EPTOooooh yeah
Mr. Wiggles Mini Mafia II
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Oooooh yeah | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
 Edit: Cause I can "Probulus Second Coming of Jesus, but his mortal parents died before they could tell him, and God took a century vacation." This I can live with. Certainly explains my drunken childhood. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:11 Paperscraps wrote: I am brilliant, you all shall sheep me and town will win the game. I'm Jesus 2.0, your point is invalid. Reading the kaller game now which is mildly off beat. Wouldn't it be awesome if the inventor could invent Jesus, but no-one believed him because he had no proof he actually was Jesus? The only way the new Jesus could activate his godly powers is if the majority of the thread prayed to him  Religious mafia! | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Someone who happens to read old games and knows your godliness when you roll scum. As for the rest of the post the last newbie game was ruined by players threatening to quit when they were labelled as scum. One just left the thread completely. It caused an absolute shitstorm because it put town at MYLO. Thats is why I have put this here. ♥ Palmar. You're too kind when you're not being an asshole | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On February 28 2012 11:50 deconduo wrote: Hey who are you guys? Burn the witch! ##Vote Pandain I'm a relative newbie around here. I've played three games and lost all three  But I tried damn hard to win in every one and somehow managed to lose. Mafia History - 0:3
Aside from these games I am usually active in the Obs QT of most games, especially the newbie ones. Any questions in particular? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On February 28 2012 18:46 Palmar wrote: dude, weren't you on my team in werewolves? didn't we win that game? Incorrect, I died and my win condition was to be alive. I wasn't technically on either of the mafia teams. I checked it with Ciry to be sure. That was part of why I wanted to get the other teams list for you. Less opportunity for me to get shot. I was just too late. It was a great game and I think I played alright, I just didn't win. This is the one to break the streak, I know it. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On February 29 2012 07:35 Adam4167 wrote: /in I like random. *Brofist* Let us make this a game for the ages. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On February 29 2012 15:35 Adam4167 wrote: I've got a bad feeling about this. Too late, you're stuck here now. Looking at the player list this should be a decent game. I expect great things my Adelaide friend | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
I am also trying to avoid my usual text walls. So far I have been failing but hopefully this game I get it right. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On to more important things, it feels so good to roll town again. As my first act I want to call out Bluelightz! Every game I have read or played with you I have not been able to tell your alignment. This diverts unecessary attention and time away from useful scum hunting. So shape up and be active. If you lurk this game I will make sure you swing from the yard-arm. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
LAL is a stupid policy and so is discussing it. The whole point of mafia is to make decisions based on the evidence in game. Having premade policy's that by their very nature preclude taking each circumstance on its merits, is stupid. I will not support a LAL policy. I doubt anyone would. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
 As for lynching lurkers, well I think they are good targets for any vigs we may have. Better to force them to post. There are different kinds of lurkers and so instituting a broad policy is stupid as well. Again, it doesn't take into account the specific information about the lurker. Has he posted at all or is he just AFK? I don't like it, there are better ways to deal with them. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 01 2012 12:19 Misder wrote: Awww, so slow... 1). I like lynch all liars. Lynch one lurker on Day 1 if needed- analysis takes care of the rest. I like analysis. 2). Doesn't the one preclude the other? I mean following any policy requires the suspension of analysis. Besides if you institute a policy such as lynching lurkers day 1 you get no information going into day 2. I mean a lurker by their very nature has no information to give. In addition mafia can just push the lynch onto a town lurker. I am much happier voting for someone who is trying to lurk or is pushing a scummy agenda than someone who is just not here. Hence why I don't like policy lynches. On a separate note, have you played much mafia here? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 01 2012 12:22 Adam4167 wrote: I can only take you at your word that you're town, Prob, but if you really are, we're either both getting a win or both getting a loss this game. Even after the Arkham city debacle, I still hate policy lynches. Ill stick to analysis for my method of finding scum. I have a streak that needs breaking. I can't lose every game I play. Let's do this *brofist* Paperscraps where you at brother? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Player List: 1. Jackal58 - USA 2. Paperscraps - USA 3. Bluelightz - Indonesia 4. Probulous - Great Southern Land 5. Snarfs - Kanucksland 6. rgTheSchworz - Romania 7. Misder - Fairy Land AKA who the fucks knows 8. Pandain - USA 9. Palmar - Iceland 10. Sandroba - USA 11. TheToast - USA 12. Adam4167 - Land Down under 13. A Killer Cuppa Tea - Neighbours with Misder 14. deconduo - Ireland This is what I have for countries based on profiles. Misder and Tea where are you boys based? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 01 2012 12:36 Misder wrote: I don't exactly know which policy you are referring to. Lynch all Liars is a good policy lynch (suspension of analysis as you call it). Any "analysis" becomes WIFOM and stupid. Lynch all Lurkers is a pretty bad policy lynch, and as such, the only time I would consider lynching a lurker without analysis would be on day 1. "Much" is relative (and I'm guessing by your standards, no), but I've been here for at least a year. lol. I plan on not getting cocky and then getting depressed so much that I have given up. I agree "much" was not the right word to use. Though I was not implying that I have any great skill at this game. I just do my best. I just wanted to know whether you had had these discussions before. Often policies look good on the surface and so are supported by new guys. I just wanted to check whether you are a new guy. As for your main point, I don't like either policy. Liars or lurkers. Like I stated having a policy requires you follow it regardless of the circumstances, otherwise it isn't a policy. If you apply it based evidence other than the fact that the poster lied than it becomes analysis. Policies allow people to vote for a lynch without decent reasoning. They can abdicate their responsibility for logic by just saying "he lied, he must die". I don't like it. | ||
| ||
