• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:13
CEST 15:13
KST 22:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW caster Sayle BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Relatively freeroll strategies Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1168 users

[Q] Fungal Growth helping ZvP vs. Deathball? - Page 7

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 All
ZionsWrath
Profile Joined December 2010
United States121 Posts
April 07 2011 18:33 GMT
#121
I think zerg's need to find the right amount of them to make. From what I have seen the ones that use it are spamming them. So I double robo colossus blink stalker and they have roach infestor, leaving my colossus generally unchecked. Target fire any infestors you can with a colossus and blink spread stalkers. But this makes me stuck on defense because of the gas I need to hold a third base. Zerg needs to find a way to abuse that as well.
Johnny_Vegas
Profile Joined December 2007
United States239 Posts
April 07 2011 18:35 GMT
#122
On April 08 2011 02:19 kcdc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2011 11:57 LaLuSh wrote:
I have always been of the opinion that fungal growth should (partially) ignore shields and do direct damage to armor (like a light version of plague from broodwar).

With fungal being a projectile as it was in the PTR build, I think fungal doing half of its damage to armor and half of its damage to shields would have been a good compromise.

Especially as protoss have got counters to infestors in colossi range and templar feedback.


Patch didn't do too much to change the infestor's situation in ZvP. I still think it's too much of an investment, too hard to micro; a strategy too prone to backfiring.

Whatever people say, you can't keep chaining fungals against a thermal lance army. Maybe in theory you can -- but doesn't work as well in practice. And it just gets harder and harder the longer the game progresses and the bigger the Protoss army gets.

2-3 infestors are always good. More than that commonly proves to be a waste.


Disagree completely. I don't think I've won a PvZ where Z has gotten a decent number of infestors out. I had a game where I was up a base the entire game (even bases is often considered to be advantage: P), ahead in food (Z should be ahead in an even game), and got completely rolled by ~6 infestors. Colossi with range aren't a counter. Templar feedback is 100% necessary, but it's not a proper counter since you wind up spending as much gas on tech and templar as Z spent on infestors. Storm sucks against roaches so you don't get much value out of the templar beyond defending the infestors, and since Z typically has access to more gas, it's a losing trade for P. I'm not going to call infestors imbalanced because it's too early and I need to work out responses, but against standard P play styles, infestors are really freaking good.



I'd love to see that replay, I've had a hard time finding good ZvP replays making good use of infestors, where the zerg isn't a level or two above the Protoss skill wise. Even I, merely a high diamond, have had nice games with infestors, only to watch the replay and relealize the Protoss never used Chronoboost, or only made 4 gateway on 2 base.

I think the day of the infestor is on its way but their proper usage has yet to be mastered.

Here are a few things I think players haven't really figured out, that will change the metagame once they are discovered:

#1 - Unit composition
What units synergize with infestors best? How many infestors should I make for a given unit composition? At what point do I abandon/pursue infestors, based on the enemy's composition? Are they best used alone (commando style), in small groups (multi-prong attacks), or as part of the main army?

#2 - Energy Management
I've seen quite a few games where the Zerg burns 100% of infestor energy during a single battle, but then loses to a follow up attack. How should energy be managed when using infestors? Should some infestors be left back at base to charge up energy, and/or ensure a charged infestor is available for the 2nd battle? At what point are there too few enemy units where I decide to NOT cast fungal, and simply run away?

#3 - Timing
Do I rush to infestors or add them in during late game? Do I slowly add them to my army, or make many at once?

#4 - Use as Harassment
If I have 4 infestors, do I keep them with my main army, or send 1 or 2 to harass expansions? If I harass should I favor Fungal Growth, Infested Terran or both? Should I use Infested Terran to snipe tech, depots, or go for harvesters? Should I try to burrow my infestors into position, or lob infested terran over a cliff (into the main for instance, on Slag Pits, with the aid of an Overlord for vision). Are ventral sacs going to be much help here?

#5 - Spell Selection
Should all energy be saved just for fungal, or can we identify situations where it is better to use Infested Terran or Neural Parasite? In late, late game, and I have 8 infestor with full energy, should I consider using them to make 64 infested terran? Is there something to be worked out here in regards to using infested terran as a form of late game supply efficiency? (infestor at full energy, 1 infested terran "costs" 1/4 of a supply).

#6 - Infestor Preservation
How reckless do we want to be with infestors? Are they worth sac'ing for a decent fungal? Can we find techniques to keep them alive? In what situations do we decide that they are too expensive too risk on certain types of missions? Should infestors in the main army be kept burrowed most of the time, or unburrowed so they can move faster?
battlereports.com (co-founder/developer), Nohunters Discussion Forum operator
Kreos.Z
Profile Joined March 2011
United States37 Posts
April 07 2011 18:45 GMT
#123
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 08 2011 03:35 Johnny_Vegas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 02:19 kcdc wrote:
On April 03 2011 11:57 LaLuSh wrote:
I have always been of the opinion that fungal growth should (partially) ignore shields and do direct damage to armor (like a light version of plague from broodwar).

With fungal being a projectile as it was in the PTR build, I think fungal doing half of its damage to armor and half of its damage to shields would have been a good compromise.

Especially as protoss have got counters to infestors in colossi range and templar feedback.


Patch didn't do too much to change the infestor's situation in ZvP. I still think it's too much of an investment, too hard to micro; a strategy too prone to backfiring.

Whatever people say, you can't keep chaining fungals against a thermal lance army. Maybe in theory you can -- but doesn't work as well in practice. And it just gets harder and harder the longer the game progresses and the bigger the Protoss army gets.

2-3 infestors are always good. More than that commonly proves to be a waste.


Disagree completely. I don't think I've won a PvZ where Z has gotten a decent number of infestors out. I had a game where I was up a base the entire game (even bases is often considered to be advantage: P), ahead in food (Z should be ahead in an even game), and got completely rolled by ~6 infestors. Colossi with range aren't a counter. Templar feedback is 100% necessary, but it's not a proper counter since you wind up spending as much gas on tech and templar as Z spent on infestors. Storm sucks against roaches so you don't get much value out of the templar beyond defending the infestors, and since Z typically has access to more gas, it's a losing trade for P. I'm not going to call infestors imbalanced because it's too early and I need to work out responses, but against standard P play styles, infestors are really freaking good.



I'd love to see that replay, I've had a hard time finding good ZvP replays making good use of infestors, where the zerg isn't a level or two above the Protoss skill wise. Even I, merely a high diamond, have had nice games with infestors, only to watch the replay and relealize the Protoss never used Chronoboost, or only made 4 gateway on 2 base.

I think the day of the infestor is on its way but their proper usage has yet to be mastered.

Here are a few things I think players haven't really figured out, that will change the metagame once they are discovered:

#1 - Unit composition
What units synergize with infestors best? How many infestors should I make for a given unit composition? At what point do I abandon/pursue infestors, based on the enemy's composition? Are they best used alone (commando style), in small groups (multi-prong attacks), or as part of the main army?

#2 - Energy Management
I've seen quite a few games where the Zerg burns 100% of infestor energy during a single battle, but then loses to a follow up attack. How should energy be managed when using infestors? Should some infestors be left back at base to charge up energy, and/or ensure a charged infestor is available for the 2nd battle? At what point are there too few enemy units where I decide to NOT cast fungal, and simply run away?

#3 - Timing
Do I rush to infestors or add them in during late game? Do I slowly add them to my army, or make many at once?

#4 - Use as Harassment
If I have 4 infestors, do I keep them with my main army, or send 1 or 2 to harass expansions? If I harass should I favor Fungal Growth, Infested Terran or both? Should I use Infested Terran to snipe tech, depots, or go for harvesters? Should I try to burrow my infestors into position, or lob infested terran over a cliff (into the main for instance, on Slag Pits, with the aid of an Overlord for vision). Are ventral sacs going to be much help here?

#5 - Spell Selection
Should all energy be saved just for fungal, or can we identify situations where it is better to use Infested Terran or Neural Parasite? In late, late game, and I have 8 infestor with full energy, should I consider using them to make 64 infested terran? Is there something to be worked out here in regards to using infested terran as a form of late game supply efficiency? (infestor at full energy, 1 infested terran "costs" 1/4 of a supply).

#6 - Infestor Preservation
How reckless do we want to be with infestors? Are they worth sac'ing for a decent fungal? Can we find techniques to keep them alive? In what situations do we decide that they are too expensive too risk on certain types of missions? Should infestors in the main army be kept burrowed most of the time, or unburrowed so they can move faster?



These are the kinds of posts that I really think the zerg community at a whole needs to think about. Zerg, in general, seem to have really gotten so frustrated with the matchup that we want to just slam what is familiar and comfortable into the toss game after game and hope it turns out well.

Blizzard drastically changed one of our most dynamic units and it has yet to seen the light of day in a competition yet, mainly because infestors are an unfamiliar unit to the matchup. However, over the next few months (probably) the top tier players are going to be trying to figure out the answers to those questions and we'll start seeing just how pivotal or not the unit will be.
VictorX
Profile Joined April 2011
United States773 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 19:11:50
April 07 2011 19:05 GMT
#124
On April 08 2011 03:35 Johnny_Vegas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 02:19 kcdc wrote:
On April 03 2011 11:57 LaLuSh wrote:
I have always been of the opinion that fungal growth should (partially) ignore shields and do direct damage to armor (like a light version of plague from broodwar).

With fungal being a projectile as it was in the PTR build, I think fungal doing half of its damage to armor and half of its damage to shields would have been a good compromise.

Especially as protoss have got counters to infestors in colossi range and templar feedback.


Patch didn't do too much to change the infestor's situation in ZvP. I still think it's too much of an investment, too hard to micro; a strategy too prone to backfiring.

Whatever people say, you can't keep chaining fungals against a thermal lance army. Maybe in theory you can -- but doesn't work as well in practice. And it just gets harder and harder the longer the game progresses and the bigger the Protoss army gets.

2-3 infestors are always good. More than that commonly proves to be a waste.


Disagree completely. I don't think I've won a PvZ where Z has gotten a decent number of infestors out. I had a game where I was up a base the entire game (even bases is often considered to be advantage: P), ahead in food (Z should be ahead in an even game), and got completely rolled by ~6 infestors. Colossi with range aren't a counter. Templar feedback is 100% necessary, but it's not a proper counter since you wind up spending as much gas on tech and templar as Z spent on infestors. Storm sucks against roaches so you don't get much value out of the templar beyond defending the infestors, and since Z typically has access to more gas, it's a losing trade for P. I'm not going to call infestors imbalanced because it's too early and I need to work out responses, but against standard P play styles, infestors are really freaking good.



I'd love to see that replay, I've had a hard time finding good ZvP replays making good use of infestors, where the zerg isn't a level or two above the Protoss skill wise. Even I, merely a high diamond, have had nice games with infestors, only to watch the replay and relealize the Protoss never used Chronoboost, or only made 4 gateway on 2 base.

I think the day of the infestor is on its way but their proper usage has yet to be mastered.

Here are a few things I think players haven't really figured out, that will change the metagame once they are discovered:

#1 - Unit composition
What units synergize with infestors best? How many infestors should I make for a given unit composition? At what point do I abandon/pursue infestors, based on the enemy's composition? Are they best used alone (commando style), in small groups (multi-prong attacks), or as part of the main army?

#2 - Energy Management
I've seen quite a few games where the Zerg burns 100% of infestor energy during a single battle, but then loses to a follow up attack. How should energy be managed when using infestors? Should some infestors be left back at base to charge up energy, and/or ensure a charged infestor is available for the 2nd battle? At what point are there too few enemy units where I decide to NOT cast fungal, and simply run away?

#3 - Timing
Do I rush to infestors or add them in during late game? Do I slowly add them to my army, or make many at once?

#4 - Use as Harassment
If I have 4 infestors, do I keep them with my main army, or send 1 or 2 to harass expansions? If I harass should I favor Fungal Growth, Infested Terran or both? Should I use Infested Terran to snipe tech, depots, or go for harvesters? Should I try to burrow my infestors into position, or lob infested terran over a cliff (into the main for instance, on Slag Pits, with the aid of an Overlord for vision). Are ventral sacs going to be much help here?

#5 - Spell Selection
Should all energy be saved just for fungal, or can we identify situations where it is better to use Infested Terran or Neural Parasite? In late, late game, and I have 8 infestor with full energy, should I consider using them to make 64 infested terran? Is there something to be worked out here in regards to using infested terran as a form of late game supply efficiency? (infestor at full energy, 1 infested terran "costs" 1/4 of a supply).

#6 - Infestor Preservation
How reckless do we want to be with infestors? Are they worth sac'ing for a decent fungal? Can we find techniques to keep them alive? In what situations do we decide that they are too expensive too risk on certain types of missions? Should infestors in the main army be kept burrowed most of the time, or unburrowed so they can move faster?


Synergy wise, I have actually had the most success with speedling/banelings

The reasoning is that to get good maximum usage of fungal AND neural parasite, the protoss must be pinned back. Roaches, being a ranged unit, once engaging the Protoss ball, make the protoss ball naturally spread into a line. All good protoss (as well as good zergs) will begin fanning out to out-flank using their ranged units. With both players trying to get "the better concave" fungal growth becomes greatly mitigated, at most catching 5-6 stalkers mid-late in the battle.

The line formation is terrible for infestors, because with stalkers at the flank and colossus at the center of the "line of fire", it becomes very hard to get off a good fungal OR a good parasite. Not to mention your infestors will be mixed in with the roaches and hydras, which the colossus are naturally shooting, it also becomes hard to move the infestors in without them getting leisurely focus fired.

With speedlings, the protoss is instantly balled by the surround, sometimes even forcing themselves into a tighter ball using forcefields. The colossus will do great damage on the speedlings. However, because infestors are allowed to cast in those 2-5 seconds the speedlings are still active, they are able to secure the entire Protoss army with two-three fungals, and chain-neural colossus to devastating effect.

Also, banerain + fungal provides the most potent Zerg ZvP splash damage, and can annihilate an army in seconds, only to be succeeded by hivetech Baneling/ultralisk/infestor/speedling, which is a nightmare for any Protoss to deal with without a sharp transition into mass voidray

As for harassment I feel baneling drops are more cost efficient and less risky than infestor harass. However on high ground ledges (3rd blue mineral base in Xel'naga, 3rd base in Typhon Peaks), just one or two infestors on the high ground can do much more than their cost.

Infestor preservation is a must, because in late game PvZ, well-micro'd blink stalker balls with support are the enemy of both broodlords and ultralisks, to be able to fungal and prevent blink spread vs ultralisks and blink forward (to snipe BL) is absolutely invaluable
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
April 07 2011 19:23 GMT
#125
On April 08 2011 04:05 VictorX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 03:35 Johnny_Vegas wrote:
On April 08 2011 02:19 kcdc wrote:
On April 03 2011 11:57 LaLuSh wrote:
I have always been of the opinion that fungal growth should (partially) ignore shields and do direct damage to armor (like a light version of plague from broodwar).

With fungal being a projectile as it was in the PTR build, I think fungal doing half of its damage to armor and half of its damage to shields would have been a good compromise.

Especially as protoss have got counters to infestors in colossi range and templar feedback.


Patch didn't do too much to change the infestor's situation in ZvP. I still think it's too much of an investment, too hard to micro; a strategy too prone to backfiring.

Whatever people say, you can't keep chaining fungals against a thermal lance army. Maybe in theory you can -- but doesn't work as well in practice. And it just gets harder and harder the longer the game progresses and the bigger the Protoss army gets.

2-3 infestors are always good. More than that commonly proves to be a waste.


Disagree completely. I don't think I've won a PvZ where Z has gotten a decent number of infestors out. I had a game where I was up a base the entire game (even bases is often considered to be advantage: P), ahead in food (Z should be ahead in an even game), and got completely rolled by ~6 infestors. Colossi with range aren't a counter. Templar feedback is 100% necessary, but it's not a proper counter since you wind up spending as much gas on tech and templar as Z spent on infestors. Storm sucks against roaches so you don't get much value out of the templar beyond defending the infestors, and since Z typically has access to more gas, it's a losing trade for P. I'm not going to call infestors imbalanced because it's too early and I need to work out responses, but against standard P play styles, infestors are really freaking good.



I'd love to see that replay, I've had a hard time finding good ZvP replays making good use of infestors, where the zerg isn't a level or two above the Protoss skill wise. Even I, merely a high diamond, have had nice games with infestors, only to watch the replay and relealize the Protoss never used Chronoboost, or only made 4 gateway on 2 base.

I think the day of the infestor is on its way but their proper usage has yet to be mastered.

Here are a few things I think players haven't really figured out, that will change the metagame once they are discovered:

#1 - Unit composition
What units synergize with infestors best? How many infestors should I make for a given unit composition? At what point do I abandon/pursue infestors, based on the enemy's composition? Are they best used alone (commando style), in small groups (multi-prong attacks), or as part of the main army?

#2 - Energy Management
I've seen quite a few games where the Zerg burns 100% of infestor energy during a single battle, but then loses to a follow up attack. How should energy be managed when using infestors? Should some infestors be left back at base to charge up energy, and/or ensure a charged infestor is available for the 2nd battle? At what point are there too few enemy units where I decide to NOT cast fungal, and simply run away?

#3 - Timing
Do I rush to infestors or add them in during late game? Do I slowly add them to my army, or make many at once?

#4 - Use as Harassment
If I have 4 infestors, do I keep them with my main army, or send 1 or 2 to harass expansions? If I harass should I favor Fungal Growth, Infested Terran or both? Should I use Infested Terran to snipe tech, depots, or go for harvesters? Should I try to burrow my infestors into position, or lob infested terran over a cliff (into the main for instance, on Slag Pits, with the aid of an Overlord for vision). Are ventral sacs going to be much help here?

#5 - Spell Selection
Should all energy be saved just for fungal, or can we identify situations where it is better to use Infested Terran or Neural Parasite? In late, late game, and I have 8 infestor with full energy, should I consider using them to make 64 infested terran? Is there something to be worked out here in regards to using infested terran as a form of late game supply efficiency? (infestor at full energy, 1 infested terran "costs" 1/4 of a supply).

#6 - Infestor Preservation
How reckless do we want to be with infestors? Are they worth sac'ing for a decent fungal? Can we find techniques to keep them alive? In what situations do we decide that they are too expensive too risk on certain types of missions? Should infestors in the main army be kept burrowed most of the time, or unburrowed so they can move faster?


Synergy wise, I have actually had the most success with speedling/banelings

The reasoning is that to get good maximum usage of fungal AND neural parasite, the protoss must be pinned back. Roaches, being a ranged unit, once engaging the Protoss ball, make the protoss ball naturally spread into a line. All good protoss (as well as good zergs) will begin fanning out to out-flank using their ranged units. With both players trying to get "the better concave" fungal growth becomes greatly mitigated, at most catching 5-6 stalkers mid-late in the battle.

The line formation is terrible for infestors, because with stalkers at the flank and colossus at the center of the "line of fire", it becomes very hard to get off a good fungal OR a good parasite. Not to mention your infestors will be mixed in with the roaches and hydras, which the colossus are naturally shooting, it also becomes hard to move the infestors in without them getting leisurely focus fired.

With speedlings, the protoss is instantly balled by the surround, sometimes even forcing themselves into a tighter ball using forcefields. The colossus will do great damage on the speedlings. However, because infestors are allowed to cast in those 2-5 seconds the speedlings are still active, they are able to secure the entire Protoss army with two-three fungals, and chain-neural colossus to devastating effect.

Also, banerain + fungal provides the most potent Zerg ZvP splash damage, and can annihilate an army in seconds, only to be succeeded by hivetech Baneling/ultralisk/infestor/speedling, which is a nightmare for any Protoss to deal with without a sharp transition into mass voidray

As for harassment I feel baneling drops are more cost efficient and less risky than infestor harass. However on high ground ledges (3rd blue mineral base in Xel'naga, 3rd base in Typhon Peaks), just one or two infestors on the high ground can do much more than their cost.

Infestor preservation is a must, because in late game PvZ, well-micro'd blink stalker balls with support are the enemy of both broodlords and ultralisks, to be able to fungal and prevent blink spread vs ultralisks and blink forward (to snipe BL) is absolutely invaluable


I agree once you get drops or ultras that ling/bane/infestor has amazing synergy. However until you get one of those two techs, FF hardcounters ling/bane.

But I have seen some high-level players adopt bane drop + infestor play, namely Naugrim & HayprO. However at the tournament level infestor play generally doesn't do well.
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
MagicGunner
Profile Joined January 2011
United States78 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 19:43:50
April 07 2011 19:31 GMT
#126
Alright guys, I've found something REALLY interesting while playing with Infestors and discovered something that could potentially change how infested terrans are used. I'm not to sure of this and I definitely need some input on what I'm about to say.

Basically, I've noticed that I've never used infested terrans outside of minor mineral line harass and building sniping. Why is this? Well, quite frankly, when you've got above 4 infestors with over half full energy, you invest so much time spamming Shift-Clickthat your focus on other aspects of the game is dulled. Well, I thought "Huh, isn't there a faster way to make infested terrans? If only there was a batch spawn ability..."

Well then I got to thinking "Is there a way you can enable mouse clicks on your keyboard?" I do some googling and sure enough, there is. By going into Accessibility and enabling Mouse Keys, your + sign on your number pad acts as a double click... So I change my Infested Terran hotkey from T to Delete (Something close enough to the Number pad + so I don't have to use both hands) and by spamming Shift-(Delete)-+ While clicking on my mouse, I was astonished at how quickly you could queue infested terrans. It might just be a neat gimmick but I definitely think that, at the very least, mass infested terrans can become more viable with this technique.

What are your thoughts guys?

EDIT: Quick replay in a unit test map. At 1:10 is when I start testing all the stuff, I was messing with my hotkeys for the first minute. The funny thing is, my apm peaks at 720 when using this method, literally double what my APM was using the normal method (I might be a little slower at clicking but I think you'll get the idea).
http://rapidshare.com/files/456374696/InfestedTerranSpam.SC2Replay
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
April 07 2011 19:32 GMT
#127
I disagree with the op. Infestors are really awesome in zvp. One thing that people often don't think about in supply effectiveness. In the late game, I could care less about cost effectiveness. It doesn't matter if your 200 supply army is going to get brutally destroyed by protoss. A infestor does so much more damage than a roach and they cost the same supply.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
April 07 2011 19:33 GMT
#128
On April 04 2011 12:28 DeadPixels wrote:
Honest question, if you simultaneously cast several fungal growths on the same group of units does the damage stack or are they just wasted fungals?

Um.. if fungal growth damage stacked ZvX would be a joke. I believe only AOE damage that stacks in SC2 is thermal lance. (I could be wrong)
obsid
Profile Joined November 2008
United States389 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 20:42:12
April 07 2011 20:37 GMT
#129
@usethis2
thermal lance, ultra damage, and tank splash, I believe all stack (none else do though) (thats because these are all over instantly rather then being a DOT like storm or fungal).


As to infesters, I have used infesters quite a bit, they are very usefull. However I think people underestimate some things about infestres. First burrow is CRITICAL with infesters. Being able to move and not be seen is very powerful in any matchup. Also casting FG/IT and then burrowing all your infesters so they cant be targeted is very good.

Secondly, people underestimate how powerful infested terrans are at harrass. If you have 2 infesters drop all thier energy (assuming about 125 energy each which seems about avr) in infested terrans at a base, it will kill all the workers or the hatchery/nexus/command center no problem (command center might be able to pick up and move away, but it depends on how you spread your IT). Although it wont kill a PF (you can drop just a few IT behind the mineral lines so the scvs cant keep mining)
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
April 07 2011 21:47 GMT
#130
Thank you obsid for the correction. And yes, I agree that a lot of Z players could better control the infestors. Even in GSL games I see them a-moving infestors with zerglings/banelings and let them die in the middle. I don't know how infestor micro works but if it's anything like HT they should always have infestors in separate group (or even multiple separate groups) and take better care of them.
morimacil
Profile Joined March 2010
France921 Posts
April 08 2011 00:25 GMT
#131
I dont think that saving infestors should be a big concern.
perhaps if you were to find a way to rush for infestors pretty fast, not die, and have them be useful, then yeah, saving them is a good idea.
Like in ZvZ if it gets into roach vs roach, and you get some early infestors, then youd really want to save them for later.

But once you get maxed, well its prebably best to have the infestors a-move into the deathball and let them die.
with high templars, once they are oom, well you can make archons, so its best to keep them alive.

But infestors, once they are oom, they are useless. Then, you need to wait over 2 minutes to get back to 75 energy, while its only 50 seconds to remake some infestors.
So if you get into a lategame ZvP, the big battle of max vs max is likely to decide the game. if you sac your infestors, well they can soak up a small amount of damage, and I guess everything helps, and then you can remax.
If you keep them alive, I dont see the advantage really, since now you have a lot of supply used up in infestors with no energy, that wont help you kill him, kill his expos, survive the rest of his army, or whatever.
If you have a lot of money, then clearly, having 20 food of actual units building right after the fight, is better than having 20 food of infestors just sitting around
even in a situation where you have little cash, having 10 infestors just sitting around for 2 minutes doesnt really seem worth it, might as well have had them soak up 900 more damage from the ennemy deathball, and have some other units still alive for those 2 minutes.
VeryAverage
Profile Joined January 2011
United States424 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 00:41:15
April 08 2011 00:39 GMT
#132
Now I'm only playing in diamond league but I think this is a decent example of how effective fungals can be when a Protoss clumps up their units.

I was the protoss and I did the normal good ol' 3 gateway sentry expansion against a zerg. As soon as I saw IdrA pull his nifty burrowed roach play, I decided I was never going to 6 gate again. So I've been kind of doing a push after I get 5 gateways and an immortal or two. This guy I was facing however, didn't get roaches. I scouted poorly and didn't realize he was going ling/baneling/infestor. Because I clumped up my units so heavily, one or two fungals effectively nullified my ability to abuse range + forcefields and he just kept pumping lings to eventually whittle down my forces to nothing. I couldn't take a 3rd base because we were close positions and the lings gave him so much map control versus roaches. He also had a shocking amount of queens which didn't allow me to tech switch into heavy void ray play.

I guess in hindsight I could have just gotten like 15 phoenixes and lifted all of his queens but that's why I'm only in diamond

PvZ Infestor/Ling/Baneling/Queen
darthfoley
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States8004 Posts
April 08 2011 00:47 GMT
#133
i'm only bronze...but wouldn't it be more efficient to neural parasite the collossi? i know it can get hard with FF's and i guess the angle would be hard to pull off...
watch the wall collide with my fist, mostly over problems that i know i should fix
SpaceGhost
Profile Joined October 2010
United States61 Posts
April 08 2011 01:29 GMT
#134
Has anyone at Blizzard ever thought about decreasing the thermal lance upgrade from 9 to 8?
mit der dummheit kampfen die gotter selbst vergebens
Prev 1 5 6 7 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
11:00
INu's Battle #13
ByuN vs ZounLIVE!
IntoTheiNu 75
LiquipediaDiscussion
Replay Cast
10:00
LiuLi Cup #46 - Day 1
CranKy Ducklings261
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 513
sas.Sziky 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34144
Calm 12006
Hyuk 5386
Horang2 2855
Bisu 1853
Jaedong 1783
GuemChi 1558
Flash 1143
Larva 674
Soma 612
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 521
Light 467
actioN 387
Mong 304
Soulkey 277
Mini 245
Snow 228
Hyun 204
hero 174
Pusan 132
TY 105
JYJ82
JulyZerg 81
Barracks 77
Killer 69
ggaemo 68
Mind 64
Sea.KH 63
Aegong 51
Noble 38
Rush 33
ToSsGirL 30
Movie 27
sorry 26
Sharp 24
scan(afreeca) 20
soO 19
Sacsri 16
yabsab 14
Terrorterran 14
Bale 13
SilentControl 10
HiyA 7
Shine 7
Dota 2
Gorgc4716
qojqva2894
Dendi1093
XaKoH 498
420jenkins301
XcaliburYe242
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2402
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor211
Other Games
summit1g11789
singsing2444
B2W.Neo759
hiko664
Lowko306
Sick292
Pyrionflax247
Hui .133
Happy122
oskar72
Mew2King44
ToD27
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 18
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis8663
Other Games
• WagamamaTV306
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
2h 47m
Replay Cast
9h 47m
WardiTV Invitational
21h 47m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.