/obs
mafia takes a lot of time and is stressful...i need to relax for a while... insert random revealing info that is related to fatties...
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
/obs mafia takes a lot of time and is stressful...i need to relax for a while... insert random revealing info that is related to fatties... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
/obs rl yeah... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
kool | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
I sheep calgar's opinion about activity. I hate lurkers too as a terran player, i hate when a lurker spine rips my ass, so i may kill you if you are missing. still it's quite early, so yeah. @calgar, hi how are you? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
trix is very evil and gives diarrhea if you eat too fast or too much. good gf choice wheaties are just stronk and good 3p killer it may have been funnier with the cereal mascots considering they are so schizophenic, coco puffs bird, tony the tiger, cookie crisp wolf. /spam so bored, post town, post........... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
well i'll show you again that i am town with fearless lynching and analysis, i am not afraid. delicious cereal shall be safeguarded today! rejoice. @jrkirby what do you think about the lynch all lurkers policy? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 04 2013 12:20 eSpi.Casey wrote: Hi everyone, looking forward to play with all of you. I will try to be as active as possible, and i hope everyone else will try aswell, even though im from Norway and following CET timezone i will try to contribute with good/analytic post as the game goes on Show nested quote + I absolutley agree with thisOn May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. seems like a sheep casey, i realize this may be your first game, but do not just say agree or disagree, try to back it up with your thought process or etc so that people can get better reads. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:22 jrkirby wrote: Well sugarfluff has stopped lurking, so the votes on him are kinda pointless. As targe pointed out, flowcaster is lurking, and also I notice shirokami is lurking, but he try to give an excuse at least. @jrkirby, what do you think of sugarfluff's posting so far? On May 04 2013 17:14 Sugarfluff wrote: Yes! Awesome feeling, waking up and knowing the PM is in my inbox! Less awesome to have some votes. ^^ Anyway, I was going to throw my vote right back at nobodywonder, but I feel VayneAuthority is slightly suspicious. Wrong lynching is obviously bad but mafia can use the extra, safe time to more effect I think. Time to get breakfast and ponder. @sugarfluff, who are your scumreads then? who are you thinking of voting? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:34 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2013 15:08 jampidampi wrote: Yes, rolled town again. On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts Why post something like this instead of trying to create discussion? On May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey all, looking forward to a fun game. I agree with the general notion that lurking should be dissuaded and active posting should be encouraged. However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. Like this post of yours? I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. what exactly was there to discuss 3 posts in? This is how I always play, I only will be convinced after the first day in a no clue game. If you guys don't like how I play then I guess I wont be in this game very long, pretty much all there is to it. or you can change your play and not die...this is highly recommended if you are town. you almost deserve to die if you don't contribute | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:36 VayneAuthority wrote: So far all I can tell is that this is either going to be an easy mafia victory or the mafia is giving themselves away on the first day and are indeed newbies. Guess we will find out soon enough. this seems to ominous, I really dislike your mindset vayne. in the shitstorm of mafia XL that I was part of, town rallied after a couple of retarded lynches and plays (i myself am guilty). i just can't help but feel that you are kinda making excuses for not contributing. you are too early to call things, anyways you can work through filters and pages...again highly recommended as town | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:40 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 02:37 nobodywonder wrote: On May 05 2013 02:34 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 04 2013 15:08 jampidampi wrote: Yes, rolled town again. On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts Why post something like this instead of trying to create discussion? On May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey all, looking forward to a fun game. I agree with the general notion that lurking should be dissuaded and active posting should be encouraged. However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. Like this post of yours? I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. what exactly was there to discuss 3 posts in? This is how I always play, I only will be convinced after the first day in a no clue game. If you guys don't like how I play then I guess I wont be in this game very long, pretty much all there is to it. or you can change your play and not die...this is highly recommended if you are town. you almost deserve to die if you don't contribute Showing up town and lynching the bandwagoners is enough of a contribution if it comes to that. Im used to being lynched day 1 since mafia fear logic and not emotional people. no, it's not. you need to contribute. for example, here's a bone for you what do you think of sugarfluff's suscipion of you? what do you think of jampi's vt claim? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
besides, if you want to argue logic, derp herrrrr emotions are a hint on how to people think still. if you want to be logical, you have to take emotions into account. anyways no more excuses. and why so suicidal? i'd be happy to oblige you though. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
@vayne link us your old games plz. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 06:20 Spicydinosaur wrote: @nobodywonder, I am curious as to why you put a vote on VayneAuthority. All the votes up to this point have been basically to get lurkers to post. Is your vote on him because of suspicion, an attempt to motivate him in some way, or another purpose? I am really annoyed by his day 1 logic thing. And as for the votes, not many people have voted so yeah... I vote him because I'm just annoyed, the action can be scummy, but his response I can't quite make a read...I'll clarify when he does this: On May 05 2013 06:30 VayneAuthority wrote: Based on my analysis I will be voting for Targe. Heading out for a while so ill be back later. Interesting, you voted, but why? Please explain your logic or whatever you cling to. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 03:35 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 02:36 nobodywonder wrote: On May 05 2013 02:22 jrkirby wrote: Well sugarfluff has stopped lurking, so the votes on him are kinda pointless. As targe pointed out, flowcaster is lurking, and also I notice shirokami is lurking, but he try to give an excuse at least. @jrkirby, what do you think of sugarfluff's posting so far? Nothing particularly suspicious yet. cool cool, let us know when you see anyone suspicious. your reads were pretty good last game, so I look forward to your posts. whats your read on me, jampi, vayne, the more activce posters? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
also @spicydinosaur, don't vote flowcaster for now because at this point he may be replaced or something. why don't you be productive and give an opinion on the active players right now. i just looked at your filter, shirokami. your filter is terrible. you post but never contribute anything besides saying my phone is terrible for typing and i'll get back to you in a while. On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game. Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard. I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing. Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. On May 05 2013 18:06 shirokami wrote: @spicy My phone corrects my punctuation so my posts will not lack in that manner, the hard part is to quote and paste things. My punctuation will go worse when I have no autocorrect anymore I'm traveling as I write back to home, still many kilometers to go but hey I will post something big after I get back home. I'm sorry for not been posting anything with content. One thing is I like jarjars posts. Will tell you later why. On May 05 2013 18:25 shirokami wrote: About 8 hours. You may have a legitimate reason with the phone thing, but seriously delaying contribution and analysis is hugely detrimental to town. I understand you can't quote stuff, but you can still give analysis of Jarjar's post somewhat. I didn't find Jarjar's posting that great... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
why didn't you vote for shirokami? why vote for flowcaster? On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote: shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. Show nested quote + On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game. Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard. I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing. Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list. On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. | ||
| ||
WardiTV Invitational
Group D
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 33794 Dota 2Sea 2921 Flash 2376 Larva 1456 Bisu 1058 actioN 879 Stork 822 BeSt 454 Mini 394 Leta 203 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games B2W.Neo1977 DeMusliM624 Beastyqt591 crisheroes538 ArmadaUGS474 Lowko431 Livibee376 Mew2King321 Pyrionflax290 Hui .255 KnowMe72 RotterdaM69 Trikslyr63 Liquid`VortiX45 NotJumperer2 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • intothetv StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SOOP Global
NightMare vs GuMiho
Classic vs SHIN
SOOP
NightMare vs Oliveira
SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
|
|