• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:16
CET 21:16
KST 05:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30
Tourneys
SC2 iNu's Battles #22 SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery Rollback Netcode in Brood War [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BW General Discussion Cwal.gg not working
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Playlenda
Playlendapro
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10783 users

[M](2) Havens Lagoon

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-16 03:31:39
November 11 2011 03:09 GMT
#1
Havens Lagoon (1.5)
Made by: Timetwister22
Published on: [NA][EU][SEA]

If you followed this map through TLMC, check out ESV Havens Lagoon RE

[image loading]

In-Game Description:
Two player map where using the terrain will be critical to your success. As the game progresses, your forces should move up the map - but don't forget about sneaky counter attacks using the low ground!

Introduction/Inspiration:
Despite the comparison, Rise of Valkyries was not an inspiration, as I didn't play broodwar nearly enough to even know how to play, let alone know the hundreds of maps. The concept of expanding upward simply came to me after drawing map layouts on paper for quite some time. Though, my biggest inspiration was the layout of the main, natural, and 3rd of Metalopolis, as the 3rd isn't nestled up against the main. Took that idea and applied it to a 2 player map. Of course there is much variation, but it was the only layout that would fit the concept of expanding upward.

Pictures (Aesthetics):
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

Data (Aesthetics):
Texture Set:
Bel'Shir Dirt Light
Bel'Shir Dirt Dark
Bel'Shir Grass Light
Monlyth Dunes
Xil Sand
Xil Dirt Rocky
Xil Dirt
Mienhoff Sand Dunes

Cliff Type:
Bel'Shir Organic Cliffs



Pictures (Gameplay):
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]] [image loading][image loading]
[Angled Overview]
[image loading]


Data (Gameplay):
Playable Bounds: 134x137
Main Choke <-> Main Choke Distance(s): 35 in in-game seconds
Nat Choke <-> Nat Choke Distance(s): 20 in in-game seconds
Mineral/Gas Counts:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


All standard bases are 8 blue mineral patches 2 vespene gyser layouts with the exception of the high yields, which are 6 mineral patches with 2 vespene gysers.

Would also like to mention that without being on a mapmaking team at the time of creating Haven Lagoons, mostly all of my valuable feedback came from NA friends Munk (Master Zerg), Lonelyhat (Master Zerg, but plays other races at a high diamond/low master level), and Jamileon (Master Protoss) :D

EDIT: Edited for newest version. Pages 1&2 of this thread discuss V1.3 and V1.4, which you can see below.

+ Show Spoiler +
Havens Lagoon (1.3)
Made by: Timetwister22
Published on: [NA][EU][SEA]

[image loading]

In-Game Description:
Two player map where using the terrain will be critical to your success. As the game progresses, your forces should move up the map - but don't forget about sneaky counter attacks using the low ground!

Introduction/Inspiration:
Despite the comparison, Rise of Valkyries was not an inspiration, as I didn't play broodwar nearly enough to even know how to play, let alone know the hundreds of maps. The concept of expanding upward simply came to me after drawing map layouts on paper for quite some time. Though, my biggest inspiration was the layout of the main, natural, and 3rd of Metalopolis, as the 3rd isn't nestled up against the main. Took that idea and applied it to a 2 player map. Of course there is much variation, but it was the only layout that would fit the concept of expanding upward.

Pictures (Aesthetics):
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

Data (Aesthetics):
Texture Set:
Bel'Shir Dirt Light
Bel'Shir Dirt Dark
Bel'Shir Grass Light
Monlyth Dunes
Xil Sand
Xil Dirt Rocky
Xil Dirt
Mienhoff Sand Dunes

Cliff Type:
Bel'Shir Organic Cliffs



Pictures (Gameplay):
My analyzer isn't working, I'll get this up as soon as I can
[Angled Overview]
[image loading]

Data (Gameplay):
Playable Bounds: 134x137
Main Choke <-> Main Choke Distance(s): 35 in in-game seconds
Nat Choke <-> Nat Choke Distance(s): 20 in in-game seconds
Mineral/Gas Counts:
[image loading]
All standard bases are 8 blue mineral patches 2 vespene gyser layouts with the exception of the high yields, which are 6 mineral patches with 2 vespene gysers.

Comments: Many tend to believe this map is highly unfavorable for protoss, and slightly favors zerg. However I feel it just forces a different style of play. We'll see what the map has to offer in the TLopen.


Would also like to mention that without being on a mapmaking team at the time of creating Haven Lagoons, mostly all of my valuable feedback came from NA friends Munk (Master Zerg), Lonelyhat (Master Zerg, but plays other races at a high diamond/low master level), and Jamileon (Master Protoss) :D


Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
November 11 2011 03:17 GMT
#2
I'd walk on water to defeat zerg on this map.
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
Deshkar
Profile Joined June 2011
Singapore1244 Posts
November 11 2011 03:51 GMT
#3
Somehow I feel if the 3rd is a little closer or 2nd a lil easier to defend, would go a long way in balancing this map for toss.
Proko
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1022 Posts
November 11 2011 03:59 GMT
#4
I really like this map's look. I don't think it's good for toss, but I do really like its look.
Caster duos should compliment each others' strengths. "You look very handsome today, Tasteless."
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
November 11 2011 03:59 GMT
#5
Whoa. You've been working hard on the aesthetics a lot. The map looks much prettier. I really like how you use the arch rock doodads, they look interesting.

I find the location of the gold expansion interesting. I would have placed it where the other expansion in between the mains is because each player would have a higher influence on that location. The path it exists on would see more action and the base would in general be more difficult to expand to and defend and very accessible by both players. It's also revealed by the Xel'naga Tower and can be easily harassed by air. I think that that expansion should be gold and the one at the 9 o'clock should be a normal expansion.

The natural is very open. Because of its openness, a lot of openers for Terran Protoss that rely on fast expands are made much more risky than they would be normally. In general, I enjoy watching games and playing games on maps that are extremely flexible and allow many builds to be possible. You will want to read this thread on spectator value if you have not already. I overall feel that the choke to the natural should be made tighter to make fast expands more viable for Terran and Protoss.

The layout of your map clearly resembles Ride of Valkyries from Brood War. They both have use the same style of symmetry, which isn't used in many maps. Usually this type of symmetry yields a close air distance and expansions that are far away from both players. Like on Ride of Valkyries, players can always expand away from your opponent. The third, fourth, and maybe even fifth expansions are fairly far away from your opponent and have a good amount of distance from one another. This means that an enemy player with a death ball will not be able to steamroll through multiple expansions as efficiently as if they were placed together because the ball with have to travel from point A to point B. The death ball will also be extremely out of position; if a counter-attack occurred, the natural would be in a lot of trouble, and since the natural is right next to the main, that player will win the base race if he is ahead on expansions because of how close the two bases are. This gives the expansions their own kind of security. The bases will be harassed, but almost never directly attack with an entire army because of how out of position the army would be. Also, none of these expansions can be dropped. There are no cliffs by any of these expansions. There probably should be so that these expansions are not as easy to expand to. I think that a cliff behind the intended third would be a good addition, and maybe even one behind the base labeled as the fifth expansion, but I'm not so sure one is necessary there.

Overall, Haven's Lagoon is very open. There are no significant chokes other than the ramp of the main into the natural. The natural doesn't have a choke, and all of the ramps on the map are very wide. An analyzer image would help a lot for determining balanced proportions. They have an average openness feature which is pretty awesome and extremely helpful. The openness of the natural and other expansions, combined with the reasons I've stated above about their low risk, put Zerg at an extremely large advantage over Protoss and a less large advantage over Terran. This thread on base vulnerabilities would be worth your while as a nice read as well. I think that the obstructions outside of the naturals and in front of the gold expansion should be made larger and that some of the ramps should be shrunk, specifically the ones into the third and the ones that lead to the Xel'naga Tower, to make the map less open.

This suggestion is a bit extreme, but if the Protoss death ball gets out of position too much, then maybe the height of the map should be shrunk. This should be a last resort if everything else fails.

I'd like to apologize for my immature behavior about the results of the TL map contest. I meant no offense to you as a map maker and am always happy to see more and more people delve into the community, especially those willing to improve, and your aesthetic update has convinced me that you are one of those people. What bothered me was that the judges picked your map over some other quality maps that I would have rather seen as finalists, and I am sorry for funneling my anger out on the map. I'd also like to mention that this map is so much better than my first SCII map. I was also really really really excited for the competition and viewed it as something that would bring community maps into the spotlight, which only fueled my disappointment at the results.

Congratulations on Haven's Lagoon being a finalist, and good luck with the competition!

Namrufus
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States396 Posts
November 11 2011 05:10 GMT
#6
congrats on your map getting a finalist's position!
This is it... the alpaca lips.
Destructicon
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
4713 Posts
November 11 2011 05:25 GMT
#7
Ah, nice work on the visuals, I'm glad too see where you took some of your inspiration from
Last thing you probably need to do now is find the analyzer and see what it says about your map.
In general you want an average openness between 3.90 and 4.15 give or take. If your map is too open you can make it more chokey by adding cliffs in strategic places, or by filling out some parts of the map with unpalatable doodads, like trees, rocks etc.
The trick is to know when to use cliffs and when to use doodads, but that comes with time.

Anyway congrats again on making the final 7 and looking forward to seeing how your map progresses.
WriterNever give up, never surrender! https://www.youtube.com/user/DestructiconSC
Idianci13
Profile Joined May 2011
United States39 Posts
November 11 2011 05:28 GMT
#8
IMO should change contested 6th base to gold base and change contested 6th to a semi-island with 1 gas (high yield)... Just my opinion, but otherwise looks good. Might be problematic for Terran/Toss to hold natural and 3rd without expanding to center though.
I'm only here to help you. But I really don't want to.
RoboBob
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States798 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-11 05:58:59
November 11 2011 05:56 GMT
#9
I'm Terran.

One small thing that makes me very happy is that both of the mains are on the right side of the map. It's *really really* nice to not worry about addons screwing up your sim city. I wish that was something that all 2 player maps featured.

I can see how people would say that this is a Zerg-favored map. But there's a lot of other good things going for it. The low ground expo with the WT kissing it saves TvZ. It's a perfect position for a planetary, just like the rocked gold on XNC. However because the expo is more open (both to ground and air) it's not nearly as imbalanced.

Another thing not immediately obvious is that the 3rds and 4ths, as well as 5ths and gold, are REALLY close together. If you drop (or warpin) at one expo with a bunch of static defense, then it is soooo easy to waltz over and hit another expo instead. So spines, spores, cannons, and PFs (except for the low ground expo) all kinda suck on this map. Which I think is a good thing, because it makes it difficult to turtle beyond 1 base, and it rewards multitasking.

I'm curious why so many people think the map is bad for Protoss. I would agree that the tough third makes it difficult to pull off the standard 3 base collossi into HT build. And the lack of chokes sucks for forcefield. But the map's lack of WTs really hurts Zerg with respect to spotting warp-ins. The pockets outside the main opposite of the ramps are perfectly sized for high ground warpins and Stargate play. And all the different map levels make it super easy to hide proxy pylons. Cliff walking Collosi can absolutely murder the 4th expos. The open naturals are kinda bad for PvZ forge builds, but it's also really good against every Terran fast expand.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-11 09:28:33
November 11 2011 09:22 GMT
#10
After getting some feedback, I've made some changes. These are not published in the TLMC version yet, so let me know what you think.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
Tightened choke between main and island infront of natural. Allows protoss to wall off their main with three 3x3 buildings.


+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading] It only takes three 3x3 buildings to wall off 3rd. Ramp width has been decreased from 4 to 3, and the minerals have been moved slightly closer to ramp for shorter distance.


+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading] More trees and doodads have been added to decrease some openness in the middle area.


+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading] Small change, but a change nevertheless. Curtain has been added to the extended land that wraps around main to make room for other uses than just robo blink in PvP, which was its original purpose.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
November 11 2011 09:30 GMT
#11
1. no protoss will use that wall off, it is fine atm
2. 3 3x3 is okay, not particularly necessary but won't change much. The width decrease on the ramp I don't understand - can you elaborate on why you want that changed?
3. Seems good.
4. Indifferent!
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Sea_Food
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Finland1612 Posts
November 11 2011 09:35 GMT
#12
On November 11 2011 18:30 Plexa wrote:
1. no protoss will use that wall off.

I play protoss and I sure will.

The changes are good but they dont fix all problems.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-11 09:44:15
November 11 2011 09:41 GMT
#13
On November 11 2011 18:35 Sea_Food wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2011 18:30 Plexa wrote:
1. no protoss will use that wall off.

I play protoss and I sure will.

The changes are good but they dont fix all problems.

It's a bad wall because
1) two attack paths = twice the number of cannons you need to defend all ins
2) Exposes your cycore, a lot (no one will build the 2nd gate)
3) Requires 2 pylons to complete - roach timings will hit around then and you're stuffed
4) Can only wall off one entrance in time for standard speedpool ling prod

By the time you get that wall up, most of the builds that you want to wall off against are no longer a threat
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Skawuscha
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria110 Posts
November 11 2011 10:05 GMT
#14
Is there a reason you put both gas on the natural to the left side?? Seems to be very vulnarable to air play...
and can you show a picture with a wall off from the main ramp to nexus??
Meltage
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany613 Posts
November 11 2011 16:35 GMT
#15
Have you tested this for lag issues? There is a lot of mist/fog doodads used in the air-areas along the map borders. Might be worth to check out before the map is used in high level tournament play. The same goes for the water areas and those with a lot of trees.
http://mentalbalans.se/aggedesign
Ares[Effort] *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
DEMACIA6550 Posts
November 11 2011 16:42 GMT
#16
I like the color now
Moderatorgold coin
Venomsflame
Profile Joined February 2011
United States613 Posts
November 11 2011 16:45 GMT
#17
It's cute, but not really balanced at all. Congrats on the competition though.
Ares[Effort] *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
DEMACIA6550 Posts
November 11 2011 16:48 GMT
#18
On November 12 2011 01:45 Venomsflame wrote:
It's cute, but not really balanced at all. Congrats on the competition though.

What parts of the map make it an imbalanced one?
Moderatorgold coin
Sea_Food
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Finland1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-11 18:46:38
November 11 2011 18:46 GMT
#19
On November 12 2011 01:48 Ares[Effort] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2011 01:45 Venomsflame wrote:
It's cute, but not really balanced at all. Congrats on the competition though.

What parts of the map make it an imbalanced one?


The third is pretty far, and to make it worse, the expansion patter there is a straight line, meaning defending vs air, especially muta will be about impossible as protoss.
Munk200
Profile Joined November 2011
United States52 Posts
November 11 2011 20:53 GMT
#20
I'm just curious why people are complaining about the "openness" of this maps natural. I mean the distance from the ramp to the natural is so small. I think its only 5 squares..... so for the tosses out there who claim you cant FFE on this map i ask you. "Whu.....? why the hell not? you can FFE on metal and that natural is far more open than on this map."

Also, @ Time, i don't think making that ramp smaller, and the flat "choke" into the 3rd smaller is necessary. You can make one or the other smaller, but making them both smaller is not needed IMO. People should not be able to get a "free" expo.

One last thing to all the haters out there. Please go play this map before you decide to super theory craft about how IMBA it is. Its easy to look at something and be like, dam that shits broken, the expos are way too far away. Go play the map a few times then make a decision. Its nice playing on something new, and not the same old routine layout of a map.

You cant choose what happens to you, you can only chose how to react.
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
02:00
#69
TaKeTV 467
TKL 456
SteadfastSC412
ZombieGrub122
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 595
TKL 456
SteadfastSC 412
mouzHeroMarine 280
ZombieGrub122
EmSc Tv 22
EnDerr 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 358
ProTech55
Barracks 28
910 15
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps2857
byalli588
gobbtv251
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3744
Trikslyr81
Other Games
FrodaN1336
Liquid`Hasu178
B2W.Neo166
ArmadaUGS108
UpATreeSC49
NeuroSwarm48
C9.Mang040
Railgan32
Chillindude17
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL68
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 22
EmSc2Tv 22
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 52
• Reevou 9
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 26
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3685
Other Games
• imaqtpie971
• Shiphtur679
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 44m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 44m
WardiTV Invitational
15h 44m
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
OSC
1d 2h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
PiGosaur Cup
1d 4h
INu's Battles
1d 15h
ByuN vs Classic
3D!Clan Event
1d 20h
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
[ Show More ]
Ultimate Battle
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
IPSL
4 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-06
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.