It's interesting because I feel inclined to believe but at the same time I have no rational basis to believe him.

What is your intent behind the holy fare attack task force?

Way to say absolutely nothing at all

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 05 2015 23:48 GMT

#127

On March 06 2015 08:46 Holyflare wrote:
leave soren alone man he seems like a nice guy

Well everyone on here is new to me pretty much, so wouldn't know.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 00:32 GMT

#147

On March 06 2015 09:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Same question Tormented never answerd:
Why does Soren say that as mafia?

I was just curious if he was voting for GB for that reason alone. I actually did want an answer to that. As far as his other post, why make a post like that when it literally says nothing at all. That is something I usually see scum do in order to seem like they are actually participating.

Also, do I know you captain? Is this what you all call smurfing on here?

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 00:43 GMT

#164

On March 06 2015 09:40 Soren333 wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm just commenting on things by inputting my thoughts.

right.....I am beginning to see the newbie town view or maybe he is just high.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 00:53 GMT

#171

On March 06 2015 09:51 Soren333 wrote:

Show nested quote +

By doing what?

As I learned last game, they use previous game meta and pressuring people to figure out who to vote for D1. At least that is what I picked up from last game. In practice, it looks like the odds are still high we will lynch a town D1, but we will gain a lot of helpful information for D2 and onward. Ie. We were able to lynch mafia D2 with pretty much certainty because of D1 discussion.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 05:23 GMT

#238

On March 06 2015 14:21 Holyflare wrote:
why is nobody voting gb? he's obvious mafia at this point in time

He may very well be, but training anyone at this time unless we are certain they are scum will just limit our information going forward. If he is mafia, do you think that makes soren town for sure?

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 05:31 GMT

#244

I will hold off until I hear his response, but I do see your points.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 05:31 GMT

#245

On March 06 2015 14:30 VisceraEyes wrote:
And look! I'm #3 on the wagon! Does anyone want to draw any conclusions as to what that might make my alignment?

That you are aligned third on the wagon?

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 05:34 GMT

#249

I don't like starting a wagon on someone so early on D1. Like I said, it just limits information. From what I have read, HF has been here quite awhile, so I do trust his judgement, but I would like to come to my own conclusions.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 05:43 GMT

#259

He took a lot of offense it seemed to Soren voting him. Would probably be something I would expect from newbie scum, but judging from his post count I would guess he has played enough. I just get the feeling that scum would probably just ignore Soren. I have never played with him, but I would lean town right now.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 19:16 GMT

#574

Wow that was a lot.....So basically we are looking at GB and Kelsier mainly?

I still read GB as leaning town, although I would be interested see why he thinks Robik is mafia. Robik has done pretty much nothing so far, so unless it is something meta, I would like to see GB's reasons for this.

Kelsier seemed a bit overly aggressive in his mafia reads on VE and captain fail. Would drawing that much attention to yourself after coming into the thread late be something mafia would do?

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 21:54 GMT

#590

On March 07 2015 06:48 GlowingBear wrote:
Mocsta has a good chance of being Mafia just because he softed a role that does not exist in this game

On March 07 2015 06:51 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

This kind of behaviour is only Mafia indicative when the player follows thread sentiment, which is not the case

Huh? how do those two statements even mesh?

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 21:59 GMT

#595

On March 07 2015 06:54 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

I've being right on most of my latest games. So, people are just not seeing what I'm seeing.

So you went from mocsta could be mafia..to mocsta's behavior isn't mafia indicative...to you are right(about which?) and we just don't see it.

_Tormented_

United States157 Posts

March 06 2015 22:41 GMT

#612

On March 07 2015 07:34 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

One is attacking a faulty logic
One is bringing reasons why someone could be Mafia

I can agree with someone's opinion on a player being Mafia, but I am not forced to agree with his reasoning

Ok...so you still think mocsta could be mafia, but you just don't agree with captain fail's logic?