Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia VI

On September 27 2011 21:28 Ciryandor wrote:
We have to go to people who are active in the forum first before those who are not active when this game started, these guys if they're scum have a much larger incentive to lurk, especially if they're playing in another Mafia.

raynpelikoneet? Thoughts on the fellow newbies?

On September 27 2011 19:38 FranzP wrote:
So like I think we should start discuss because if we don't then we won't win.

On way to make people talk is to threaten to vote for the guys who don't talk. That way people will talk. That would be a better start than nobody talking.

On September 27 2011 21:28 Ciryandor wrote:
We have to go to people who are active in the forum first before those who are not active when this game started, these guys if they're scum have a much larger incentive to lurk, especially if they're playing in another Mafia.

raynpelikoneet? Thoughts on the fellow newbies?

On September 28 2011 00:23 Ciryandor wrote:

There thanks, at least we have one guy who can start talking. Sknowman, I know you were part of my GMed game and that you were at least lurking hardcore there, you mind putting your thoughts in? Also, why are you so eager to do a pseudo-random targeting on jish, zany? Explanation besides the disproven fact that you wanted to fish for clues?

On September 28 2011 01:26 FranzP wrote:
Sknowman played in werewolf and resurection mafia at least. And FatesGod is the brother of OriginalName apparently.

On September 28 2011 01:48 Ciryandor wrote:

Nope, nobody else in the list really, so I don't have any advantage over them. Best to look at post history if anyone has been active post PM receipts. We may catch one lurker or two that way.

On September 29 2011 10:15 Ciryandor wrote:
Edwin5 hasn't even posted anywhere else, so I'd rather call him as absent than as lurking.

And SERIOUSLY, why are we going to jump on him? I would really recommend pushing on someone who we are sure has at least shown activity after the game started. Let the GM do the modkill on him if he isn't active.

I'll switch to Edwin only if you can convince me of why we're voting him off instead of letting a mod-kill happen.

On September 29 2011 18:18 Ciryandor wrote:


It's better to vote a potentially active (i.e. someone who has at least shown forum activity since the game started) person if the votes threaten to put them onto the lynch threshold, because this would force a response from them. This way, we get information from them and we can still get an inactive either via a late swing or a modkill. One can always lynch someone under pressure if they crack and do scumslips.

And your reply screams scumslip, the sentences are awkward as hell to read anyway.

On September 28 2011 03:30 Zanfada wrote:
Hi all,

This is my first time playing mafia but I have played werewolf a few times so I am not a total newb.

@raynpelikoneet I think there is an advantage personally playing with someone before because you have actually interacted and not read the manuscript of what was said. However we are getting sidetracked.



zany implies there are clues in a half assed way, either he is a stupid town wanting to get us to start talking about nonexistent clues or he is a mafia looking to side track us with stupid nonexistent clues. I am going to be watching him more closely.

On September 30 2011 04:17 Zanfada wrote:
##UNVOTE: Toadesstern
##VOTE: zany_001


my vote for Toadesstern was to get him join us, which he has. I mentioned zany earlier about his half assed clue thing which did strike as an odd post more fluff then anything (scum tell.) Then he joins the kill Edwin group for no real reason other then to kill anyone. The kill edwin group grew rather fast and I think it was mostly mafia trying to blend in and pick off an easy kill without drawing to much attention. Zany still hasnt responded to anything really. So I would like to hear thoughts ans suspicions on what has been going on in the game so far. Till then he has my vote.