I feel like I should be WaveofShadowing somebody lololol
[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I feel like I should be WaveofShadowing somebody lololol | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
/shadow if people will have me then. Same boat as fubadooba though---if I'm too 'experienced' give the spot to someone else. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On December 25 2013 01:24 justanothertownie wrote: See, that's why I would like to shadow one of those guys. Playing the following game is a whole different story. Obviously people are different. That's why I said "at least for me". I didn't critisize anyone of a different opinion and I didn't say this project isn't a good idea but the things I said are the reasons why I personally won't join this although I would like to shadow a good player. WoS asked why and I answered. I was about to say that I'm surprised you think that way considering many of the people who want to shadow aren't exactly inexperienced or newbie players and are quite skilled in their own right, and then I looked at the list again and realized that a great deal of that category of players isn't being allowed to shadow lol. Maybe at some point down the road we could do this with an 'intermediate' level as well? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On December 30 2013 07:18 jaybrundage wrote: So the question is... Who's the weakest player on the list That's a very interesting question. Are we allowed to talk about that in the thread? (I know if I end up replacing somebody it'll be me lololol) | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
(Just don't do that again ) | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
For my baby. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 00:36 Holyflare wrote: This better be actually rng'd :x I can't think of a game I've ever played that wasn't RNGed... | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 01:14 kitaman27 wrote: Don't mind the fact that they are RNG'd multiple times until they get the outcome that they want. Don't lie to me kita. It's bad enough I'm going to have to deal with you doing that once the game starts. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I think the only difference here is for the first time I'm actually relieved to roll town. I'd be pretty terrified to go up against this town as scum. One of these days I will have another scumgame; it seems that day is not today. Holy! Where you at? I've never played a non-voice game with you before. Let's do something. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 10:46 kitaman27 wrote: I was kinda hoping to role mafia with the all vanilla setup. They probably have the advantage regardless of who is playing. Wanna vote sandroba with me? He may or may not be scummy. lol I'm really hoping you're not scum kita. Nah no reason to vote sandroba yet. Not only is there basically nothing to vote him for, I've seen what he's capable of as the game progresses (from PYP) and if he is town and plays this game anything like that, he'll start slow and then start bringing the pain to scum. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I only offered that as an aside anyway, my main reason for not wanting to vote him is because I literally don't see one. Hapa, do you see yourself getting shot N1 in this game? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 11:35 Promethelax wrote: Okay broskis, this is just silly. We know how to start a game and it isn't this Mafia Scum inspired baseless lynches shall we discuss policy? Why yes we shall because you all will actually have to commit to something. Since we aren't the run of the mill hokey dory TL types I think its time we set a few ground rules: there should be no discussion of policy lynching lurkers. We simply lynch them. If everyone is good enough to be shadowed everyone is good enough to play the game and we cannot tolerate lurkers. It is my hope that this particular policy doesn't come into play since, obviously, we are the best that TL has so we should play the best as well and lurking simply isn't the best. We are all good enough to carry a town and I would like us all to be that good this game. Play your hearts out gentlemen. I would also like a non-aggression pact. That is we all agree to play nice since I'd rather like to be good role models for our newbies. And yes, I know I'm scummy for posting this, does someone want to come out and say it so that I can defend myself and we can move on with this game and make actual cases on each other and find scum. Unlike WoS I was excited to roll scum in this game, I figured I'd have an excuse to be steamrolled but if I did a good job it would be a huge accomplishment but no, I'm town, I have to figure things out. I would much rather lie to you all but fuck me, I don't get to lie to you. I gotta work for my money. So get it together boys, we are policy lynching lurkers, we aren't going to be mean to each other and we are going to catch scum. And we'll start with Hapa making a case on me, why? Because its tradition is why. I don't think lurkers will be an issue in this game. I'm really confused by your opener though...you want to discuss policy and then you state right after that you don't want to discuss it? Like...discussion of policy on its own isn't scummy imo but why did you go about it so awkwardly? I do agree with the non-aggression thing, but no offense---I'd imagine you'd have to be one of the primary people to agree with that (and it seems as though you have?) Now onto more important details: why specifically Hapa? Do you two have a history? Is he going to want to make a case on you at all, never mind find something specific in this post of yours in order to make one? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 11:47 Promethelax wrote: You got so close to making that case on me. So close. And yet so far. It is policy and we could discuss it, I just assume no one will disagree with it so there is no discussion which will stem from it. The discussion comes from me posting things which you can call me town on or base a case on. That is what generates discussion, not policy we all agree on. Since you are, so far, the only person interrogating people on the shit they post I'm choosing to believe you are town for the moment. Since I am town that means you and I shall discuss other people. In this case VE and this post: You see VE knows how to say things. But this post doesn't say things. This post, when the fluff is removed says that we should let Sandroba do his own thing because no matter what he'll do his own thing and that Sandroba may or may not catch scum. It shows such a lack of curiosity that I am disturbed. Do you, Hapa, agree? y/n? Will you go on a date with me y/n? O I C It's gonna be one of these games. And of course never mind that I said the exact same thing VE did before he said it. Prome I feel rejected. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Get out of my head VE Though I must admit two of these this early bodes pretty well for us, does it not? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 12:02 kitaman27 wrote: I can't call VE scummy, else he will vote for me. I KNOW YOUR SECRETS. I'd rather talk about marv. He suggest that the all vanilla setup makes things difficult to start off rather than attempting to generate conversation. I'm kind of interested to see a game in which marv is not likely to take over. On January 21 2014 11:57 Hapahauli wrote: Yeah I agree. I've been put off by VE's posting so far, mostly because he's been one of the more active people in the thread and hasn't managed to post anything substantive. It's reminiscent of my last few voice mafia games with him, where he's willing to talk a lot about irrelevant things at length, while ignoring attempts at any meaningful discussion. My initial vote on him was random, but I like where it's parked right now. What's your favorite restaurant? I'll make the reservations <3 I'm fine with VE for now for reasons stated earlier. What does bother me a little Hapa (and I'll admit, bothers me every time this is brought up by anyone in any game) is your comparison of VE's play to voice mafia games. There is very little if any indication at all that you can base people's play in forum games on how they play on TS. Par example (though not the only one), in voice mafia I am supremely confident, can sniff out scum with just a few words from them, and play mafia really damn well. Would you say that describes my forum mafia play? Essentially text and forum-based games are way too different to make proper comparisons in my opinion, and I would really think that you'd be aware of that. | ||
| ||