• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:53
CEST 15:53
KST 22:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN2The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL19Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)13Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN Karma, Domino Effect, and how it relates to SC2. Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group B EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
Practice Partners (Official) GG Lan Party Bulgaria (Live in about 3 hours) BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Battle.net is not working Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Monster Hunter Wilds Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18910 users

Protoss Identity in SC2: Power and Cost

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-25 18:42:21
October 10 2012 18:41 GMT
#1
This is something that I have written up on the HotS beta forums. I thought it would be worth sharing here.

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6794032960?page=1#4

This is more about design than balance, and it isn't the usual whine, or at least I hope not. I hope to advance a constructive dialogue much like ArcherofAuir did with his article on macro.

Introduction: What are Protoss and how is this identity reflected mechanically?

First Born of the Gods, the Protoss represent the setting's height of civilization and cerebral development. They are Purity of Form made manifest. Mechanically, the Protoss reflect this favored station with high unit damage and health versus their counterparts, absurdly powerful spells, and a high cost in minerals, vespane, and supply. When playing Protoss, the player should feel like they are in command of a small, but elite group of warriors.
What does Micro mean to Protoss? Protoss do not reproduce quickly. After the events of Starcraft 1 and the ensuing Brood War, the Protoss are a shattered people and a broken empire. Thematically, Starcraft 2 captures this with units like the Immortal, as well as their increasing reliance on robotic units like the Sentry and Colossus to supplement their waning numbers. This means that each unit, while durable, is precious and hard to replace. Every unit saved is a victory, every unit lost, a defeat. A Protoss general should be worried when their Stalkers take hull damage, and grimace when they lose a High Templar to a Ghost’s sniper rifle. Design that supports this theme is good for the game and the experience because it encourages a distinct skill set and builds tension for player and unit alike. In this respect, Starcraft 2 does very well in communicating the identity of the Protoss. They know they are an endangered species and they are resorting to whatever means they can to tip the scales in their favor.

The Old Way: Unfortunately, playing the defeated guys doesn't feel terribly fun. Protoss players miss the days when they commanded infantry that demanded the enemy to make tier 2 units to meet them on even terms. Times have changed, and Zerg and Terran have units at tier 1 that efficiently exchange in straight up fights: The Marauder and the Roach, while these units enable a play style diversity, this is coupled with some really cool Protoss advances that have necessitated balance tweaks, creating an unfun dynamic which I will explain below.

Warp In is a fantastic and awesome mechanic that feels very Protoss. They need to allocate their few warriors where and when they need them. However, introducing it as a staple mechanic at a pivotal point in the Protoss tech tree (Cybernetics Core) is problematic. The ability to make units anywhere you have a power grid drastically reduces the defender’s advantage for the opposing player. Moreover, Warp Gate is treated as a macro mechanic, meaning that the optimal play is to always make your gateways into Warpgates, raising the skill ceiling due to the fact that you can’t queue up units. To make this fair, Protoss units have been diminished significantly. The Stalker has 20 less health than its predecessor, the Dragoon (along with the coveted +2 damage per upgrade), and the Zealot has lost 10 Shield. Because of the power of Warp In, the High Templar can’t enjoy an energy upgrade without breaking match ups, and the Dark Templar has a 100 second structure with no upgrades to compensate for the ability to appear next to a Hatchery the moment the tech finishes.

What does this dynamic do? It creates an environment where Protoss still pay the most for their units, but their units aren’t worlds ahead of their tier 1 or tier 1.5 equivalents, and often inferior when upgrades like Stim are taken into account. This means that Gateway units are frantically warped in as fodder to protect their powerful Tier 3 units like the Colossus and the High Templar. It’s like playing Zerg with a bad credit rating. I feel like I spend and sacrifice so much to achieve so little.
To better understand why this is dynamic exists, let’s look at the numbers between the tier 1 units of BW and SC2.

Unit Name Cost: Supply: HP/Shields Damage
BW Zealot 100/0 2 100/60 16
BW Dragoon 125/50 2 100/80 10 (+5 Med+10 Large)
BW Zergling 25/0 .5 35 5
BW Hydra 75/25 1 80 5 (+2.5 Med +5 Large)
BW Marine 50 1 40 6
BW Firebat 50/25 1 50 4 (+4 vs Med +12 vs Small)

The relationship is pretty stark between Protoss and the other races. Protoss units cost around double (or quadruple in the case of the Zergling) the amount of resources, but in exchange have 100%+ advantage in damage and durability. A Zealot about 3 times as much damage as a zergling or a marine. A Hydra literally does half the damage of the Dragoon. These are huge discrepancies that made Protoss the powerhouse it was in Brood War. Let’s look at current unit relationships in Wings of Liberty.

Unit Name Cost Supply HP/Shields Damage
WOL Zealot 100/0 2 100/50 8x2
WOL Stalker 125/50 2 80/80 10(+4 Armored)
WOL Zergling 25/0 .5 35 5
WOL Roach 75/25 2 145 16
WOL Marine 50 1 45+10 6
WOL Marauder 125/25 2 125 10(+10 Armored)

Here we see the relationship get pretty murky. Zerg gets a unit that has 2.5% less total health than a Zealot and 20% less HP than a Stalker, yet does effectively more damage than the Zealot (Armor reduces damage by 1 for the roach vs twice for the zealot) and does more damage than the Stalker’s base or vs armored values. We see the same issue with the Marauder and the Stalker where a Tier 1.5 Terran unit can solo a Stalker. This is because the Marauder does 40% more bonus damage than its Protoss counterpart without losing much in the way of durability (it has about 70% of the Stalker’s hp) while the Stalker is more fragile than its predecessor. WoL’s basic unit relationships are not clear in their power relationship to one another, making things frustrating for everyone involved. This means that Protoss are the most expensive race without being the most powerful per unit. This is the core problem, not Warp In in of its self. It is important to note that Warp In limits how powerful Gateway units can be. (The Immortal was moved to the Robotics right before the WoL beta because of this issue.)

So we have established that the defining elements of core units have changed considerably between Starcraft 1 and 2, making Protoss’s status as “heavy hitters” less distinct. This dissatisfaction has yielded a backlash from traditionalist portions of the community (most notably Team Liquid). These portions of the community wish to revert to older norms, the scrapping of Wings of Liberty’s additions in favor of old favorites like the Reaver, Dragoons, Corsairs, and Old Carriers. This is an understandable reaction because presumably the old system works. However, this is not necessarily correct, nor desirable. A sequel should draw on the design roots to further the design of a game, not replicate it. Warp In and Force Field are fantastic additions to Starcraft 2, but like many things in design, their current implementation produces gameplay that is less satisfying and dramatic than it could be.

A less noticeable identity crisis: Khala and the Dark Templar casts.
With Wings of Liberty, Blizzard has pushed the theme of unity between the despondent Protoss tribes. This is fantastic and naturally flows from the events of Starcraft 2, while producing potentially divergent playstyles within the same race. Love it. And some of their implementation is fantastic. The Stalker is more fragile than the old Dragoon, but has mobility and cunning in exchange. A good Executor can use Stalkers to infiltrate and backstab unwary opponents and retreat to the shadows in the span of 30 seconds. Top notch. The Immortal is a very Khala unit, it is very durable and has very high damage, but is very expensive and is prone to being overwhelmed by lesser units. Units like the Oracle are also spot on where conflict is avoided and tricks are used to harass and befuddle the enemy. All Protoss units are expensive and (should be) high damage relative to their opposing factions. The difference between the casts should be the Khala’s direct and durable vs the Dark Templar’s subtly and fragility (relative to cost). The Voidray is a deeply confused unit and should be addressed.

Gameplay Solutions:
I am not going to claim that these are the best options, and some of them certainly aren't the easiest. But implementing these changes requires no programming or fundamental overhaul of the Protoss tech structure. They require no new units, and they synergize well with the new Mothership Core and the new Stargate units.

Potential Solutions

Again, these ideas are not about achieving numerical balance, but rather to achieve the racial dynamic where Protoss will win fights on a unit to unit basis (not necessarily cost for cost, or supply for supply). All my proposed changes hopefully raise the skill ceiling without raising the skill floor. Good esports are easy to learn, tough to master. Finally, changes to thinks like force field are intended to create gameplay situations that have gameplay options on both sides, not just one. It makes for less binary gameplay, and more gradients in success that Dustin talks about in his lecture on esports.

Change Package #1
-Make Warp Gate require Twilight Council to research.
-Warp Gate Reduces unit build time by N seconds (N is a number to be determined by testing)
-Warp In cooldowns are equal to 120% of the unit’s build time.
-Increase Conversion time by 5 Seconds.
This combination of changes allows Warp Gate to be a powerful Macro oriented research while allowing Protoss core units to be a little bit stronger since they are subject to the same defender’s advantage as the other races. This also lets late game macro toss be viable without heavy use of Warp In without screwing up early timings. With the addition of the Mscore’s recall, Protoss can be highly aggressive at the cost of delaying their Warp In research (Mscore costs 100 gas and the Twilight Council costs 100 gas)

Projected Effect: This change will allow for two different playstyles, a steady legionary march style vs a Special Operations deployment style. The following unit changes are less definite and would require more testing. I do feel that these changes would allow for a stronger Protoss army. Again, even if the numbers are squiffy, this is about yielding a better feel for the race.

Change Set #2

A Tier 1.5 Immortal!
-Move Immortal to Gateway from Robotics Facility. It requires a Cybernetics Core to be built.
-Hardened Shield is now an upgrade costing 150/150 with a research of 75 seconds at Twilight Council
-Health reduced to 100 from 200.
-Damage Reduced to 15+15 vs Armored. (Upgrades give +1/+2 vs Armored) The immortal may hit air units.
-Cost Reduced to 150/75. Supply Reduced to 3.
-Build Time reduced to 35 seconds.

Projected Effect: Making the Immortal a massable unit is a risky proposition. The reason I advocate for such a dramatic shift is because of its binary relationship to Mech. Currently, because a unit exists that can completely ignore tank volleys while doing 50+ damage a shot to armored targets, makes for a relatively predictable TvP. Making Hardened Shields a pricey upgrade allows for tanks and Immortals to have a less binary relationship. Given their slow speed, Immortals would be less likely to simply run over an opponent after a victory, allowing the opponent some time to rally, hopefully yielding more back and forth games. Ghots are also made more effective, as their EMP negates half of the Immortals effective health rather than one third. Finally, it would actually improve Protoss's ability to hold against mass Roach, and give Protoss soldiers that can unit for unit hold their own.

Anti-Light Stalker
-Damage changed to 10+ 4 vs Light (Upgrades remain +1)

Projected Effect: The Stalker becomes a rather nasty soft counter to marines until shields or stim are researched, but must be wary of marauders. They give Protoss a smoother solution to mass muta play. Zerglings are still dangerous post speed, given that it would take +3/0 Stalkers to 2 shot 0/0 Zerglings. What this would do would allow for Blink Stalkers to be more powerful as a core harassment or anti harassment unit. This answers the desire for a dangerous harassment option that deals physical damage to the enemy economy.

Tier-2 Sentry at Robotics
-Move Sentry to Robotics Facility from Gateway.
-Increase cost to 100/150. Supply increased to 3.
-Increase Health and shield to 80/80.
-Increase damage to 10
-Increase Build Time to 35 seconds.
-Guardian Shield now halves the duration of slows and roots.
-Force Field now counts as a neutral structure with 500 HP and N base armor.
-Hallucination no longer requires research.

Projected Effect: Making the Sentry a beefier slightly more expensive support unit allows Protoss to less reliant on landing a single spell. Furthermore, investing in Forcefield delays Colossus tech, making Protoss players choose how they want to dominate the ground. The change to Forcefield allows counterplay for all army compositions and forces the opponent to make a split decision. “Do I kill these forcefields at the cost of damage, or do I try to trade as best as possible?” It also lets the Protoss player kill Forcefields early if they chose.

Change Set #3 Star Gate Tech

Phoenix
-Pulse Crystal Upgrade increases range of Graviton Beam

Projected Effect: Phoenix can more reliably use Graviton Beam to snipe key units like Infestors, Ghosts, or Tanks in the late game.

Glass Cannon Voidray
-Decrease Health to 100 Decrease shield to 80
-Increase base damage to 8+2 Armored. Increase Charge damage to 14+4 Armored.
-Add Prismatic Battery upgrade at Fleet Beacon. (100/100/60 seconds) Increase charge rate by 50% +2 seconds to charge duration.

Projected Effect: This makes the Voidray a dangerous airborne harassment option that requires the opponent to deal with them quickly to mitigate damage. However, due to their decreased durability, they are not a cost efficient a move unit. (3 Storms will kill them.) The Prismatic Battery upgrade enhances their ability to perform their role as well as incentive protoss to move their Voidrays around more.

A non capital ship Tempest
-Tempests do not require a fleet beacon.
-Reduce Shields HP to 100/200 from 150/300
-Bonus damage to Massive reduced to +10
-Cost Reduced to 200/150 Supply reduced to 4 from 6
-Reduce Build time to 50 seconds from 75.
-Range reduced to 9 from 15
-Speed increased to 2.25 from 1.88
-Add Gravitation Sling Upgrade at Fleet Beacon (100/100/ 80 Seconds: +6 Range to Tempests)

Projected Effect: This set of changes is intended to make the Tempest a more viable option for dealing with massive threats like Brood Lords, Thors, and Battle Cruisers. They are more supply efficient for their damage, allow for Stargate bases strategies be aggressive by giving Protoss an early siege unit that is vulnerable to units like Marines, Hydras, Mutalisks, Vikings ect, that evolves into a beast of a sniping unit late game that requires sight and good positioning to optimally use. Furthermore, this differentiates it from the Carrier while still making it a cool addition to the Protoss Armada. Entaro Tassadar!

Improved Carrier
-Decrease build time to 90 seconds from 120.
-Increase base Armor to 3 from 2.
-Increase Interceptor Armor to 2.
-New Passive: Interceptor Squadron Allow Interceptors to stay outside of a moving carrier so long as it is moving. If ordered to attack, they will deploy with greater speed. (Equal to that of a current Gravaton Catapult upgraded Carrier)
-Replace Graviton Catapult with Repair Bay upgrade (100/100 80 seconds: Interceptors are fully repaired upon entering the carrier.

Projected Effect: Carrier has arrived! The Carrier will be a capital ship worth fearing. By legitimizing the old interceptor bug, the vision of the Carrier as a sudden strike craft is enabled from the get go, allowing surprise tech switches to be dangerous. The upgrade provides the old tension that NonY describes in his video regarding the Carrier. The counters to this unit are still in place. Vikings and Corruptors are cost effective, but Marines, Hydras, and Stalkers must rely on good positioning rather than just shredding the Carrier's interceptors.

Mothership:
-Vortex Removed
-New Passive: Psionic Web: Mothership provides a constant powerfield in a radius around it.
-New Spell: Temporal Dilation (100 Energy/Range/Radius:4 Reduce the movement speed and attack speed of all units within area by 50%

Projected Effect: The Mothership continues to serve as a mobile objective that provides more counterplay than Vortex currently does. Temporal Dilation was a fantastic ability in the WoL beta and it is a shame it was removed. For one, you can't abuse it like you can the Archon toilet. Two, landing a good Dilation is strong, but still allows good army splitting to mitigate the damage before and during the spell. Finally, it synergies with good army positioning like Vortex. Also note, that a well timed Nerual could cancel a huge warp in. Big plays

General Projections- Gateway management becomes a measurable aspect of player skill and increases the skill ceiling without raising the skill floor. Good players can stabilize by having gateways pumping out reinforcing units mid battle, or if they are gaining an advantage, can choose to risk the potential of future units by converting their gateways to warp gates and going all in. It provides choices that are not clearly optimal. This makes for interesting gameplay and more involved matches for the viewer. Cooler Stargate play is something I think we all could enjoy watching.

PTR Update: Internal testing is going well. The Immortal is currently a bit too strong for what it costs and is being tweaked. (A bit less damage vs armor and we are giving it a projectile attack so PDD is effective at mitigating damage.)Pre Hardened Shield, Immortals and Tanks are well matched, post research the same issues arise. By making the attack a projectile, Terrans can support their Tank compositions via Bio with the Ghost's EMP, or use the Raven's PDD to further fortify areas. We are also experimenting with making the Jotun light armored and waving the tech lab requirement (but not the armory, allowing them to be mass produced like Hellions.) Gateway/Warpgate play really affects how you place your buildings. Stalkers are an Tier 2 unit and have been buffed slightly to compensate. Having that much damage out at Tier 1.5 was silly vs Hydras, Lings, and Marines. In short, TvP feels pretty damn fun again. With the Widow Mine and MShip core and Tempest, I think we could see a truly varied and rich match up.

PTR Update: 11/25/2012
A NOTE TO ALL: THESE VERSIONS ARE NOT FINAL. NOT ALL OF THE CHANGES WE WANT TO MAKE ARE IN PLACE YET. We are still tweaking HotS units as well as problem units like the Mothership. Feel free to play, and give us feed back at onevoicemod@gmail.com . Just know that things are changing rapidly.
Reflection and Respect.
Rimak
Profile Joined January 2012
Denmark434 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-10 19:02:03
October 10 2012 19:01 GMT
#2
awesome!
Especially moving a sentry to robotics, It's just so logical and fluent!
2000 Jungler 66% Hecarim, 63% Volibear, 60% Jarvan IV
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
October 10 2012 19:05 GMT
#3
Haha, thanks! Robo's theme in WoL has been ground dominance, (I actually like the presence that SC2 robo has. It feels more unsubstantial than BW given the you only had the Reaver.) I think making the Sentry a more powerful unit gives Robo some fantastic options that fit that theme, while making Force Field more of a playstyle option and less of a prerequisite.
Reflection and Respect.
theNational.
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada54 Posts
October 10 2012 19:11 GMT
#4
This is actually pretty brilliant. I've really been irritated with sc2 toss for a long time but my solutions have tended to be "just give me my fucking Reaver back". I really like how you address the warp-in mechanic since I do feel it's a good macro mechanic at differentiating Protoss and Terran and it adds another level of thought to your reinforcing. I'd be curious to see how the Force Field change would play out, I don't particularly like the mechanic as it makes most protoss units weaker because of how powerful it is.
Try as you may but you will always be a tourist - Titus Andronicus
mlspmatt
Profile Joined October 2011
Canada404 Posts
October 10 2012 19:13 GMT
#5
Clearly a well thought out thread, and all the races have issues that players would like to fix, or revert back to BroodWar.

BroodWar was, and still is the best RTS ever made. As a Terran I still want the Goliath back, and buffed tanks. And most of your suggestions are good and worth thought, but if Blizzard was interested in making SC2 more like BW they've shown no sign of it so far.
Doominator10
Profile Joined August 2012
United States515 Posts
October 10 2012 19:19 GMT
#6
OMFG This is really well thought out. I'm gonna send over some of these ideas to the Starbow Mod guy(s)

Gj
Your DOOM has arrived,,,, and is handing out cookies
thezanursic
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
5478 Posts
October 10 2012 19:31 GMT
#7
A Hydra literally does half the damage of the Dragoon, but hydras still rape dragoons!
http://i45.tinypic.com/9j2cdc.jpg Let it be so!
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
October 10 2012 19:32 GMT
#8
On October 11 2012 04:13 mlspmatt wrote:
Clearly a well thought out thread, and all the races have issues that players would like to fix, or revert back to BroodWar.

BroodWar was, and still is the best RTS ever made. As a Terran I still want the Goliath back, and buffed tanks. And most of your suggestions are good and worth thought, but if Blizzard was interested in making SC2 more like BW they've shown no sign of it so far.


Thanks for your input! I also miss strong tanks and the goliath. However, I don't think you are being entirely fair to Blizzard. The games I have played in post Warhound Heart of the Swarm have been decidedly better design wise than WoL. The Swarm Host is a surprisingly well designed unit, though some tweaks could be made. The Mothership Core gets my love because Protoss it provides a fun and unique way for protoss to move out across the map without going all in. The new Widow Mine is a fantastic addition to SC and with enough tuning, would be a BW quality unit. Contrary to the doom and gloom, things ARE improving. They will improve more quickly the more articulate, civil, and consistent a dialogue we engage in.

If you folks want to see more changes like this, go to reddit and upvote articles like this. You can find my submission here: http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/new/

Don't just look at mine though, get involved in the reddit and forum communities. The more eyes that we bring to these issues, and the more insistent our voices are, the better chance we have at creating a lasting dialogue with Blizzard. Designing a game is tough, and good ideas often take many many iterations; not to mention the game industry can be pretty insular. Look at Starbow and how many iterations it has gone through.
Reflection and Respect.
Woizit
Profile Joined June 2011
801 Posts
October 10 2012 19:41 GMT
#9
Very interesting proposals. I like thinking of how different Protoss gateway will be if the immortal and sentry's switched around. Leaving twilgiht with 3 unit upgrades with warpgate seems to leave it a bit heavy on that side while robo will still be absolutely necessary for observers. I'm not sure how that complication will work out, but it'll probably create more meaningful decisions on the unit composition than what we have now.
Rorschach
Profile Joined May 2010
United States623 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-10 19:47:11
October 10 2012 19:45 GMT
#10
This is the kind of massive redesign is what the race needs. Between HoTS and WoL toss is too stale and some of these ideas would give actual options to the race...
En Taro Adun, Executor!
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
October 10 2012 19:49 GMT
#11
Really need to convince Browder that buffs/nerfs tweaks aren't what needs, but a serious redesign of the core concepts.
MMA: The true King of Wings
spetznova
Profile Joined September 2012
United States13 Posts
October 10 2012 19:53 GMT
#12
These proposals are all very well thought out, and just make so much sense. In particular, stalkers specializing against light rather than armored, switching the sentry and immortal, and making the gateway/warpgate into an actual choice for the player to decide (with pros/cons to each). I would be very happy if these changes were implemented - and I hope the development team reads these ideas.
Prog455
Profile Joined April 2012
Denmark970 Posts
October 10 2012 19:56 GMT
#13
Very nice thread. As a Terran player i am especially quite fond of the way that you adress Tanks vs. Immortals. Alternatively, something that i have given some thoughts lately, is the idea of giving Immortals energy, and making Hardened Shield somewhat similar to PDD, although i am not quite if this would be too much of a nerf in TvP. Furthermore i am not quite sure if it is a good idea for HTs to counter Immortals.

Anyway - very nice thread with a lot of valid points!
JyB
Profile Joined January 2012
France466 Posts
October 10 2012 19:57 GMT
#14
Nice read. I agree with you 100%.
Grendel
Profile Joined November 2010
Belgium126 Posts
October 10 2012 19:58 GMT
#15
Well thought out post. Though I don't think some of these changes have to be as difficult as you make them, and some of the changes are so big that they probably never will happen, like the Immortal on gateway tech (yes, I know it would be rebalanced, but it's too big of a change for Blizzard to make).

Regarding Warpgate tech, while interesting, I really would wish if they just made it so that gateway armies would be produced FASTER than warpgate armies, instead of the other way around. That way both techs would still be viable (warpgate for the harassment, gateway for the normal producing of army). Ground units could be balanced accordingly then.

Anyway, great post (truly), but too much for Blizzard to change.

K_osss
Profile Joined June 2010
United States113 Posts
October 10 2012 20:03 GMT
#16
I like the analysis of how the two games, BW and SC2, feel very different as protoss. Protoss definitely feels alot "weaker" on a unit by unit basis. SC2 is sitll very balanced and fun to play but I have to say the feel of Protoss in BW was better, dare I say much better?

Honestly, while I LOVE the warp in mechanic, I'd sacrifice it to allow for some more old school protoss units feel.
unteqair
Profile Joined November 2011
United States308 Posts
October 10 2012 20:05 GMT
#17
Changing the Stalker damage like this would also make mech viable in TvP.

I'm always for any buff to Stargate units.
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
October 10 2012 20:05 GMT
#18
On October 11 2012 04:58 Grendel wrote:
Well thought out post. Though I don't think some of these changes have to be as difficult as you make them, and some of the changes are so big that they probably never will happen, like the Immortal on gateway tech (yes, I know it would be rebalanced, but it's too big of a change for Blizzard to make).

Regarding Warpgate tech, while interesting, I really would wish if they just made it so that gateway armies would be produced FASTER than warpgate armies, instead of the other way around. That way both techs would still be viable (warpgate for the harassment, gateway for the normal producing of army). Ground units could be balanced accordingly then.

Anyway, great post (truly), but too much for Blizzard to change.



These changes are too big to make in one beta alone. And some of these changes probably aren't worth the upheaval they would cause. These are ideas to address the lack of verity in Protoss play in a constructive, civil and articulate way. And we have the LotV beta as well. Eventually, we can work with Blizzard to make protoss a more diverse and rewarding race
Reflection and Respect.
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
October 10 2012 20:06 GMT
#19
On October 11 2012 05:03 K_osss wrote:
I like the analysis of how the two games, BW and SC2, feel very different as protoss. Protoss definitely feels alot "weaker" on a unit by unit basis. SC2 is sitll very balanced and fun to play but I have to say the feel of Protoss in BW was better, dare I say much better?

Honestly, while I LOVE the warp in mechanic, I'd sacrifice it to allow for some more old school protoss units feel.


We don't have to lose the Warp In mechanic, or Force Fields for that matter. It is just a matter of implementation.
Reflection and Respect.
K_osss
Profile Joined June 2010
United States113 Posts
October 10 2012 20:11 GMT
#20
On October 11 2012 05:06 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2012 05:03 K_osss wrote:
I like the analysis of how the two games, BW and SC2, feel very different as protoss. Protoss definitely feels alot "weaker" on a unit by unit basis. SC2 is sitll very balanced and fun to play but I have to say the feel of Protoss in BW was better, dare I say much better?

Honestly, while I LOVE the warp in mechanic, I'd sacrifice it to allow for some more old school protoss units feel.


We don't have to lose the Warp In mechanic, or Force Fields for that matter. It is just a matter of implementation.


Right, I didn't say that very clearly - rather than sacrifice it totally I meant sacrifice it's current position in the tech tree. Don't make me chose between the old feel of protoss and the new warp mechanic haha!
1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
12:30
K-cup France
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EnDerr 69
Vindicta 66
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28322
Calm 5226
Bisu 3139
Sea 3075
Rain 2527
Shuttle 2363
Horang2 1156
Hyuk 973
actioN 490
Zeus 440
[ Show more ]
Stork 310
Soulkey 305
Mini 224
firebathero 111
Mind 75
Rush 67
TY 51
ToSsGirL 38
JulyZerg 29
Killer 21
GoRush 17
Sacsri 17
SilentControl 16
Mong 16
Free 13
soO 12
IntoTheRainbow 9
Icarus 6
Bale 6
Dota 2
Gorgc4936
qojqva2313
Dendi1936
Fuzer 292
XcaliburYe250
BabyKnight83
PGG 81
League of Legends
rGuardiaN73
Counter-Strike
markeloff723
edward143
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King126
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 67
Other Games
singsing2172
B2W.Neo1460
hiko452
XBOCT444
DeMusliM435
Happy419
crisheroes393
ArmadaUGS87
QueenE77
ToD77
KnowMe67
Liquid`VortiX19
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 49
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Dystopia_ 5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• FirePhoenix0
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 5445
• WagamamaTV605
League of Legends
• Jankos2092
Upcoming Events
Road to EWC
2h 7m
Road to EWC
8h 7m
Road to EWC
19h 7m
Road to EWC
20h 7m
Road to EWC
1d 8h
Road to EWC
1d 19h
Road to EWC
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Road to EWC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.