##Vote Kurumi
Personality Mafia 2 - Page 26
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Vivax
Austria20848 Posts
##Vote Kurumi | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On March 11 2013 05:03 Stutters695 wrote: Very convincing. I can feel.the skill oozing from this post. I love when bad scum cherry pick posts. Dont you? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote: Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... | ||
Vivax
Austria20848 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote: I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On March 11 2013 05:01 strongandbig wrote: oatsmaster is the master of scummy, evil oats Exhibit One: Scum Are Inconsistent And Go After Easy Targets So he starts out with a decent reason to be suspicious of iamperfection - big list post, not involved like his usual meta. But then we see him latch on to mocsta for some reason: + Show Spoiler [mocsta's posts the page before t…] + On March 10 2013 22:19 Mocsta wrote: Channeling Oatsmaster Expound. Channeling personality Most of us are trying to simulate our personalities. Why so too eager to white knight Iamp/Yamato. On March 10 2013 22:25 Mocsta wrote: Stop being stupid: you use expound all the time. Half the thread hasn't posted, and its all talking shit. If you want a top read so far: iamp post reads like the most bullshit to me - lists half the player list and says: "a scum must be there"... no shit sherlock Ver; made one post and its dumb as fuck, and so what? Maybe its a forced personality post? What more is there to make of it then that? Sounds to me like you know something I don't, or something? Expound. On March 10 2013 22:26 Mocsta wrote: Yeah, yamato done nothing special and you giving him a town read. Way too eager. On March 10 2013 22:35 Mocsta wrote: I dont need you to explain townreads. yam isnt scum or town for me. hes still sitting at null. 0 points for him, 0 points for you. Really? Oatsmaster thinks that's not "spammy" or "jovial," and that it's different enough from mocsta's jovial and spammy meta to earn a vote? I don't buy it. Then there's some stupid back and forth between oats and mocsta, and then oats goes on to looking at other stuff. But look at the difference between how oats interacted with suspicion on iamperfection and suspicion on mocsta. He claimed that they were both not playing to their town metas, but whereas at the time iamperfection actually wasn't matching his meta, oats's portrayal of mocsta's behavior this game was both curt and inaccurate. Plus, iamperfection had the bad listy intro post, which oats also claimed he was suspicious of. Then a bit later in the filter, we get this: nonono seriously? no explanation of how the actions in the thread since the initial vote influences the read? No explanation of why people should still be going after mocsta? So what's the difference between iamperfection and mocsta? Well, simply put - one of them is a much easier target. Iamperfection does tend to attract some suspicion as town, so he's a safe target for dispersed suspicion, but he's better-known and more veteran than mocsta, and therefore more likely to be influential and a more dangerous target for scum to go all in on. Mocsta, on the other hand, is someone I've never heard of before and therefore a newer player, plus from his behavior this game he seems less focused and srsbsns than iamperfection in response to suspicion. Exhibit Two: Scum Love To Give Good Advice To Town, But Hate To Follow It This is something I started looking for in the couple of games before I stopped playing for a while. "advice posts", be they long or short, are easy for scum to do, as is complaining about how the town is behaving. However, when a townie gives advice or criticism to/of the town in general, it means they care enough about that particular issue or problem to try to get everyone to focus on it. That also means they'll be thinking about it in their own posts. Basically: Townies follow their own advice, scum don't. We have Oats's very first post: Personal attacks bad, back-and-forth bad, non-alignment indicative stuff bad. Okay, those are all good things for townies to be thinking about. We can summarize this as "don't engage in personal bitchfights because they distract the thread and don't help demonstrate that you're town." So how does Oats do putting his posts where his mouth is? He starts off spamming around and not engaging the thread: + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 21:29 Oatsmaster wrote: Lynch anyone who doesnt add anything to the thread in their opening post after like 7 pages of content. New policy. On March 10 2013 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see any questions here. This is not a question cause it doesnt ask ANYTHING. On March 10 2013 21:55 Oatsmaster wrote: Im gonna use this quote cause its awesome Then he gets into a personal-attack bitchfight with mocsta + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote: I do not use the word expound. Mocsta start playing the damn game. What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv. Who is your top scumread. On March 10 2013 22:37 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah. Where is the jovial mocsta that spams up half the thread. Come on. ##Vote: Mocsta On March 10 2013 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see any questions here. This is not a question cause it doesnt ask ANYTHING. On March 10 2013 22:59 Oatsmaster wrote: Iamp. But again I said that already. Or you are scum Mocsta Dont give me shit about not matching your scum meta. Why is it such a big issue that Marv thinks you are telling supersoft how to play? On March 10 2013 22:52 Oatsmaster wrote: I ask you, because I think its weird and odd and what you thought.,.. You are being prickly and defensive as shit. Why? Also Is A LOT of interest 1 question to 1 person? I dont think so. Then there's some personal bitching at acro: + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote: Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? On March 10 2013 23:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far? And Kurumi + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote: Kurumi, You know Chez is actually useful as town right? On March 11 2013 00:53 Oatsmaster wrote: Kurumi, do you actually have any reads? Or are you just intent on trolling the thread. Then we get another piece of "town advice" Okay sure - if you aren't presenting and pushing your reads, then you're scum. Not always true but a completely valid way to play as town. If we combine that with Oatsmaster's earlier complaints about personal attacks and non-alignment-indicative fluff and bickering, we get a pretty strong philosophy of town play. One that is absolutely nothing like how oatsmaster has been playing this game. Go back and look again at the posts I put in the spoilers above about him getting into personal bitchfights. There's the Mocsta stuff, where we learn that Oats "has a read" and that his read is "mocsta is scum because he's not jovial or spammy", followed by like five unnecessary other posts as Oats lets himself be drawn into you-said you-said with mocsta. But other than that one post, and one post where he says he has a read on iamperfection, what discussion of his reads do we get? What reads do we get at all, other than the two "scum reads" he made in like his first three posts based on the first few pages of the game? What interaction with all the new information that's come up in the thread? What does Oats think about Kurumi and WBG? Given how much he wants substantive posts involving reads, you'd think he would have told us his reads on them at some point during the several posts he makes about them and aimed at them. But nope - we don't. In fact, he goes out of his way to avoid pointing to either of them as scum: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote: So what do you propose, how do you determine the scummyness of one over the other? Since you feel that both cant be mafia and one probably is. It is also a valid town strategy to avoid night kills. His only "reads" are ill-thought out, ill-explained, and inconsistent. He complains / gives advice about the prevalence of certain specific poor townplay practices, then engages in exactly those practices himself. These are both characteristic scum behaviors and both have clear scum motivations. Oatsmaster is scum. ##vote: Oatsmaster BIG CASE EVERYONE READ MY BIG CASE also did anyone tell foolishness the game has started? He's not living up to his position as In his Profile, Foolishness wrote: I am Foolishness, the de facto head and director of the mafia forum on Team Liquid. If he keeps letting us down, he could be in danger of a mob attack... | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:11 Vivax wrote: That said Kurumi post normally my normal self has recently become a Chezinu hater so I want you dead if you keep up roleplaying that dude ##Vote Kurumi Just because I did something you did not agree with in LX does not mean that is a valid reason to vote me. | ||
Vivax
Austria20848 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:34 Kurumi wrote: Just because I did something you did not agree with in LX does not mean that is a valid reason to vote me. I don't know do you want half of this town or mafia or who is doing that to be speaking in riddles and roleplaying so we have no idea what they're talking about? Cause that's the main point I am trying to bring across, if you want to roleplay make it pro-town and understandable and I will have no reason to vote for you. | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:41 Vivax wrote: I don't know do you want half of this town or mafia or who is doing that to be speaking in riddles and roleplaying so we have no idea what they're talking about? Cause that's the main point I am trying to bring across, if you want to roleplay make it pro-town and understandable and I will have no reason to vote for you. Are you blind? Everyone is role playing. Why not vote everyone? | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
burn me because if I ever fucking turn mole I will throw something heavy out of my room ##vote Kurumi | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
I AM A SCUM ROLE AND I AM TOWN ALIGNED AND I WANT TO DIE SO WE CAN AVOID THE POSSIBILITY OF ME BEING A MOLE thanks | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
you should vote me | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:55 prplhz wrote: Calm down Kurumi. shut up bitch and vote me, i have the "towniest mole of them all" disaster from PYPI in my heart, just vote me and we've got one thing less to worry about do it prplhz. For Town. For Children. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:31 Vivax wrote: [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. | ||
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 11 2013 05:21 VisceraEyes wrote: Prom: would you say that Ver appears to be looking for scum? Ver is a great man, He may have a great plan. Though he looks like an ass I'll give him a pass. Soon he must take a stand. He has provided no insight, he has not picked a fight. Since today is day one, it may be that he is just having fun. His scum hunting contributions have been less than light. | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote: Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro... ##Vote: Yamato Gonna start scumhunting? i'm at work you asshat it's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now. | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 11 2013 06:59 yamato77 wrote: i'm at work you asshat it's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now. thanks man | ||
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On March 11 2013 00:08 Kurumi wrote: Hello guys, It is me, Chezinu! So I see we have started this game and I am really happy to play it. I will try my best to have fun! So how about we start having fun right now? I tried this last game, but I got cursed so it was a disaster... Write down three things! One is false, rest is true! 1) I am Chezinu. 2) I have not read my role PM. 3) I don't have a day power. On March 11 2013 03:11 Kurumi wrote: I never claimed I got a role called Chezinu or anything like that. What I claimed is that I AM Chezinu. It is not about roles (which I love finding out as you might know already) but about being a certain person. I just don't abide by the rules, hosts want me to believe I am someone when I clearly am someone else. The rat has snivelled his way into quite the mess, wouldn't you say? "Oh yes, yes I would sir. Maybe the rat wants some of the stew sir?" It's not a stew, it's a broth! "But of course. We can say it's a broth." My beard grows longer. | ||
| ||