself. Does this ability perchance explode one of those person's nukes, raising the radiation level by one, and killing the person, thus revealing their alignment? Also, I switched to it as soon as the nukes started going off like this, but please: VOTE FOR OPERATION WATCHTOWER. FOR PEACE. FOR JUSTICE. | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 23:25 GMT
#1179
On July 07 2011 08:24 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2011 08:17 GMarshal wrote: On July 07 2011 08:15 Drazerk wrote: On July 07 2011 08:14 GMarshal wrote: Also, lets say you theoretically had a way to get someone's alignment published in the next day post, who would you choose? This is *purely* a theoretical exercise. Myself confirmed townies are always good if there is medic support around Now lets say this theoretical power had the *tiny* setback of destroying one of that person's nukes, and raising radiation levels by 1. Would you still use it that way? Lets also say you can't aim it at yourself. Does this ability perchance explode one of those person's nukes, raising the radiation level by one, and killing the person, thus revealing their alignment? Also, I switched to it as soon as the nukes started going off like this, but please: VOTE FOR OPERATION WATCHTOWER. FOR PEACE. FOR JUSTICE. Not this tidy theoretical power that doesn't really exist and I am not trying to figure out whether to use or not. No, I would guess not. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
July 06 2011 23:25 GMT
#1180
On July 07 2011 08:20 Eiii wrote: so what you're saying is I should get my nukes out now hell no wtf he's full of shit he claims china, and says he picked that guy that gave him an anti nuke and an extra life,both of which are now gone. He also now claims to have an EMP which may or may not do something (he's hesitant to claim what it does, although I don't know why because I don't think anyone can do anything about it. Otherwise it would be a shitty special power) And he also claims a public alignment check that destroys all nukes but raises radiation by 1? | ||
| ||
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Weekly #48
Krystianer vs NicoractLIVE!
Wayne vs Gerald
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea 15342 Dota 2firebathero 3454 Bisu 1515 Calm 1229 Pusan 747 EffOrt 358 ggaemo 240 Last 233 BeSt 227 Soulkey 221 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH185 StarCraft: Brood War• StrangeGG 52 • MindelVK 22 • Kozan • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamez Trovo • IndyKCrew • Gussbus • intothetv • aXEnki Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
The PiG Daily
Clem vs Rogue
Reynor vs TBD
Dark vs ReBellioN
herO vs TBD
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
GSL Code S
ESL Pro Tour
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
Hatchery Cup
BSL
ESL Pro Tour
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|