Normal Mini Mafia I
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
| ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
| ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
Can a mod please explain the safe-claim rule? I don't quite understand what they are or how they work/how they would prevent role claims. | ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
One thing is clear, we must force the traitors among us to speak! I am an instrument of the Emperor's will, the taint of chaos can not hide from our sight. Let us actively seek out the unclean. If we do not, it could be the doom of us all. Time is our enemy, truth is our strength. Sidenote: I love the warhammer theme, I could really get into this! Let me inquire you, my brothers. What shall be our course of action to seek out and purge the heretics among us? | ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
On February 03 2012 02:58 Timeaisis wrote: OK, well I checked and it looks like everyone has posted something, however Vilonis had one introductory post and hasn't said anything since. So... ##Vote: Vilonis No offense man, I just want a response. None taken, I suppose. I attend school and live on the west coast. I made a post as late as I could last night, and only now have time to make another. Day1 Lynching? You should lynch D1, it should not be random... Not lynching D1 is like starting a new game where chaos either has an extra vote or there is one less townie. Any reasoning that could be done in D2 after not lynching could equally be done in D1, so lets lynch. That being said, don't random lynch. People are already saying dumb/incriminating things. Let it play out. If I were chaos, a random lynch would not scare me. But as an imperial, random lynching scares the hell out of me. I don't want to die D1 for no reason. So I'm going to fight random lynching. Advocating random lynching will put you first on my suspicion list, and will, most likely, earn you a vote A vote leader is dumb... Why would any townie trust a vote leader. I am talking to you, Sinensis. Don't discourage discussion. Don't try to control votes. Don't pretend that the ONLY way to get a majority vote passed is by way of a vote leader. The town out number the mafia drastically, such that all town can vote for one player and even if the mafia vote no lynch, the vote would still go through. Who has been the most destructive? Possibly Sinensis. The swapping back and forth on random voting, advocating a vote leader and nominating himself to be that leader. Much discussion has arisen over this (not much of it particularly useful). Seems he has backed off of random lynching for now though... Nisani201. Started this whole bandwagon discussion. IMO, it is too early to start claiming bandwagons. We are not close to a vote, there were not many people, and the 'bandwagon' was probably the best candidate to be lynched anyway. As far as I can see it, this is only really preventing pressure on players that deserve it, as having 3 votes on you is nowhere as demanding that you make a post as having 7+ votes on you would be. Also, "You guys make this too easy" with an explanation-less vote, followed by claiming a few people voting on suspicions are a bandwagon. Stop make a virtue out of keeping you options open. You should vote on suspicion. It makes your opinions and intentions clear. It makes you (somewhat) committed. Suspicious Prplhz (anyone else read this name as Purple Haze, then have the Jimmy Hendrix song stuck in their head?). Lots of votes, not many posts. Short, mostly useless posts. Probably a time zone thing, but I would like to see more discussion from him. Who is probably scum? My vote is for Nisani201. And as I think you should put your vote where your suspicions are... ##Vote: Nisani201 What is FoS: Player + Show Spoiler + In code tags so you can see the bold tags, and so it doesn't look terrible. If [b]##Vote: Player[/b] is in a quote, it will not be counted as your vote, right? | ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
I believe that there has been a good case against Timeaisis, and we have a chance to lynch him, so I will vote him. I like what Nisani206 said here, about Timeasisis's general aggression, and pointed out the post of Timeasis's herein which he put the burden of proof on proving why Bluelightz and UoNSentinel are NOT mafia. On D1, where we have no real concrete evidence, this seems like pretty chaosy behavior. ##Unvote: Nisani201 ##Vote: Timeaisis Sorry if I spelt your name wrong in my post, I am kinda in a rush. | ||
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
First, his consistency. Everyone should read through TheToast's filter. He has been tracking and building up evidence against Bluelightz and prphlz the whole game. He didn't want to lynch Timeasis Example, On February 04 2012 09:47 TheToast wrote: Nope, I'm good right where I am. Timeaisis or Sentinel may be scum, but I don't think there is enough evidence against either one. Since you all seem to have rejected the logic of my plan, I hope you all get really lucky. In addition, he has done more helpful analysis than anyone else in this thread, and called out more poor analysis. The point of all of this? TheToast is right. If it is possible, he should be saved. He is the most obvious town right now. We should also keep an eye on Bluelightz and prphlz, and consider them strong lynch candidates. | ||
| ||