EPT
Newbie Mini Mafia XXVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 24 2012 02:51 Z-BosoN wrote: I don't think caller game should count if you agree /in  Haven't you only played 3 games? XXIV LVII and caller's? | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
 | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 26 2012 11:13 kushm4sta wrote: im going to lurk more this game Kush. Advanced warning. If you play like you played the last 3 games. I am going to lynch you | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 26 2012 11:36 kushm4sta wrote: last game my reads were so good though. Err. You were scum last game. hard to have bad reads when you know everyone's alignment <3 | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 26 2012 13:28 thrawn2112 wrote: I stole this list from marv's standard newbie op who may have stolen it from echelontree. While we're waiting for the game to fill up consider reading some of the following. If it's your first time then definitely read up. Useful Guides
The guides that have been the most helpful to me are the General Guide and Ver's Town Guide. The general guide is pretty easy reading but with Ver's guide you probably want to follow along with the game he's referencing. Very worth it! Blazinghand wrote an AMAZING guide also. You should all Definitely check it out. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 26 2012 20:24 Alsn wrote: That would be all well and good if I could actually find it! Got a link? :p Here you go | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 26 2012 21:16 marvellosity wrote: /coach town hapa, go coach scum bro edit: actually, I wouldn't mind coaching scum. Your call Just coach me <3 | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
I /in'd after Z-Boson and Before Kush. Seems like I should be on it still ^_^ | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 06:58 kushm4sta wrote: @sonic getting everyone's thoughts on lurker policy is important. Don't argue about it but share your views on the matter please.. No it's not. It is simply a mechanism to get the discussion going and allows scum to seem to participate and to potentially mislynch an inactive townie. Any more talk of policy will get you FoS'd. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 08:51 Djodref wrote: @Darthpunk Nevermind you look just more confident to get a scum on D1 than me. Regarding my plan, I think we need general directions to follow because of the majority lynch. It is a way to gather everybody around 2-3 suspicious players and secure a lynch. I'm assuming everyone agree on a no-lynch to be stupid. A no lynch is not going to happen. And yes focusing on 2-3 players is natural. So there does not need to be policy or talk of policy on the matter. As a side note, I am in almost the exact same time zone as you are. So I will also be missing deadlines etc. But it will be nice to have someone who is awake when I am. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:03 kushm4sta wrote: @Darth what are your thoughts on lurker policy? What is your opinion of policy lynches? What is your policy about policies? Read the thread. My position on these has already been made. I don't feel like I need to repeat myself. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:10 Z-BosoN wrote: After LVII I'm rather liking the idea of policy lynches, in extreme cases. Killing lurkers in a lurker-infested town, for example, is something I'm inclined to agree on. If the town proves itself active, then whoever proves himself scummier will occupy the noose. Given that this is a newbie game, scums are generally more scared to post. While that is a general tendency, I don't agree with mass posters being cleared right off the bat, even if their posts seem meaningful. What I suggest in this game, is that people read. From my few games, much time is usually wasted discussing things that have not been read properly. This is a rather useless post. Newbie towns want to scumhunt. Newbie scum want to look like they are scumhunting. That =/= posting a lot but not for the sake of posting, or whatever you meant. And please tell me, what do you mean? You say you hope to have moved past the lurker discussion, and yet you are telling people to post a lot? In my eyes you are telling people not to lurk because that will make them seem scummy. It seems to me that you are indirectly stating your views on lurkers despite openly saying you don't want to talk about them. Meh. Don't like lurker policy lynches at all. It just tells scum: Post. and your safe. I have read every post so far as scummy and I don't see SDM's post as more or less scummy than the others. But posting a lot will let people get a good read on you so you should 100% be doing this as town. And then if all the townies are posting you force scum to. Which makes it much easier to nab them also. SO. Post a lot if you are town. You make scum uncomfortable and facilitate town reads on yourself and scum reads on scum. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:14 kushm4sta wrote: I just dont like it when people threaten me.. so hard to suppress my urge to flame. So here you act like your post was serious. On September 28 2012 09:18 kushm4sta wrote: You have no sense of humor darth. This is the second time I made a joke to you and the second time you took it literally. I do agree with you that it's stupid to have a "plan" for day 2. Everyone vote for their top scumreads and that's all the plan we need. And here you act like it was a joke. So which was it? If it was a joke. It wasn't funny. and sarcasm is impossible to interpret through text unless it is incredibly obvious. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:31 kushm4sta wrote: The one where I call you an asshole was serious. That is the post boson quoted. The one saying the word policy a bunch of times was not serious. That is the one you took seriously. The first time you took a joke seriously was pregame chatter. you are very cold dude and I don't like it. I would like to move on but if you prefer I continue to expand on your faults I would be happy to. Go for it . But I don;t buy any of that for a second. Your reaction to the same catalyst was 2 posts. the first was serious and 'flaming' me, and the second was a joke. Firstly, can you not see how I would not take it as a joke if you flamed me immediately before hand? and secondly that is not a consistent reaction to pressure at all. Which makes me suspicious.It seems like you realised it would be bad to get into a protracted argument with me and therefore decided to play it off as a joke and unimportant. On September 28 2012 09:18 kushm4sta wrote: You have no sense of humor darth. This is the second time I made a joke to you and the second time you took it literally. I do agree with you that it's stupid to have a "plan" for day 2. Everyone vote for their top scumreads and that's all the plan we need. On September 28 2012 09:31 kushm4sta wrote: The one where I call you an asshole was serious. That is the post boson quoted. The one saying the word policy a bunch of times was not serious. That is the one you took seriously. The first time you took a joke seriously was pregame chatter. you are very cold dude and I don't like it. I would like to move on but if you prefer I continue to expand on your faults I would be happy to. Playing it off and trying to shift the focus elsewhere. ##FoS: Kush | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:40 kushm4sta wrote: thank you now I won't be nk lol what? ## Vote: Kush | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On September 28 2012 09:48 kushm4sta wrote: anyway to defend myself: before this game even started you said you were going lynch me if i play the same way ive been playing. well guess what that's my personality and it's not changing so if you don't like it too bad? you said "if you talk policy again im fosing you." I make a post. 1 sentence of flame. For that I am sorry (not really). Second sentence was a brief explanation of why I think 1 post on policy discussion is a good idea. "if you talk policy again im fosing you." The second post I make in response to that is basically saying policy policy policy policy. And you don't get that it's a joke? I am voting for you because you seem scummy. The joke thing just created confusion (obviously) and crapped up the thread. Also I am not against policy talk but that first post where you talk policy was also scummy as hell. And the thing with the not getting night killed? Yeah you did the exact same thing in your last game as scum. | ||
| ||
