I'm still sorta confused about the two worlds no quoting/posting thing. I get we are not allowed to quote/post, but it doesn't say we can't read have conversations with people on the other side. It simply seems like if we want to do it we have to go a more complicated route. Something like "@player response". The spirit of the rule makes it seems like we arin't suppose to communicate, but its not impossible. how does that work.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 00:50 GMT

#108

On December 12 2012 09:26 Clarity_nl wrote:
The worlds alternate lynch/swap, so we should lynch scum and swap scum (and during the swapday convince the other world why the person being swapped is scum.)

I think it works the other way, If we swap scum to the other side, it will be swap day when he gets there.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 01:18 GMT

#122

Maybe I'll declaer what my role is. It worked really well in the single mafia game I played.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:17 GMT

#144

I actually think sandro's idea has some merit. Since it would be nice to have confirmed townies. However, instead of swapping the scummiest they swap the second scummiest since they can lynch their scummiest target sooner than we would be able to, after that we would be able to use our lynch + new information from their lynch to see if we need to lynch the potential scum target they sent over.

Unless we somehow find somebody on our world who we want to lynch ahead of their second scummiest person in which case that person survives an extra day.

Sounds likes a lot work for something that may not even be better since this would require their world to have two reads and their weaker read being stronger than our strongest.

Unless we are willing to let our strongest read go un-lynched for the purpose killing everybody in one world to confirm the rest.

I started all that when I first saw sandro's idea, and by the time I finished it looked like even sandro changed his mind, but screw it I wrote it up I'm positing it.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:19 GMT

#145

And of course Greymist posts that after I check the thread again. In that light it might actually be a good idea to follow Sandro's idea since a confirmed list is always good + they wouldn't be forced into lynching townies.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:35 GMT

#147

No lynch is bad. A confirmed town list is good. It's a matter of which we value more.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:36 GMT

#149

IF we went with that plan, not convinced its the best idea yet.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:45 GMT

#153

BH your posting in the wrong thread.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 04:48 GMT

#154

Both sides swapping their scummiest player sounds like a stupid plan. That means the soonest that player can be lynched is in two days after that swap when the side swapping him could have lynched him in one. Their SECOND scummiest player however can be lynched a day earlier if the other side is willing to do it for them.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 06:14 GMT

#158

@yamato77 If we swap the lurkiest player what prevents mafia from playing that role.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 06:36 GMT

#161

Does doing the lynch everybody from one world first actually reduce our chances of finding scum though? I suppose its more unlikely for one side to find both before the other finds one, but say we have no strong read for our next lynch cycle wouldn't lynching the one from the other world to narrow that list and potentially get confirmed townies be good?

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 06:59 GMT

#163

@yamato

Are we actually losing lynch days though? we are still lynching just from one side first. Once we clear one world we can do the same thing for the other. They swap their second scummiest, and lynch the scummiest the next day. The net sum of lynches is still the same it's just focused on one side to get some free confirmed townies.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 21:53 GMT

#199

Palmer that sounds so damn reasonable you have to be scum. ##Vote (Grey): Palmer

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 22:06 GMT

#201

I dunno I just wanted to get a vote down and I made up something about the last person when i checked the thread. I suppose I could vote for myself, but that's no fun.

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 22:58 GMT

#205

On December 13 2012 07:49 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

you don't really understand how to play mafia, do you?

I understand you are scum! Easiest game of my life, I've already found both scum its Palmer and marvellosity. GG

randombum

United States2378 Posts

December 12 2012 23:30 GMT

#211