• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:10
CEST 20:10
KST 03:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition32
StarCraft 2
General
Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad The New Patch Killed Mech! TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada herO Talks: Poor Performance at EWC and more...
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) WardiTV Mondays RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BSL Season 21 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW caster Sayle BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [ASL20] Semifinal A
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Relatively freeroll strategies Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1543 users

Discussion: Prize pool cap by Blizzard.

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
MadChem
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Germany218 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-24 19:47:59
July 24 2011 15:49 GMT
#1
[I dont want this to become a thread with a discussion about what TB should or should not do. His case is just an example for how it works, so plz stay on Topic]
EDIT: I dont mean that Blizzard should get no money, but rather than starting with 50 % fees on revenues, they should start with a lower percentage from my point of view.


Hi all,
it seems like Blizzard gets 50% of the ad revenue of events if the advertisement
income is higher than 5000 $. As I found out after opening a original thread with a question about it...

Update:
On July 24 2011 23:25 TotalBiscuit wrote:
This is what I know. Yes, you can go over $5k with special dispensation from Blizzard. However, it is policy for them to then require 50% of your ad revenue. I know of several large tournaments that have had to do this. If SHOUTcraft Invitational were to do this, it would mean less money getting into the hands of players, which is completely against what the tournament is all about. It makes no sense for SCI to do this, rather than just run more than one event.


Obviously is SCII the property of Blizzard and Blizzard is providing Battlenet as a Platform for us
and have thereby expense they have to pay, but is taking 50 % of the revenue above 5k a fair deal?
Just from an perspective like this case were the audience is donating money to the prize pool.
My opinion is that Blizzard should a special license for these cases and allowing a Bigger Prize Pool, if the cash is provided by the community.

What do you guys think? (Discuss ;-) !!!)

[I edited it shortly before it got closed, so there are some line double, but this is the OP:
Hi everybody,

Yesterday during the TotalBiscuit Invitational:
TB told the amount of money people
donated for the next tournament.
It was more than 5k $ and he told the audience that
the prize pool cap by blizzard is 5K $.

What I would like to know is how do tournaments get the
right to have a higher prize pool and the conditions around that.
I hope someone around here knows it ;-)

MadChem]
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=247189

P.S.: I will look later if I can find a press email of Blizzard and write them if they want to make a statement.

On July 25 2011 01:39 Isken wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2011 01:27 Nerdslayer wrote:
Dude there is a difference between selling a product for profit and trying to control the product when it allrdy has been sold.

I dont even understand how this can be legal what blizzard is doing

Well if you read the ToS (and it was the same for WoW, I used to read them when servers were down :p ) you would learn that you never owned anything you bought.

2.3 and 9.2 are relevant to the discussion here
http://eu.blizzard.com/en-gb/company/about/termsofuse.html


Poll: Is the current state of the current free prize pool acceptable?

No, the free prize pool cap should be higher and the percentage payments should be lower. (305)
 
88%

Yes. (23)
 
7%

I dont care. (14)
 
4%

No, but I dont know what would be better. (5)
 
1%

347 total votes

Your vote: Is the current state of the current free prize pool acceptable?

(Vote): Yes.
(Vote): No, the free prize pool cap should be higher and the percentage payments should be lower.
(Vote): No, but I dont know what would be better.
(Vote): I dont care.



May be the expression free prize pool is not so good, but in reallity a prize pool is most of the times made possible by ad revenue...
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." - Oppenheimer
Nerdslayer
Profile Joined April 2011
Denmark1130 Posts
July 24 2011 15:58 GMT
#2
Yea I heard about this also yesteday. Its typical activision/blizzard really that 5k cap is actually hurting esports sicne it means less money for the players.

Blizzard should be ashamed really but I doubt they care
sheepman
Profile Joined December 2010
United States54 Posts
July 24 2011 16:00 GMT
#3
I really think half is way too much... I would understand the rule much more if it were say: 15-20%
Ravencruiser
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada519 Posts
July 24 2011 16:02 GMT
#4
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.
"Yah, free will is a bitch" - Drone
Gnax
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden490 Posts
July 24 2011 16:03 GMT
#5
50% sounds like a lot. But I guess they can justify it since players or casters wouldn't be able to make that ad revenue without their game. It doesn't really encourage people to do these nice things for e-sports though.
MadChem
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Germany218 Posts
July 24 2011 16:05 GMT
#6
On July 25 2011 01:02 Ravencruiser wrote:
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.


Sure, but you have to see it from an other perspective. Here a bunch of people donates money for a price pool and those people dont really get advertisement of it. The community is kind of investing
in the growth of the sport, which will eventually help Blizzard.

My opinion is if a bunch of people donate money for an event with a big Prize pool
that it should not fall under advertisement from my point of view....
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." - Oppenheimer
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-24 16:08:01
July 24 2011 16:06 GMT
#7
On July 25 2011 01:03 Gnax wrote:
50% sounds like a lot. But I guess they can justify it since players or casters wouldn't be able to make that ad revenue without their game. It doesn't really encourage people to do these nice things for e-sports though.



It's in their hands. We can only hope Blizzard raises the cap sooner rather than later. Just keep plugging away.

On July 25 2011 01:05 MadChem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2011 01:02 Ravencruiser wrote:
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.


Sure, but you have to see it from an other perspective. Here a bunch of people donates money for a price pool and those people dont really get advertisement of it. The community is kind of investing
in the growth of the sport, which will eventually help Blizzard.

My opinion is if a bunch of people donate money for an event with a big Prize pool
that it should not fall under advertisement from my point of view....



I agree. Ads and donations should be separate.
Premier
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States503 Posts
July 24 2011 16:07 GMT
#8
I feel like this constricts esports. Blizzard is limiting the amount of money that is put into the hands of the players, when instead they should be increasing the amount of money put into the hands of the players to motivate more people to play and increase SC2 and E-sports in general.
Picture Me Rollin' - DJ Premier, Titan of the Tables
Nerdslayer
Profile Joined April 2011
Denmark1130 Posts
July 24 2011 16:07 GMT
#9
On July 25 2011 01:02 Ravencruiser wrote:
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.


You dont see a problem? yea it makes a product to make money but they also control everything els related to the product. To make an analogy what if companies that make footballs decide to charge the premier league half of there add revenue for the use of there footballs! Its absurd really.

its capitalisme in its finest form and it stinks and the reason why it stinks becuase it takes away money from the players and that is wrong..
SkyTheUnknown
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Germany2065 Posts
July 24 2011 16:08 GMT
#10
I think they are hurting themselves with this strategy.
The profits are not that big to make some real earnings for Blizzard (i.e. for medium sized tournaments, very big tournaments would be the opposite). A company that big should ignore these "peanuts" and focus on the question how to make SC II and E-Sports even bigger.
So maybe a higher "cut-off" amount would be good for these small/medium tournaments - about 10k-20k? And not 50% lol.
The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown - H.P. Lovecraft
Cel.erity
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4890 Posts
July 24 2011 16:11 GMT
#11
This seems ridiculous to me; it basically means we can never see a $10k event, since half of that $10k would go to Blizzard, and it just makes more sense from everyone's point of view to run the event for $5k in the first place. I think it is a really poor business and PR strategy for Blizzard to make the cut that high.
We found Dove in a soapless place.
vyyye
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden3917 Posts
July 24 2011 16:15 GMT
#12
This is hurting eSports.
Probably the first time I've used that phrase seriously in my life. Can't say it surprises me, but I definitely don't like it.
Fuckyeah
Profile Joined May 2011
17 Posts
July 24 2011 16:15 GMT
#13
So the fans/players of SC2 donated $5000 to a tournament and now Blizz feels that they should earn 50% of the ad revenue of that tournament for whatever reason and make it harder for that tournament to grow?
Dammit Blizz...
NotSupporting
Profile Joined February 2008
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-24 16:21:11
July 24 2011 16:20 GMT
#14
Wow 50% is just off the wall and it's for a fact going to hurt and discourage the establishment of new tournaments. I totally understand if Blizzard wants to make some money of big tournaments but something like 10-15% would be a lot more reasonable to me, the way it is now they will chock tournaments rather than give them an opportunity to grow. Greedy and bad for fans, players and tournament organizers.
Bartimaeus
Profile Joined January 2011
United States67 Posts
July 24 2011 16:22 GMT
#15
I'd like to see a poll on the topic in the OP. Madchem, if you were to edit one in we could more easily see the opinions of the people of TL without having to wade through hundreds of pages (which this thread is sure to become).

IMO, demanding 50% of the ad revenue in the first place is ridiculous after everyone already bought the game - I would think that 10-20% would be far more reasonable, but I doubt blizzard cares at all for the suffering players when they know they'll continue playing in hopes of winning a major tournament.
Equity213
Profile Joined July 2011
Canada873 Posts
July 24 2011 16:24 GMT
#16
On July 25 2011 01:07 Nerdslayer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2011 01:02 Ravencruiser wrote:
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.

its capitalisme in its finest form and it stinks and the reason why it stinks becuase it takes away money from the players and that is wrong..


Yeah and its capitalism that MADE starcraft 2 in the first place. You think a video game like this would EVER be created without a profit motive?

This is a shitty thing for bliz to do, and I dont liek it either, but ravencruiser is right. Battlenet is their property and they can do what they like with it. Now if we had LAN that would be another story, but we dont.
Timerly
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany511 Posts
July 24 2011 16:24 GMT
#17
Kotick realised there was money he didn't yet have. He wants ALL the money.

Seriously though, it makes sense that Blizzard as a company is interested in this money and obviously most countries allow for this kind of thing (I doubt their standard terms are applicable everywhere though). However, it's ridiculous to expect 50% of the revenue. Is this only ad revenue or does it include sponsoring? Could you offer to pay out less money and instead have hardware prizes? Also, the rule if it stands just like that creates scenarios that are loss/loss.
Say you run a tourney, instead of paying out 6k and giving up maybe 1k in ad revenue to Blizzard you pay out 5k. You make the same money, the players make less money, Blizzard makes NO money. How can anybody with who ever passed an economics class not realise that this kind of thing has to work progressively? Maybe it does not work as explained here and I'm completely off but
Apparently the whole thing was thought up to profit off South Korea when Blizzard still expected SC2 to instantly become the new BW because outside of GSL and maybe MLG most tournaments, even with bigger prize pools, have a hard time staying economically feasible and destroying tournaments can't be Blizzard's idea of "nurturing free advertisment".

All in all it's pretty ridiculous.
Janar
Profile Joined February 2011
Netherlands96 Posts
July 24 2011 16:24 GMT
#18
Blizzard is hurting Esports since 1998
Only the fittest of the fittest shall survive, stay alive.
Nerdslayer
Profile Joined April 2011
Denmark1130 Posts
July 24 2011 16:27 GMT
#19
On July 25 2011 01:24 Equity213 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2011 01:07 Nerdslayer wrote:
On July 25 2011 01:02 Ravencruiser wrote:
Blizzard is a for-profit company.

It makes a product, and if you use the product you must agree to a set of conditions outlined by Blizzard.

I see no problems here.

its capitalisme in its finest form and it stinks and the reason why it stinks becuase it takes away money from the players and that is wrong..


Yeah and its capitalism that MADE starcraft 2 in the first place. You think a video game like this would EVER be created without a profit motive?

This is a shitty thing for bliz to do, and I dont liek it either, but ravencruiser is right. Battlenet is their property and they can do what they like with it. Now if we had LAN that would be another story, but we dont.


Dude there is a difference between selling a product for profit and trying to control the product when it allrdy has been sold.

I dont even understand how this can be legal what blizzard is doing
KingFool
Profile Joined January 2008
Canada428 Posts
July 24 2011 16:29 GMT
#20
Which explains the prize pools of certain tourneys, such as homestory cup.
MLG/Dreamhack/GOM/TSL must all divy up to blizzard.
Stimin myself on a daily basis
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Safe House 2
17:00
Playoffs
SpeCial vs AstreaLIVE!
TriGGeR vs MasTeR
ZombieGrub537
TKL 202
EnkiAlexander 55
3DClanTV 41
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Clem_sc2 648
ZombieGrub537
TKL 202
ProTech68
CosmosSc2 54
BRAT_OK 37
JuggernautJason35
DenverSC2 14
MindelVK 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Soma 530
Larva 496
Barracks 453
Mini 428
Light 336
firebathero 188
Hyun 172
PianO 144
Dewaltoss 109
Sharp 65
[ Show more ]
Mong 32
NaDa 19
scan(afreeca) 17
Dota 2
Gorgc6413
qojqva2236
Fuzer 187
Counter-Strike
fl0m2577
Stewie2K179
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor553
Liquid`Hasu404
Other Games
B2W.Neo890
Skadoodle261
KnowMe185
Hui .141
ArmadaUGS117
ToD92
Grubby30
Trikslyr28
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1746
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 31
• Adnapsc2 13
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 27
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2926
• lizZardDota240
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2645
Upcoming Events
IPSL
50m
Sziky vs Havi
Artosis vs Klauso
Replay Cast
15h 50m
Monday Night Weeklies
21h 50m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 20h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Online Event
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.