EPTThis is my response to your bolding of the blue portion.
If I in anyway took something out of context or misrepresented your argument please explain what you were meaning when you bolded the blue portion
TL Mafia XXXVII - Page 60
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
This is my response to your bolding of the blue portion. If I in anyway took something out of context or misrepresented your argument please explain what you were meaning when you bolded the blue portion | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
@Gmarshal, I like your defense of your view on Icemac @Deconduo, in relation to the cell idea, I misunderstood it at first. I thought it was for selective claiming. After I realized it wasn't, I wanted to propose a counter-list, as I thought that it was likely GMarshal, you, and annul were scum at the time. Perhaps I'm getting one of you confused with Chaoser? As it is, though, I am not as suspicious | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:33 LSB wrote: Sorry, I gave barundar more credit for his argument than it was do Umm... So more unsupport arguments? It doesn't take a genious to take a gun to Priority 2 players who probably weren't medic protected. Why do I have to be at the helm of any intresting play? In addtion, that is one gigantic WIFORM Lets assume that LSB is scum That means foolishness is town Which means LSB is scum. My biggest problem with you wasn't Barun's analysis. It was the way you defended yourself from it with a completely bad argument. If his argument was so full of holes or so terrible, why attack that minor point with such flawed reasoning. Also that you ignored my post, but I was wrong about that sorry  | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
Is it sad that I am almost as afraid, if not moreso, of dying to a terrible vigilante shot? @Vig, if you are going to hit me, claim in thread beforehand so you can be clear and lead a lynch tomorrow. | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
I know Barundar disagrees with that, as he felt like the mafia gave Annul up too easily, which is why he is suspicious of LSB. I mean, if LSB is scum, bussing his teammates, why don't we just let him do it?  | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:34 gryffindor wrote: Deconduo, I admit that you posted the majority of our PM conversations, but I recall feeling you left something out. Perhaps I was wrong, but it's way more of a big deal to you than me, apparently, since I'm so "scummy". Well of course it was a big deal to me. You claimed I edited/cut PMs when I did not and then IGNORED ME when I called you out on it. @Gmarshal, I like your defense of your view on Icemac @Deconduo, in relation to the cell idea, I misunderstood it at first. I thought it was for selective claiming. After I realized it wasn't, I wanted to propose a counter-list, as I thought that it was likely GMarshal, you, and annul were scum at the time. Perhaps I'm getting one of you confused with Chaoser? Fair enough As it is, though, I am not as suspicious | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:38 gryffindor wrote: Also, I knew the list I made was completely randomized, whereas GMarshal had admitted to tweaking his. Is it sad that I am almost as afraid, if not moreso, of dying to a terrible vigilante shot? @Vig, if you are going to hit me, claim in thread beforehand so you can be clear and lead a lynch tomorrow. Why not go with the 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 etc, which could not be set up by anyone? | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
| ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:46 gryffindor wrote: that's actually a good idea, though I admittedly hadn't thought of that. It was posted quite a few times in response to GMarshal... | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:37 deconduo wrote: My biggest problem with you wasn't Barun's analysis. It was the way you defended yourself from it with a completely bad argument. If his argument was so full of holes or so terrible, why attack that minor point with such flawed reasoning. Also that you ignored my post, but I was wrong about that sorry Okay, so what major points have I ignored? And why is paying attention to his arguments a bad thing? | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
And you still ignore my posts where I explain the reasoning is perfectly rational. Your chasing a ghost that doesn't exist | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:38 gryffindor wrote: Also, I knew the list I made was completely randomized, whereas GMarshal had admitted to tweaking his. Is it sad that I am almost as afraid, if not moreso, of dying to a terrible vigilante shot? @Vig, if you are going to hit me, claim in thread beforehand so you can be clear and lead a lynch tomorrow. Can I just say that that's a horrible scumslip? Really? telling a VIGI to claim in thread??? Role reversal will dick him over...blue fishing at its finest | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
he will accrue medic protection, and if he claims it tomorrow it could be counterclaimed. You don't want a clear? | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
claim in PM to me | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 01 2011 01:43 gryffindor wrote: ack, i forgot about that extra mechanic claim in PM to me LOL so apparently you are the most trusted person for this plan to go forward with? Yeah ok. | ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On March 01 2011 01:43 gryffindor wrote: ack, i forgot about that extra mechanic claim in PM to me ...  On February 23 2011 12:46 gryffindor wrote: I'm a veteran claims to me HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Gryff i am dissappoint | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 01 2011 01:43 gryffindor wrote: ack, i forgot about that extra mechanic claim in PM to me Also, how does that make sense? Vigi claims to you in PM. Shoots you, you die, no one knows who vigi is cause you're dead. I call bullshit on this plan. FoS to the fucking highest. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
On March 01 2011 00:31 deconduo wrote: Here was the post in question: -Your 'explanation' was mafia would use it to destroy town at end game. I gave you an example of your supposed endgame situation. You completely ignored it and simple put it down to opinion. I'll give my take on this... Posting pm for no reason is a bad thing because it will reveal information to mafia. However, there are many circumstances where posting pm is good. For example, look how Foolishness post his pm with me and find that I didn't do what exactly I promised. That generated one point saying why i am mafia. If he is mafia and I town, and edited the pm, I can denied it and there goes 1 mafia of the two. If I am mafia and he town. If I denied the pm and same 1 mafia out of the two. If both are town, I shouldn't lie. If both are mafia, mafia is stupid. Icemac also gave out all pm before he died. It give additional information for town to work with and town can use those to accuse or defend people. Taking those pms into the grave is not as useful. Your case describes that mafia edit the pm and use them for the late game. This situation only works if the other person mafia is editing the pm from is afk and don't claim the pm is edited. This is huge risk from mafia and certainly mafia would take unless they are desperate. Your other case say that 2 or more mafia talk in circles and post pm to make themselves look good. This case stands because it would be hard to prove these pms wrong. Also even revealing one of them mafia doesn't prove that the other is mafia believe it could very well be legit pm between mafia and town. But if we just compare the pro and con of post pm. i find it is beneficial for them to be posted given there is a reason. So I have to agree with deucenuo on this subject and asking you to describe why it is bad to post pm. Also give your reasons why posting pm is bad. (Does the con outweigh the pro?) | ||
| ||
