• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:40
CEST 17:40
KST 00:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners6Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)8[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June4Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th156Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0
StarCraft 2
General
High level ptr replays? where can I find them? StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection
Tourneys
Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) GSL Code S Season 2 (2026)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ vespene.gg — BW replays in browser Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ? [BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Summer Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Does Workplace Frustration D…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9633 users

SC2 Optimal worker saturation

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
SubtleArt
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
2710 Posts
February 24 2010 14:30 GMT
#1
How does the worker saturation / diminishing returns system work in starcraft 2? In BW it was basically just more workers > faster mining although the rate of increase gradually went down.

How does it compare to Starcraft 2? I heard with better AI its a lot more complicated, and in some instances having more workers might lower income? I don't know much about this so I'll let the more knowledgeable post their opinions
Morrow on ZvP: "I'm not very confident in general vs Protoss because of the imbalance (Yes its imbalanced, get over it)."
magz4
Profile Joined December 2009
United States9 Posts
February 24 2010 15:31 GMT
#2
2 per field at the minimum for proper saturation. Any more than 3 per field is effectively useless for anything besides maynarding.
Volshok
Profile Joined August 2008
United States349 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-30 22:23:44
February 24 2010 16:08 GMT
#3
Previous info was incorrect, as per Orb's post:


6:
Zerg: ~248
Protoss: ~248

10:
Zerg: ~419
Protoss: ~419

14:
Zerg: ~590
Protoss: ~590

18:
Zerg: ~705
Protoss: ~705

22:
Zerg: ~762
Protoss: ~762

Here is the replay of the test game proving this:
http://www.mediafire.com/?uyqjjdymmhy

edit: also here's the ratios of going from step to stop going up 4 workers:
6>10
worker ratio: 1.6667
Mining ratio: 1.6895

10>14
worker ratio: 1.4
mining ratio: 1.4081

14>18
worker ratio: 1.2857
mining ratio: 1.1949

18>22
worker ratio: 1.2222
mining ratio: 1.0809

as you can see you're getting basically 1:1 bang for your buck up to 14 workers, but after that your payoff per worker added drops and it gets less and less efficient to add workers.


Along with Zeke's info

Also, note that each worker has a walking speed of 2.8125. Every single one. There are also NO known differences in mining speed.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=123657
tabako
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35 Posts
February 24 2010 16:48 GMT
#4
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...
Zavior
Profile Joined August 2009
Finland753 Posts
February 24 2010 16:57 GMT
#5
On February 25 2010 01:48 tabako wrote:
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...


My guess would be that it varies by race because... the workers are different! At least zerg workers move a bit faster on the creep if I'm not completely mistaken
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-24 17:02:39
February 24 2010 16:59 GMT
#6
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


ill add another perspective that supports the statement above about Zerg:

According to the income tool in the replay on a 8 mineral field 8 drones gather around 300-350 minerals. 16 drones will gathers around 2x 300-350 =600-700. The soft cap of mining per base is close to 8x3 drones, after this each drone mine 50% less until you reach 8x4 which is the hard cap where additional worker won't make more resources.

Once you have reached 8x2 drones each new drone you produce after that will gather roughly half the minerals of a drone, if you make 4 additional drones after the 8x2 you will in reality only get minerals from 2 drones. If you make 8 additional drones after the 8x2 you will only be getting minerals from 4 drones. any more drones after 2x8 plus 8 is a waste of resources and supplies.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
SubtleArt
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
2710 Posts
February 24 2010 17:11 GMT
#7
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


Holy shit why is it THAT much different for Zergs? Was this intentional :O?
Morrow on ZvP: "I'm not very confident in general vs Protoss because of the imbalance (Yes its imbalanced, get over it)."
Drunken.Jedi
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany446 Posts
February 24 2010 17:29 GMT
#8
On February 25 2010 01:57 Zavior wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2010 01:48 tabako wrote:
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...


My guess would be that it varies by race because... the workers are different! At least zerg workers move a bit faster on the creep if I'm not completely mistaken

I'm pretty sure that drones do not move faster on creep. At least it used to be like that when the movement speed bonus for zerg units was first implemented. Also, from watching streams and vods, drones do not seem to be any faster on creep.
Apart from that, movement speed has nothing whatever to do with the amount of minerals you get from full saturation. All that increased movementspeed would do is to decrease the number of workers required for full saturation.


My best guess as to why the numbers for zerg and terran are so different is that one of the two players (or both) that tested this somehow made a mistake or that they used different methods of measuring income.
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
February 24 2010 17:31 GMT
#9
the only zerg ground unit that does not move faster on creep is the drone.

i think the numbers are mistaken
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
MannerMan
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
371 Posts
February 24 2010 17:37 GMT
#10
Or maybe it's because it is harder for zerg to get workers because they have to focus on building other stuff so to keep it balanced their workers harvest better?

I don't know just speculating.
Queequeg
Profile Joined September 2003
Germany263 Posts
March 16 2010 17:30 GMT
#11
I just tested it for Terran, just mining minerals on 8 patches, no MULEs.

16 SCVs: 610-667, avg 639, ~39.9 per SCV
20 SCVs: 705-800, avg 753, ~37.6 per SCV, 4 more SCVs yield 29 each
24 SCVs: 781-876, avg 829, ~34.5 per SCV, 4 more SCVs yield 19 each
28 SCVs: 781-876 ==> 24 = saturated

So if you have 20 SCVs mining, and you add another SCV, it will only be half as effective.
daywiss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States83 Posts
March 16 2010 17:42 GMT
#12
those numbers for zerg are wrong, it looks more like stats for 2 bases not one. from my own testing zerg 1 base looks closer to the toss numbers, i was barely able to break 800 rpm.
sorech02
Profile Joined January 2009
United States15 Posts
March 16 2010 17:54 GMT
#13
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


I'm guessing that since he pasted this together from two sources, they each had a different time limit, as well as other potential factors I'm not thinking of. The two sets can't be directly compared in this case.
HolydaKing
Profile Joined February 2010
21254 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-16 18:01:16
March 16 2010 18:00 GMT
#14
On March 17 2010 02:54 sorech02 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


I'm guessing that since he pasted this together from two sources, they each had a different time limit, as well as other potential factors I'm not thinking of. The two sets can't be directly compared in this case.

obviously you are right. it's 2 different time limits, but that doesn't matter as both show when you reach the saturation.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
March 16 2010 18:04 GMT
#15
lol drones don't move faster on creep...have u guys even played sc1?
zerg's always required fewer workers because they don't need to maynard workers unlike the other races
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 16 2010 18:08 GMT
#16
So we can conclude that P and T have the same mining rate, which isn't surprising. In sc2, Zerg actually does have a faster movement speed on creep, that's why Z mines faster. When you have 2 probes or SCVs mining a single patch, there is about half a second in between where the mineral patch is vacant. Zerg's faster movement compensates for it so they are efficient at 16.
Tristan
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada566 Posts
March 16 2010 18:22 GMT
#17
due to diminishing returns and because I'm a Zerg I'd rather just nom more delicious map with a hatchery when I have 16 drones.
http://Zangano431.tumblr.com/
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
March 16 2010 19:26 GMT
#18
Holy shit only 19-20 drones mine 30% more than 24-26 probes?

WTF?
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-16 19:37:37
March 16 2010 19:37 GMT
#19
I guess one of them was timed in-game for one minute, while the other was timed with the game clock in a replay.

On March 17 2010 03:04 da_head wrote:
lol drones don't move faster on creep...have u guys even played sc1?
zerg's always required fewer workers because they don't need to maynard workers unlike the other races

The reference to SC1 is hardly relevant, and I'm pretty sure the reason why Zerg require fewer workers is wrong. This results from using the hatchery to make both drones and army units. First off, to increase production capacity, you need to build hatcheries, which you might as well do at expansions, and if you expand more, you need fewer workers. Secondly, you will have fewer workers because you need the larvae for other units.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
PizzaHash
Profile Joined February 2010
Netherlands76 Posts
March 16 2010 19:38 GMT
#20
yup - sounds fair - zerg loses probe for every building
Though terran should be buffed with minerals maybe - their worker is not mining when building, but will be back when building finishes, so they lose mining time while protoss doesnt.
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
15:00
Season Finals: Group Stage 2
RotterdaM700
TaKeTV 405
IndyStarCraft 120
BRAT_OK 80
SteadfastSC72
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Serral 2163
uThermal 1386
RotterdaM 700
mouzHeroMarine 278
IndyStarCraft 120
SHIN 113
BRAT_OK 80
SteadfastSC 72
LamboSC2 42
sc2solar 22
Classic 13
SpiritSC2 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 42551
Calm 4801
Sea 1729
EffOrt 848
Mini 418
ggaemo 235
Nal_rA 200
actioN 174
Sharp 112
Hyun 70
[ Show more ]
Shine 66
hero 64
910 51
Pusan 49
ToSsGirL 30
zelot 25
Sacsri 24
Killer 20
Rock 18
sorry 17
Movie 17
IntoTheRainbow 12
GoRush 11
Noble 3
Dota 2
qojqva4103
Counter-Strike
fl0m8346
olofmeister1283
zeus321
kRYSTAL_32
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King136
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor361
MindelVK9
Other Games
gofns40353
tarik_tv11429
singsing2609
B2W.Neo576
crisheroes334
Hui .127
ArmadaUGS113
KnowMe91
QueenE46
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1298
BasetradeTV168
StarCraft 2
angryscii 23
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Shameless 5
• Adnapsc2 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota270
League of Legends
• Nemesis4988
Upcoming Events
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
3h 20m
Jaystar vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs TerrOr
XuanXuan vs Bonyth
Mihu vs Dewalt
Messiah vs Jaystar
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
TerrOr vs Dewalt
Wardi Open
19h 20m
OSC
1d 8h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
OSC
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
6 days
XuanXuan vs Jaystar
Mihu vs Messiah
eOnzErG vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs Jaystar
TerrOr vs Messiah
XuanXuan vs Mihu
eOnzErG vs Jaystar
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - GSB
2026 GSL S2
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Murky Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1

Upcoming

CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.