+ Show Spoiler +
move looks interesting and the underdog. I like it
Forum Index > General Games |
Archers_bane
United States1338 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + move looks interesting and the underdog. I like it | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
ahem qrs, why do we HAVE to play Qc2, or trade queens? We don't We are also enabling Nh4, and if we don't put him in check, he has way more options I'm keeping my vote. If you didn't want to attack the doubled pawns, we shouldn't have traded away our damn bishop. | ||
Ng5
702 Posts
![]() ![]() + Show Spoiler + 10% Luck 20% Skill 15% Concentrated Power of Will 5% Pleasure 50% Pain | ||
Ng5
702 Posts
I would call that a feat. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 21 2011 15:37 Bill Murray wrote: You mean after 11. Qxc6+ Qd7? Because the best alternative is Qc5 and that loses our Queen + our d-pawn for Black's choice of minor piece. Every other move on the board loses the Queen for at most a pawn.ahem qrs, why do we HAVE to play Qc2, or trade queens? We don't not in spoilers because if Ng5 hasn't figured that out by himself, we've got nothing to worry about in this game. + Show Spoiler [response to the rest of your post] + We are also enabling Nh4 Sorry, could you clarify? I'm not sure what you mean by that.and if we don't put him in check, he has way more options. That's true, but which would we prefer: way more options or a single option that we know leads to a position that doesn't look good for us?I'm keeping my vote. your prerogativeIf you didn't want to attack the doubled pawns, we shouldn't have traded away our damn bishop. I think that's too rigid a way of thinking. We traded away our damn bishop to attack the doubled pawns, yes, but 1) We have something better in this situation. Just by way of illustration, if Ng5 had somehow opened up a mate in one, you wouldn't insist on taking the pawn just because that was our original plan, right? We have to play the board: Ng5's last move has on the one hand made it unattractive to kill c6 immediately (for the reason that I outlined in my last post) and on the other hand given us a different opportunity which looks better. 2) It's not like you can say, "If we wanted to play Qxa7 then we shouldn't have played 9. Bxc6." If we hadn't played 9. Bxc6, then Ng5 would never have played 10...Rb8 (it would have been virtually pointless), and we would not have been able to play Qxa7. 3) It's not like by playing 11. Qxa7 we'd be abandoning our plans to attack the doubled pawns. They remain a weakness that we would like to exploit; in fact, in several lines, we take aim at them again next turn (with 12. Qa4 or in one line 12. Qa8). Saying that we want to attack something doesn't mean that we necessarily want to do that at the very first opportunity possible--on the contrary, it often pays to wait for the best moment, just as we waited four moves to play Bxc6. | ||
aphorism
United States226 Posts
| ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
you're actually right i thought we had a move we didnt im changing me vote 11. Qxa7 | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
| ||
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
On September 21 2011 15:48 Ng5 wrote: + Show Spoiler + 10% Luck 20% Skill 15% Concentrated Power of Will 5% Pleasure 50% Pain Maaan... that was the best album back in junior high and I just started listening to it again... and with this thread I've been playing chess online again... I have a german test tomorrow... T.T But yeah, cool quote thar. Edit: I intend some major analysis tomorrow afternoon. Until then, don't let black move. >.> | ||
Ng5
702 Posts
hp.Shell wrote: and with this thread I've been playing chess online again... I have a german test tomorrow... T.T Chess can be addictive. Especially blitz. But don't let it get to you too hard. Studies are the most important. The only reason I've been posting all night is because I'm doing my research till the morning a lot lately, too. I'll be so dead by Thursday. ![]() But yep, grab the sleep. Chess will be there tomorrow. It's one of those things that don't run away, trust me. | ||
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
On September 21 2011 17:50 Ng5 wrote: Show nested quote + hp.Shell wrote: and with this thread I've been playing chess online again... I have a german test tomorrow... T.T Chess can be addictive. Especially blitz. But don't let it get to you too hard. Studies are the most important. The only reason I've been posting all night is because I'm doing my research till the morning a lot lately, too. I'll be so dead by Thursday. ![]() But yep, grab the sleep. Chess will be there tomorrow. It's one of those things that don't run away, trust me. Urgh, yeah, IT'S THE BLITZ! I lost my first 4-5 games and now I'm winning a lot but it's taking a while to make the climb back to 1200. I'm the best procrastinator ever! Time to study while listening to CatZ ladder. Good thing I have a photographic memory.... | ||
popzags
Poland604 Posts
I'm really really surprised. There are some people voting for 11. Qxa7?? Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? It forces Queen to spend at least 2 moves to really get back into action. Black develops white-squared Bishop with tempo, since 12... Ra8 (trapping the Queen) is threatened. Seriously, in a position where Black has better developement, taking on a7 with the most powerful piece looks almost suicidal. I like 11. Qxc6+. If 11...Qd7 12. Qxd7+ Bxd7 either 13. Rb1 or 13. b3 are needed to stop the invasion of Rook on b2 square after mass exchanges on d2, but then comes something like 14...Bb4 and Black gets upper hand on white squares, forcing our King to stay in the center and keeping the chance for 15...Bd3, 15...a5 and some other dangerous moves. Therefore we need the following line: 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3. White has an ugly position and will never be allowed to castle, but after driving the Bishop from e1-a5 diagonal, we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position. Still, I think taking by Bxc6 was a mistake we'll have to pay for in a long run. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 21 2011 22:46 popzags wrote: Read my summary above before criticizing. I spent a long time on it. Not everything you assume on "first sight" ends up being true, you know.I'm really really surprised... Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? + Show Spoiler [Analysis] + I'm really really surprised. There are some people voting for 11. Qxa7?? Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? It forces Queen to spend at least 2 moves to really get back into action. Black develops white-squared Bishop with tempo, since 12... Ra8 (trapping the Queen) is threatened. Seriously, in a position where Black has better developement, taking on a7 with the most powerful piece looks almost suicidal. I like 11. Qxc6+. If 11...Qd7 12. Qxd7+ Bxd7 either 13. Rb1 or 13. b3 are needed to stop the invasion of Rook on b2 square after mass exchanges on d2, but then comes something like 14...Bb4 and Black gets upper hand on white squares, forcing our King to stay in the center and keeping the chance for 15...Bd3, 15...a5 and some other dangerous moves. Therefore we need the following line: 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3. White has an ugly position and will never be allowed to castle, but after driving the Bishop from e1-a5 diagonal, we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position. Still, I think taking by Bxc6 was a mistake we'll have to pay for in a long run. Now, as far as the specific line that you propose at the end of your post, + Show Spoiler [line] + 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2? Ba6 13. a3 Qb5!. Here's a continuation for you: 14. Qd1 Bc3 15. Pretty much anything you like 15...Qd3. Here's a picture: ![]() White to play Still think "we need the following line"? Or that "we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position"? If you have any improvements to the continuation I gave, please let me know. | ||
mastergriggy
United States1312 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + As far as I can tell, the main line after 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qxd7 Bxd7 looks good for Black with the double bishop and all of white's pieces are completely immobile, which at the least will give Black time to gain his material back. I looked at 11. a3, and it looks like it just let's black capture right away with his rook after all the minor pieces are taken off, which means we will trade a doubled pawn for a slightly stronger (albeit slightly) pawn. | ||
popzags
Poland604 Posts
On September 21 2011 23:31 qrs wrote: + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + On September 21 2011 22:46 popzags wrote: I'm really really surprised... Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? + Show Spoiler [Analysis] + I'm really really surprised. There are some people voting for 11. Qxa7?? Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? It forces Queen to spend at least 2 moves to really get back into action. Black develops white-squared Bishop with tempo, since 12... Ra8 (trapping the Queen) is threatened. Seriously, in a position where Black has better developement, taking on a7 with the most powerful piece looks almost suicidal. I like 11. Qxc6+. If 11...Qd7 12. Qxd7+ Bxd7 either 13. Rb1 or 13. b3 are needed to stop the invasion of Rook on b2 square after mass exchanges on d2, but then comes something like 14...Bb4 and Black gets upper hand on white squares, forcing our King to stay in the center and keeping the chance for 15...Bd3, 15...a5 and some other dangerous moves. Therefore we need the following line: 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3. White has an ugly position and will never be allowed to castle, but after driving the Bishop from e1-a5 diagonal, we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position. Still, I think taking by Bxc6 was a mistake we'll have to pay for in a long run. Now, as far as the specific line that you propose at the end of your post, + Show Spoiler [line] + 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2? Ba6 13. a3 Qb5!. Here's a continuation for you: 14. Qd1 Bc3 15. Pretty much anything you like 15...Qd3. Here's a picture: ![]() White to play Still think "we need the following line"? Or that "we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position"? If you have any improvements to the continuation I gave, please let me know. Dude... That was harsh. + Show Spoiler [Another Try] + 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a4 instead of 13. a3? As it stops 13...Qb5. Then we can try to unangle our pieces with b3, Ra2, Ba3 kind of plan. Ugly? Yes. Playable? I don't know; the position sucks already. But okay, 12. Qc2 leads to unpleasant positions either way. In view of this, I don't see anything wrong with exchanging Queens and trying to develop the remaining pieces kinda artifically (no castling probably, and I guess a1 Rook must move out through the flank). I also think that for 12. Qxd7+ Black responds 12...Kxd7. Since the Queen got exchanged, the King does not need to be protected by castling and c8 Bishop belongs to a6 anyway. ![]() Here (jdseemoreglass's vote), line goes 14. Re1 0-0 (pointless is 14...Ba4 15. Re3 0-0 16. Rxb3 Bxb3 17. Kc3) 15. Re3 Rfb8 16. a4 (depriving Bishop of a4 square) and after 17. Kc2, 18. Raa3 we are solid. True, it jeopardizes a4 pawn, but even at worst, we may just throw it away and even up material to catch up in development. + Show Spoiler [Footnote] + My last word today is that line I also considered 14. Re1 0-0 15. Re3 Rfb8 16. Kc2 Ba4 17. Rxb3 Rxb3 (17...Bxb3+ 18. Kc3) 18. Kb1 Rd3 19. Be3 Re1+ 20. Ka2 Bb3+ 21. Kxb3 Rxa1 loses the exchange and, probably, the game. Anyway, I copied the position and your analysis so I'll examine these lines closer at home. See you by now and thanks for enlightement! | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 00:22 popzags wrote: Sorry. It's just that after spending so much time on that summary post, and trying to address everything I could there, it was frustrating to see people just ignoring it and posting analysis or voting as if it didn't exist. It's not that I think people have to agree with me, but I hope they'll at least read what I write and then if they disagree with something, quote it and say why they disagree.Show nested quote + On September 21 2011 23:31 qrs wrote: + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + On September 21 2011 22:46 popzags wrote: I'm really really surprised... Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? + Show Spoiler [Analysis] + I'm really really surprised. There are some people voting for 11. Qxa7?? Doesn't that move look awful to you on a first sight? It forces Queen to spend at least 2 moves to really get back into action. Black develops white-squared Bishop with tempo, since 12... Ra8 (trapping the Queen) is threatened. Seriously, in a position where Black has better developement, taking on a7 with the most powerful piece looks almost suicidal. I like 11. Qxc6+. If 11...Qd7 12. Qxd7+ Bxd7 either 13. Rb1 or 13. b3 are needed to stop the invasion of Rook on b2 square after mass exchanges on d2, but then comes something like 14...Bb4 and Black gets upper hand on white squares, forcing our King to stay in the center and keeping the chance for 15...Bd3, 15...a5 and some other dangerous moves. Therefore we need the following line: 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3. White has an ugly position and will never be allowed to castle, but after driving the Bishop from e1-a5 diagonal, we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position. Still, I think taking by Bxc6 was a mistake we'll have to pay for in a long run. Now, as far as the specific line that you propose at the end of your post, + Show Spoiler [line] + 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a3 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2? Ba6 13. a3 Qb5!. Here's a continuation for you: 14. Qd1 Bc3 15. Pretty much anything you like 15...Qd3. Here's a picture: ![]() White to play Still think "we need the following line"? Or that "we'll hopefully be pawn up in a slightly inferior position"? If you have any improvements to the continuation I gave, please let me know. Dude... That was harsh. On September 22 2011 00:22 popzags wrote: Well, that's definitely better, at least. I spent a bit of time looking at it just now: I tend to agree with you that it looks pretty grim for us, but in this line I don't immediately see a forced loss. If someone were advocating it, I'd spend some more time on it, but for now we both agree that it's not looking good for us, so let's leave it at that.+ Show Spoiler [Another Try] + 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qc2 Ba6 13. a4 instead of 13. a3? As it stops 13...Qb5. Then we can try to unangle our pieces with b3, Ra2, Ba3 kind of plan. Ugly? Yes. Playable? I don't know; the position sucks already. But okay, 12. Qc2 leads to unpleasant positions either way. On September 22 2011 00:22 popzags wrote: Thanks for reading/responding to my summary. My response is: as soon as you play your 16th move, you give the pawn back (not just jeopardize it) + Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler + In view of this, I don't see anything wrong with exchanging Queens and trying to develop the remaining pieces kinda artifically (no castling probably, and I guess a1 Rook must move out through the flank). I also think that for 12. Qxd7+ Black responds 12...Kxd7. Since the Queen got exchanged, the King does not need to be protected by castling and c8 Bishop belongs to a6 anyway. ![]() Here (jdseemoreglass's vote), line goes 14. Re1 0-0 (pointless is 14...Ba4 15. Re3 0-0 16. Rxb3 Bxb3 17. Kc3) 15. Re3 Rfb8 16. a4 (depriving Bishop of a4 square) and after 17. Kc2, 18. Raa3 we are solid. True, it jeopardizes a4 pawn, but even at worst, we may just throw it away and even up material to catch up in development. 16...R3b4 forks a- and d- pawns and we can't defend them both. It's the same tactic as appears in my summary under the try 13. a4. That's why my vote is + Show Spoiler + Qxa7 | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 00:22 mastergriggy wrote: I like that you're checking out other possibilities. I had a look just now and I agree with your assessment of 11. a3.11. Qxa7 + Show Spoiler + As far as I can tell, the main line after 11. Qxc6+ Qd7 12. Qxd7 Bxd7 looks good for Black with the double bishop and all of white's pieces are completely immobile, which at the least will give Black time to gain his material back. I looked at 11. a3, and it looks like it just let's black capture right away with his rook after all the minor pieces are taken off, which means we will trade a doubled pawn for a slightly stronger (albeit slightly) pawn. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 00:22 popzags wrote: Interesting line. I agree with you that it doesn't work in that version--but your ideas of+ Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler [Footnote] + My last word today is that line I also considered 14. Re1 0-0 15. Re3 Rfb8 16. Kc2 Ba4 17. Rxb3 Rxb3 (17...Bxb3+ 18. Kc3) 18. Kb1 Rd3 19. Be3 Re1+ 20. Ka2 Bb3+ 21. Kxb3 Rxa1 loses the exchange and, probably, the game. Anyway, I copied the position and your analysis so I'll examine these lines closer at home. See you by now and thanks for enlightement! Kc2-b1-a2, Be3 to stabilize our position. Just now I looked at what happens if we start the plan right away with 16. Kc2 (Note: I'm correcting the move number to "16" instead of "14" as we've been calling it: these lines start at the 16th move), but it ran into problems: 16. Kc2 Ba4 17. Kb1 Rd3 18. Be3 Bb3 ties us in knots--the King can't move and he's blocking one of our Rooks in--and it's hard to see what we can ever do to get out of them. a4 doesn't really help because Black can lock us down with ...a5 and eventually will probably be able to pick off the weakened a4 pawn. | ||
EvilNalu
United States91 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + It gets very complicated, and you guys have done lots of great analysis on black's weaker responses, but the most critical lines have been the least analyzed. I think black's best responses are 11...Bg4 and 11...Rb6. 11...Bg4, qrs has proposed 12. Qa4 (we do need to extricate the queen with haste). However, after the pretty much forced sequence 12...Bxf3 13. Qxc6 (white can save this move until later in the sequence, it will just transpose) 13...Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 black will soon at least even up material in a rook ending where whites pawn weaknesses mean we will at best be grovelling for a draw. 11...Rb6 might be even stronger but it is hard to tell as it has received almost no analysis. It seems that 12. Qa4 is practically forced here otherwise white's queen will be all but trapped after Ba6. However, after 12...Ba6 our king will be stuck in the center and after something like 13. a3 Bxd2 14. Nxd2 Qh4 it is starting to look a little dicey. I think 11. 0-0 might be pretty decent here. Sure, he can play 11...Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxd2, but after 14. Bc3 we are still threatening both a7 and c6, and our game is much less hairy than the Qxa7 or Qxc6 lines. Therefore, I vote 11. 0-0 | ||
Xog
7 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Just because you spent time analyzing Qxa7 doesn't make it any less losing. Stop trying to gather sheep with repetition. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Grubby4119 ScreaM3098 hiko1699 FrodaN1693 Beastyqt1182 ceh9722 B2W.Neo601 elazer333 crisheroes239 Liquid`VortiX175 ArmadaUGS155 Livibee137 Trikslyr81 QueenE30 JuggernautJason15 Fuzer ![]() Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Adnapsc2 StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Laughngamez YouTube • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Migwel ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|