@_@....
When do you intend to begin? prior to new years?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
@_@.... When do you intend to begin? prior to new years? | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 28 2010 07:13 Insanious wrote: I just want to throw this out there... but in Pokemafia we hit the active members of the game because well, they gave us something to talk about. We then badwaggoned on those people without thinking that no one was defending them. This turned into a game where all our active players were dead (town lynched them, and mafia killed them). At the end of the game we had few players that talked and mostly inactives. This made it impossible to find the mafia. What I'm just trying to say is that the town helped kill the town by removing anyone who actually helped out and talked. Inactives do absolutely nothing but hurt us, so I think we need to pressure inactives more than point fingers at active players. On day 1, we have very little to work with, all we can do is pick someone to lynch and pray. We might as well kill someone who could be a lurking mafia or someone who will help kill us later in the game. An active mafia is too smart to screw up on day 1 and die, as well an active mafia gives town a lot more material to work with once someone catches them with their pants down. An inactive mafia looks like an inactive town. To me, I would rather kill inactives (not don't post and don't vote, as in only vote and barely post) than kill someone who's actually talking. In pokemafia we killed Kenpachi and Zeks since they were talkative and didn't speak like a perfect townie. On later analysis we saw that they didn't actually look like mafia, they just spamed a lot and we wanted that gone. If we would of lynched inactives, we would of been able to find 4 of the 6 mafia, and would of saved 3 - 4 town. We would of won the game, but we focused on killing people that speak. I mean, we can get rid of someone who isn't helping now, and then have our DTs check people while we do forum analysis. This helps us more later in the game, then a random lynch of an active townie helps us now. Just my $0.02 Is it wrong I greatly support this post? | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
My opinions as of now are this, LSB and Annul are probably two townies. Too aggressive and center of attention for day one for the mafia to want to do. That's just how I feel. I liked what RoL said about not being surprised if they both were scum, but who knows, RoL hasn't been saying much else. Dunno how I feel about Doc yet. With regards to my vote on Pandain? I've been talking with Pandain, and just haven't moved it yet. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
(Conspiracy theory) I liked what RoL said about not being surprised if they both were scum, but who knows, RoL hasn't been saying much else. Dunno how I feel about Doc yet. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 28 2010 15:39 LSB wrote: I'm confused. Can someone point out my scummy posts? I want to see if you all actually read what I wrote or just mouthing information from Annul. As for the OpZ inactive lynch, he has posted a bit now. But he hasn't really said anything besides what other people had posted. Well, I've had nothing really new to discuss. I think Pandain needs to post more in the thread too. He's playing off again. I liked Annuls original post against you LSB, but I can't really go from there. It isn't enough I'm willing to vote either of you on yet. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 29 2010 05:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2010 07:49 seRapH wrote: It's pretty obvious that the Pandain wagon makes zero sense, so if you were mafia trying to establish credibility letting that go through would be stupid. Annul my vote is going on you now because after reading through this thread I also think your analysis has been forced. Also I'm keeping an eye on meapak. This is one of the posts I found really interesting. The pandain wagon did make no sense and Seraph says what I think he is trying to do. We can just label it wifom. At the same time he discredits Annul saying his argument is forced Show nested quote + On December 28 2010 08:55 seRapH wrote: A forced argument is when you try to conjure up something out of nothing. Then explains what forced means! But seriously, how is Annul's analysis forced? I read it, it felt pretty natural to me. Annul remains dedicated and keeps going for his lynch of LSB and LSB OMGUS him back which is a really shitty way to play and incredibly anti town. The thing is I also believe that could just be a blue tell from LSB believing his role to be important for town victory. Who's argument were you calling forced earlier? On December 28 2010 05:12 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I got my defense wrong! I have a strange idea. I think both annul and LSB might be mafia, this little tiff is exactly what annul/KJ did in ExMiMa although this is a little different. I know LSB is a better player than to attack his attacker AS mafia, its kind of an odd tell. My first thought was that he is probably town and just thought the analysis was scummy. But the analysis seems fine to me. The arguments almost feel a little forced too if you read through it. This is definitely something to keep in mind. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 29 2010 05:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2010 07:49 seRapH wrote: It's pretty obvious that the Pandain wagon makes zero sense, so if you were mafia trying to establish credibility letting that go through would be stupid. Annul my vote is going on you now because after reading through this thread I also think your analysis has been forced. Also I'm keeping an eye on meapak. This is one of the posts I found really interesting. The pandain wagon did make no sense and Seraph says what I think he is trying to do. We can just label it wifom. At the same time he discredits Annul saying his argument is forced Show nested quote + On December 28 2010 08:55 seRapH wrote: A forced argument is when you try to conjure up something out of nothing. Then explains what forced means! But seriously, how is Annul's analysis forced? I read it, it felt pretty natural to me. Annul remains dedicated and keeps going for his lynch of LSB and LSB OMGUS him back which is a really shitty way to play and incredibly anti town. The thing is I also believe that could just be a blue tell from LSB believing his role to be important for town victory. Who's argument were you calling forced earlier? I'm kinda confused On December 28 2010 05:12 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I got my defense wrong! I have a strange idea. I think both annul and LSB might be mafia, this little tiff is exactly what annul/KJ did in ExMiMa although this is a little different. I know LSB is a better player than to attack his attacker AS mafia, its kind of an odd tell. My first thought was that he is probably town and just thought the analysis was scummy. But the analysis seems fine to me. The arguments almost feel a little forced too if you read through it. This is definitely something to keep in mind. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 29 2010 12:36 seRapH wrote: Just finished catching up -_-'' didn't expect to be out all day. I still don't see why LSB was scummy at all. I mean look at annul's "analysis": http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7419308
Seriously the whole inactive thing was just a talking point, and now I'm just thoroughly convinced that you're almost certainly a very closed-minded townie or scum. Hopefully the blue actions will yield something good so we won't have to waste a lynch on you though. + Show Spoiler + Oh hey I just mentioned blues again, I'm probably blue/scum right? Did you see RoL's post calling you scum? I would guess with all the talk about it, you would have checked it.... | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 30 2010 08:04 ~OpZ~ wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2010 12:36 seRapH wrote: Just finished catching up -_-'' didn't expect to be out all day. I still don't see why LSB was scummy at all. I mean look at annul's "analysis": http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7419308
Seriously the whole inactive thing was just a talking point, and now I'm just thoroughly convinced that you're almost certainly a very closed-minded townie or scum. Hopefully the blue actions will yield something good so we won't have to waste a lynch on you though. + Show Spoiler + Oh hey I just mentioned blues again, I'm probably blue/scum right? Did you see RoL's post calling you scum? I would guess with all the talk about it, you would have checked it.... fml, I missed a page. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 30 2010 12:12 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: alright everyone vote insanious or my previously outlined reasons. ....Why you want to lynch vote now? Hatters probably placed bombs on them. Removing bombs is a good thing for scum. I want this to be discussed, not just followed. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 30 2010 18:57 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Alright. So I am tired of this town being wishwashy so much. Tomorrow before I go to work I am going to decide on a lynch target. We are going to kill them, if I am wrong you guys can kill me if you so wish it. The thing is I will chose my target, I will push them relentlessly, and I will be right. I will most likely choose one of the three mentioned before, but it is going to be large analysis followed by a relentless attack until I get my way. I see three candidates going out right now with some shitty stupid reasoning. I will examine every person being suggested right now and decide which one is best. I welcome all who oppose me. Let's kill Seraph, per your post about him. Insanious mentioned him, iirc but he came up with Brockett instead of siding with your decision of Seraph. I'm not too fond of the Seraph idea, but I would like your opinion on Pandainm RoL. I've been pming him, but we haven't talked much the last day. On December 30 2010 14:54 Insanious wrote: Meapak_Ziphh you, just like RoL make a huge mistake. I was not 100% sure LSB was blue. I was 100% sure he was either blue or red... Either he proves he's blue. He lives. He doesn't, he dies. This could of happened on night 3, wouldn't of hurt the town at all. It could of only helped by saving a blue for more nights, or saved a blue for the rest of the game. Litterally no down side for the town... so we should of waited. I would of killed him instantly on day 3 if I wasn't 100% sure he was blue. Waiting helped the town, killing him gave us nothing. This is what I was saying... there was no point where I KNEW he was blue. And there was no point that I said I was 100% sure he was blue until after he died... Read my posts, and don't put words in my mouth. The problem is mobilizing the town to kill someone. L had gotten himself out of millions of lynches, but just popping up with a new target. While you may have been all for it, we can't possibly be certain of anything. I'd be fine lynching any of RoL's "certain" suspects. It's a nice idea, and clearly with how much it has been blatantly ignored, I'm fine to follow it. He has some decent point, and why is it that this is one game no body listens to him? I mean, dudes been on a streak with Day One Mafia finds. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 31 2010 06:00 Insanious wrote: Double lynch after day 1 seems a little soon... I mean, we might as well wait till day 2 to see if we can actually get some analysis done. We don't even have a single target for lynching right now, let alone two for a double lynch. Maybe after we finally get some discussion going we can actually have some candidates for double lynching. Seems like a good decision to me if Seraph or you wind up being mafia....Don't you think? | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 31 2010 04:20 GGQ wrote: I feel that I should reveal this information since mafia already knows it; I was roleblocked last night. I just read through the entire thread again and here are my thoughts: -Pandain doesn't seem like scum to me, just a flip-flopping townie. -Brockett narrowly avoided a lynch and still hasn't contributed anything. Much fewer posts and different posting style than his townie play in Pokemafia -I'm still suspicious of TheMango but don't have solid reasoning for it -I am pretty confident that ROL is town, but I dont necessarily agree with all his picks for mafia -Insanious doesn't seem scummy to me. People keep saying that he was 'so sure' LSB was blue, but if you actually read his posts, that's not what he was saying -I'm on the fence about annul. I always thought his tunneling on LSB was stupid, but that doesn't make him mafia. He certainly could be, though -I'm most suspicious atm of Seraph (as ROL pointed out) and Mr Wiggles. While reading, I noticed that all of Mr Wiggles posts are riddled with uncertainty, fear, and unwillingness to commit. He may be a newer player, but it still makes me very susicious of him. My vote goes on him for now GCQ has slid over to my likely town. I would also like to not, RoL is not without suspicion in my eyes. I'm just willing to see were his idea leads us. On December 31 2010 05:03 Barundar wrote: Mr.zergling would you mind posting your reason for voting mr.wiggles? And why you pick hin over the other suggested targets? Would you mind pming me back? Everyone wants me to post, and be active, okay. Fine. I was content just reading, but if you would like to see all my thoughts, I'll start posting a few of them. On December 31 2010 04:15 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I just finished reading all of Annul's posts and I feel a little ashamed of myself. Why? Didn't you promise to be active all day today....Because you didn't work? | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 31 2010 07:38 Barundar wrote: I find it interesting you appear when called out OpZ. I'm unsure whether you trust RoL or not, most of your posts in the thread has been about something he said. What do you think speaks for lynching Insanious? Same reason Mepak found it a good course of action. Not to mention the dude gives me weird vibes, and Seraphs increased activity? Why aren't you asking Seraph why he appears when pressured, ONLY after LSB is lynched? Yet I'm worth your time? Honestly, you PM'd me, which made me start posting some more too. But you just ignored my PM apparently cuz you haven't responded. I'm Willing to give RoL a lynch, (listen to him for one lynch), but beyond that, we will have to see. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 02 2011 02:55 Barundar wrote: IRC was a great idea, I encourage town to take part in the discussions. I’m now convinced Pandain is town. We decided to hold off on Mr.Zergling, at least for tonight, and instead push for Orgolove. His only contribution to the thread is his vote for double lynch. Annul is a top suspect. He hasn’t added anything apart from getting LSB lynched, and has now gone into lurking. That said, we should ##vote double lynch for tomorrow. With the knowledge we get from the lynch and the night hits, we should be able to get 2 kills by then. Also it’s an insurance if Orgolove turns out not to be red, since we will need the extra KP. Please go ahead and join us on IRC In Annuls defense, I've seen him do that a few times in other games. I'm more concerned that Darth is going to be gone, and that should be noted. IRC, I feel its a good idea. I sadly can't log onto it right now because I'm on my lap top, stealing some internet. I voted for insanious, because as I've said, I'm willing to give RoL one lynch, but I still feel very iffy about him. I'm going to change my vote from insanious to Oroglove tho, because of his post saying Pandain been spamming. He has by far slowed his spamming in several recent games. It's like theres a different person playing lately...I still don't know how I feel about him though. I won't call him protown cuz I'm not used to this Pandain, but his posts do scream it. I just wished he himself posted more. Which I can't really talk, but my internet usage has been rather limited. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 02 2011 04:56 Pandain wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Annul Pandain pm'd me asking me to switch my vote to orgolove.....AND pushed him himself in the thread....Now why would he switch his vote to annul? | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • HeavenSC 77 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 53 • gosughost_ 16 • practicex 8 • Kozan • LaughNgamez Trovo • aXEnki • Poblha • intothetv • Gussbus • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
Hatchery Cup
BSL
ESL Pro Tour
|
|