EPT/in
Personality Mafia 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
/in | ||
|
| ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
 Also i'm on tablet during the wekends so i might not be posting as much initially but oh well | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
I think that everyone who is contributing should have lower priority than those who are not posting but anyway only until we got everyone to post so we can be sure that we're looking for the mafia when they actually posted already  marv, ve what dou you think of my idea? Also im still posting from tablet which is pretty annoying so i will be able to play properly in about 6 hours when im back home. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 10 2013 23:49 Oatsmaster wrote: What is your idea exactly? Not personality claiming? Waiting for people to post? ??? Well yeah i think personality claiming doesn't matter at all it's just for fun except for the powers and we should probably just play like we're supposed to and focus on getting everyone to post. I think that putting the thought out there that people can't just lurk is a good start for that and anyway, waiting for people to post is pretty much normal during day 1 :p | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 10 2013 16:22 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh is that what this is? Pressuring lurkers to contribute? Oh cool, well by all means. Tell me how it works out and make sure you spell out your methodology in the postgame after we lynch the fuck out of you. I just said what is scummy - your swing from "aggressive fuck" to "whatever I'm just doin my thang" feels fake and diplomatic. And now you're in here excusing your shit when I've barely accused you. Actually do something if you think I'm wasting my time. In the meantime, you're must making me nice and cozy where I'm at. For instance, what about Crossfire did you not like? You said "at least my vote was somewhere meaningful" as if you've made some kind of contribution to the thread by placing it - why don't you explain it a little bit? I'm back earlier than I thought and I thought about the fact that a lot of people asked for this game to start in the weekend so I would expect more of them to be posting which isn't the case so I think it makes it likely that mafia is simply lurking. Sure there might still be mafia posting early and we should look at all options but one of our priorities is to get inactive people to post I think. So yeah that should be around the number of 6 I didn't count them all but Foolishness and sloosh are among them. I quoted that post above cause I wouldn't mind lynching VE actually. Also Oats putting the idea out there is already a good start to pressure lurkers into posting so I don't know why you sound so opposed to the idea  | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 02:55 VisceraEyes wrote: LOL this game. Vivax maybe you can explain what about that post you didn't like? Maybe explain why it's scummy and why you want to lynch me? Yamato is just butthurt that I found him so fast, but what's your excuse? There is no excuse I just think it's scummy (you say yamato wants to pressure lurkers just to look like contributing and I did the same but you didn't attack me for it, sooooo...) by the way why did you call it excuse do you think I'm scum faking something? Cause it wouldn't make any sense for me to be pretending something when I just expressed my interest into lynching you Anyway I would also be happy to lynch those people speaking in riddles regardless of them roleplaying someone to force them to post something more meaningful regardless of the roleplaying. Yes it would be a policy lynch (duh) but I would like other townies to agree with me on trying to make them post something useful and not just this weird stuff (Even if you roleplay you should show that you're taking a pro-town direction with it). I'm just not sure who I would prefer out of Kurumi or Bugs yet :/ , Bugs seems rather willing to call others scum with his riddling though so it's probably Kurumi as first choice. There's also another guy I find suspicious but I'll see how he performs before calling him out. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
 ##Vote Kurumi | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote: I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:34 Kurumi wrote: Just because I did something you did not agree with in LX does not mean that is a valid reason to vote me. I don't know do you want half of this town or mafia or who is doing that to be speaking in riddles and roleplaying so we have no idea what they're talking about? Cause that's the main point I am trying to bring across, if you want to roleplay make it pro-town and understandable and I will have no reason to vote for you. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote: I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ? ) | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
*keeps it lowered* | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 07:09 marvellosity wrote: er, if Kurumi is mod-confirmed town-aligned for today, then we're not lynching him How is that mod-confirmed we don't know if that role belongs to scum or town and how it works. You disappoint me marv | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 07:12 marvellosity wrote: the host said Kurumi is town-aligned what more do you want? Are you serious the host also tell an insane DT that his target is the opposite of what he really is that doesn't mean it is what the host said it is. Anyway I like that Kurumi went off Chezinu mode, time to move on to the next riddler: ##Unvote ##Vote Promethelax | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 07:16 marvellosity wrote: yes it does, in that instance the host is 100% telling the truth, it's just the role that's insane. if you're looking for mafia in the guy that the host said was town, you're doing it wrong. What I could say too: "The host is 100 % telling the truth it's just that the role tells "player X is town" regardless of alignment" we have no way of knowing. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 07:35 marvellosity wrote: just looks and feels like town oats so far, s&b Have you forgotten that we are roleplaying ? Marv what do you make of Corazon please. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
Well those are also my questions cause the way he handled S & B's post doesn't make much sense, he dodged my question now he seems to be dodging yours which is essentially the same. He kinda looks to me like noob scum, says things that look acceptable without showing real interest behind what he's saying. He doesn't pursue his own case while saying S & B's is very good but doesn't push for an Oats lynch either. | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
and mine | ||
|
Vivax
22027 Posts
On March 11 2013 08:06 cDgCorazon wrote: I'm not afraid of you, it's just that I don't trust anyone right now, and I could see how scum Vivax would turn that around on me. I'll be coming out with a case a few hours before the deadline. It's too early now and I know that cases presented too early in the day just lose so much traction (My case on WB in NMM 37). Dude, this shitty logic is bad for your standards Marv. Why are you attacking me for having the same view as you? We literally just said the same thing (like the case but don't want to vote for it). You are saying that you are not going to vote because it does not make Oats mafia and I said I'd rather see Yamato lynched than Oats. What is the problem with that? The thing is, Oats' meta is not the main part of the case. BnS laid out many reasons as to why he thinks Oats is scum and I just made a comment that I liked his case and that it had a lot of valid points in it. Let me ask you this Marv: Would you rather I... Say "I agree with SnB" and just vote for Oats? or Say "I think it's a good case but I'm going to continue to scumhunt and push my top scum read" If you prefer #1 it would be such a glaring scumtell. You refuse to comment on a case you like cause you are afraid of scum making a case on you for that? Can you repeat what I just said cause I'm not sure if I can believe what you said. | ||
| ||
