EPTHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 21 2010 23:36 Hesmyrr wrote: ~OpZ~ Nice to see you claim pro-town. I had anticipated for someone trying to claim anti-town :p Also, how does Mafia benefit from knowing who the hidden horocrux is? Well, according to the flavour, Harry Potter the last horocrux did need to be killed by no one other than Voldemort so the person who is horocrux may also need to be killed by Death Eaters in this setup- which is another vast strike against the mass roleclaiming; I doubt Bill Murray would introduce such harsh win condition though. I will hold off nominating someone until I am pretty certain of one town read. Experience is not bad when we are picking someone to be protected, but most importantly I rather have player I have most confidence in being town-aligned. There seem to be enough good players in this roster anyhow. *yawn* Weak attack. How does mafia benefit by knowing who it is? They don't kill him on accident. Everyone claiming, they might know who he is then. Like I said, I just want more discussion before claiming, I'm not against claiming as I have nothing to hide. Oh, and...Any other attempts? (FoS @ Hesmyrr) [FoS= Finger of Suspicion] | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 22 2010 03:55 Hesmyrr wrote: Okay, maybe I was not as much concise as I would have liked. My post was writing down of my impressions as I read along the people's first post, and in fact I am support your argument against role claiming (what you are saying is basically what I am saying). I was curious how you got the impression I was attacking you and your argument, because this post just cries casual glancing over. Because I'm terribly defensive!? -_- At any rate, you asked me how the benefit, and I was in a list of three people with Radfield....And I don't have a good feeling about Radfield this game yet...just a hunch so far... | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
Now lets see...Name claiming may be useful...But I said that it might give them a clue to who the other horcrux is. I like the idea of role blocking the inactives, yellowink should definitely be one of them in my opinion. YellowInk being inactive and even an idea for candidacy is kind of upsetting. I'd nominate Radfield, but Radfield said he wont be as active. If Hes isn't nominated, consider this his nomination. I don't really give two craps about the mayor, but I most certainly hope he is active. People seem to listen to them. And Abenson, post more. I've seen content filled posts from you. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 22 2010 22:04 ElyAs wrote: So as of now we have 3 candidates : MoM /Sponsor : 1)YellowInk / Jspazz 2)Amber[LighT] / AcrossFiveJulys 3)Hesmyrr / Radfield Opz wanted to nominate Radfield but didn't. Amber[LighT] wants Radfield as Pardoner My thoughts for now : I've seen the aggressive townie style from YellowInk in game XVII, which is why I'm likely to be voting for him. If he is green or blue, we've got ourselves a great ally in an important position. But I'm reserving my vote for now. I agree 100% on the fact that the MoM must be rolechecked. We really want a trustworthy MoM. Also, OpZ is highly suspicious of Hes, Radfield, and YellowInk. But not a lot of discussion seems to be going on. Let me help. I nominate DCLXVI to be the lynch candidate. So far, I can't recall one decent post. Abenson just probably needs a PM to nudge him to play the game. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 22 2010 23:42 DCLXVI wrote: Do we have a detective? The role list says Detective: See Legilimency and Occlumency. Legilimency is listed as a mafia spell. From the way medic is defined (see episky, a blue spell) it seems that there is no actual detective that can role check. Also, can people have multiple spells? Occlumency seems kind of useless unless people can have multiple spells. I am not sure why the mafia would want to try to find out everyone's character. Obviously they would like to know who harry is so they don't kill him, but other than that it only seems to help them guess at blue roles, maybe. (this is assuming that the mafia already have a safe name list) So is it true that only mafia get the red spells and only townies get the blue spells? Town has to be able to use some of those red spells imo. Also, some townie roles clearly would be able to. I don't think Aurors are just body guards, prob DT and Vig capable too. They're are prob plenty of med/roleblockers...It's a themed game, and almost every themed game (see any of callers/aces games that are themed) we have on TL is overly filled with roles. On June 22 2010 23:42 DCLXVI wrote: I am not sure what to think about Amber[light] right now, he seems like a good player but until I get a clarification on spell rules I cannot make a guess at his role. Now that YellowInk is here I feel more secure in voting for him or radfield. Radfield may be the better choice just because he sort of didn't want the role because he doesn't think that he will be active. That is either a good ploy or he is thinking for the better of the town; I think that it is more likely a townie sort of play. I have no idea about Hesmyrr. @opz So far I have only seen 1 good post out of you too, I just don't spam the thread like you do to seem active. I'm not voting YellowInk. He has one decent post, and I demand more. Better statement of his own plans. I feel he should be investigated and atleast one other person who threw support (Not Johnnyspazz). Oh and... Aww, sorry, did you get butt hurt by my calling you out? Did it get you to post? I think so. That's the whole point. Draw attention to the stragglers. Make them think they'll die and they come and make decent posts. Good Job. And look, I probably just taught you something? Sheesh. Atleast now you won't be killed for inactivity. Now onward to more pressing matters! On June 22 2010 23:47 zeks wrote: @DCLXVI good point do we even have a town rolecheck to work with? Forget what I said above. My vote remains on Amber but with possibility of changing tonight. Don't go into game set up. It's always reasonable to assume atleast one detective role is in the game. So yes. We have a role check to work with. Probably quite a few. Now about that role check...will we see results? Possibly, possibly not. Dude investigating could die, dude being investigated could die, person investigating might not ever post findings. It's all ifs. We can't just assume they will be posted. On June 23 2010 00:00 Hesmyrr wrote: ~OpZ~ and Amber[light] voted for Radfield. zeks and AcrossFiveJulys voted for Amber[LighT] Casual question to ~OpZ~... If you don't like Radfield, why are you voting for him? I like him more than you (not that I don't actually like you, ThreeKingdoms you were my buddy!). I'm actually planning on changing my vote still, and you had the same idea as me with Roffles, but I don't know if Roffles can scum find...I know Radfield can...But I learned my lesson from the game I was modkilled for. I was active, except the last day, and missed my vote. Radfield ALSO said he doesn't have as much time to dedicate to the game, (As I've pointed out) so I don't really feel he should be a mayor or pardoner. And Amber voting for Radfield (Amber trying to be pardoner?). How does that sound to you Hes? =( | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 01:20 Amber[LighT] wrote: Ahhh and I did not realize that there was a godfather in this game. I understand that this is (yet another) variable. However with checking players it will be wise to note that the godfather is probably someone who can mask their identity (ie someone that could be good, but is bad). The book fanatics are going to really have to step up when we need to decipher between potential "bad" characters and the good ones. I'm ready to assist with what I can, but ultimately the detectives will need to make the choice to with-hold or post up valuable clue information. Luna Lovegood's father is probably the Traitor, or snape. GF could prob be either too. He was full on supportin harry in book 7, but instantly betrayed cuz luna was kidnapped. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 22 2010 13:03 Bill Murray wrote: i even almost left out severus on accident No. Amber. Snape is in the game. He almost did. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 03:46 DCLXVI wrote: Now that we know there is a godfather I am more suspicious of Amber[light]. He is trying to arrange the two offices and asked for someone to rolecheck him once he gets an office. I am going to throw my vote on roffles for now for the same reason as hesmyrr. ... Wow you are dumb (or mafia) -_-....Anyone who campaigns on a plan to lynch this guy I'm for.... | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 05:20 Thegilaboy wrote: Hey everyone, back from another fun day at work. I'm going to go ahead and cast my vote for Radfield. The guy definitely seems to have a grasp on the game, and with all of the crazy spells and roles in this particular game, we need somebody like him to sort through the muck and the mire. Plus I support his notion of lynching the relatively inactive players, those just trying to skate by. And with that, I'm off for a bit of a bike ride. Oh and about the whole red/blue spells, it would seem that town has to have some access to red spells, what with DT's and Vigs alone. Seems we would have a very difficult game ahead of us if we had our hands tied from using those at all. You get points for the bike ride, but we all need to sort through the muck to find them. Not just follow the mayor...Mayor could be red. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
Possible scum gamble to give Radfield mayor? Dun Dun Duuuuuuun | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 05:50 Amber[LighT] wrote: THey're not only more votes, but they're votes from people who have no reasoning. Lol @ Abenson reading everything in 5 minutes and now having a "grasp" on the game, and at the same time voting for Radfield... nothing against him it's just the people that are voting for him are looking scummy  Notice Radfields sudden "I'ma vote for myself to secure governor?"? Yea... | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:15 DCLXVI wrote: any particular reason as to why? You called me dumb when I was explaining how to get perfectly innocent/inactive/scum to talk! Obviously! | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:42 zeks wrote: Unless he is mason... Anyways Jugan's vote and Gila's vote switch were after 6:30pm et so they're void. ...Bill might not of been so firm. Is their any reason you care so much? | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On June 24 2010 21:41 ElyAs wrote: For now I'm gonna do what AcrossFiveJulys and amber suggested. I was trying to see the differences between playstyles in mafia XXVII and here for OpZ, but since we are in the same list, I suggest that someone else does this (If I posted something in the lines of "He was mafia in the XXVII and he was less active/aggressive", I don't think it would have any meaning) I think I'm gonna do this for AcrossFiveJulys and zeks, they were in Mafia XXVI with me so I can do some analysis using the two games. Lol...No you figured out how I play as mafia?! Did I miss these lists or something? -er- anyway, I don't mind you trying to analyze me. Or anyone. Not hiding nothing this game. Ludwig needs to post. I'm for lynching YellowInk solely based on finding out if any of the random voters at the end (I'm part of that list) are mafia. I voted for him because I was uncertain of Radfield and didn't want Radfield to be pardoner. But YellowInk made a scummy post...In my eyes atleast. But he was going to lynch DC for me... Lol...At any rate, I'm going to take a look around now. Let's see what I find. On June 24 2010 23:00 lakrismamma wrote: Wouldn't it make more sense to investigate people on the other lists then the one you are on. This to prevent mafia from investigating eachother if they now had one candidate they wanted elected? Or am I missing something? OMG...Thank you for quoting Hes's post. I was wondering what the plan was. It seems the plan was to investigate...the people who all bandwagoned certain players? Examining different lists is fine. I feel like taking it a step forward though. Do not investigate those that investigate you. If they've already been investigated, fuck it, do your own investigation. Anyway, Hes how didn't you notice the flaw Lakrismamma just pointed out. Kinda obvious one.... On June 24 2010 23:27 Amber[LighT] wrote: I mean when you pick two people to investigate.. make sure that they are BOTH on the same list. You should not be picking people that are on the SAME list as you... and there can be overlap in analysis... that's encouraged actually. sorry for the confusion. Do what? What are you saying? Investigate the same list or a different list? | ||
| ||
