• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:27
CEST 19:27
KST 02:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension1Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone [Guide] MyStarcraft [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 626 users

TL Mafia XXXVII - Page 59

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 57 58 59 60 61 129 Next
Barundar
Profile Joined May 2010
Denmark1582 Posts
February 28 2011 11:01 GMT
#1161
On February 28 2011 19:30 gryffindor wrote:
How can we know the mafia presence wasn't there?
We can't.

Ofc it was there. It wasn't strong though, no shitstorm even though we got a mafia.
Bartundar
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 11:13 GMT
#1162
To explain why I'm getting pissed off at this game, and why I posted this:

On February 28 2011 04:16 deconduo wrote:
Why does everyone ignore me...


First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:

On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote:
Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.

I'd like to know why I am the only one concerned about gryffindor and his lie.


Essentially he paints it as a difference in opinion instead of responding to any of my questions or hypothetical scenarios. I point it out and no one picks up on it.



LSB reponds to Barundar's analysis of him with a hugely hugely bad and flawed argument. I'm the only one that picks up on it, and I point it out. LSB and everyone else ignores it and just continues on as if nothing happened:

On February 28 2011 02:15 deconduo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 02:09 LSB wrote:
Barundar's contradiction (again)
On February 27 2011 19:04 Barundar wrote:
LSB doesn’t need convincing of Foolishness either:
Everyone trusts certain people. For example, I'm trusting Foolishness because I don't believe that RoL would make him mafia given the state of TL town.

This argument has no behaviour support at this point in the game. It’s an arbitrary reason for placing trust in someone, and it lacks that distrust of others that is indicative of town behaviour.

So we can't speculate about role picks?

Oh look what you did yourself
On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.


In fact, you did the exact same thing. You trusted Foolishness with Absolute no behavior support and accused me of being scum for doing the same


Flawed/bad argument. You claimed host wouldn't pick Foolishness as mafia. He claimed there was an experienced player due to the play, and that you and Foolishness were the 2 most experienced. Theres a big difference.




Finally, gryffindor lies, blackmails etc. I call him out on it. Not only does he not defend himself, everyone else just walks on by as if nothing happened:

On February 26 2011 00:06 deconduo wrote:
Ok, good lynch guys. I have no idea what sort of a dumb play he was making but we'll see soon enough. I wouldn't be surprised if he was bussing LSB or GMarshal or something, especially as GMarshal tried to save him in the last minute. One thing that puzzles me is that the people trying to 'save' annul all spread out their votes as opposed to focusing on trying to lynch one person.

I would scrutinise everyone voting for icemac. Reading through the thread it really does look like people tried to divert the wagon onto him.

My biggest FOS by far right now is gryffindor.

-Fucks around with fake claims
-Attempts to blackmail me
-Claims I edited the PMs I posted which is a barefaced lie
-Tells everyone that they have to vote for icemac or annul. If everyone who left the annul BW changed to icemac he wouldn't have been lynched at all. But gryff conveniently leaves his vote on annul so he can claim 'look I lynched the scum' if the play doesn't work. (which it didn't)
-Incident with the 'sarcasm' While he is probably telling the truth it doesn't mean we should ignore it completely.
-Long drawn out argument with GMarshal about the cell idea, yet suddenly agrees with him and votes annul instead. I honestly think that GMarshal + gryffindor staged that to some extent. There was something fishy there.

Would suggest him as a DT check target.


While DTs + cops are unreliable, we should at least use the threat of them to force mafia to waste KP covering/framing.


I'm going home for the weekend, and its a long, tiring trip. I probably won't be online again until tomorrow.


Maybe bright red might help.

Gryffindor lied about me editing PMs and has not said anything more on the matter or defended himself on it.

Also cute, saying I'm from the UK. It won't make me mad, it will just make me try my damned best to get you lynched.
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 11:14 GMT
#1163
Also, how on earth did you manage to have 3 bandwagon changes while I was asleep?
gryffindor
Profile Joined November 2009
United States524 Posts
February 28 2011 12:27 GMT
#1164
you cut off the part of the PM i was referring to
would you like me to get it?
it is trivial for me, as I find you to be town, but if you are really going to be pushing for lynches during the night, I might have to actually do that.

How about, since you are seemingly deadset on my lynch, you respond to my wall from a page ago, as opposed to bringing up things that occurred days ago?thanks
i got blisters on me fingers
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 12:41 GMT
#1165
On February 28 2011 21:27 gryffindor wrote:
you cut off the part of the PM i was referring to
would you like me to get it?
it is trivial for me, as I find you to be town, but if you are really going to be pushing for lynches during the night, I might have to actually do that.

How about, since you are seemingly deadset on my lynch, you respond to my wall from a page ago, as opposed to bringing up things that occurred days ago?thanks


Because you never responded to the stuff that occurred days ago. Why should I just forget about it? Once again, I did not cut anything from the PMs I posted.
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
February 28 2011 13:39 GMT
#1166
On February 28 2011 15:04 Ace wrote:
gryfinndor has good memory. judge day 1 med claim -_-

Haha I remember you were sooo pissed after that game. Especially considering judge still thought it was a good move after the game was over.
Uff Da
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
February 28 2011 13:48 GMT
#1167
@gryffindor I "knew" icemac was town because after a couple sucky posts (which I rated as scummy) he got better and actually started doing stuff, hence I attributed the scummyness to being just general mistakes from a new player, rather than actual red play, thats why I came out with a green verdict. Events after that only confirmed it in my mind, which is why I did not end up voting for him
Moderator
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 14:01 GMT
#1168
So I've read through your wall and I think either:

-Fucked up and didn't realise it OR
-You're trying to wiggle your way out of a lie like with the 'sarcasm'

Here is my post, read it PROPERLY:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=191888&currentpage=36#708

Notice that I did post the conversation about Orgah.


you can try, but i don't believe you'll have support, as a lot of good players view me as town
you are pushing me for very silly reasoning, and a personal feel
you played with me as a SK, and you pushed the cell idea in Orgah (supposedly, or so you said in PM, do you dispute that?) You also backed it up here. I killed you as scum, when you were the godfather, in orgah. Sure, you are playing differently here than there, but you had red text creating your play there. You could easily be lurking/tunneling/pushing me actively just to appear like you are scumhunting when you are, actually, in fact, not.

See above

Deconduo pushing me is because he has a pretty funny PM in my inbox, from my perspective. I don't believe he is scum, though, due to meta, or I would have been pushing him.

No, I'm pushing you because you lied, threatened and have been playing thoroughly untownlike. Your opinions on everything switch every 10 seconds. You've been antagonising me on purpose for whatever reason. Also, as I said before I've posted every PM I we've had. Pretty good reason for voting you no?

you appear to be actively lurking, and tunneling, from my perspective
of course it's easy for me to pick up on this, as it's me you're tunneling on.

As I said on friday I was going home for the weekend and would be on less. I'm back now. In addition, EU timezone makes it harder to be active as I'm asleep when most of the action is going on. Look at any other game I've played in. Also, I'm not tunnelling you. I have voiced FOSes on other people, even voted for LSB last lynch due to his hugely flawed defence against Barundar. You have just been the scummiest player from my point of view. (See above)

No, I really didn't.
Deconduo was talking about how he proposed the cell idea from Orgah, where he was scum, and he also supported said idea here, making it look like he was scum.

How is that lying?

You lied about me editing/cutting PMs.


Admit you were wrong and apologise and I'll forget about the PM thing and the blackmail for now. However you still haven't answered as to why you went from going after GMarshal for the cells idea to proposing it as your own...
JBright
Profile Joined September 2010
Vancouver14381 Posts
February 28 2011 14:08 GMT
#1169
There isn't all that much for me to say in this situation. I think my play so far have been a hindrance to town - at best a bad townie and at worst a lurking scum. Both situations won't bring me to a situation of being nightkilled, so I'll assume that I'll be up for a lynch by the next day cycle if there are no better candidates.
ModeratorThe good and the wise lead quiet lives. Neo's #1 Frenemy and nightmare.
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
February 28 2011 14:57 GMT
#1170
On February 28 2011 20:13 deconduo wrote:
To explain why I'm getting pissed off at this game, and why I posted this:

Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 04:16 deconduo wrote:
Why does everyone ignore me...


First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:

Show nested quote +
On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote:
Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.

I'd like to know why I am the only one concerned about gryffindor and his lie.


Essentially he paints it as a difference in opinion instead of responding to any of my questions or hypothetical scenarios. I point it out and no one picks up on it.



LSB reponds to Barundar's analysis of him with a hugely hugely bad and flawed argument. I'm the only one that picks up on it, and I point it out. LSB and everyone else ignores it and just continues on as if nothing happened:

Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 02:15 deconduo wrote:
On February 28 2011 02:09 LSB wrote:
Barundar's contradiction (again)
On February 27 2011 19:04 Barundar wrote:
LSB doesn’t need convincing of Foolishness either:
Everyone trusts certain people. For example, I'm trusting Foolishness because I don't believe that RoL would make him mafia given the state of TL town.

This argument has no behaviour support at this point in the game. It’s an arbitrary reason for placing trust in someone, and it lacks that distrust of others that is indicative of town behaviour.

So we can't speculate about role picks?

Oh look what you did yourself
On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.


In fact, you did the exact same thing. You trusted Foolishness with Absolute no behavior support and accused me of being scum for doing the same


Flawed/bad argument. You claimed host wouldn't pick Foolishness as mafia. He claimed there was an experienced player due to the play, and that you and Foolishness were the 2 most experienced. Theres a big difference.




Finally, gryffindor lies, blackmails etc. I call him out on it. Not only does he not defend himself, everyone else just walks on by as if nothing happened:

Show nested quote +
On February 26 2011 00:06 deconduo wrote:
Ok, good lynch guys. I have no idea what sort of a dumb play he was making but we'll see soon enough. I wouldn't be surprised if he was bussing LSB or GMarshal or something, especially as GMarshal tried to save him in the last minute. One thing that puzzles me is that the people trying to 'save' annul all spread out their votes as opposed to focusing on trying to lynch one person.

I would scrutinise everyone voting for icemac. Reading through the thread it really does look like people tried to divert the wagon onto him.

My biggest FOS by far right now is gryffindor.

-Fucks around with fake claims
-Attempts to blackmail me
-Claims I edited the PMs I posted which is a barefaced lie
-Tells everyone that they have to vote for icemac or annul. If everyone who left the annul BW changed to icemac he wouldn't have been lynched at all. But gryff conveniently leaves his vote on annul so he can claim 'look I lynched the scum' if the play doesn't work. (which it didn't)
-Incident with the 'sarcasm' While he is probably telling the truth it doesn't mean we should ignore it completely.
-Long drawn out argument with GMarshal about the cell idea, yet suddenly agrees with him and votes annul instead. I honestly think that GMarshal + gryffindor staged that to some extent. There was something fishy there.

Would suggest him as a DT check target.


While DTs + cops are unreliable, we should at least use the threat of them to force mafia to waste KP covering/framing.


I'm going home for the weekend, and its a long, tiring trip. I probably won't be online again until tomorrow.


Maybe bright red might help.

Gryffindor lied about me editing PMs and has not said anything more on the matter or defended himself on it.

Also cute, saying I'm from the UK. It won't make me mad, it will just make me try my damned best to get you lynched.

I feel ignored www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=191888&currentpage=50#991
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 15:00 GMT
#1171
On February 28 2011 23:57 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 20:13 deconduo wrote:
To explain why I'm getting pissed off at this game, and why I posted this:

On February 28 2011 04:16 deconduo wrote:
Why does everyone ignore me...


First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:

On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote:
Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.

I'd like to know why I am the only one concerned about gryffindor and his lie.


Essentially he paints it as a difference in opinion instead of responding to any of my questions or hypothetical scenarios. I point it out and no one picks up on it.



LSB reponds to Barundar's analysis of him with a hugely hugely bad and flawed argument. I'm the only one that picks up on it, and I point it out. LSB and everyone else ignores it and just continues on as if nothing happened:

On February 28 2011 02:15 deconduo wrote:
On February 28 2011 02:09 LSB wrote:
Barundar's contradiction (again)
On February 27 2011 19:04 Barundar wrote:
LSB doesn’t need convincing of Foolishness either:
Everyone trusts certain people. For example, I'm trusting Foolishness because I don't believe that RoL would make him mafia given the state of TL town.

This argument has no behaviour support at this point in the game. It’s an arbitrary reason for placing trust in someone, and it lacks that distrust of others that is indicative of town behaviour.

So we can't speculate about role picks?

Oh look what you did yourself
On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.


In fact, you did the exact same thing. You trusted Foolishness with Absolute no behavior support and accused me of being scum for doing the same


Flawed/bad argument. You claimed host wouldn't pick Foolishness as mafia. He claimed there was an experienced player due to the play, and that you and Foolishness were the 2 most experienced. Theres a big difference.




Finally, gryffindor lies, blackmails etc. I call him out on it. Not only does he not defend himself, everyone else just walks on by as if nothing happened:

On February 26 2011 00:06 deconduo wrote:
Ok, good lynch guys. I have no idea what sort of a dumb play he was making but we'll see soon enough. I wouldn't be surprised if he was bussing LSB or GMarshal or something, especially as GMarshal tried to save him in the last minute. One thing that puzzles me is that the people trying to 'save' annul all spread out their votes as opposed to focusing on trying to lynch one person.

I would scrutinise everyone voting for icemac. Reading through the thread it really does look like people tried to divert the wagon onto him.

My biggest FOS by far right now is gryffindor.

-Fucks around with fake claims
-Attempts to blackmail me
-Claims I edited the PMs I posted which is a barefaced lie
-Tells everyone that they have to vote for icemac or annul. If everyone who left the annul BW changed to icemac he wouldn't have been lynched at all. But gryff conveniently leaves his vote on annul so he can claim 'look I lynched the scum' if the play doesn't work. (which it didn't)
-Incident with the 'sarcasm' While he is probably telling the truth it doesn't mean we should ignore it completely.
-Long drawn out argument with GMarshal about the cell idea, yet suddenly agrees with him and votes annul instead. I honestly think that GMarshal + gryffindor staged that to some extent. There was something fishy there.

Would suggest him as a DT check target.


While DTs + cops are unreliable, we should at least use the threat of them to force mafia to waste KP covering/framing.


I'm going home for the weekend, and its a long, tiring trip. I probably won't be online again until tomorrow.


Maybe bright red might help.

Gryffindor lied about me editing PMs and has not said anything more on the matter or defended himself on it.

Also cute, saying I'm from the UK. It won't make me mad, it will just make me try my damned best to get you lynched.

I feel ignored www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=191888&currentpage=50#991


Missed that one
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 15:10 GMT
#1172
On February 28 2011 04:25 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 02:15 deconduo wrote:
On February 28 2011 02:09 LSB wrote:
Barundar's contradiction (again)
On February 27 2011 19:04 Barundar wrote:
LSB doesn’t need convincing of Foolishness either:
Everyone trusts certain people. For example, I'm trusting Foolishness because I don't believe that RoL would make him mafia given the state of TL town.

This argument has no behaviour support at this point in the game. It’s an arbitrary reason for placing trust in someone, and it lacks that distrust of others that is indicative of town behaviour.

So we can't speculate about role picks?

Oh look what you did yourself
On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.


In fact, you did the exact same thing. You trusted Foolishness with Absolute no behavior support and accused me of being scum for doing the same


Flawed/bad argument. You claimed host wouldn't pick Foolishness as mafia. He claimed there was an experienced player due to the play, and that you and Foolishness were the 2 most experienced. Theres a big difference.

There is a difference, and it's not what you say.
They arguments are similar as both of them
1) Make assumptions on RoL's picks
2) Assume that Foolishness is mafia

There is a few differences.
My support of foolishness is weak, I recongnize that the argument shouldn't go far
Barundar uses this assumption as central of FOS of me. His argument is that between LSB and Foolishness, foolishness is probably town so LSB must be mafia.


In addition another difference is that I'm not accusing Barundar of being scum because of this argument. The difference is I'm pointing out that Barundar made the exact same argument and it is hypocritical of him to try to accuse me of being scum for using my argument.


Lets look at the important part of the post:

On February 28 2011 02:09 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.


In fact, you did the exact same thing. You trusted Foolishness with Absolute no behavior support and accused me of being scum for doing the same


You were very selective, here is the full quote from Barundar:

On February 27 2011 01:43 Barundar wrote:
Looking over the lynch again, we got off way too easy. Several people called annul out asking for better reasoning and posts, or at least some sort of defense. A good part of his votes was basicly people who didn’t know who else to put their vote on, finding his defense lacking or his posting obstructive. It was by no means a strong bandwagon, and I believe that if annul had really wanted he could have saved himself. Heck, if I had been on his team I would have pressured him to defend himself better as to not die to a weak lynch. No strong counter bandwagon appeared. His goodbye post was not concerned, and he even wished town good luck, wtf? When we got him in mafia xxxv he kicked up a fight and wrote a very emotional goodbye post.

At the same time it’s clear from the night hits that we have at least 1 experienced analysist on the scum team. The only really experienced players in the game are LSB and Foolishness.

LSB is the most suspicious of the 2. He wasn’t the first to get suspicious of annul, or to call him out on his bad play, but he tried to take full credit for the lynch, asking for medic protection instantly. This is exactly how a mafia who has just bussed his team mate will act.

LSB had a possible scumslip to boot:
Show nested quote +
For example, in PM gryffindor just defended Iceman/annul. When annul flips red this will prove very useful information.


Foolishness on the other hand voted annul to pressure him. He later changed his vote to pressure seraph, and left it there until the lynch. If I was mafia buddy with annul I would have left my vote on him to get town cred or to try and save him.

FoS LSB


My point still stands.
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
February 28 2011 15:13 GMT
#1173
That I responded to again... I don't want to dig it up.
Firstly, you didn't respond to any part of my post just threw up another post pretending it disproved it
Secondly, to say that is the central analysis of the post is plain silly
Thirdly, to say that not voting for annul = town is silly
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
February 28 2011 15:19 GMT
#1174
[QUOTE]On February 28 2011 20:13 deconduo wrote:
First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:

[QUOTE]On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote:
Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.[/QUOTE]

I didn't dodge it. You just didn't like my answer. Ya the one you skipped.
And now you're in a pissing contest over the content of a posted PM.
Have fun.
We got scum here folks.
Life can only kill you once.
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
February 28 2011 15:20 GMT
#1175
Quote fail.
Life can only kill you once.
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 15:22 GMT
#1176
Barundar uses this assumption as central of FOS of me. His argument is that between LSB and Foolishness, foolishness is probably town so LSB must be mafia.
Nope, he uses the kill pattern as the central assumption. Not how ROL would pick the mafia teams.

In addition another difference is that I'm not accusing Barundar of being scum because of this argument. The difference is I'm pointing out that Barundar made the exact same argument and it is hypocritical of him to try to accuse me of being scum for using my argument.

Different points.

Barundar's argument:
Due to the kill pattern, mafia must have an experienced player. LSB and Foolishness are the only two candidates, and LSB has been much scummier than Foolishness.

Your interpretation:
Barundar trusts Foolisness blindly.

Your reason for trusting Foolishness:
RoL wouldn't make him mafia.
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 15:24 GMT
#1177
On March 01 2011 00:13 LSB wrote:
That I responded to again... I don't want to dig it up.
Firstly, you didn't respond to any part of my post just threw up another post pretending it disproved it
Yes I did. I clarified there.
Secondly, to say that is the central analysis of the post is plain silly
Didn't say this
Thirdly, to say that not voting for annul = town is silly
I agree. But once again, taken out of context.

gryffindor
Profile Joined November 2009
United States524 Posts
February 28 2011 15:28 GMT
#1178
Based upon the fact Foolishness survived Night 1....
yeah...

i got blisters on me fingers
deconduo
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Ireland4122 Posts
February 28 2011 15:31 GMT
#1179
On March 01 2011 00:19 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 20:13 deconduo wrote:
First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:

On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote:
Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.




I didn't dodge it. You just didn't like my answer. Ya the one you skipped.
And now you're in a pissing contest over the content of a posted PM.
Have fun.
We got scum here folks.


Here was the post in question:

On February 25 2011 00:46 deconduo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 24 2011 22:41 Jackal58 wrote:
On February 24 2011 22:35 deconduo wrote:
Jackal, you haven't clarified this:

+ Show Spoiler +
On February 24 2011 05:31 deconduo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 24 2011 02:18 Jackal58 wrote:
On February 24 2011 02:13 GMarshal wrote:
On February 24 2011 02:11 Jackal58 wrote:
On February 24 2011 02:00 deconduo wrote:
On February 24 2011 01:56 Jackal58 wrote:
I have received a PM from GMarshall as well. Whoopee. I will probably even answer him.
But posting quotes and copies of PMs is a very scummy thing to do. You can make them say anything. Please stop.


What?

If someone manipulates or changes PMs to say what they want that's a scum caught straight away.

Also as easy for 2 scum or more to edit and post PMs to kill town


While I appreciate the sentiment, I don't think that's an issue right now, even if that did happen, when the townie flipped green we would immediately go after the people who posted the PM

I understand that. But if we get in that habit scum will use it to kill us at endgame. Better not doing it at all.


So your reasoning is:

Two mafia might edit a PM and post it to gang up on a townie to get them lynched in a lylo situation so therefore don't do it at all ever. Anyone who does post a PM is scummy.


This is so flawed I don't even know where to begin....



What is your logic behind telling people not to quote or post PMs? It honestly does not make any sense to me. It feels an irrational conclusion to jump to.

I did explain it. Go ahead and post PM content. Go ahead and get comfy with it. Go ahead and watch scum use that to destroy town at end game.
I think it's a horrid idea.


I honestly 100% don't understand your logic. From what I can gather you are saying the following. In a lylo situation, 2 mafia 3 town say. Person A + B post PMs showing C is mafia. C denies it and says they are faked. Now according to you,

i)If no PMs were posted previously, people A+B would be lynched.
ii)If a couple of PMs had been posted previously, and people were 'comfy' with it, C would be lynched.

How you managed to get here I have no clue whatsoever. There must be some huge step in logic that I'm missing as to what universe you think this would happen in.


-Your 'explanation' was mafia would use it to destroy town at end game. I gave you an example of your supposed endgame situation. You completely ignored it and simple put it down to opinion.
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
February 28 2011 15:33 GMT
#1180
Sorry, I gave barundar more credit for his argument than it was do

Umm... So more unsupport arguments? It doesn't take a genious to take a gun to Priority 2 players who probably weren't medic protected. Why do I have to be at the helm of any intresting play?

In addtion, that is one gigantic WIFORM
Lets assume that LSB is scum
That means foolishness is town
Which means LSB is scum.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
Prev 1 57 58 59 60 61 129 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti Stream Rumble 5k Edition
RotterdaM786
SteadfastSC86
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 786
mouzHeroMarine 389
SteadfastSC 86
BRAT_OK 57
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 1544
Larva 1543
Sea 1138
firebathero 892
EffOrt 576
BeSt 558
LaStScan 126
Mind 96
Shine 54
Movie 37
[ Show more ]
Rock 35
Shinee 31
sSak 26
soO 20
IntoTheRainbow 11
ivOry 5
Dota 2
qojqva3893
League of Legends
febbydoto13
Counter-Strike
fl0m534
flusha375
pashabiceps331
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King110
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor233
Other Games
hiko1314
Beastyqt823
ceh9614
crisheroes400
Lowko288
KnowMe164
Hui .133
ArmadaUGS115
oskar112
QueenE46
FunKaTv 44
Sick44
Rex26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick5308
StarCraft 2
angryscii 23
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2981
League of Legends
• Nemesis6369
Other Games
• imaqtpie541
• Shiphtur418
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 33m
Replay Cast
16h 33m
WardiTV European League
22h 33m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
1d 6h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.