The original map is by Testbug, the greatest foreign mapper ever. This map is intended for FFA play only though casual 1on1 would be fun too.

Here's the Liquipedia Article on the original Seven Sins

Map is published on the NA server.

+ Show Spoiler [Brood War Version] +

HQ Image 2048x2048
+ Show Spoiler [Side View] +

Features:

7 Players
Start locations at 11, 1, 3, 5, 6:, 6:30 and 10
Space Shark makes its appearance again.
Each start location has its own pros and cons.
Makes for hilarious FFAs
I recommend you play by The Official ~NoHunters Free-For-All Rules of Conduct for maximum enjoyment. The rules were originally made for Starcraft: Brood War, but can be applied to SC2 as well.

Comments
Once again, Tanks forced me to change a lot of the map from the original. Go die SC2 tanks.

There's a lot of doodads in some areas where I could mess aroud since it's unpathable anyway, but in other places, not so much. I kind of went overboard with trees in places but oh well. And also, there's this cool little thing below the 6:30 base but then it doesn't show up in-game because of the camera angle =(.

This map is not intended for any serious 1on1 matches as there are obvious positional problems. It's just meant for a fun FFA match with lots of drama, trash-talking and 6 pools. As stated by The Official ~NoHunters Free-For-All Rules of Conduct. Have fun with this.

Make sure to check out my other maps here.

WniO

United States2706 Posts

October 30 2010 05:26 GMT

impressive.

-{Cake}-

United States217 Posts

October 30 2010 05:29 GMT

I feel like the 6:30 player has a huge advantage, short of diplomacy, it seems really east to turtle there on 4 bases, while everyone else gets 3 bases tops, overall though ,the idea of really asymmetric maps is interesting

Randomaccount#77123

United States5003 Posts

October 30 2010 06:11 GMT

--- Nuked ---

kXn

254 Posts

October 30 2010 08:01 GMT

I would like to see more unsymmetrical 1v1 maps, regardless of the imbalances

Looks fun however. Is this map on EU?

dezi

Germany1536 Posts

October 30 2010 08:55 GMT

Unsymmetrical is fine but imbalance isn't. I don't know how the player at 3 can hold a zergling rush. Some start locations are really that much harder to hold or to start from. I don't consider this map good or balanced (only layout wise).

neobowman

Canada3324 Posts

October 30 2010 09:15 GMT

On October 30 2010 17:55 dezi wrote:
Unsymmetrical is fine but imbalance isn't. I don't know how the player at 3 can hold a zergling rush. Some start locations are really that much harder to hold or to start from. I don't consider this map good or balanced (only layout wise).

On October 30 2010 14:04 neobowman wrote:
This map is not intended for any serious 1on1 matches as there are obvious positional problems. It's just meant for a fun FFA match with lots of drama, trash-talking and 6 pools. As stated by The Official ~NoHunters Free-For-All Rules of Conduct.

Drayne

Canada239 Posts

October 30 2010 09:20 GMT

7s , as in the greatest BW clan ever? is Magnum still alive?

dezi

Germany1536 Posts

October 30 2010 09:25 GMT

On October 30 2010 18:15 neobowman wrote:

Show nested quote +

Even with this in mind i'd rather play on one of the official maps for trash FFA because it's already hard enough to survive there if 2+ players come after you. So i you don't understand why you made some positions that kinda hard to hold. It's just a "k, i gonna lose this no matter what i do". I don't think this will be fun.

You can have enough fun in FFA with all players sitting in mumble/ts3/... and just force a worker rush on someone.