EPTLast Newbie Game!
Newbie Mini Mafia XIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
Last Newbie Game! | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
 | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
 | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
You play well 3:1 on TL, I'm only 1:2 | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
On May 06 2012 07:14 Nova_Terra wrote: heh, thanks, my townie play is still awful though Whose isn't? Town play has been suffering for the past months, according to BH. | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
@Gummy Matt would've banned/modkilled them if they were playing badly. Don't need to give them a bad rap. | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
Lynching lurkers in the early game not a good idea. My reasoning is that people need to be able to post before we persecute them. Something to think about lurkers, Mafia will try to lurk, but their posts will have more intent behind each one. Why? Every post they make is going to push its own idea of an agenda, but the more they post the more the idea could be misinterpreted. Before we lynch a lurker let's look at the intent of the post: a Mafia agenda push or a helpful Townie post. | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
On May 10 2012 08:17 BioSC wrote: Sounds like a solid strategy. Basic, but solid. Getting rid of lurkers/low content players seems like a win/win. If they are lurking scum players, town gets a nice snipe. Should they be town, they would be just as bad as scum in that they wouldn't help town anyways. Seems like the first couple of hours will be spent waiting on the rest of the players to get here. Yay for idle chatter. Not true, lynching an inactive is a waste. Scum wants us to not lynch them. We can call lurkers out, and they have to respond. They don't respond, we start looking at them. Lynching, because they are lurkers is stupid. | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
On May 10 2012 08:36 FirmTofu wrote: Hi again dahdum! I hope you aren't mafia again >< I'm all for lynching a lurker, but we should definitely wait a bit for everyone to have a chance to post. What are you implying here? We should wait for everyone to post before coming to conclusions? That seems scummy to me, we should be analyzing peoples posts right now. You just created a reason for you not to post. Convince your not scum. ##Vote: Firm Tofu | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
On May 10 2012 23:41 Anacletus wrote: It was for a misspell. I don't understand what your line about FirmTofu is saying, it makes no sense. I doubt that the mafia would try to be hyper-aggressive day 1. I think that the people who aren't voting are suspicious. I think it makes more sense for the mafia to try and be passive in voting yet vocal in chat to try and rule who otherw vote for and keep their hands clean. No editing period. You can mess up your whole quoting system + Show Spoiler + like this[quote[quote[quote[] ]]] | ||
| ||
