EPT/in
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
/in | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Also, need moar people to join so this game isn't at its peak during my midterms.... | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I tend to let mine grow out on occasion but it often looks quite awful and I don't think my kid appreciates it much either. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 06 2013 03:43 glurio wrote: Let's not start on the weekend this time around! In fellow newbies!  Well we can always start next Monday if we don't fill up soon. Which really sucks for me. Why won't people jooiiiiinnnn | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Is this a usual problem with newbie games? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 07 2013 03:23 warbaby wrote: I could try writing a blog (with lots of nonsense and pictures) but I'm not sure I'm qualified to be telling other people to join mafia yet, since I've hardly played it at all myself. Part of me wants this game to take forever to fill up (or even /out), so I can catch up on work. But the other part of me likes playing mafia way more than doing work. T_T You're assuming people are going to read your blog lololol. But yeah nonsense and pictures and stuff for some reason are the more popular blogs so i say DOO EET | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I apologize in advance for being really shitty at this. Is ma furst rodeo. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 08 2013 05:20 zarepath wrote: If I roll scum, I wouldn't want to use WIFOM because you'd call it a scum tell. So clearly if I end up using WIFOM, I will be town. Except that WIFOM doesn't get you anywhere more often than not and only serves to muck people up, so why bother using it if town? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
And so now everyone can meta my reading comprehension. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Of course you can! Well I couldn't before! Dr. Se-uss Dr. Se-uss.... | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I thought we had to wait until 20:00 but I guess since others are posting... I'm completely against RNG lynch I'd much rather to lurker if possible if we need a Day 1 strategy. Mocsta I saw in a game you were recently in (i'm kinda busy to check right now) someone suggested RNG lynch and everyone immediately dumped all over him for scum. Why should this game be any different? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 11 2013 11:08 Mocsta wrote: Its hard to say; I dont actually have a problem if you or Sn0_Man or anyone else do not want RNG. [Just dont call it retarded as a reason for no] But I did have a problem with him flaming me due to grammar. If he did not understand the sentence, due to the incorrect usage of verbs whatever, than ask for clarification. I dont believe he asked for clarificaiton, which logically means it was an attempt to publicly mock me - why else bring attention to this. And I do not see how that really offers any benefit to Day 1 discussions. So based on the "cheap-shot" flaming, would have probably carried a similar sentiment. As far as I'm concerned, early game banter based on taking offense to others cheap shots or picking apart grammar is useless and should just be ignored. I'm fairly sure at this point enough people have declined the RNG vote so the topic should be dropped by everyone. Can the scumhunting begin now? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
We don't have a lot to go on as there are still people in the thread who haven't even posted since the start of D1 (more than half, so no point listing them yet) so I'm going to be ballsy and let Mocsta know that I have my eye on him for filter burying. That being said it's really because it's way too early to have a solid scumread at this point, so unless more people come out of the woodwork (and we can get a soild read on them) I will be voting to lurker lynch D1. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 11 2013 11:33 Mocsta wrote: Filter burying? Please clarify You talk a lot, and it's not always useful. Clarified. Going to go eat and study. Will check on the thread every so often but I'm not expecting much activity for a while. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I have to agree with Mocsta here, at the very least lurker removal D1 can be a useful strategy, but I can't say I'm in favor of removing those who are performing the bare minimum (read: have actual 'qualitative additions,' as geript put it) when there will be scum actively trying to disrupt our hunting efforts. If it comes to pass that those who are performing the bare minimum ARE the scum who are detracting from our efforts, then that's another story, but I feel like we should be slightly more certain of this than a regular lurker lynch, and I would also argue that this kind of thing would have to happen after D1. Once again, making my position very clear: if you are inactive or do not contribute to the hunt D1, then you are my target. Obviously the Day is still young but I expect more from my Town as the day progresses. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 11 2013 13:28 cDgCorazon wrote: So you are more likely to lean towards a "Lynch All Lurkers" position for D1? If that is the case, I kind of disagree with this way of thinking. I think we should vote for the player who acts the scummiest. This sums up my feelings about D1 lynches very well. I also like the soft town claim (I bolded it). Put it this way: if there is an extremely strong scumread on someone that is nigh irrefutable, then great, I can get on board. Otherwise LAL, but as I said, we shall see how the day progresses. Also regarding the soft claim (I feel I should address it) wouldn't I say the same thing if I were scum?  | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 11 2013 13:41 Mocsta wrote: Sorry, but, I cant even begin to fathom what you are implying with this? Please clarify, as it reads very WIFOM to me. I'm trying to say don't look too much into it. There are more important things to be done like scumhunt; determining as to my town alignment should become obvious by my future actions, not by my words. On February 11 2013 13:44 warbaby wrote: WaveOfShadow, this is not your town. It's not my town, and it's not Mocsta's town. It is the town, and it's members shall think for themselves and analyze the thread before doing stupid things. Please. Warbaby, this sure as hell is my town as I'm a part of it and I care about it. I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm telling or leading people not to think for themselves or that I'm doing something stupid. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 11 2013 13:58 cDgCorazon wrote: I love how Mocsta just accused WB of trying to associate him with town and then WB just hard-claims town. @WB: Do you mean VT or some other blue role? If it makes you feel better, you have a 100% telling-the-truth rate when it comes to claiming roles. @Waveofshadow (WoS from now on): You don't own the town. It is the town. We all care about it collectively. It's a socialist concept thrown into the English language. Stop pretending that you own all of us. Jeez you guys are sensitive. In no way did I insinuate that I am the leader or that I own you guys, nor am I or have I ever bossed anyone around thus far in the game; people need to stop looking for things to be offended about when there is nothing. Makes you look scummy. Alright no more posting until I get something RL-related done but I leave with this final thing. Warbaby, if you are soft-claiming blue, I would have thought you had learned from previous NMM; blue claim is really not a good idea this early into the game. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I can honestly say I didn't expect to have an attempted bandwagon started against me in the time I was gone, but I will do my best to refute what zarepath has started against me. Give me a few minutes to consolidate my shit. | ||
| ||
