TL Mafia XXVIII

On July 15 2010 08:14 SiNiquity wrote:


lol.. no. For a general idea:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mafia_(party_game)

On July 17 2010 11:50 Divinek wrote:


4. You cannot vote for yourself or anyone dead or outside the game.

On July 17 2010 13:15 rastaban wrote:

[*]Suicide Bomber - this is the role we really want to lynch early because until it is eliminated, any claiming at all can be disastrous seeing we can't setup medic protection without risking the medic as well.

On July 17 2010 14:27 youngminii wrote:
GAAAAAAAAAAME STAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!

On July 17 2010 15:02 DarthThienAn wrote:
[DarthThienAn inserts useful comment here]

On July 17 2010 15:26 Bill Murray wrote:
hes not playing
3rd times a charm?

On July 18 2010 10:30 Tricode wrote:
##vote abstain

Just doing this if I don't make it tomorrow to vote. My dad is spending his last full day at home before he has to leave for a few months for work.

Other then that, I do suggest we lynch an inactive.

1.if we keep abstaining cause we are always uncertain of what to do, we will never push to killing and finding a mafia member if we went at that rate.

2. That person who is being inactive is probably useless to us anyways just because they are not doing anything to participate.

3. One of the inactive are likely to be mafia just because there is usually one or two guys that are inactive or just post a little bit just so they can stay alive.

Either case, we won't accomplish anything by abstaining, it might even hurt us cause if we keep the option in our head we might use it to much in fear of constantly killing townies/blues and such. So I suggest try keeping abstains as placeholders or if you are truly uncertain in what to do.

Otherwise I encourage and highly suggest that we always use our lynches.

On July 18 2010 10:51 Divinek wrote:


I actually have to really agree now that this has been pointed out.

This is his first and only post, and it is posted in a manner to perhaps put himself just above the threshold of inactivity.

And he then votes for someone for contributing and trying to help the town too much. Not to mention the post he's quoting as his 'reason' for voting is the very one that points out his own activity.

Perhaps we can then put some more pressure on his inactive ass to give us any more substance.

##unvote
##vote hyperbola

On July 18 2010 16:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Actually, until those 5 people explain themselves.

##unvote
##vote pandain

You get the vote as the third - fourth voter of most bandwagons turns out to be red. Convince me your legit, or stop being retarded and ill move my vote.

Hrm. Exactly what scum would do.
Starting a bandwagon against me when I've accused one of their operatives.

On July 18 2010 16:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Thing is, he did call someone out, which explains why that person voted him, it also could explain another person voting for him. BUT 5 people total voting for someone based on day 1 activity on a weekend with little to no real discussion going on makes a bandwagon insanely bad idea. IF he flips town, those original bandwagoners are going to get owned by town for the bad play, or ignored all game for being stupid and potentially lose us said game.

I appreciate where you are coming from, and well, its not bad in principle and if this had been posted day 2 or after I would fully endorse the action, but bandwagons day 1 are insanely anti town, especially when based on such a lack of information to discuss.

On July 18 2010 16:16 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
3. We should be using our day 1 lynch to kill someone who is being STUPID. This way we either kill a stupid townie (a burden) or a stupid mafia (yay!)
.