Yea it's time for you guys to stop voting robik.

Atleast two players have proven they are bad. Sebastian brought up percentages. The percentage of newbie games first lynch mafia is a lot lower than ring.

Anyway gobble is scum, so obvious.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 16 2014 23:23 GMT

#207

On July 17 2014 05:49 IAmRobik wrote:
I kinda feel like 1 mafia is defending me, but i'll fucking take it. anything to not get mislynched

If robik is mafia and his partner is one of the four that voted, this post is the best post in the game. Obi why are you doing scummy stuff.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 16 2014 23:25 GMT

#209

I retract some of my last statement but Obi unvoted in such a scummy way.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 16 2014 23:26 GMT

#210

Answering kush. Best as in people people read flipped scum filters and get fooled by them. Aka everyone lets lynch everyone who did not vote robik.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 03:09 GMT

#243

lol kush why the hell do you ask me the same question twice when I never even came back to the thread. Your forcing questions out.

Time for me to join the party.

##Vote: kushmasta

I will actually contribute tomorrow when I am not so tired. But here is the case on kushmasta. Who the hell asks the same question to somebody twice without them popping into the thread. He is just making his filter look good while also making me looking scummy. He has not done anything productive except or ask questions. Also he votes me then makes the comment of cool four people have now asked snickers the same question. Just a sly way to make me look like shit.

I SHALL EXPLAIN MY MYSTERIOUS SELF TOMORROW WHEN I AM NOT SO TIRED. Advice for all of you would be for everyone to stop looking so scummy. TOODLES

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 03:18 GMT

#246

If you want to see try hard look at my mini mafia (roman number) game hosted by kurami. (not 100% if that is his correctly spelled name, he is from Poland).

That point only makes sense if I am also not try hard when playing town. THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE SLIPPED. I am tryhard, I double checked your count of four people. You have enough suspicion to vote me but are too lazy to actually do a real check. You retract your vote for terrible reason because you are afraid of what my close reading can do. One scum has been found.

Also clarification. The reason why his filter being entirely questions is bad, is because he completely forced one question. Aka his filter is all forced, nothing genuine.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:20 GMT

#256

On July 17 2014 12:51 kushm4sta wrote:
snickers, the post in which I asked you the same question twice, i also asked you a new question. I was just consolidating my questions.

And no I didn't read a lot of your filter, nor have I read any of your town filters. I actually have to read one of your town filters to get a good meta read of you, you are right.
But the reason why I unvoted you was because your posts looked less tryhard than your scumgame. So I'm not going to vote someone for shitposting, if they don't shitpost as scum.

ANYWAY something doesn't sit right about you still. You are too tired to explain thoughts you already had, like why things you said were scummy were scummy, yet you had plenty of energy to concoct this shitcase against me for "asking questions." Seems like explaining your old suspicions would be quicker than coming up with new ones.
Add to that the fact that your suspicion is very omgusy.

##vote snickers

still wanna read one of your towngames before I feel confident in the vote though.

numbers refer to paragraphs.

1. This smells of the shittiest bullshit I have ever heard.

2. Your first post towards me was you seriously asking me about my posts. Next post... BAM VOTE. You did not vote me for shit posts and if you thought they were shit you would not seriously ask me about them. I did nothing in between the time interval for you to think ...good posts...shit posts..

3.If it is a shitcase, why are you acting like I put alot of effort into it. I do not understand the sentence that starts with seems.

Summy is that you are not making anysense and just back peddling yourself.

Any more bad defense posts that I can use for my case against you tomorrow?

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:22 GMT

#257

fyi bh has the most expierence with me and I will weigh in on BH tomorrow for now I am too busy with other matters.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:26 GMT

#260

I dont see how that helps the thread at all. Also I love how kush reads my meta---> I am town. Reads my meta again ----->I am scum. Stop reading me with an alignment in mind.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:29 GMT

#261

So now you are back to being "serious". How about you try to think of all the reasons of why I posted that.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:36 GMT

#265

oh really how about you state again the other two thirds. Stop being so wishy washy too. And obi like I said do something useful.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:39 GMT

#267

So you agree with me to vote and me lol. So you are taking my posts seriously even though you think I am scum. Aka you do not actually think I am scum and are just letting your emotions guide my alignment. Just like kushs meta reads on me.

I am 100% defending myself? lol cause I am not pushing kush. What questions need to be anwsered obi? Let me help you as much as I can.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:45 GMT

#269

If you read closely, I was not even talking about that post. And it is time for me to come clean. Off of the top off my head, I said gg was obv scum to get discussion going. The reason I said him was because I find it most likely for scum to be the third one to jump on. Also I think his reasoning was weak. As for obis unvote, his reasoning was also weak.

Now these were mainly to get conversation going so I do not really care if my recalling of details is accurate.

And if Robik wants to read me mafia this game like last game I did something similar, well I would not have such a great case on kush without them

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:50 GMT

#272

On July 17 2014 13:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:

Show nested quote +

._.

.________________.

I really do not understand this. I think you are not reading well. I was talking about kush defending himself. Do you really want me to answer your question in detail of why I said something to get discussion going? You seem to care a little too much.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 04:57 GMT

#274

.... I was being sarcastic you said I was 100% defending myself. I took the meaning of that as I was only defending myself. I was saying I was pushing kush so it is impossible for me to be 100% defending myself. Anyway I have waited long enough for kush to post something. Meta reads on me are useless. I have played two games. Once as a power role, again as mafia. There is no meta of my VT play. Most likely in this game I am VT. So therefore atleast 1/3 of kushs case on me is based on something is most likely not valid.

Snickers

United States1575 Posts

July 17 2014 05:09 GMT

#277

no that is not sarcasm and this is not either. Start doing something useful please. Unless of course you are extremely tired like I am. I was too tempted with kush's bad mafia play tho.