/in
TL Mafia XLVIII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Refallen
452 Posts
/in | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
(I really thought palmar was scum that game haha) | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
anyway I'm going to bed look orward to reading this thread tomorrow! | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
Oh, I forgot to confirm. I read my PM etc before I made any posts once the day had started (just to be clear that I am aware of my role align in all of my posts etc etc). I thought this was weird by vader, wouldn't this be automatically assumed? Not sure what to make of this though, whether it leans him more to a powerrole/mafia or just nothing special. I agree with redFF's analysis for the most part, and I especially found it weird that Palmar proposed the no-day lynch, which indicates him to be maybe scum. However, I'm not sure how far Palmar posting "useless" stuff would go in proving he was scum; from what I read of XLVII (admittedly the only time I saw Palmar play), he just likes to post huge amounts of text, whether it might be immediately useful or not; seems to me he's just throwing his thoughts out there, hardly a scum tell. VisceraEyes Scum-List of Correctitude Palmar - I liked Red's case on Palmar, and his attempt to discredit it by discrediting me is telling. Like, yeah...he thinks I'm bad...but my skill-level has nothing to do with Red's points or Palmar's posts. It's a ridiculous non-defense, and it's scummy as hell. SCUM. Drazerk - His criticism of Radfield of his RNG vote caught my eye. Like, what's the point there? Does he think he's scum trying to appear to contribute? Does he think he knows how to play better than Rad? We don't know because he doesn't say. It looks to me like he's soft-defending prplhz...especially when he says things like "...you're not going to stick with Prplhz throughout the entire day and if you do you're tunneling him which has drawbacks"....it stinks of pre-knowledge. Not to mention the fact that he's posted several times and hasn't voted OR given his opinions on any players. SCUM. We still have a lot of lurkers, I'd like to see content from everyone fastly. You know, I find this post a bit weird. He points out in the Palmar argument that skill level discussions are irrelevant when deciding who to vote; a good point. And yet he uses the same line of argument to argue for Drazerk being scum, simply for critisizing Radfield. ("Does he think he knows how to play better than Rad?"). It sounds like you're trying to get people to vote Palmar... Right now I think Corrupt looks pretty scummy but he hasn't really had a chance to speak out and defend himself yet. Still, if day ends now I would vote him to be mafia. PS: What does EBWOP mean? Also, how do you get the "On Date XXX YYY wrote:" when you quote? | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
(Also I find it interesting that the other person who has called out Drazerk is VE, who I think to be slightly suspicious as well) | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
On December 05 2011 13:47 Refallen wrote: not only that but the claim that there has been nothing in the past 17 pages to analyze suggests that he is more likely scum than town. I have a hard time believing that any townie would say they found nothing special in the past 17 pages, and even if they did, they would more likely be trying to generate discussion by asking questions rather than throwing out a random vote to someone who is town and distracting everyone from it. (Also I find it interesting that the other person who has called out Drazerk is VE, who I think to be slightly suspicious as well) ^^ my reasoning And haha I think I only seem defensive because the thread is moving soooooooooooo slowly and I'm waiting for the NASL finals to finish | ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
| ||